Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 August 5

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< August 4 August 6 >

August 5 edit

Template:Intellectualism sidebar edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 August 19. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 16:48, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Singapore NB edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:07, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

unused template -- AquaDTRS (talk) 17:46, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Electric Tilt Train route diagram edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 18:16, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused; duplicates information in {{Tilt Train route diagram}}. AlgaeGraphix (talk) 16:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Category TOC ATC edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:35, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't seem to be used in any useful way. It's only links are template tracking categories and its only uses seem to be categories, where the alphabetic links don't work anyway. Tom (LT) (talk) 09:09, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from creator. The links work fine for me. When I click "H" in the TOC of Category:Redirects from ATC codes, the listing starts at ATC code H01A; when I click "B02", it starts with ATC code B02A; same for Category:Redirects from ATCvet codes (analogous to {{Category TOC}}). This seems useful for categories with thousands of entries, even if they are tracking cats. However, the template is only used in these two categories. If that's not enough, maybe we could subst it? --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 12:14, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Links seem to work fine for me. If we're going to keep this in the categories, it doesn't make sense to subst it rather than keep it as a template - we're not running low on database storage space in the Template namespace. I don't really see a rationale for deletion here, and it seems to have a valid use, to help make categories more useful when they're packed with thousands of members. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 12:32, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheTVExpert (talk) 14:37, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Links also work for me, and the point of this template is to be placed on categories, leaving no valid reason for deletion. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:24, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Episode table/top and Template:Episode table/bottom edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 August 21. (non-admin closure) Techie3 (talk) 11:54, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2021 PBA season by team edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 18:24, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recently created navbox containing mostly redlinks. Only 4 real links AussieLegend (✉) 08:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note - The creator of this template keeps removing the TfD tag, as well as CSD tags at his other creations. --AussieLegend (✉) 12:17, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete per nom. I also proposed to delete or move to draft all of the user's creations because it violates the WP:TOOSOON policy, in which the user is create this namespaces directly without any reviews from the reviewers and not using "Article Wizard". CruzRamiss2002 (talk) 13:23, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kolkata Metro Line 1 diagram edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:07, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused; duplicates information in {{Kolkata metro line 1 new}}. AlgaeGraphix (talk) 02:38, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2020_August_5&oldid=974160721"