Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 December 7

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< December 6 December 8 >

December 7 edit

Template:Central Ontario Junior C Hockey League labelled map edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete except Template:IL baseball labeled map, which is now in use. ✗plicit 03:00, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All unused, unnecessary, unneeded maps for one hockey, one minor league baseball, and football/soccer leagues. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:53, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the Israeli football ones (Liga Leumit and Ligat Al) as those articles use different maps. Haven't checked the rest. Gonnym (talk) 10:05, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all the football ones they are all covered by different maps in the relevant season articles. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:54, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 21:23, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all football ones per Joseph. GiantSnowman 21:24, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The hockey map is the one at the top that's the title of the nomination batch. LMB to Primera División de México 2011−12 Labeled Map are all the football/soccer maps. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:50, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Most populous cities in Anhui edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:55, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These have all been merged with the parent article with attribution per prior discussions, so they are now unused. Frietjes (talk) 22:04, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. I was the one who added the templates to the respective provinces but since they are no longer single-use these can be deleted without any worry. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:03, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Broadside Electric edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:54, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Filled with red links with one or two deleted under speedy criteria, the main article deleted from a 2nd Afd last month, the rest uncreated and unlikely to be as this is a template for a non-notable band. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:36, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, the only links in this navbox are red and as such it isn’t useful for navigation. —GMX🎄(on the go!) 17:48, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the point of a template is to navigate between articles, and all of these are redlinks. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:49, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bahnstreckenabschnitt edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:54, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and not a standard railway template as since its creation it just links to where this template is being used. But it isn't being used anywhere. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:21, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unused. Gonnym (talk) 14:38, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Boylston (MBTA station) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:54, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused railway station template with very little information. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:21, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unused. Gonnym (talk) 14:38, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ASEAN Railway stations edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:58, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For the same reason as Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 November 29#Template:EU Railway stations. As WikiCleanerMan pointed out, it is best to have them featured on their respective country railway navboxes but we don't know if they are already created or not. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 14:56, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete There may or may not be templates for the respective countries for this topic, but the categories are the current and most used form of navigation. But this template is too broad as it relates to a geopolitical entity and not the specific countries part of the organization. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:45, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Homologene2uniprot edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:31, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The template and all of its sub-templates are all unused. Gonnym (talk) 14:13, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Homologene2PDBe edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:31, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The template and all of its sub-templates are all unused. Gonnym (talk) 14:07, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:DE edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:30, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template that styles a link label. Gonnym (talk) 13:55, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Produces edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:30, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These templates provide a link that fills the move page field. However, to produce the auto-filed information an editor needs to fill that information. This is much more work than just clicking on the move button itself. Gonnym (talk) 13:51, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Muta2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:29, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused other than in creator's /sandbox. Should be subst and deleted. Carc3 is unused. Gonnym (talk) 13:45, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:GHS category edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:34, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused other than in creator's /sandbox. Gonnym (talk) 13:42, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Single strand DNA discovery2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:26, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused other than in two talk pages and seem to be superseded by Template:Single strand DNA discovery which includes all the links. Gonnym (talk) 13:38, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:S-line/SRT left/Sawankhalok edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:41, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Won't be used as SRT already uses Module:Adjacent stations/SRT. Gonnym (talk) 10:23, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jurassic nav edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:43, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Relevant categories use Template:geological category see also for navigation. Gonnym (talk) 10:14, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep This is similar to Template:Ordovician nav. And should be added to the respective categories that make up the respective period of the geological era. Unless a reason exists for Ordovician nav to be removed then Jurassic nav can be deleted. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:12, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- We discussed this back in 2018 at WikiProject Geology, because banned user User:Look2See1 had placed this (and similar) boxes on thounsads of categories. The conclusion was to replace all of these category boxes with Template:Geological category see also (per Gonnym, above). Therefore, this template is now unused and should be deleted. — hike395 (talk) 08:30, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Later: I upgraded {{Geological category see also}} to use Lua and work throughout the Paleozoic: {{Ordovician nav}} (and similar) have been replaced and are now unused. — hike395 (talk) 03:54, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ethiopia 2013 African Cup of Nations qualification edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An unused template. (8 years stale) Platonk (talk) 05:15, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiAfrica Artist edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:50, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template created by short term user in 2012. Platonk (talk) 05:10, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:51, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment it looks like it should be a substitution template used to create a skeleton article; however it appears to be broken -- 65.92.246.43 (talk) 04:07, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Prothom Alo - This debt of yours will not be repaid edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. ✗plicit 09:02, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Malformed template, redundant to Template:Creative Commons text attribution notice * Pppery * it has begun... 02:25, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:34, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. This template does not appear to be malformed. It is a normal attribution template in use in multiple articles, including A. N. M. Nuruzzaman. It is similar to {{EB1911}}, which is widely used. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:20, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:01, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment If attribution is to be kept, then it should be within the article as a normal/standard footnote and reference. Not on it's own template. And this newspaper won't be cited as much outside articles it is currently used on. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:10, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I fail to see how the above comment is consistent with the existence of Category:Attribution templates, which contains nearly 400 templates. