User talk:WildComet/Archive 1

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, WildComet! Thank you for your contributions. I am Mz7 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Mz7 (talk) 22:57, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi WildComet! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 21:09, Friday, September 23, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

File:City of Toronto PFR logo.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:04, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of the City of Toronto Parks, Forestry and Recreation Division.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the City of Toronto Parks, Forestry and Recreation Division.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Jonathan Vance

Hi - I do not think we need the honorific prefix and suffixes in the infobox. The awards already appear in the infobox and the main text so why repeat it (a third time)? If you look at many thousands of other military articles (certainly across Canada, Australia and the UK) we have tried to standardise articles without honorific prefix and suffixes. By the way MOS:POSTNOM refers to the lead (where postnoms should be included) rather than infobox. Dormskirk (talk) 18:27, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ministry of Children, Community and Social Services logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ministry of Children, Community and Social Services logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:33, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of the RCMP.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the RCMP.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SSHRC CRSH.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SSHRC CRSH.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Alt Toronto Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alt Toronto Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Begoon 20:11, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello WildComet, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Municipal government of Toronto have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:58, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Old Toronto Parks and Recreation Logo, pre amalgamation.png

Thank you for uploading File:Old Toronto Parks and Recreation Logo, pre amalgamation.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ontario Government Wordmark April 2019.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ontario Government Wordmark April 2019.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Toronto Public Health.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Toronto Public Health.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Toronto Public Health logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Toronto Public Health logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:44, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leader of the Government in the House of Commons (Canada), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Privy Council Office (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

For your clean up of René Lévesque

blindlynx (talk) has bought you a pint! Sharing a pint is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the WikiLove by buying someone else a pint, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Cheers!

Spread the good cheer and camaraderie by adding {{subst:WikiPint}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Message received at 11:03, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Patented Medicine Prices Review Board logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Patented Medicine Prices Review Board logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Office of the Prime Minister.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Office of the Prime Minister.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GRC-RCMP Logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GRC-RCMP Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Toronto Police Services Board, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jim Hart.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chief of the Defence Staff (Canada), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Art McDonald.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sheila A. Hellstrom.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sheila A. Hellstrom.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:51, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for your help WildComet. Could you help me with additional references for Sheila Hellstrom biography? Thank you Antondostoyevsky (talk) 09:22, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Government of Ontario

Hello WildComet. I wondered why you reverted my two changes. The first line of the article used to start with "Government of Ontario" (which is consistent with the heading of the article. This has been used in the article since at least 2007 if you look at the version history. While the "Government of Ontario" is of course a provincial government, it is never referred to as the "provincial Government of Ontario." The original reference, as it has existed for at least the last 13 years, was correct.

Secondly, the legal reference is not "Her Majesty's Government". This term is used in the United Kingdom but not used in Canada. The legal reference, as used in contracts, order-in-council, court decisions etc. is "Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario".

As an example, please see how the Government of Ontario is referred to in the style of cause of this court decision from the Supreme Court Canada: https://www.scc-csc.ca/WebDocuments-DocumentsWeb/36456/FM050_Respondent_Her-Majesty-the-Queen-in-Right-of-Ontario.pdf

Please also see how the Government of Ontario is referred to in this Order-in-council: https://www.ontario.ca/orders-in-council/oc-6442019 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greenwood10 (talk • contribs) 00:00, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi, @Greenwood10:

The use of the big-G "Government of Ontario" is how the Executive brands itself and refers to the Queen in Council specifically. Because the article is about the entire government (executive, legislative and judicial), it's not appropriate to have that form of branding.

As is the case with the term "Her Majesty's Government". It refers specifically to the executive, and is not relevant in the context of the judicial and legislative (save for reference to the governing party). From the order in council linked:

whereas by Order in Council 643/2019 the Government of Ontario established the Ontario Provincial Police Independent Review Panel (the “Independent Review Panel”)...

• bolding mine - note that it uses the big-G "Government", in reference to the Executive Council, the body that advises on the exercise of executive power and the body that advised the order in council.

therefore, pursuant to the prerogative of Her Majesty The Queen in Right of Ontario to provide for the remuneration of...

