Welcome!

edit
Hello, WikiWizird! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! JesseRafe (talk) 13:32, 13 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Your edits on Heo Sung-tae

edit

Hello WikiWizird, you recently made a series of edits on the Heo Sung-tae page. The first time, I reverted you. You proceeded to redo all the edits, ignoring the summary I left in my revert; in fact, you simply ignored the fact that you got reverted. It seems you are uninterested in working collaboratively with other editors but only care about inserting material that you feel belongs in the article. Most of the content you have added is unreferenced, such as films that do not even have a dedicated Wikipedia page, and this is not acceptable. Other films simply do not list the actor as being part of the cast, at least not on Wikipedia. Where did you source your information from? An actor's filmography on Wikipedia is not intended to be comprehensive; it is a selected overview of an actor's more notable work. If someone wishes to peruse the actor's entire repertoire, they are free to look at the imdb page, which is linked at the bottom of the page. Please do not continue in this manner of editing. You have not made the effort to become a registered user, and yet you behave as if it's ok to add whatever you want to articles without considering that Wikipedia has rules and protocols. If you continue to be a disruptive editor, your editing privileges will be curtailed. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 01:41, 22 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

January 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Bovineboy2008. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Operation Mincemeat (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BOVINEBOY2008 23:52, 14 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Paul Low-Hang

edit
 

The article Paul Low-Hang has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. (t · c) buidhe 10:39, 5 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Paul Low-Hang for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Low-Hang is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Low-Hang until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

(t · c) buidhe 21:28, 5 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Dave Wong (actor)

edit
 

The article Dave Wong (actor) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. RoanokeVirginia (talk) 18:37, 15 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Fabien Frankel

edit

Hello, WikiWizird

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Joseywales1961, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Fabien Frankel, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article. You may remove the deletion tag yourself once the article has at least one reliable source.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Josey Wales Parley 09:46, 20 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Maja Bloom

edit

Hello, WikiWizird

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Maja Bloom, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article. You may remove the deletion tag yourself once the article has at least one reliable source.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

John B123 (talk) 14:41, 20 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

April 2022

edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Inception has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 02:59, 29 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Dave Wong (actor) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dave Wong (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Wong (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Natg 19 (talk) 01:14, 3 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

July 2022

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Heo Sung-tae, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Btspurplegalaxy 🗩 🖉 07:25, 9 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

October 2022

edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to House of the Dragon, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:11, 13 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Sosie Bacon has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 17:39, 21 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

January 2023

edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Deaths in 2023, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. sixtynine • whaddya want? • 04:35, 24 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

September 2023

edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page List of longest living dogs has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 06:35, 15 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Leah Lewis, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 14:05, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alex Garland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ex Machina. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Rings of Power

edit

Hey, you have made a couple changes recently to The Rings of Power articles that were not supported by the credits of the show or any reliable sources. Please make sure you are following what the show and sources say and not your own personal opinion. - adamstom97 (talk) 14:15, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply