User talk:Vanished user 9oijnsdfknefijh3tjasfi34/Archive 1

Archive 1

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 07:17, Wednesday, November 13, 2024 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Your comment on the article I created "Spain at the UEFA European Football Championship‎"

Thanks a lot for the feedback, it is highly appreciated! I found it about time that this article would be created. Of course it can be further extended with, for instance, some prose and the top scorer list of Spain at the European Championship. Feel free to do so. :) Regards, Kareldorado (talk) 11:13, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

You're welcome too. Hope you continue enjoying to edit articles and create new ones! :D Romtam^talk 11:18, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Starting CVUA

Hello Vanished user 9oijnsdfknefijh3tjasfi34 , I had started your counter vandalism academy page as a subpage of my Talk Page. Get ready for some training! Once you finish, I will move it as a subpage of your own for future reference.
{{{1}}}

Click Here

New message

Per IRC testing and fun Cheers, Thanks, L235-Talk Ping when replying 05:44, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Ping

Posting per IRC request. Revent^talk 07:37, 18 August 2014 (UTC) And again. Revent^talk 07:40, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

New message

You wanted me to post something here so I did :) Darylgolden^(talk) 09:25, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Have a nice day! Romtam^talk 09:28, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

.js

It was super effective! :P

27.130.82.254 (talk) 14:48, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

IRC testing

Test. 61.90.150.20 (talk) 01:33, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Test. Again. Just again. 27.130.165.151 (talk) 15:34, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		Amanda's Guestbook Barnstar
		This user has signed my guestbook! Be sure that you're next to sign!		Amanda Smalls

@MirrorFreak:: Thanks a lot. Really appreciated it! Romtam^talk 16:28, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile!

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. Happy Editing! ~ Anastasia [Missionedit] (talk) 16:55, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikiproject REHAB

Hi Romtam. I'm trying to bring back the Wikiproject REHAB and was wondering whether you would join the project. We need someone like you who has experience with vandals. Please help me help others and therefore Wikipedia. Mirror Freak 18:03, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

@MirrorFreak:, I'm sorry to say that I think I am not suitable for this WikiProject. Looks like I need a lot more experience. Romtam^TalkToMe 09:34, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

You have signed my guestbook!!

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		Hello Vanished user 9oijnsdfknefijh3tjasfi34 Recently you have signed my guestbook! Thank you very much for signing my guestbook. Cheers NickGibson3900 Talk Sign my Guestbook Contributions 07:22, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

One of the nicest users I know!

VeNeMousKAT (talk|contribs) 11:40, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

@VeNeMousKAT: Thanks. So cute! Romtam^TalkToMe 11:46, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for signing my Guestbook

		Ascii002's Guestbook Barnstar
		This user has signed my guestbook and been presented with a barnstar. Sign my guestbook now if you have not yet!	Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 15:19, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

the earlier changes.

I just felt the need to respond to the violent defamation of East Slavic history that occured on the Wikipedia link about Yaroslav the Wise.The main link used as a proof for that alleged Viking classification is highly unreliable because the author of the book Companion to the Calendar: A Guide to the Saints and Mysteries of the Christian Calendar is a well known slavophobe.Mary Ellen Hynes also lacks the most basic knowledge of the Rus state and its rulers yet she dares to classify them as Scandinavians even though these rulers were adherents of the Slavic politheistic religion and later on of Orthodox christianity.

Slavic people are not asking for special treatment,they just want an objective representation of their history on the pages of Wikipedia.

this part is off topic.Rurik might have been a Varangian,a Wagrian or a Finnic tribal chieftain but for some reason(without historic consent)Germanic writers and historians are classifying him and his descendants as mainly Scandinavian?Why is that allowed?First of all,Rurikids were fanatical followers of the Rodnovery(statues of Slavic gods found and Greek-Rus treaties described the naming process of several Rus leaders and their druzhinas being conducted under the protection of Perun and Svarog)

One thing that i know about Scandinavian people from that age is that they were fanatical followers of their religion(they would have never abandoned their gods in favour of a fruitful position in a distant land),they proved that with constant battles against the christian forces in the 9th,10th,11th and 12th century).

