&t

A welcome from Sputnik edit

Hi, Technohead1980, Welcome to Wikipedia!  
Hello, bonjour, salut, privyet, konichiwa, shalom, hola, salve, sala'am, bonjourno, and hi! I'm Sputnik. I noticed that you were new and/or have yet to receive any messages so I just thought I'd pop in to say "hello". We're glad to have you in our community! I hope you like this place — I sure do — and want to stay. Wikipedia can be a little intimidating at first, since it's so big but we won't bite so Be Bold and get what you know down in microchips! If you do make a mistake, that's fine, we'll assume good faith and just correct you: it'll take a few seconds maximum! I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful. If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you. Here are a few links to get you started:
And remember:
  • If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
  • If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal.
  • P.S. I'm happy to help new users. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Happy Wiki-ing!


- ;span style="color: black">СПУТНИКССС Р 13:24, 8 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Computational group theory edit

Thanks for your message. I have just finished a PhD in Computational Group Theory at Birmingham, and enjoyed it greatly. My supervisor moved to QMUL about a year ago, so you probably know him. Huppybanny 10:33, 26 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for {{{1}}} edit

Thanks for uploading [[:{{{1}}}]]. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:05, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Disagreement with User:62.25.109.194 edit

You might start by asking him to provide a source for the information. Failing that, since it seems to be a dispute between just two editors, you can post a mention of the problem at Wikipedia:Third opinion, so someone outside the disagreement can look at it from a fresh angle. Joyous! | Talk 15:05, 17 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

  • Then I strongly recommend listing the problem at Wikipedia:Third opinion, so you don't get caught reverting more than 3 times in 24 hours. That's a blockable offense, and I don't want it to happen to you, since you seem like you want to find a reasonable solution. Joyous! | Talk 16:12, 17 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
  • At the bottom of the "third opinion" page, there's a space that says "active disagreements." Use the listing that's already there as a model for yours. It may take a few days for someone to comment, though, so don't expect immediate miracles. There's also WP:RfC, where you can ask for other people to look at an article to get a consensus on what works best. Joyous! | Talk 16:59, 17 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Re: Hi edit

You're welcome. I was bored last night and couldn't sleep so I went through a lot of recent number one singles and added/completed chart trajectories and succession boxes to the ones that needed them. I update several of them on a weekly basis anyway. -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 12:25, 12 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

I use the Radio 1 website to check the Singles and Downloads Top 40s every week, then on a Monday I check Yahoo! because they have the Top 75 Singles and Top 200 Downloads but not until Monday. On Fridays I check the Irish Singles Chart on the Irish Recorded Music Association's website. There's also a website linked from there where you can get the peak positions of any single in the Irish Chart. Then in addition to that, there's a site called polyhex.com which gives chart trajectories for all singles and downloads! I tend to forget about albums though! Damn it, now you know all my secrets! I try to be quick because I don't like people doing it before me!!! -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 12:36, 12 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
Yeah that would be cool.... what's yours? :) -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 17:55, 12 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
I don't want to put mine on here either... if you activated your email on here you could email it to me or I could email mine to you or whatever... The only site I can think of where you could possibly send me a message is last.fm. I've got a link to my profile there on my user page. Not sure if it would work though. Email through here would probably be best. -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 23:36, 12 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
I sent an email, so I hope it went through ok :) -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 00:02, 13 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
Maybe you could try emailing me too... I think I emailed someone once and they never got it. -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 00:14, 13 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Queen Mary students and alumni edit

Would you like to join Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: Queen Mary, University of London? Timrollpickering 21:03, 19 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Believe it edit

mat_x 11:08, 25 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Big Brother (UK series 7) edit

Hey there. I'm leaving you this message as you were a part of making the article Big Brother (UK series 7) and I've had the crazy idea of trying to get it to featured status, or at least a good article. I've made a peer review page, and comments there for improving would be greatly appreciated. Also, if you see I have left anyone out could you message them as well? Thanks. --Alex (Talk) 11:36, 1 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

I agree! I think that the List of Housemates would be even better to be featured.
The list would probably need a lot more work on it - could you leave a comment on the peer review page? Thanks. --Alex (Talk) 13:48, 1 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Helena Paparizou and Mambo edit

Hi! Do you have the link that shows Mambo getting the 185th place on Uk Chart? Is the Singles Chart?--Chronisgr 12:00, 23 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the answer. So it's the Singles Chart,isn't it? Do you know how many copies it sold the 1st week? Any prediction for the place she will get the 2nd week?--Chronisgr 14:25, 23 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Deal or No Deal UK, potential deletion edit

