Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 February 19

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< February 18 February 20 >

February 19 edit

Template:Infobox bilibili personality edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:10, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. If this data is necessary it should be a part of Template:Infobox YouTube personality or some renamed merger of the two. Izno (talk) 22:55, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Television Star edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:TV Star. Selecting the merge target as the older of the two. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:11, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Television Star with Template:TV Star.
We wound up with two of these, and it's probably time to remove the "TV" one as not as coherent as "television". There are no unsubsted transclusions, so closing would be as simple as changing links in one or two directories. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 22:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bhamo Township edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 February 27. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:12, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Banmauk Township edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 February 27. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:12, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Zalun Township edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:14, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of red links with no reasonable chance of ever becoming an article. Bot created. Why the whole category can not be deleted is a mystery to me, so I follow the advice of Plasticpork and nominate them separately. The Banner talk 17:21, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Bold Barnstar edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 12:02, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

originally nominated for speedy deletion by @Elizium23 with the reason "The_Bold_Barnstar.gif was deleted" FASTILY 20:07, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Indeed the gif went 10 years ago and now it is purely text: "The Bold Barnstar". I'm not a fan of barnstars but it doesn't seem much of a reason to delete. Nigej (talk) 21:20, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Unused, without realistic chance of ever seeing use. --Paul_012 (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    It's "unused" because it's subst-only. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:12, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I did a quick insource search for "The Bold Barnstar" in "user" and "user talk" space and found 2 uses, one from 2010 (User:Bovineboy2008/Awards) and one from this month (User talk:Elizium23). Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:35, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Indeed, I'd be happy to see it deleted on the basis that it's surplus to requirement. Nigej (talk) 19:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:TL Services trains edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Izno (talk) 05:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Iraq War Coalition troop deployment edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 February 27. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:43, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:TL Services ferries edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Izno (talk) 05:28, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wikipedia for World Heritage Invitation edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Long over and done. No objection to moving to some relevant some page and substing any remaining uses. Izno (talk) 05:27, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Trains/associated edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:45, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused subtemplate. Izno (talk) 05:20, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ludomił Rayski edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after moving content to article Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:47, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use template. Izno (talk) 04:56, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Userpageheader2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Izno (talk) 04:53, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WAAS timeline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after moving content to article Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:49, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Single use template. Izno (talk) 04:38, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Aberdeen opentask edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Single use template that can be trivially substed. Izno (talk) 04:26, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Old cruft from over a decade ago. I don't think this even needs to be substituted, but I have no objection to doing so. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Aberdeen tasks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Its only use was trivially replaced in Talk:Aberdeen. Izno (talk) 04:26, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Old cruft from over a decade ago. I don't think this even needs to be substituted, but I have no objection to doing so. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Voltaire timeline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Izno (talk) 04:21, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - It was used in Voltaire until 16:01, 11 December 2020‎ when it was removed with the comment "Chronology: Removing this block image (detailed timeline), which as far as I can tell, can't be edited." Clearly it can be edited, but no one has added it back into the article. Options are Delete and Subst/Delete back into the Voltaire article where it used to be. Nigej (talk) 18:11, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I suspect "can't be edited" means "I CBA to figure out how any timeline whatsoever works because timeline is a hot mess of syntax"... which is a reasonably charitable description. --Izno (talk) 19:21, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This is why article content shouldn't be stored in (formerly) single-use templates, it results in the accumulation of cruft via natural article editing. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Iloilo City imagemap edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:52, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template is used to hold an image and previously held an excessive table of the population of each district. I've since removed the table because of the excess (and because there was no sane way to have the table and meet the need of WP:MOSCOLLAPSE). Izno (talk) 04:15, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst and delete Purely static information, hasn't been meaningfully edited since 2015. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:South Dublin County Council polling scheme edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:58, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use template. Izno (talk) 04:10, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rail network in South East Queensland box edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:43, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template used in only one page. Izno (talk) 03:58, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SWC Results/pair edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:49, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template used in only two pages. Izno (talk) 03:56, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst and delete This template does a lot of complicated switching based on parameters, but in the end it's just a wikitable. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lv-conj-table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after substituting Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:55, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template used via 3 separate templates in only 1 page. Delete as a single-use templates. Izno (talk) 03:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment The -1,-2.-3 templates are called by Latvian grammar#Conjugation classes (the -3 template being called twice). These three then call the -table template. All very complicated unless there is some plan to expand the number of uses. Nigej (talk) 18:01, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Indeed. Subst and delete the lot as single use. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline of Alcibiades' life edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:56, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use. Should be merged into the relevant page. Izno (talk) 03:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wikipedia's sister projects (fluid) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:07, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wikipedia's sister projects is responsive now, which makes this template entirely superfluous.

Transcluded in a few places, so I think substing, or moving to some primarily user-space subpage seems a reasonable response here if not a full delete. Izno (talk) 01:11, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_February_19&oldid=1009406243"