Welcome!

edit
Hello, Vinay Dedhia! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! -- Deepfriedokra 22:34, 18 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

-- Deepfriedokra 22:34, 18 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

February 2020

edit
 

Hello Coconutmediabox. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Coconutmediabox. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Coconutmediabox|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Coderzombie (talk) 12:16, 11 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Golkeri (February 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 15:12, 11 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Coconutmediabox! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 15:12, 11 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Golkeri (February 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 14:58, 13 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

February 2020

edit
 

Hello Coconutmediabox. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Golkeri, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Coconutmediabox. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Coconutmediabox|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Please disclose your Conflict of Interest on User Page. Please note that Wikipedia is not for film promotion or advertisement. The film article is only accepted as an encyclopedia entry. You may request edits at Talk:Golkeri page. Editing the article may not be considered acceptable. Nizil (talk) 06:42, 17 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Recent edits to Golkeri

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Golkeri, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 08:48, 17 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please disclose your Conflict of Interest on User Page. Please note that Wikipedia is not for film promotion or advertisement. The film article is only accepted as an encyclopedia entry. You may request edits at Talk:Golkeri page. Editing the article may not be considered acceptable. Please read previous messages.-Nizil (talk) 11:13, 17 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

February 2020

edit
 
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 12:16, 17 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Vinay Dedhia (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

I had not read WP:COI guidelines before so had made mistakes. I will no longer edit any article and use only talkpages to put points wherever Conflict of Interest is involved. I will also declare my each and every Conflict of Interest on Userpage.

Accept reason:

Renamed, agreeable to conditions.. -- Deepfriedokra 22:33, 18 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

globally renamed Coconutmediabox to Vinay Dedhia

edit

globally renamed Coconutmediabox to Vinay Dedhia-- Deepfriedokra 16:37, 18 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Dreamy Jazz: Unblock OK?-- Deepfriedokra 16:39, 18 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Deepfriedokra, fine by me. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 22:30, 18 February 2020 (UTC)Reply