Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 June 30

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< June 29 July 1 >

June 30 edit

Template:WikiProject Olympics announcements edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:47, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The template has not been edited since 2014. The template is now obsolete and should be deleted. Q28 (talk) 15:19, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:X9/styles.css edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after moving to a subpage of the module Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:49, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The styles.css of sandbox is not used at all. Q28 (talk) 15:10, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • This was a sandbox to demonstrate a potential change to Module:Flex columns that I asked for feedback on and haven't gotten any. Regardless, it is in the template sandbox namespace, so that alone should prevent deletion. But if we want, it should be moved to a subpage of Module:Flex columns. Keep regardless. Izno (talk) 15:51, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Is it a sandbox version of Module:Flex columns/styles.css? If so, then yes, move it to Module:Flex columns/sandbox/styles.css. Gonnym (talk) 07:07, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, and in my opinion it would be worth creating styles.css pages for say the first 10 template sandboxes. I think that these would be really useful for testing uses of templatestyles. 192.76.8.85 (talk) 16:51, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete G2 explicitly includes Subpages of the Wikipedia:Sandbox created as tests. By analogy that prohibition should be extended to subpages of other sandboxes. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:52, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Xpdopec edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:47, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This template has not been used in recent years. Q28 (talk) 15:04, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Xpdop3c edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:48, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This template has not been used in recent years. Q28 (talk) 15:03, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Han Chinese subgroups table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:54, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

列表中存在明显的原创研究而且缺乏明确的划分标准。所谓“幽燕人”的称呼既不是学术著作的称呼，也不是民间的称呼。事实上，这个称呼是一小群网友发明的。这群人幻想北京皈依于基督教并独立建国，他们四处推销他们创作的新概念，并长期在中文维基百科、日文维基百科上添加他们的原创研究。

尽管该表格已经说明了依照语言划分族群，但是其标准依旧是不明确的：例如，列表中列出了冀鲁人、河北人和山东人，但河北和山东是一个行政区划的概念，河北境内有说晋语、北京官话、冀鲁官话、东北官话的族群；山东境内有说中原官话、冀鲁官话和胶辽官话的族群。事实上，冀鲁官话即河北-山东官话，所以如果河北人和冀鲁人是并列的，那么河北人和山东人的概念中中就不包括说冀鲁官话的族群，这显然是荒谬的。

There are obvious original studies in the list and there is no clear division standard. The so-called "Youyan people" are neither the titles of academic works nor the folk. In fact, this title was invented by a small group of netizens. This group of people fantasized that Beijing would convert to Christianity and build an independent country. They sold their new concepts everywhere and added their original research to Chinese Wikipedia and Japanese Wikipedia for a long time.

Although the table has explained the division of ethnic groups according to language, its standard is still unclear: for example, the list lists the Jilu people, Hebei people and Shandong people, but Hebei and Shandong are the concept of an administrative division. There are ethnic groups speaking Jin Chinese, Beijing Mandarin, Jilu Mandarin and Northeast Mandarin in Hebei; There are ethnic groups in Shandong that speak the Zhongyuan Mandarin, Jilu Mandarin and Jiaoliao Mandarin. In fact, Ji-Lu Mandarin means Hebei-Shandong Mandarin, so if Hebei people, Shandong people and Jilu people are juxtaposed, then the concept of Hebei people and Shandong people does not include the ethnic groups that speak Jilu Mandarin, which is obviously absurd. Eguersi (talk) 13:42, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Parth Siddhpura edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:50, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An unused navbox that has no blue links at all. Gonnym (talk) 06:16, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:European Athletics Championships medalists in men's hammer throw edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 03:04, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single-article content that should be substed and deleted. As mentioned in previous discussions, transcluding these tables makes them uneditable for editors using Visual Editor. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:36, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:52, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:36, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I have seen the opposite side of the street here. A list article this long will attract deletioists who will complain it is too large. So this article came up with a reasonable alternative, use templates. So my suggestion is: Go somewhere else, set a policy on how to administer a long list article. The amount of content in this article and similar articles will only grow. It will not shrink. Every couple of years it will increase. Set a Wikipedia wide way to deal with it, instead of attacking and potentially deleting content. Until then, hands off. Trackinfo (talk) 23:35, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Further, this is double jeopardy. It was already discussed Template:Transclusion orphans|here. That decision was this was too large a subject for a TfD, which is what I said above. End this TfD and take it up elsewhere. And include me in that discussion, you can drop me a message. Trackinfo (talk) 00:15, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete after substituting into the parent article. Keeping the content outside of the article does not reduce the overall size of the HTML, so there is no benefit for the reader. For the editor, it makes it harder to watch the contents (multiple pages) and harder to edit (find the content). With section editing, the size of the wikitext being modified during the edit process is no larger. This is why we generally don't need single-use templates with no input parameters. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:53, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_June_30&oldid=1097504765"