Open main menu
Userboxes
OTRS Wikimedia.svgThis user is a member of the OTRS response team and has a page on Wikimedia OTRS-wiki.
Wikimedia Foundation RGB logo with text.svgThis user desires open communication and respect from the Wikimedia Foundation for the English Wikipedia's dispute resolution processes.
A fact from the article Space climate, which this user created or significantly contributed to, has been featured in the Did you know... section on the Main Page.
Ponkan query.pngThis user is a member of
WikiProject Requested articles.
4445 pending submissionsThis user is a participant in WikiProject Articles for creation. You can help!
ENGThis user supports the English rugby team.
Answer to Life.pngDon't Panic! Nosebagbear is actually h²g² Researcher Nosebagbadger.
Wikipedia New page reviewer.svgThis user has new page reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)


3This user's rugby union position is Tighthead prop.Rugbyball2.jpg
Wikipedia Reviewer.svgThis user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)
Igloo icon.svg This user prefers cold weather.
WikipediaSignpostIcon.svgThis user enjoys reading
The Signpost.
Wikipedia Rollbacker.svgThis user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)
Padlock-skyblue.svgThis user likes to steal wikimarkup code for use on their own userpage.
Star of life.svgThis user scored 5293 on the Wikipediholic test (revision 833977525).

NOTE: PLEASE ASK ON MY TALK PAGE IF YOU WISH ME TO LOOK UP A JSTOR PAPER FOR YOU

So frequently over the long length of my account running I have said that Wikipedia is not where I belong - "I have come merely to add and correct a few article close to my heart" such as MUN and H²G², in the case of h2g2 I was sent, in order to ensure the correctness of a small part. h2g2 seemed so much more spiritually in tune - a good social aspect, a weird and wonderful, but high quality set of articles, it was an excellent place.

But each time I wander back from my wikibreaks I find myself staying longer, and making more edits. My most recent trip has already more than doubled, quadripled, octupled, sexdecupled, Duotrigintupled, Quattorsexagintupled my edits, seen me pick up AfD, AfC (Interesting AfC Graph, Twinkle, vandal patrolling and, of course, perhaps a soupcon of conventional editing.

The wikipedias serious.jpg

It's even had me get to my first wikimeet (on my third try, with an entertaining set of reasons seemingly desperate to keep me from seeing you all).


MAJOR QUESTIONS OF LIFE (please answer on talk page!)

  1. How do I edit Wikipedia articles while using both arms to conduct Einaudi's "Divenire"?
  2. Who will be the lucky unfortunate editor to restart the Stocks?
  3. How to get to the 'Crats to adopt "Fiat Consensus Ruat Caelum" as their motto?
  4. Has it not occurred to anyone that OVERSIGHT have the creepiest, censorship-esk, logo?


I have a few current focuses/objectives:

  1. Conclude GA review of Roman Tmetuchl (Talk:Roman Tmetuchl/GA1) - review completed, on hold to 28/08 [Check up]
  2. One "genre by artist" list at a time, fix every discography article to either source sufficiently or redirect.
  3. Create another B-class article (possibly done - we'll seen what MFJ gets)
  4. Finish off the rugby players who warrant articles
  5. Add spoken versions for all my articles (5/7 done)
  6. Assess suggested edits for Mark Lindquist, post ANI discussion


We might spend eons discussing the details, but a good general ethos for Wikipedia and Life: Neither needlessly offend, nor be too quick to take offense

Association of Inclusionist Wikipedians (2016)


As of about September 2018 (and still as of September!) my computer has become a right hissy monster - as such, if you see me making strangely frequent save rates it means it's not been playing ball!

This user is a member of the Association of Inclusionist Wikipedians.

The motto of the AIW is conservata veritate, which translates to "with the preserved truth".
This motto reflects the inclusionist desire to change Wikipedia only when no knowledge would be lost as a result.

AIW


My early days (way back in 2012) had me as the staunchest of inclusionists, but I have softened over time to find my general role as a centre-inclusionist. Please feel free to natter on the subject to me whether you be inclusionist, deletionist, mergist or a radical transwikist! It's only by the discussion that you actually get the best answers :)