Please sir,could you bring back my minor change to that page.I am just doing this in the name of history and objectivity(and i am sorry for missing the part where i had to write an explanation for my editing process)

(talk page stalker) @Tvrtkothefirst: Wikipedia goes by what reliable sources report. National Geographic certainly is such a reliable source. If other reliable sources explicitly dispute that claim, you should present them. Do not simply remove well-sourced content. Huon (talk) 15:47, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Same as @Huon: said. Also, next time after your message please sign your message with ~~~~. Romtam^TalkToMe 15:52, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

I find it highly disturbing that a writer who focused her studies on the history of christian holidays calendars would dare to write anything about a complicated subject such as the Early Rus state.Not even historians who spend their entire lives studying this subject would dare to write such informations.Anyone with basic knowledge of the early Rus would call these men as Variags,Wagrians or Varangians.All the theories of the Rurikid ancestry are labeled as disputed for a good reason(historians lack the proof to finalise their enigmatic origin).

Another thing,National Geographic produces magazines that need to sell in order to make money.Vikings,are profitable and likeable.And it is not like National Geographic could make a mistake.

The part where it says that he is the son of a Varangian(viking) Grand Prince Vladimir the Great is ironic if anyone even read anything about Vladimir the Great.The man was an almost fanatical follower of the Rodnovery.Sure,he had distant cousins in the North but does that mean that he is Scandinavian just because his ancestors intermarried with a foreign family?

Again, provide reliable sources. Without them, your opinion is no more relevant than mine, that is, not relevant at all. Huon (talk) 16:52, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Dragonology

Yes they were test edits but that article actually is a shitty article. It fails highly to distinguish fact from fiction. A novel about "dragonology" isn't "non fiction". I've read it myself, the book is totally bogus. 71.85.48.131 (talk) 04:02, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

@71.85.48.131: It is really inappropriate to tag an article with a lot of tags and section stubs. Anyone is OK to tag some if that tag is appropriate for the article, but you tagged all the sections and all the tags. It is very hard for readers to read and improvement. I hope you understand this. Thank you. Romtam^TalkToMe 04:06, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
10		Wongwian Yai (talk)						Add sources
213		CUPS (talk)						Add sources
47		Lumphini Park (talk)						Add sources
13		Rail transport in Bangkok (talk)						Add sources
97		World Scout Jamboree (talk)						Add sources
24		Thong Lo (talk)						Add sources
114		Internet encyclopedia (talk)						Cleanup
6		Sukhumvit MRT Station (talk)						Cleanup
564		Donbass People's Militia (talk)						Cleanup
25		Watthana District (talk)						Expand
40		Khlong Toei District (talk)						Expand
1,201		IOS 8 (talk)						Expand
156		Patpong (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
98		Protection ring (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
4		Hat Yai Junction Railway Station (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
27		System Information (Mac OS) (talk)						Merge
3		Rangsit Canal boat service (talk)						Merge
299		Context switch (talk)						Merge
233		America's Next Top Model (cycle 1) (talk)						Wikify
229		Apple Maps (talk)						Wikify
116		Finder (software) (talk)						Wikify
6		Pullman Bangkok Hotel G (talk)						Orphan
5		Satriwitthaya 2 School (talk)						Orphan
6		Embassy of Germany, Bangkok (talk)						Orphan
12		Sathon Road (talk)						Stub
18		Sparkle (software) (talk)						Stub
46		Quebecor (talk)						Stub
264		Keychain (Apple) (talk)						Stub
26		Naman (talk)						Stub
74		Launchpad (OS X) (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Your request for rollback

Hi Romtam. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! — MusikAnimal ^talk 23:14, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

@MusikAnimal: Thanks! Romtam^TalkToMe 00:07, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Thank you for all your anti-vandal contributions. Cheers, Thanks, L235-Talk Ping when replying 01:18, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

@Lixxx235: Thanks for the great barnstar! Romtam^TalkToMe 02:09, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Hey Romtam, one thing: try not to use sup tags in your sig. While not explicitly prohibited at WP:SIGPOL, it causes a slight change in the text around it in that the next row of text up is slightly higher. Just wanted to point that out. Happy editing! Cheers, Thanks, L235-Talk Ping when replying 02:14, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to STiki!

