Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 July 1

July 1 edit

Template:Infobox Claxton Shield edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox sports season. Izno (talk) 02:45, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox Claxton Shield with Template:Infobox sports season.
No reason for this defunct league with limited season articles to have a separate infobox for seasons. Proposing merge to {{Infobox sports season}}. –Aidan721 (talk) 22:01, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Municipality of Loreto Political Participation edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 11:45, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:22, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 21:09, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. –Aidan721 (talk) 22:02, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Brevicipitidae-stub edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:47, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no category. Her Pegship (?) 20:02, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It might be needed someday, but at the moment it is not being used and does not appear necessary. Her Pegship (?) 19:53, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Added the template to 9 stubs. The problem was that all these Brevicipitidae stubs had {{Amphibian-stub}} at the end. Excellenc1 (talk) 07:42, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your efforts; however, 9 articles doesn't justify the existence of the template. WP:WPSS guidelines recommend "60 articles or more, or 30 or more if it is the primary stub type of a WikiProject, though this figure may vary from case to case." Her Pegship (?) 16:38, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Swedish Football Division 3 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:48, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Severely outdated, not of any use 2022. Jonteemil (talk) 18:37, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. –Aidan721 (talk) 21:29, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 19:07, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, not needed - outdated and low level league that does not need a navbox anyway. GiantSnowman 19:10, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Presidents of Alsace edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:50, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's used only in two articles, no scope to be used in any other article, and it is just a table that can manually be added. Also, it does not have reliable sources to cite the list of presidents, which could have rather been added if it were a table. Excellenc1 (talk) 16:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. –Aidan721 (talk) 22:05, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hasan ibn Ali edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 July 11. Izno (talk) 02:50, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Substr:Biography edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:58, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Same as {{Biography}}. Sole transclusion in a user's sandbox, who a minute before creating it, used {{substr:Biography}} instead of {{subst:Biography}} on that page. CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {CX}) 15:31, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Selecţia Naţională edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 11:44, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Barely-used navbox which is largely made up of red links and redirects. The majority of actual articles included in this template are already covered in Template:Romania in the Eurovision Song Contest, rendering this navbox redundant. Sims2aholic8 (talk) 11:24, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom: redundant. It's actually only in use on four articles, all of which also have the Romania in ESC template that navigates in the same manner. Grk1011 (talk) 13:02, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pcc edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. The template has been modified and put into use since the start of the discussion. Please feel free to renominate it if you still believe it should be deleted. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:56, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links. Ambiguous template name. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:59, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep. Jdcompguy (talk) 15:03, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. MOS:NOTOOLTIPS is clear not to use tooltips to give information. This template does entirely that. Gonnym (talk) 15:08, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. I note that this template has transclusions, categories, and some minimal documentation now. I have no objection to keeping it if it is useful and used. If this is kept, I strongly recommend rearranging the names so that {{Pcc}} is a redirect, {{Particular calendar change}} is the canonical template, and the current content of {{Particular calendar change}} is moved to a subpage of {{Particular calendar change}} to show that it is a fully dependent part of that template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:55, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts now that the template is in use?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 11:07, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My thoughts are in my deletion rational. The usage of this template violates the MoS without any good (or any) reason. Gonnym (talk) 14:48, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Strike my above comment. It seems the template creator @Jdcompguy replaced the tooltip usage with a note which a great change. A shame they didn't write something here about it. Do not support deletion anymore. Gonnym (talk) 14:50, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As of now no valid "speedy keep" rationales found, contents in this template are still neo-spam contents, maybe G1 or G2 applies. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:40, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Unfriended edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 11:42, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template links to only two articles; does not meet guidelines at MOS:FILM#Navigation. DoubleCross () 07:33, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Chinese/Burmese edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 11:41, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Template:Infobox Chinese sub-pages. Gonnym (talk) 06:51, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hansel Manzi Bugingo, Hal Kamanzi Bugingo, Harel Gisa Bugingo and Hazel Mahoro Bugingo edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 11:42, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and not something that needs a template. Gonnym (talk) 06:45, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).