I wondered whether it would be worth setting up a separate wiki for this sort of thing via [[1]] - it would be unregulated by Wikipedia, but still linkable to here. I actually have copies of all three stats pages up to yesterday, if we need them. Elcondor 20:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Right, I've set them up on http://scratchpad.wikia.com/wiki/Deal_or_No_Deal_UK - obviously if the AfD goes our way there's no need to do any more, but if it doesn't, it may be possible to get a full Deal or No Deal wiki on www.wikia.org, which I can then copy this stuff to. Elcondor 12:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Bot code edit

The software I use is WP:AWB in C# - source and executables on sourcefourge. Some of the XML configuraiton files I wrote are available aT Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/Settings in regular expressions. Other frameworks available include pywikipedia in Python, and various bots published in perl. See also Wikipedia:Creating_a_bot and WP:BOT. Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 12:05 18 December 2006 (GMT).


Fitlads edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. An article you recently created, Fitlads, has been tagged for speedy deletion because its content is clearly written to promote a company, product, or service. This article may have been deleted by the time you see this message. Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not an advertising service. Thank you. Ooooooooo 00:09, 20 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

2 Unlimited edit

Hey,

I saw you've changed my info on Romy and Marjon .. I had to re-change it because all my new text was gone.

I knew that about Marjon and Marion, but I thought that she was still working under the name 'Marion' because here name was spelled that way in the articles I read about her jazzband .. but I was wrong, I checked the 'official' website of the jazzband (on http://www.neworpheans.com/tno/archive/cat_bezetting ) and saw that you are right and that her real name is Marjon and that she is currently working by her real name.

So sorry for the 'uncorrect' correction.

And actually I don't like jazz and I don't like Romy and Marjon .. I only wrote the added info, because everybody asumes that Romy and Marion were two new Belgian girls. But they're also Dutch .. I only liked 2 Unlimited with the real Ray & Anita

Cheers

Ddance

AFD edit

Hey theres currently an AFD debate in progress for an article on Ill.Skillz. Don't know if you're familiar with them but please take a look at the debate, they're pretty high profile Austrian producers.--OriginalJunglist 16:43, 25 December 2006 (UTC)Reply


Fitlads again edit

Hello, Thanks for your message re: fitlads. The page has now been deleted so clearly an editor agrees with me on this. I also note that another person has also tagged fitlads as non-notable in the past. There are millions of websites out there, and merely having thousands of users is not, I feel, grounds for notability: Wikipedia would become a stupidly large directory of websites if that were the case. Thanks for the gaydar pointer, I will take a look at that page too. Ooooooooo 11:37, 31 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Style note edit

Hi. I have just a small note about the use of capitals. Per WP:MoS#Sections and headings, one should use lowercase except for proper names. For example,

==Over finite fields==

is preferable to

==Over Finite Fields==

This is a small thing but I thought I'd let you know. Cheers, Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 15:09, 22 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Re: Bonde Do Role edit

The version of Bonde do Role that I deleted was created by User:Rvoid17, an employee of Domino Records. Rvoid17 had created a spammy article based on an advertising blurb, so it qualified for deletion per WP:CSD#G11. If someone were to create an non-advertorial article on the band that explained their notability, then the article would likely be kept. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 10:21, 20 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for Image:R-158948-1124207561.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:R-158948-1124207561.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:10, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: BB8 Criticism and Controversy Section edit

Just so you know, I put this here as there was nowhere else to put it, and may be seen by some people as controversy. No need to be rude. And I have moved it to a more appropriate section. Babygurl1853 23:45, 19 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Reversion of my edit to Big Brother 2007 (UK) edit

Just wondering, why did revert my sorting of the contestants by last name in this article? Official policy is to sort people by their last name unless there is a compelling reason not to (e.g. Madonna is not usually known as Madonna Ciccone so is sorted as Madonna) so I don't really understand why you reverted it (in future it might help to say why in the edit summary). Thanks - EstoyAquí(tce) 21:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

It being Wikipedia policy, and part of English sorting rules, I didn't think it needed to be discussed (similar to how you thought your reversion didn't need to be explained maybe? ;) ). Anyway, clearly I was wrong. There's a discussion on the relevant page now. - EstoyAquí(tce) 22:02, 20 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Acen Razvi edit

