Would you please stop it with the weirdly phrased, off-topic, strangely formatted edits to articles like Mink and Jackal? They are not helpful nor even intelligible, and quite disruptive. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 14:25, 17 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions have removed content without a good reason to do so. Content on Wikipedia should not be removed just because you disagree with it or because you think it's wrong, unless the claim is not verifiable. Instead, you should consider expanding the article with notable and verifiable information of your own, citing reliable sources when you do so. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:11, 21 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

May 2020

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jackal. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Anaxial (talk) 20:44, 23 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Eukaryote. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Plantsurfer 11:06, 25 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Wild boar. --Mr Fink (talk) 12:34, 25 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:06, 26 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Edits to Fox

edit

Hi Vocovoco2010, I've reverted your edits to Fox. The note that you added was in very broken English and I could not understand what point you were trying to make. The changes to the text in the lede other than the note didn't seem to be an improvement. Perhaps it would help if you could explain what you were trying to do on the talk page?

One other note; you have been marking all of your recent edits as "minor". Please don't mark edits as minor unless they are changes that could not possibly be controversial: simple spelling and typographical corrections or reversions of unambiguous vandalism, for example.

Best wishes, Wham2001 (talk) 11:20, 7 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Toothed Blob moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Toothed Blob, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~ Amkgp 💬 19:12, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 23:11, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

June 2020

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Drmies (talk) 17:12, 19 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Toothed Blob

edit
 

Hello, Vocovoco2010. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Toothed Blob".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:49, 11 December 2020 (UTC)Reply