Your submission at Articles for creation: Tony Lawson has been accepted

edit
 
Tony Lawson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Onel5969 TT me 23:59, 24 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Araling Panlipunan

edit

Pa sagot naman po yung tanong nato?? ( ika-una at ika- dalawang yugto ng pananakop ng europeo sa mga kanluran at silangang asya??) — Preceding unsigned comment added by JamNeil Roa (talkcontribs) 04:15, 25 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cambridge Social Ontology Group (December 6)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Caorongjin was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Caorongjin (talk) 22:16, 6 December 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Yannickslade, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Caorongjin (talk) 22:16, 6 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Cambridge Social Ontology Group has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cambridge Social Ontology Group. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 19:28, 29 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cambridge Social Ontology Group (April 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by L293D was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
L293D ( • ) 18:45, 24 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Cambridge Social Ontology Group

edit
 

The article Cambridge Social Ontology Group has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent references. Group seems to be moribund, website doesn't appear to have been updated since 2014/2015 (list books from that period as "Just published"... Like most researchs groups, this does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NORG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 15:53, 16 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Cambridge Social Ontology Group for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cambridge Social Ontology Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cambridge Social Ontology Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 12:58, 20 June 2018 (UTC)Reply