I'm very confused. This wasn't the page I moved, the page I moved was a proper article which I remember editing! The deletion log says User:Jimfbleak deleted this article today as patent nonsense[2]. I'll ask him about it. - Zeibura (Talk) 17:52, 8 July 2007 (UTC)Reply


Hey there , I am the publisher for Acen Razvi & the original text regarding Acen's details are blatantly wrong & misleading - If you have any queries - please get in touch with either me or Acen himself thru myspace/acenmusic. The original article mentions a full name which is wrong & also that he recorded under the name Appleheads. We will consider legal action to get this resolved as it shows Acen in a misleading way not to mention the rather tame article. We would rather it be deleted altogether or left as Acen wants it , which is the bio we replaced the original article with. User:Acenfacts) (Talk)

for the moment I've deleted and protected the article against recreation, I need to check exactly what action to take about the totally out of order attempt to threaten Wikipedia, but I'm out all day, so this is a holding action to halt the edit war. Jimfbleak 05:29, 9 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
As you are probably aware, User:Chaser has restored the article, and Acenfacts has been advised on a legitimate way forward. If the text dumps continue, one of us will block him from editing. However, please also bear in mind that words like "garbage" are not likely to improve the situation. Jimfbleak 06:53, 9 July 2007 (UTC)Reply


Acen Razvi edit

Please post the reference to Acen's real name , this will at least resolve one issue ( which is incorrect , especially since Wikipedia is supposedly based on fact ) We will then take it up with Guinness , If this is the case. On the other hand - we are satisfied that the Appleheads entry has been erased. Please understand that an Artist such as Acen, has the right to defend the misleading representation that has appeared in this case & Wikipedia should maintain its integrity by insuring its fact based knowledge is, indeed so. Typing 'Acen Razvi' into a google search, throws up the Wikipedia article 2nd from the top result - this is therefore damaging to Acen's profile entirely. We will work on an alternate write up shortly & understand that we do not want any ill will with Wikipedia & its public forum but im sure, incorrect entries of this kind shouldn't be a problem for Wikipedia to resolve. Thanks. Daimen Wilcox: Bucks Music Publishing. (Acenfacts 10:22, 9 July 2007 (UTC))Reply


Acen Razvi edit

Likewise to your ' misrepresentation ' comment - we don't understand how the article we replaced it with is not appropriate  ? Maybe you could send us a list of 'Q's , which I will get answered direct from Acen - maybe this will help resolve any misinformation & help us understand how the facts/info on Acen Razvi should appear on Wikipedia. We would be happy to help.

Btw "misrepresent" in dictionary : misreport, misquote, quote/take out of context, misinterpret, put a spin on, skew, warp, falsify, distort, misstate, exaggerate. In other words ' to misrepresent ' we mean to 'falsify' from unofficial & unconfirmed sources Thanks : Daimen (Acenfacts 12:04, 9 July 2007 (UTC))Reply

Stempelkissen edit

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Stempelkissen, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. B. Wolterding 16:43, 3 August 2007 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LTBCYB.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:LTBCYB.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

London Meetup - January 12, 2008 edit

Hi! There's going to be a London Wikipedia Meetup coming Saturday January 12, 2008. If you are interested in coming along take part in the discussion over at Wikipedia:Meetup/London7. The discussion is going on until tomorrow evening and the official location and time will be published at the same page late Thursday or early Friday. Hope to see you Saturday, Poeloq (talk) 02:23, 10 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bonkers1.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Bonkers1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:58, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:{{{1}}} edit

Thanks for uploading [[:Image:{{{1}}}]]. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:24, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:No Limit file.ogg edit

Thank you for uploading Image:No Limit file.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:41, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of DJ Dougal edit

 

An editor has nominated DJ Dougal, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Dougal and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 16:59, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

"Too lazy to google?" edit

No, I wasn't "too lazy to Google". I simply marked that statement as requiring a citation because the source provided didn't exist. That's a legitimate thing to do, and if you want to go around calling people names, I would suggest otherwise. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 06:44, 8 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

In response to your claims that I don't warn you, consider this your second warning. There will not be a third. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 07:41, 9 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
I've blocked you for 24 hours for persistently removing the warning and making personal attacks. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:04, 13 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
I would like it to be made clear that I haven't agreed with anything that you've said and I stand by all the comments I've made. You shouldn't be an administrator. You use the power you've got to get revenge on people you dislike. Your actions aren't in the interest of wikipedia. Technohead1980 (talk) 13:15, 13 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
You're welcome to maintain that view, but the fact remains that you have removed warnings from your Talk page as well as called me names. It is your behaviour that is the problem. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 22:14, 13 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Whatever you want to believe. Technohead1980 (talk) 08:41, 14 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to Wikipedia meetup in London edit

