Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 August 19

August 19 edit

Template:Intellectualism sidebar edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Comments, while not explicitly calling for it, indicate that it is identical to another template and is thus not needed. Primefac (talk) 23:58, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This sidebar is just a poorly-defined grouping of unrelated articles and semi-related articles that have the word "intellectual" in their title. The user who created it has been permanently blocked for a while now, and it seems like it's just adding clutter to the pages on which it appears. Drevolt (talk) 23:55, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 16:48, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2020–21 Football Superleague of Kosovo table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 03:51, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

template not needed - table now included at 2020–21 Football Superleague of Kosovo Boothy m (talk) 10:30, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Boothy m: As long as this system is used in other European leagues, it will be used in 2020–21 Football Superleague of Kosovo as well. I ask you don't remove template from article until the discussion is over. — BalkanianActuality (talk) 13:05, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The system of table templates is only used in some European leagues, not the majority. They have only been used in the last two seasons of Superleague of Kosovo articles so it's not like there is a long standing precedent.
The consensus at WT:FOOTY is to include tables in the season articles (easier to spot vandalism etc).
It also makes no sense to have a separate template which is only used on one page and can be included in the season article. Boothy m (talk) 23:37, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chopped/begin edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 03:51, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned template, deprecated/forked wikicode version of {{Episode table}}. -- /Alex/21 05:49, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. No transclusions. --Bsherr (talk) 03:27, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Echoes tracks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:02, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. While all the songs have articles, a track listing template for one compilation album from a band with a number of compilations would seemingly be inappropriate (why just this one?) and certainly wouldn't outweigh the advantages of simply going to Echoes: The Best of Pink Floyd for both the full track listing and sufficient navigation. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:59, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rock Steady tracks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:02, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Per Template:Infobox song, these contain minimal links to songs with articles and navigation to those is sufficiently provided by {{No Doubt}}. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:42, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Amnesiac track listing edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:01, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused with no serviceable purpose as only two of the songs from the album have their own article and both are linkable through the {{Radiohead}} navigational box. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:26, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).