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:56, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Just because this is one of about 400 attribution templates doesn't mean it should be one. I fail to see how this could be used throughout Wikipedia and what benefit it presents. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:15, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 05:07, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • weak keep, seems no works than the others, but I could see some benefit with having these use a common backend for formatting. Frietjes (talk) 22:19, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ethiopian Premier League Teams Map edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:50, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Over 10 years old. Platonk (talk) 05:04, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete if someone can work out what season it's for, then subst it into that season's article. Otherwise, just delete. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:27, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Psychology tasks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:51, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The listings here are very out of date; updated listings are available from: https://bambots.brucemyers.com/cwb/bycat/Psychology.html -- Beland (talk) 04:11, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Left a note on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Psychology. -- Beland (talk) 04:12, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:41, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • To be fair, while it was last updated a month ago, those articles do still have those problems. It's out of date only because it hasn't needed updating (I have been checking). However - delete because clearly no one's using it. And the maintenance burden isn't worth it anyway, people generally know what articles or type of thing they want to work on. --Xurizuri (talk) 13:42, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Uforia Audio Network edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:51, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links from discussion pages. Appears to contain content that exists in a more complete form in {{Univision Communications}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:23, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:USEP student signup edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template with no edits since 2012, that, as far as I can tell via an insource search, appears in a hidden comment in only one page from 2012, Wikipedia:United States Education Program/Courses/WomenAndAmericanPolitics (Danielle N. Pritchett)/Articles (and in a few report pages). – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:21, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:US-KY edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links. Entire content is {{flag|Kentucky}}, which is better-maintained and just as easy to type or copy. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:17, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The name of the template makes no indication that is uses a flag, while the flag template does. So opposing also a redirect here. Gonnym (talk) 10:16, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tri-bio-results-top edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links. At the previous TFD in 2012, editors were hopeful that it would be used, but after 9 years, that has not happened. I checked about 20 articles for world-champion and Ironman-champion triathletes, and they use a variety of tables or no tables at all. If the project wants a standard table, they should discuss what it should look like, create it, and deploy it with a much better name than this poorly named template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:11, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Trenitalia stations edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:06, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links. Appears to be an abandoned experiment from 2015. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:04, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tuen Mun SA squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:06, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Empty, untranscluded sports roster template. Could only be used at Tuen Mun SA, where it should just live as a table, not a template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:04, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete before being blanked in 2020, it did have a number of blue links. However, there is no value to this template unless it's updated with a valid squad list, and that list has multiple bluelinks- which I think is unlikely as the team doesn't play in a fully-professional league (so players won't be presumed notable for playing at this club). Joseph2302 (talk) 15:30, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 19:47, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - serves no purpose. GiantSnowman 19:48, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Latest stable software release/Microsoft Visual Studio Express edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:06, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Out of date. Has been replaced in the only relevant article, Microsoft Visual Studio Express, by manual data, which is easier to maintain. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:47, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Latest preview software release/Haiku (operating system) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:07, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Has been replaced in the only relevant article, Haiku (operating system), by manual data, which is easier to maintain. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:46, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Latest preview software release/Apache OpenOffice edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:07, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Empty template. Has been replaced in the only relevant article, Apache OpenOffice, by manual data, which is easier to maintain. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:45, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BNname edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:07, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused name template and unlikely to be added to Bengali-related articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:01, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The template's creator stopped editing a month after its creation so might be a failed test. Gonnym (talk) 10:13, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Redirect draft edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:56, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Per the template's documentation this should be used on redirects with drafts, however, Template:R with possibilities already exists (and used) and automatically detects existing drafts. As such this template redundant is to that. If there is something missing from that template, it should be brought up on its talk page. Gonnym (talk) 01:00, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Campaignbox Lithuanian–Muscovite War (1368–1372) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:08, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and has only 1 blue link, so nothing to link to or from. Gonnym (talk) 00:52, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete The red links won't be turned into articles and I doubt there is much to create outside of the main conflict page. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:15, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Language with name and transliteration edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:09, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused language template (except in one user sandbox). Gonnym (talk) 00:46, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Language with name and alternate script edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:10, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused language template. Gonnym (talk) 00:45, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Iso2language edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:15, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused language template (except in two talk pages) that if needed can be called via {{ISO 639 name|link=yes|deu}}. Gonnym (talk) 00:40, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Language article edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:21, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused language template that if needed can be called via {{ISO 639 name|link=yes|deu}}. Gonnym (talk) 00:38, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Language with name/template edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:22, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sub-template of Template:Language with name. Gonnym (talk) 00:32, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Language name edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:22, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused language templates. Gonnym (talk) 00:29, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Language family with name edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:23, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused language template. Gonnym (talk) 00:28, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lang titlepart edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 09:01, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused in article space and used incorrectly in two user pages. It also is redundant to Template:Lang which has a |nocat= parameter (which this is a wrapper for). Gonnym (talk) 00:26, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_December_7&oldid=1060371319"