 
Wikimedia UK logo

Date: 13:00 onwards, Sunday 10 August 2008

Venue: Penderel's Oak pub, Holborn WC1 map

More information: Wikipedia:Meetup/London 12


Hello,

I noticed that you have listed yourself as a Wikipedian in London, so I thought you might like to come to one of our monthly social meetups. The next one is going to be on Sunday 10 August, which might well be rather short notice, but if you can't come this time, we try to have one every second Sunday of the month.

If you haven't been before, these meetups are mainly casual social events for Wikipedia enthusiasts in which we chat about Wikipedia and any other topics we fancy. It's a great way to meet some very keen Wikipedians, but we'd also love for you to come along if you're interested in finding out more about Wikipedia, other Wikimedia projects, or other collaborative wiki projects too.

The location is a pub that is quite quiet and family friendly on a Sunday lunchtime, so hopefully younger Wikipedians will also feel welcome and safe. Alcohol consumption is certainly not required!

Although the meetups are popular, many UK-based editors still don't know about them. It would be great to welcome some fresh faces, so I hope you can come along.

Yours,

James F. (talk) 09:27, 3 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please forgive the slightly impersonal mass-invite!

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice edit

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 07:39, 31 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Jackiey Budden edit

 

I have nominated Jackiey Budden, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackiey Budden (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Guy (Help!) 22:46, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Question edit

Hi. Do you have a reliable source for this change? Best regards, --Kanonkas :  Talk  07:40, 8 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ah okay. Would you be able to insert a source for this? Just stating Wikipedia isn't enough, we need a reliable source, which then states her name. Sorry, we just need to be absolutely source with such changes. Just paste the source here or on my talk page. Best regards, --Kanonkas :  Talk  19:37, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

London Wikimedia Fundraiser edit

Good evening! This is a friendly message from Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry, inviting you to the London Wikimedia Fundraising party on 19th December 2010, in approximately one week. This party is being held at an artistic London venue with room for approximately 300 people, and is being funded by Ed Saperia, a non-Wikipedian who has a reputation for holding exclusive events all over London. This year, he wants to help Wikipedia, and is subsidising a charity event for us. We're keen to get as many Wikimedians coming as possible, and we already have approximately 200 guests, including members of the press, and some mystery guests! More details can be found at http://ten.wikipedia.org/wiki/London - expect an Eigenharp, a mulled wine hot tub, a free hog roast, a haybale amphitheatre and more. If you're interested in coming - and we'd love to have you - please go to the ten.wikipedia page and follow the link to the Facebook event. Signing up on Facebook will add you to the party guestlist. Entry fee is a heavily subsidised £5 and entry is restricted to over 18s. It promises to be a 10th birthday party to remember! If you have any questions, please email me at chasemewiki at gmail.com.

Hope we'll see you there, (and apologies for the talk page spam) - Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 00:03, 13 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Contribution Team cordially invites you to Imperial College London

All Hail The Muffin Nor does it taste nice... 11:51, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

List of number-one dance hits from the 2000s edit

Hi there Technohead. I've noticed that a few years ago you created some articles that listed which were the number-one dance hits in the UK for the years 2000–2006, which is great, 'cos obviously we were missing them. But I was just wondering what your sources were – I've been comparing the lists to some web archive crawls of Radio 1's dance chart page, and some of them are showing different results. For example, this page suggests that "Do You Really Like It?" was number-one the week after "Up Middle Finger", but the Wikipedia article currently says that it was number-one the week after "You Are Alive", and that "Up Middle Finger" was never number-one at all. I'm not doubting the accuracy of what you've put, I was just curious as to what your source was. Thanks very much. A Thousand Doors (talk) 14:57, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
Hello, Technohead1980. You have new messages at A Thousand Doors's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
 
Hello, Technohead1980. You have new messages at A Thousand Doors's talk page.
Message added 00:14, 28 March 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply
Hello again Technohead. I've had a look through the histories of the lists of number-one dance hits from the 2000s, and, from what I can tell, what you originally put back in 2006 is the correct list. Sorry for doubting you. From the looks of things, during July of last year, a group of anonymous IPs (presumably all the same person) went through the lists and, for no apparent reason, changed a whole bunch of the entries so that they were completely different. It really is quite bizarre... Well, I've gone through and reverted them to what you had originally put. Hopefully they should now match the archive crawls of Radio 1's Dance Chart, although I've not had the chance to check them all yet. A Thousand Doors (talk)