Hello, Romtam, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison with other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Ugog Nizdast (talk) 11:01, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

@Ugog Nizdast: Thanks! Romtam^TalkToMe 11:03, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Userbox Comment

Mind if I steal your birthday Userbox?Mirror Freak 12:42, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

@MirrorFreak: Actually, it's not mine. Code is: {{User:The High Fin Sperm Whale/Userboxes/Birthday|Your birthday date}} Also, I'm sorry to see that your rollback request is declined. :( Looking forward to hear from you. Cheers, Romtam^TalkToMe 12:45, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Its whatever. Like User:MusikAnimal said, Try again when you have 100 more edits to mainspace.Mirror Freak 12:46, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

@MirrorFreak: You might want to apply for CVU/A. Romtam^TalkToMe 12:48, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Already have here. Don't worry, I'll get there.Mirror Freak 12:50, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

@MirrorFreak: I admire your dedication toward achieving your goals, but I just want you to know that not having rollback does not make you any less of an editor. Users with hundreds of thousands of edits and high respect from the community may have no additional rights whatsoever, solely because they don't need them. That's all rollback is – a tool, not a "status". If you show a need for the tool and exemplify that you won't misuse it you will easily be granted the right. Glad to see you've enrolled at CVU/A. Your mentor will help you better understand the difference between good-faith and bad-faith edits, which I think you may have had trouble with. If after finishing the program you decide you'd like to continue fighting vandalism, give it a little time of patrolling on your own and then reapply at WP:PERM/R. Thanks for helping keep Wikipedia tidy :) — MusikAnimal ^talk 14:44, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

@MusikAnimal: Totally agreed. Thanks for replying here! Cheers, Romtam^TalkToMe 14:48, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Improper edit

Romtam, I received your message regarding my edit to Stock character. I am very disappointed that you failed to validate my edit for yourself, and instead marked it as vandalism. If you were to check the reference given by the original author, as I did, you would see that my "undo" edit corrects the inappropriate change made by the anonymous editor before me. Please check this for yourself, and restore the page back to its correct direct quote of the cited reference. Christopher.ursich (talk) 13:07, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

@Christopher.ursich: That was my fault. For some reason, the edit summary didn't show that time. I'm sorry. Romtam^TalkToMe 14:13, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

@Christopher.ursich: Further, I have added a hidden comment to prevent people from deleting that again. Romtam^TalkToMe 14:20, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ed Miliband

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ed Miliband. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:09, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
26		Bluebird Foods (talk)						Add sources
27		Emporium (Bangkok) (talk)						Add sources
7		Interchange21 (talk)						Add sources
10		River City Shopping Complex (talk)						Add sources
23		Khlong Saen Saep boat service (talk)						Add sources
23		Bangkok Mass Transit Authority (talk)						Add sources
247		History of Lego (talk)						Cleanup
69		Cyclonus (talk)						Cleanup
172		Ssshhhh...Koi Hai (talk)						Cleanup
16		Sathon District (talk)						Expand
23		Bundeli language (talk)						Expand
21		Bang Na District (talk)						Expand
21		Chandio (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
274		Command key (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
23		Old Azeri language (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
28		Implementation of bus rapid transit by country (talk)						Merge
21		Lego Technic Test Track (talk)						Merge
10		Alcoa Power Generating Inc. (talk)						Merge
3		Nakhon Sawan Railway Station (talk)						Wikify
19		Book town (talk)						Wikify
987		Optimus Prime (talk)						Wikify
4		Michael A. Wartell (talk)						Orphan
1		National Association of Sports Commissions (talk)						Orphan
4		Transformers SCF (talk)						Orphan
5		National Stadium BTS Station (talk)						Stub
5		Richmond Marathon (talk)						Stub
9		Asok BTS Station (talk)						Stub
205		Pranav Mohanlal (talk)						Stub
659		Avatharam (2014 film) (talk)						Stub
18		Phaya Thai Station (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:51, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for inviting me to create a Wikipedia account. I have been contributing using IP addresses for a few years, but recently I have been considering creating an account. 88.104.100.248 (talk) 14:45, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Replied at talk page (existing conversation) Romtam^TalkToMe 14:47, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Vanished user 9oijnsdfknefijh3tjasfi34. You have new messages at I dream of horses's talk page.
Message added 01:50, 3 September 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Unblock request

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Vanished user 9oijnsdfknefijh3tjasfi34 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "NabhatR". The reason given for NabhatR's block is: "Clearly not here to contribute to building the encyclopedia".

