User talk:TheNuggeteer/Archive 8

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

DYK Update?

Hi @TheNuggeteer: I assume you'll be reviewing my DYK DYK:Dilaw (song) nomination. I just want to check if it's been approved or not. Thanks! Royiswariii (talk) 11:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Hmm, why not? I plan on nominating AmBisyon Natin 2040 for DYK and this can probably be my QPQ. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 12:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

sure, i can do that. Royiswariii (talk) 12:58, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Typhoons in Taiwan

Hello! Your submission of Typhoons in Taiwan at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and your nomination has been rejected. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry before nominating further. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Leafy46 (talk) 15:23, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Teodoro Asedillo

On 17 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Teodoro Asedillo, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that a former teacher in the Philippines became a Robin Hood–like outlaw? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Teodoro Asedillo. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Teodoro Asedillo), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 00:26, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Philippines at the 1928 Summer Olympics

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Philippines at the 1928 Summer Olympics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Arconning -- Arconning (talk) 13:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Re: 1953 Pacific typhoon season

Hey there TheNuggeteer. I got your email about the 1953 Pacific typhoon season. I wondered what you meant by reformatting. Do you mean expanding? If so, that would be really beneficial. Almost all of the sections are empty.

A few easy sources you could use:

• IBTRACS
• This source from USAID has a lot of older Philippine typhoons, including bits of info for Judy and Cora
• Info on older Guam typhoons, including a few 1953 storms
• Alice was one of the wettest storms on record in Guam, so that should be easy to find information on it.

Hopefully this is a good start! Good luck fellow Wikipedian. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:40, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

I wanted to reformat the page to have monthly sections, like the 1937 season, because most of the sections are empty. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 04:00, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Kevin Sagra for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kevin Sagra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Sagra (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

C F A 💬 12:59, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A Boy Is a Gun, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Igor.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Philippines at the 1928 Summer Olympics

The article Philippines at the 1928 Summer Olympics you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Philippines at the 1928 Summer Olympics for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Arconning -- Arconning (talk) 14:43, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

GA reviewing

Hi -- I noticed you've started another GA review, and I see from above that there's a thread that you haven't responded to in which some have suggested you should not be reviewing articles at GAN until you have a bit more experience. There was also a conversation at WT:GAN to the same effect; you responded there but didn't comment on the request for you not to review for a while.

Since you've now picked up another review, can I ask you to address those concerns? You've had some experienced editors telling you you need to slow down, but you seem to be ignoring them. Can you tell me why? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 14:26, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

I honestly don't know how long to take a break for, I took a break for five days, and I don't know how much longer. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 23:12, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

By the way-I already completed the review, which is leaning towards a fail. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 23:15, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

@TheNuggeteer I hate to insert myself here and I can't speak on behalf of anyome else but I have reached out offering to help you out with your review of Tumor necrosis factor. It's a pretty tricky article for anyone to review let alone someone who isn't experienced with medical topics. I know others have suggested you take a break but I'm thinking maybe collaborating on a GA review might be a good way to ease back into things. IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

@IntentionallyDense What about you review the medical parts and I review the rest? 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 03:38, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

@TheNuggeteer It's a little hard to just review the medical parts since every part of the page from prose, format, and sources are all dependant on the medical manual of style. I was thinking maybe we could kinda just work alongside each other and share our proccess. It might be easiest for you to start with the prose review and for me to start tackling the sources as sources tend to be the hardest part with medical pages (see WP:MEDRS). With reviweing prose for medical articles it might be helpful for you to look over WP:MEDLANG, Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Medicine-related articles#Writing for the wrong audience, and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Medicine-related articles#Writing style. One of the biggest things is making sure that these articles are understandable to a broad audience. Meaning that if you find yourself confused while reading something then that probably needs to be changed to be more understandable. If in doubt I would lean on the side of caution and bring up anything you find overly technical and I can help you figure out if the wording used is appropriate. IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:48, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

TheNuggeteer, I was going to suggest that you find another editor who is willing to help you; a mentor, in other words. It looks like IntentionallyDense is offering to take that role on for at least one review. Can I suggest that you stop picking up new GA reviews until you've completed the review with IntentionallyDense? And if IntentionallyDense is willing to take on the extra responsibility, perhaps you could follow their advice on when you are ready to start doing new reviews again? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:58, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

@Mike Christie Okay. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 13:11, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

@Mike Christie Side note I am happy to take on the extra responsibility. Because the page is so complex I am probably going to ask for a third set of eyes at the GA talkpage, more so for peace of mind. I have started doing the review however @TheNuggeteer hasn't started reviewing yet (which is fine as prose reviews can take awhile). I'm hoping that they will chime in with some prose review soon and then we can take it from there! I am trying to lay out each step of my review so this can be a learning experience for everyone and hopefully that will help a bit. IntentionallyDense (talk) 18:32, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Al Gelato for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Al Gelato is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Gelato until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Netherzone (talk) 23:36, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, TheNuggeteer. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:38, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Tyler, The Creator

Hello. Please note that according to the proposals page of the WikiProject Council, which determines if a proposed WikiProject can be created, no WikiProjects should be started unless their proposal process is overhauled. Once you see this message, you might want to WP:G7 that page and all relevant pages thereof. Elias / PSA 🏕️🪐 ^{[please make some noise]} 05:00, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

You can also consider If your group can't wait for the new process, please only create group pages in the userspace of one of your members. So I can probably move it into my userspace. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 07:41, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

seconding this. given that this wikiproject only has one other participant and such a niche scope, i don't think it will be very useful in the grand scheme of things, and even less so in userspace where it will be sequestered away. i suggest you have a look through Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject SZA (2nd nomination). ... sawyer * he/they * talk 13:18, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

DCWC submission declined

Hey TheNuggeteer, and thanks for your participation in the Developing Countries WikiContest. I've declined your submission of this GAN review for points as it does not meet the standards expected for a review of this kind. Your review is quite short and none of your comments make reference to the good article criteria to explain why you failed the nomination, and some of the suggestions you made — such as lengthening the lead or rearranging sections — are neither within the scope of a GAN review nor explicitly required by any policy or guideline. Please see the relevant section of the scoring rules for more information, and let me or another coordinator know if you have any questions.

Speaking only as an editor and not an event coordinator, I would highly recommend that you immediately disengage from content quality–related processes on Wikipedia and focus your efforts elsewhere for some time. Many editors over the last few months have warned you about the improvements needed in the way you approach these processes. So far, those improvements have not been forthcoming, and continuing on that path will likely lead to the community placing sanctions on you based on the "competence is required" rule. These kinds of decisions are unnecessarily stressful for everyone involved, and will make it much harder for you to return to contributing to those areas in the future. I think everyone would prefer if that mess could be avoided, so the best option that I think you have is to voluntarily step away from article creation, GAN, FLC, NPP, and possibly others. Use your time away to take it slow, build your editorial experience in other areas, and familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines so you can come back in the future (at least a few months later) a much more constructive contributor. And you don't need to dive back into things headfirst, there are resources in place for you to seek help if you need it. For example, you could make use of the GA mentorship, articles for creation, or NPP school processes to ease your transition back into those roles with lower stakes and guidance from experienced editors. I hope you will consider my suggestions, and I wish you the best wherever your editing career takes you next. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Bilorv's minimalist challenge

Hey, I don't want to be the fun police, but that challenge is for getting an article to GA before there are 50 revisions in the page history total. Both of the articles you're citing have well over 100 edits, so they don't qualify. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:19, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Oh, I thought you meant the how many edits the user created to the page. Did you revert it? 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 04:22, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, a few people have made that mistake, I think I'm going to clarify the wording of the challenge. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:36, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Bigkis Pinoy Movement

Hey, quick question: you have been around for a while and could create an article directly into mainspace yet decided to submit Draft:Bigkis Pinoy Movement for review (I'm currently going through the AfC backlog). Is there any specific reason for doing so? Superboilles (talk) 21:14, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bigkis Pinoy Movement (September 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bigkis Pinoy Movement and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 03:20, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library

Hey there, I'm reviewing Philippines at the 1928 Summer Olympics which I saw you nominated for GA. I think looking at the improvements made by another editor before they renominated it, and their use of WP:The Wikipedia Library would really help you with writing better Wikipedia articles. Tell me if you have any questions. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 08:04, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Nice! The only library I know was JSTOR. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 08:17, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

DYK Nomination

Hi TheNuggeteer! I'm asking if you can review my DYK nomination here: DYK/Bini (group). Thanks! Royiswariii (talk) 16:56, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

@Royiswariii I have no QPQs lined up yet. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 22:50, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 September 2024

• In the media: Courts order Wikipedia to give up names of editors, legal strain anticipated from "online safety laws"

• Community view: Indian courts order Wikipedia to take down name of crime victim, editors strive towards consensus

• Serendipity: A Wikipedian at the 2024 Paralympics

• Opinion: asilvering's RfA debriefing

• News and notes: Are you ready for admin elections?

• Gallery: Are Luddaites defending the English Wikipedia?

• Recent research: Article-writing AI is less "prone to reasoning errors (or hallucinations)" than human Wikipedia editors

• Traffic report: Jump in the line, rock your body in time

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

GA Review

Hey TheNuggeteer! I responded to your comments on the GA nomination for Swawilla Fire a few days ago, which you may not have seen. Just a reminder, no need to rush anything. :) SirMemeGod  13:03, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, just a bit shaken by a discussion made to me and a recent talk page message above. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 13:08, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

You're fine, I completely understand. I'm not one to rush people about things, if it takes a month, I'm fine with that. (striking out my comment as things should be done in a timely manner, but you get my point). :) SirMemeGod  13:25, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Hey Sir MemeGod, I'll take over this review, I'll get to your comments soon. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 06:24, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Topic ban enacted

Per consensus at the administrator's noticeboard (link), the following topic ban has been enacted:

"TheNuggeteer (talk · contribs) is topic-banned for six months from content assessment processes, broadly construed. This is explicitly noted to include: GA nominations and reviews; FA nominations and reviews; FL nominations and reviews; DYK nominations, reviews, and other participation; Peer review; and AfC/NPP. Where a 'contest of any kind' has any level of overlap (as per 'broadly construed') with any of these explicitly-included processes, this topic-ban extends to that contest."

Please read Wikipedia:Banning policy#Topic ban, Wikipedia:Banning policy#Exceptions to limited bans and Wikipedia:Banning policy#Evasion and enforcement. I encourage you to take the broadest reading of 'broadly construed' possible, to avoid any potential issues.

Details regarding appealing a community-imposed topic ban are contained at Wikipedia:Banning policy#Appeals of bans imposed by the community. This topic ban will be logged at Wikipedia:Editing restrictions.

Regards,
Daniel (talk) 01:53, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Last prep at DYK

Hi there. If you're promoting hooks to the final set, keep in mind that we like to have at least half the set empty, so that problematic hooks from earlier preps can be swapped in if necessary. Thanks! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:06, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for the notice! 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 23:05, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of A Boy Is a Gun

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article A Boy Is a Gun you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PSA -- PSA (talk) 01:43, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

If you are willing to further discuss this nomination, as well as nominating more articles for GAN going forward, please do not hesitate to ping me here. I also invite people who have previously said something about it here to participate. Elias / PSA 🏕️🪐 ^{[please make some noise]} 03:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of A Boy Is a Gun

The article A Boy Is a Gun you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:A Boy Is a Gun for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PSA -- PSA (talk) 04:03, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Well-meaning, but chronically disruptive, editing from TheNuggeteer. Thank you. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, TheNuggeteer! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The Teahouse

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! User:Matticusmadness (talk) 09:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

I don’t see a welcome on your user page, and, given the current attention you’re getting, thought the links that most welcome templates give out, could serve useful. I’ve asked at the ANI thread what other tasks might fit your skill set. Might be worth chipping in there what you like doing?

Danke. MM (Give me info.) ^(Victories) 08:58, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks Signing TyphoonAmpil's Guestbook. over 5,000 edits. †TyphoonAmpil† T/C 13:47, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Tyler, The Creator

Wikipedia:WikiProject Tyler, The Creator, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Tyler, The Creator and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Tyler, The Creator during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 23:26, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Thank you for being clear and giving guidelines to help fellow editors like me get the Communism in the Philippines article the Good Article rating it deserves. You have done great work for Wikiproject Philippines. TheFloridaMan (talk) 03:03, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Suggestion/plea to help with a project

Hey there TheNuggeteer, I wondered if you had any interest in helping with some of the older Pacific typhoon seasons. It's clear you have a passion for editing, so I wondered if you had any interest in this task. It's a really important project, but it might take some time. There is a need for most years between 1902 and 1935. You can use IBTRACS, which it seems you're familiar with. You can also use sources like the Monthly Weather Review. For example, September 1935 here.