Proposed deletion of Sarah Phillips edit

 

The article Sarah Phillips has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Intoronto1125TalkContributions 19:53, 16 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification edit

Hi. When you recently edited List of UK Indie Chart number-one singles of 2012, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Someone Like You (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Yorgo Voyagis edit

 

The article Yorgo Voyagis has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. BO | Talk 14:44, 30 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Digital Dog edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Digital Dog, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Drm310 (talk) 15:36, 25 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 15 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Erin Lordan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BBG (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 15 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Airi L for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Airi L is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Airi L until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Launchballer 09:46, 23 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 2 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of UK Dance Chart number-one singles of 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hey Brother (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for December 1 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hannah Wants, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Lorenzo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 1 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Kungs) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Kungs, Technohead1980!

Wikipedia editor Class455fan1 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

An article like this needed to be made since his song recently stormed up the charts.

To reply, leave a comment on Class455fan1's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Speedy deletion nomination of Hannah Wants edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello. A tag has been placed on Hannah Wants requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- HighKing++ 12:38, 12 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Technohead1980. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposing an article for deletion edit

I removed your attempt to Proposed for Deletion the article List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 1988 as you did not correctly place the Proposed Deletion template. To properly propose an article for deletion, place the text {{subst:Proposed deletion|1=Your reason for deletion.}}. That will cause a properly formatted Proposed Deletion template to appear. For more information, please refer to WP:PROD. Thanks. Safiel (talk) 18:07, 29 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Technohead1980. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 8 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of artists with the most UK top 10 singles, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Private Number and Don't Make Me Wait (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 8 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Tasha Killer Pussies for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tasha Killer Pussies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tasha Killer Pussies until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The editor whose username is Z0 20:09, 13 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Technohead1980. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

EO (rapper) moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, EO (Rapper), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Sam Sailor 13:29, 19 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: EO (rapper) has been accepted edit

 
EO (rapper), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KylieTastic (talk) 15:15, 23 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

2 Unlimited edit

I modified this line on the No Limits page to refer to the single releases rather than the album itself: "As their British record company PWL were dissatisfied with Ray Slijngaard's raps, the British version of this album replaced most of the raps with instrumental parts."

I find this misleading, since it only takes a purchase of the UK CD of the album to do such (I haven't). Also, the UK 7" issues for Tribal Dance and Faces had the regular "rap" mixes as the B-sides, and the final two singles (Maximum Overdrive and Let The Beat Control Your Body) were issued with the rap sections unaltered on the "Radio Edit" tracks.

Maybe it is referring to Get Ready, which was issued in a messy configuration in the UK? --TapLover (talk) 20:42, 25 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

I forgot this, but I believe the sources used for that line referred to "No Limit" only, specifically the "Techno, techno, techno, techno" part found in the UK single edit. Maybe you'll understand better now --TapLover (talk) 20:45, 25 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

What you've said isn't true. The UK version of the No Limits album had all the raps removed and for the reason that Pete Waterman thought Ray couldn't rap. Technohead1980 (talk) 13:59, 14 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:2 Unlimited - Faces album art.jpg edit

 

The file File:2 Unlimited - Faces album art.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Preferring the other (standard) image...

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 18 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:No Limit file.ogg listed for discussion edit

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:No Limit file.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 19 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:2 Unlimited - Faces album art.jpg listed for discussion edit

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2 Unlimited - Faces album art.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 21:57, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Well whatever that was all about, they've since deleted it. Typical deletionist Wikipedia! Technohead1980 (talk) 13:55, 14 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Dave McAleer edit

 

The article Dave McAleer has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz Read! Talk! 20:09, 2 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Arz (rapper) moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Arz (rapper), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz Read! Talk! 00:37, 13 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Why? There isn't any information on the article that has been referenced afaik Technohead1980 (talk) 11:40, 13 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Oh I think I see. It's because some of the websites only cater to that kind of music. Is that right? Technohead1980 (talk) 11:52, 13 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arz (rapper) has been accepted edit

 
Arz (rapper), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:36, 24 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:LTBCYB.jpg listed for discussion edit

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LTBCYB.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 06:28, 6 April 2024 (UTC)Reply