• here, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario is used to refer to the small-g "government"; it is used here because the power to tax and spend is a function of the legislature

advisors who serve Her Majesty’s Government of Ontario in the discharge of its executive obligations and responsibilities, the following remuneration is determined effective the date of that appointment

• here, Her Majesty's Government is used because it is in reference to the Executive; HM Government discharges the executive obligations, etc.

"Her Majesty's Government" and "Government of Ontario", the big-G Government are specifically the executive; "Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario" and "provincial government", the small-g government not in reference to any specific institution and thus can refer to either the executive (queen in council), the legislative (queen in parliament) or the judicial (queen on the bench) functions of the government.

Hope this clears things up, let me know if you have any more questions! WildComet (talk) 00:17, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Government of Ontario and Government of Canada

Hi WildComet,

Thanks for explanation. This is helpful – I better understand your reasoning.

I note that you edit pages on Commonwealth government and perhaps that is where some of the ambiguity has arisen. I am not sure if you live in Canada or in the United Kingdom.

I noticed that you used the terms Queen-in-Council for the executive, Queen-in-Parliament for the legislature, and Queen-on the Bench for the judiciary. These are not terms traditionally used in Canada although I can understand what you mean by them. I wonder if you would consider the following.

The Legislation Act, 2006, S.O. 2006, c. 21, Sched. F (an Ontario statute) provides legal definitions for various terms used in Ontario: https://www.canlii.org/en/on/laws/stat/so-2006-c-21-sch-f/latest/so-2006-c-21-sch-f.html

For example:

“Lieutenant Governor” means the Lieutenant Governor of Ontario, or the person administering the Government of Ontario for the time being in Her Majesty’s name, by whatever title he or she is designated; (“lieutenant-gouverneur”)

“Lieutenant Governor in Council” means the Lieutenant Governor acting by and with the advice of the Executive Council of Ontario; (“lieutenant-gouverneur en conseil”)

“Her Majesty”, “His Majesty”, “the Queen”, “the King” or “the Crown” means the Sovereign of the United Kingdom, Canada and Her other Realms and Territories, and Head of the Commonwealth; (“Sa Majesté”, “la Reine”, “le Roi”, “la Couronne”)

“Legislature” means the Lieutenant Governor acting by and with the advice and consent of the Assembly; (“Législature”)

In light of above, I have included suggested wording below for your consideration (I included notes for you, but these are not intended to form part of the Wikipedia entry)

The government of the Province of Ontario [note: in line with your earlier explanation, this formulation just seems a bit clearer and does not suggest that “provincial government of Ontario” is an actual title] (French: gouvernement provincial de l'Ontario), is the body responsible for the administration of the Canadian province of Ontario. The Province of Ontario is a constitutional monarchy and the Crown is a corporation sole, assuming distinct roles: the executive, meaning the Lieutenant-Governor-in-Council; the legislature or Provincial Parliament, meaning the Lieutenant Governor acting by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Assembly; and the judiciary [note, the term “Queen on the Bench” is not used in Canada]. These three institutions — the Lieutenant Governor in Council [note the Executive Council is the premier and cabinet ministers minus the lieutenant governor]), the legislature or Provincial Parliament [note the Legislative Assembly is the Legislature (Provincial Parliament) minus the Lieutenant Governor], and the judiciary, respectively — exercise the powers of the Crown. Its powers and structure are partly set out in the Constitution Act, 1867. [note -see section 58 of the Constitution Act 1867 and following sections of the Constitution Act, 1867. The Constitution Act, 1982 (which was incorrectly referenced) is a separate statute and contains the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.] : https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/CONST_TRD.pdf

The term Government of Ontario (French: Gouvernement de l'Ontario) [note: the following is correct, in line with your earlier explanation - i.e. the Government of Ontario does not refer to the legislature or the courts] refers specifically to the executive — political ministers of the Crown (the Executive Council), appointed on the advice of the premier, and the non-partisan Ontario Public Service (whom the Executive Council directs), who staff ministries and agencies to deliver government policies, programs, and services—which corporately brands itself as the Government of Ontario, or more formally, Her Majesty's Government of Ontario (French: Gouvernement de Sa Majesté).[1] [Note – added “Ontario” to Her Majesty’s Government”. This follows the wording in the Order-in-Council that we saw earlier. This also makes it clear which government we are talking about as there are many other governments in Canada i.e. Her Majesty’s Government of Nova Scotia).

