Template:Did you know nominations/Space climate

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:29, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Space climate edit

Created by Usoskin (talk). Nominated by Nosebagbear (talk) at 01:24, 29 December 2018 (UTC).

  • Article was created on July 30, 2018. While some good improvements were made this month, it has not been 5x expanded. Sorry, this looks like a cool article but it doeans't appear to meet the rules for nomination. Apologies if I've missed something. Damien Linnane (talk) 05:58, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Article moved to mainspace on 29 December. Gfosankar (talk) 09:01, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
  • My apologies, I didn't notice that. Other issues still exist though. There are multiple unreferenced parts. The sentence beggining with "It studies mechanisms" is unreferneced. The three aims are unreferenced, as are the two sentences after "(biennial since 2004) was organized". This all needs to be addressed. Damien Linnane (talk) 13:06, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
  • - I've tagged these, and aim to resolve them tomorrow (I've set out how to resolve at least two of them, and hopefully the third (details in-article comments)). Nosebagbear (talk) 23:39, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
  • - Have either added some sources or, in one case, removed detail that was tricky to demonstrate in any concise fashion. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:08, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Looks good to go. Damien Linnane (talk) 14:20, 30 December 2018 (UTC)