It's more useful, in my opinion, having more season articles, rather than making new storm articles. Lemme know what you think of the idea. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:01, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Ooh, looks interesting, I will start the project this afternoon, since I don't have that much time between school. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 04:14, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

It doesn't have to be right now, it's just a long term project that we're gonna need at some point, and there aren't many people interested in older season articles. I say that because I wrote the 1900 and 1901 PTS articles back in 2016, and in 2017 I worked with a few users to write 1927. I wrote 1931 in 2019, and did 1936/1937 earlier this year. It takes a lot to write these articles, so if you don't feel like it, it's OK, but at some point we're gonna need these articles. I can help you if you'd like. Just lemme know what year you'd wanna start with. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:29, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Already did the 1902 Pacific typhoon season one, though this one looks particularly unfinished. How about we create a group to work and create these season articles to steadily help the effort? 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 11:32, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Who do you have in mind? I'm in the middle of another project (2005 Atlantic hurricane season), so I can help with this project here and there, like provide links and help research certain important storms. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:29, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

@Hurricanehink Did you ask HurricaneEdgar yet? If not, probably Borgenland. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 22:59, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Would you like to try taking the lead? I think you can handle it. Start by reaching out to the others and seeing if they're interested, maybe start with 1935 and work your way backward? Draft:1935 Pacific typhoon season - here is a basic draft you can link. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:09, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Will try to find projects for you!

Hey TheNuggeteer! I read about the ANI situation. Sorry to hear that you went through that. All long-term editors have been in a place once where we ran into some trouble, but I think (from the responses in the thread) you are handling it the correct way. While you are on your topic bans, I will try to help you find smaller projects to do (in between school, of course!).

Here's one: I looked at 19th Congress of the Philippines and there are several members who do not have articles in English Wikipedia. Would you be interested in writing up some of those articles? If they exist in Tagalog Wikipedia, then translate it and either put it in draftspace or mainspace and then I (in AFC) or someone in NPP will look at it. If they don't have an article in the Tagalog wikipedia, then it may need to be written from scratch. Just remember to make sure it's got good sourcing and a NPOV.

If you're not interested in that, let me know if there are other things I can suggest that we need help with.

Best of luck

Bkissin (talk) 21:03, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Asking explanation for declining draft

Hi, I saw you declined my draft for Comedy Central Family (Hungarian TV channel). I just took references from Hungarian Wikipedia'a article and I want to know: which of the sources I took are not reliable?

PS: I already changed some references to that draft. Filippo.g204 (talk) 17:10, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

DCWC closing update

The 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest has come to a close! After a thrilling finish to the event with a slew of submissions on the final day, we have our winners. With 608 points, Thebiguglyalien (submissions) comes in third with his series of Kiribati and Botswanan submissions; BeanieFan11 (submissions) flies into second place at the last second with 771 points after a string of good articles about sportspersons; and after leading for much of contest's three months, Generalissima (submissions) finishes with a whopping 798 points to take home the Gold Belt Buckle. Congratulations to our winners!

In addition to his spot in the top three, BeanieFan11 (submissions) also wins the special awards for submitting under the most countries (44 countries) and for writing the most articles about women (15 Did you know? nominations)! Magentic Manifestations (submissions), after making 16 submissions under the Indian flag—15 of them good articles—receives the awards for most submissions for a single country and most featured or good articles promoted. For their submission of one FAC review, five FLC reviews, and 20 GAN reviews, Simongraham (submissions) wins for most article reviews.

The results of the contest have far exceeded any expectations the coordinators had for it at the beginning: among the submissions to the event were 3 FAs, 10 FLs, 88 GAs, dozens of article reviews of every kind, and more Did you know? submissions than we can count! Regardless of your level of participation, every contestant can be proud to have contributed towards a major step in countering the systemic bias on Wikipedia. Every year, millions of readers and editors around the globe use Wikipedia to educate themselves and communicate with others about parts of the world that often receive less attention than they deserve. Thank you for participating with us in the contest and contributing to this effort. The DCWC will return next year and we look forward to seeing you contribute again! However, before that...

We need your feedback! Join the conversation on the talk page to discuss your reflections on the contest (even if you didn't participate!) and help us make it better.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 19:02, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Anti-Systemic Bias Barnstar

		The Anti-Systemic Bias Barnstar
		Thank you for participating in the Developing Countries WikiContest! You've received 166 points, and here's a special award for your contributions.

... sawyer * he/they * talk 19:16, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Asik-Asik Falls

On 7 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Asik-Asik Falls, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the water of Asik-Asik Falls (pictured) comes from a source inside a cliff? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Asik-Asik Falls. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Asik-Asik Falls), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Tropical Storm Kai-tak

On 7 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tropical Storm Kai-tak, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that while soldiers carried out relief operations for Tropical Storm Kai-tak, the New People's Army attacked them? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tropical Storm Kai-tak. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tropical Storm Kai-tak), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

September 2024 NPP backlog drive – Points award

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to TheNuggeteer for accumulating at least 25 points during the September 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 19,000+ articles and 35,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 26,884.6 points) completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:29, 7 October 2024 (UTC)