I would also suggest the following changes to the Government of Canada entry in line with the federal Interpretation Act: https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/laws/stat/rsc-1985-c-i-21/latest/rsc-1985-c-i-21.html

Governor, Governor General or Governor of Canada means the Governor General of Canada or other chief executive officer or administrator carrying on the Government of Canada on behalf and in the name of the Sovereign, by whatever title that officer is designated; (gouverneur, gouverneur du Canada ou gouverneur général)

Governor General in Council or Governor in Council means the Governor General of Canada acting by and with the advice of, or by and with the advice and consent of, or in conjunction with the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada; (gouverneur en conseil ou gouverneur général en conseil)

Her Majesty, His Majesty, the Queen, the King or the Crown means the Sovereign of the United Kingdom, Canada and Her or His other Realms and Territories, and Head of the Commonwealth; (Sa Majesté, la Reine, le Roi ou la Couronne)

Parliament means the Parliament of Canada; (Parlement)

The federal government of Canada (French: gouvernement fédéral du Canada) is the body responsible for the federal administration of Canada. Canada is a constitutional monarchy, and the Crown is a corporation sole assuming distinct roles: the executive, meaning the Governor-in-Council; the legislature or Parliament of Canada; and the judiciary (including the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Appeal, and the Federal Court). These three institutions — the Governor in Council (conventionally, the Cabinet), the Parliament of Canada, and the judiciary, respectively, — exercise the powers of the Crown.

The term Government of Canada (French: Gouvernement du Canada) refers specifically to the executive — ministers of the Crown (the Cabinet) and the federal civil service (whom the Cabinet direct)—which corporately brands itself as the Government of Canada, or more formally, Her Majesty's Government of Canada (French: Gouvernement de Sa Majesté).[3][4][5]

[I can advise that the Government of Canada never refers to itself as “Her Majesty Government” or even “Her Majesty’s Government of Canada”. The footnotes cited also do not seem to provide evidence of current use of this term. I could not find that reference in Footnote 1 (the "A Crown of Maples" document). Footnote 2 does not seem to be functioning. Footnote 3 leads to an 1874 Indian treaty which contains this reference, but one source from 1874 is not determinative of modern usage. The term “Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada” is the formal legal term used in court documents, legal agreements, etc. to refer to the Government of Canada.]

Examples: https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/smt-gst.nsf/eng/sf02129.html https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/7957/1/document.do

What do you think of the above? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greenwood10 (talk • contribs) 06:03, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

@Greenwood10: I was the one who re-did the first paragraphs of those articles because they were way to cluttered. In terms of references, Crown of Maples mentions Queen on the Bench, HM Government, etc. As for replacing Queen with Governor, I'd hesitate to do so as it isn't always the Governor General who exercises those powers (eg right now, Orders in Council are signed by the Administrator of the government in Council). When you have Queen (and we have a template that auto-updates when she dies), it's always technically correct, regardless of who is exercising the power. I'll re-write the leads again sometime soon, but in the meantime I'd suggest you also make a post on the talk pages of the articles if you want to get more feedback. Cheers, WildComet (talk) 03:02, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:City of Toronto PFR logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:City of Toronto PFR logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Capitalize the term Chief of the Defence Staff

Hello again WildComet

I see we meet again. I noticed that you reverted my change. I has simply changed the the term back to the original used in the article since 2004 You provided a link to a reason. However, I would note that that the link you provided supports my wording: "Titles should be capitalized when attached to an individual's name, or where the position/office is a globally unique title that is the subject itself, and the term is the actual title or conventional translation thereof.

