User talk:Zafarcreation/Archive 6

Archive 1

←

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Melody Queen

A tag has been placed on Draft:Melody Queen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

evidently term invented by the user who created page

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 22:34, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Other editors pages

Not sure what you are doing in there - but other editors sub pages and user pages are not for general tinkering JarrahTree 08:38, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Dear @JarrahTree:, I was not doing it for bad intention, I was checking something in that page.Zafar24Talk 09:02, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

checking should not involved deleting content on a user page

please understand I am not an admin - I can imagine an admin would offer you a block if you keep playing with others pages !! deleting other peoples content is not a right! JarrahTree 09:05, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

@JarrahTree: You said: I can imagine an adm inwould offer you a block if you keep playing with others pages. You are too fast to judge others! I already said that it was a mistake!Zafar24Talk 09:11, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

fair enough - modified text as 'bold' is like caps and is WP:SHOUTING - also corrected my text - take care JarrahTree 10:39, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Hindi horror shows

The article List of Hindi horror shows has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

List which could be better served as a category.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:36, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Hindi horror shows for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Hindi horror shows is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Hindi horror shows until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 09:34, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Controversy

Zafar, please stop adding this to Bhabi Ji Ghar Par Hai!.

1. "Controversy" sections are not preferred by the community because they unnecessarily draw attention to negative aspects of a subject, which makes it difficult to maintain neutrality. Controversies can be included, but they should be included in an intuitive way.
2. "Left in a lurch" is not proper encyclopedic tone.
3. The content already exists in the Cast section so your emphatic note "This is a part of history and informative! Readers must know the truth!" is already being satisfied. If you want to flesh out the content in the cast section, feel free, but a unique section for a petty dispute is totally pointless.

Also, did you even check the page history to see why it was removed? I thought I explained it fairly clearly. I've removed the section. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:35, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Edit to Shriya Saran

@Zafar24: Shriya Saran has acted in a lot movies which are not in Telugu, therefore, shouldn't the main article in the 'See Also' section should be List of Indian Actresses.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tasker (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Narutolovehinata5 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tasker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 04:19, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Zafar24, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:19, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

2A03:2880:0:0:0:0:0:0/34

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zafarcreation (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy.

Decline reason:

That's a Facebook proxy range that has been used abusively and is blocked both here and globally. Sorry, you'll need to find another way to connect; there's no chance this one will be disabled. Kuru (talk) 04:03, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your draft article, Draft:Qmobile Linq 15

Hello, Zafar24. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Qmobile Linq 15".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 10:51, 2 September 2017 (UTC)