• Blocking administrator: PhilKnight (talk • blocks)

---

Accept reason: I've unblocked as you're a good faith user caught in a block intended for someone else. PhilKnight (talk) 06:59, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Education Institution IP. Thanks, Romtam^TalkToMe 04:28, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Additionally, IPBE? Romtam^TalkToMe 06:18, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

At the moment, I don't think IPBE is necessary, however if there are further problems with being caught in autoblocks or range blocks, then you may need to given IPBE. PhilKnight (talk) 06:59, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

There is nothing wrong with the recent edit I made

I know nonconstructive edit when I see one, and I found nothing wrong with it, unless there were grammatical errors or it was out of context. What do you find wrong with it? 121.172.80.186 (talk) 02:02, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

I'm in an autoblock. I would call that a AGF edit because the style isn't great but it is constructive. Feel free to remove that notice from your talk page. Sorry! Thanks, Romtam^TalkToMe 02:28, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Unblock request #2

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Vanished user 9oijnsdfknefijh3tjasfi34 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "NabhatR". The reason given for NabhatR's block is: "Clearly not here to contribute to building the encyclopedia".

• Blocking administrator: PhilKnight (talk • blocks)

---

Decline reason: Both checkuser and behavioral evidence indicate that Romtam has been abusing multiple accounts. I've extended the block to two weeks and removed the user's rollback userright. GorillaWarfare (talk) 04:23, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

@PhilKnight:, this time, might be IPBE. Screenshot Romtam^TalkToMe 02:32, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Discussing this with DeltaQuad after IRC conversation with Romtam. GorillaWarfare (talk) 04:09, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vanished user 9oijnsdfknefijh3tjasfi34 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My schoolmate knew that I had a Wikipedia account, and so decided to vandalize my user page and he was blocked indef by PhilKnight. However, as we were both using school computers, and it is a static IP, I was autoblocked for the second time. But today, GorillaWarfare extended the block to two weeks, and removed my rollback right. (The IP is 61.90.150.20) I am not using multiple accounts. This is a misunderstanding that arose as a result of a schoolmate vandalising my user page from the same IP range. I apologise for the inconvenience but would like to have the block lifted and would like to request IP block exemption and have my rollback right re-added. If I'm unblocked, I would continue vandalism patrolling as I do before. Thank you for your time. Romtam^TalkToMe 14:17, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Per WP:BROTHER OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:32, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You also lied to us last night about the chain of events that happened. You told me you went back to class after assisting him in the creation of the account, but later said you saw him vandalize a second time. Also there is no indication at all that your IP is shared or is a school, speaking from both the WHOIS and CU information. You also had a stellar 24 second revert time in this instance, while on a computer using the same operating system, just a different web browser. To really top this all off, you told us several times last night that you did know this person in real life. So why does it look like you don't here? I think this is sufficient to say we aren't getting the true story, though I could go on.

My recommendation to you is that you take this as it is, and move on. Come back when your unblocked, and continue. This is something you can work by and move forward from. It shows character when you rough the waves out and continue on. That would be my recommendation. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 15:41, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Further suspicious stuff: Romtam interacting with the IP that he is editing from, according to the screenshot Romtam previously provided. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:46, 4 September 2014 (UTC) Oops, missed that. Thanks. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:56, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

@Ohnoitsjamie: The screenshot only shows Romtam viewing the user talk page for that IP address; it does not identify the IP address as Romtam's. GorillaWarfare (talk) 17:48, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

@DeltaQuad: Just wanted to point out that Romtam has TC-RC-Bot on their personal IRC channel(##Romtam ^connect) and I'm pretty sure it's watching Romtam's userpage, and because the page "User:Romtam" contains Romtam's IRC nick, whenever there's a change to their userpage and TC-RC-Bot reports it it pings Romtam on IRC. Cheers, Thanks, L235-Talk Ping when replying 23:32, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 September 2014

• Arbitration report: Media viewer case is suspended

• Featured content: 1882 × 5 in gold, and thruppence more

• Op-ed: Automated copy-and-paste detection under trial

• Traffic report: Holding Pattern

• WikiProject report: Gray's Anatomy (v. 2)

• Recent research: A Wikipedia-based Pantheon; new Wikipedia analysis tool suite; how AfC hamstrings newbies

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:03, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 September 2014

• Op-ed: Media Viewer software is not ready

• Traffic report: Refuge in celebrity

• Featured content: The louse and the fish's tongue

• WikiProject report: Checking that everything's all right

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:56, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Archive 1