As indicated in these links (and in any Government of Canada publication) the term "Chief of the Defence Staff is always capitalized:

https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/corporate/organizational-structure.html https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/corporate/organizational-structure/chief-defence-staff/cds-bio.html

If you look at the Wikipedia articles for other militaries that have a CDS, the term is also capitalized, as is the term Chief of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (for the United States, for example).

The Wikipedia article should be consistent with official Canadian government usage and other Wikipedia entries. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greenwood10 (talk • contribs) 14:06, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Chrystia Freeland. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Sorry for the template, but you removed multiple maintenance templates in your edits there. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:08, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Whoops my bad - copied it to my sandbox to edit and kept the templates out so it wouldn't get catalogued. Thanks for the heads up. —WildComet ^talk 06:11, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Chrystia Freeland opening sentence

You and Bruce leverett have reverted me adding the professional alias of Chrystia Freeland into the lead sentence of the article. However, both ways of including Chrystia's name I was doing are mostly permitted by MOS:NICKNAME.

• "If a person is known by a nickname used in lieu of or in addition to a given name, and it is not a common hypocorism of one of their names, or a professional alias, it is usually presented between double quotation marks following the last given name or initial. The quotation marks are not put in lead-section boldface." "Chrystia" certainly fits this bill. The mistakes I did for this were formatting-related.
• Real name followed by their commonly known names is also permitted in the MOS.

Additionally, "spam" is not really the best term for the single revert I did (changing between the quote way to the "known" way). Pinging @Bruce leverett: also. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 04:41, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

@Mellohi!: thanks for your message. Since you made a WP:BOLD change that was reverted, the proper place to establish WP:Consensus is the talk page of the article, not by re-adding the disputed line again in the article.

I reverted your edit because I have the article watchlisted and noticed you re-added the content after it was removed, contrary to the standard WP:BRD process. If you'd like to discuss your revisions, the best place to do so is on the article's talk page, not an editor's personal page.

Thanks. —WildComet ^talk 05:24, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

You have still not retracted or addressed the problem of calling my reformatting "spam". Otherwise, I'll bring it up with Bruce on the article talk page. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 05:36, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thanks for the heads up for the deputy minister article! I thank you for explaining it kindly. Thanks !!!

Rushtheeditor (talk) 22:22, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi WildComet, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Schwede66 18:11, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Ontario First Party for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ontario First Party, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ontario First Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ontario First logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ontario First logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Noormohamed

Yes, I used "dodged" because that was the past tense of the term used in the title of the page being linked to! I thought using the actual term used by the media outlet might be understood as trying for 'accuracy'. "|title=Vancouver Liberal dodges questions on principal residence tax exemption use on 40+ home sales |" — Preceding unsigned comment added by NiceTryEarl (talk • contribs) 12:04, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

On numbers, yes.. I saw that the numbers did not jive between the earlier reports, that's why I said "over 40"

Re: Also why was the story giving context within the platform removed?

Not entirely sure what you mean here, because there's so many fingersprints on this page, but it may have something to do with @Canadascholar23 running to Butlerblog and complaining and lying about me (ie: "using ad hominem" attacks,). How can any reasonable person not notice that that editor is almost certainly a Liberal party staffer or at minimum, very very close to the Liberal party? It's crazy. All their edits are to liberal party candidates or insults written to Pierre Polevre's page. NiceTryEarl (talk) 12:55, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Why did you remove "the longest serving Conservative PM since John A. Macdonald..." in the first paragraph of Stephen Harper's lead?

How is it trivial? Ak-eater06 (talk) 16:10, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Noormohamed "Where is the Source for these numbers?"

user @Canadascholar23 removed these citations in their June 10, 16:39 edit, but left the text intact, knowing it would likely face removal as a result.

I really can't understand how the deletion of citations while leaving the text isn't some sort of vandalism. This person - who ran to Butlerblog to make accusations about another editor and get their help in 'scrubbing' the page, is now removing Butlerblogs content (the 16:40 edit). This is probably why Walter threw in the towel on this page; the endless vandalism and WP:Peacock additions.

Refer to the previous page after Butlerblog finished up. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Taleeb_Noormohamed&oldid=1092481293. There's your citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.103.252.100 (talk) 03:01, 11 June 2022 (UTC)