Your submission at Articles for creation: Space Climate (October 22) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Legacypac (talk) 06:03, 22 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Usoskin! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Legacypac (talk) 06:03, 22 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Space Climate has been accepted edit

 
Space Climate, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Nosebagbear (talk) 00:18, 29 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Space Climate edit

Hi there,

I just reviewed your draft to turn it into an article - was very interesting to read, so thanks for writing it!

I think other people might find the concept interesting too, so I was planning on submitting a "Did You Know" (DYK) "Hook", which is an interesting fact. If others agree with me, it might ultimately end up on the front page!

Fair warning - it'll be my first time submitting a DYK, but it seems to tick all the boxes, so I'll let you know how it progresses.

Feel free to keep editing the article, and congrats again on your success.

Cheers,

Nosebagbear (talk) 00:28, 29 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

It will have come up in your watchlist, but you can see my nomination on the SC talk page Talk:Space climate#Did you knowDYK comment symbol nomination Nosebagbear (talk)

A page you started (Space climate) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Space climate.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Good start, please fill in references 4 to 8 to be consistent in style to refs 1 through 3.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|JC7V7DC5768}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JC7V (talk) 01:18, 29 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

@JC7V7DC5768: Thanks! edit

Thanks!

I will.


Usoskin (talk) 19:07, 29 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Space climate edit

On 27 January 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Space climate, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the space climate discipline researches how solar wind and interplanetary magnetic field fluctuations can affect Earth over timescales ranging from a few weeks to more than 1,000 years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Space climate. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Space climate), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 27 January 2019 (UTC)Reply