User talk:TTN/Archive 14
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | → | Archive 18 |
Petey Piranha
I was just trying to be bold when making it into an actual article. Can we chat a little on why not to make Petey an actual article before reverting again? Fire Emblem Freak! 17:43, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- The character does not and will not ever establish notability. There is absolutely no reasoning as to why it could possibly establish a full article. If you're insistent on keeping it around, I'll just end up putting it up for deletion, so it would be better to just keep it as a redirect. TTN (talk) 17:37, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
I see... Fine then. Just trying to help. Fire Emblem Freak! 17:43, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Please add your input on the debate at this page. I'm willing to abide by whatever decision you and other editors come to.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 00:32, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Additionally - if you did indeed put forward support for merging the Races page, could you please explain where? I wholly accept its merge, but I can't find anywhere where you voiced support for it, as was claimed.
- Also - I apologize if my comments on the talk page seem like an accusation at you. They aren't meant to, and I worded them extremely badly.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 00:36, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Category:Frankenstein characters
I am restoring the characters that you unilaterally removed on the grounds of the category's being "useless". If you believe the category is "useless" then nominate it for CFD. Otherwise please do not depopulate it without discussion. Thank you. Otto4711 (talk) 23:38, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- There is following necessary process and then there is just being unnecessarily bureaucratic. It only lists a few relevant characters, while the rest are trivial, so it should be easy to tell that it is just pointless. TTN (talk) 23:57, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- TTN I'd like to say your edits are great! I agree with the person who awarded you the barnstar below, and think you should keep up the good work. I don't believe that every fictional character from every movie, or every episode from every tv show, deserves it's own article. So keep it up, and I'll try to help (a good place for me to start is to see where others just decide to go and revert your edits, and boldly revert them). 128.223.131.21 (talk) 01:01, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
AfD summary context
I have a request. When you nominate fictional subjects for AfD, could you mention the fictional source in the AfD summary, rather than just saying "its series"? It seems you do this sometimes, Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Doctor_Septimus_Pretorius_(2nd_nomination), but not usually Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nick_Naylor, Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dimitri_the_Echidna, Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Willona_Woods. With such a high AfD volume, being able to tell at least which series you were working in would be helpful (and the third-to-last bullet point at WP:AFDHOWTO supports giving a little more context than you typically do.) gnfnrf (talk) 14:34, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- I guess that's something I'll try to remember. TTN (talk) 18:16, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Barnstar of Diligence
The Barnstar of Diligence | ||
For your many AfDs in the area of non-notable film characters. ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 19:18, 3 November 2008 (UTC) |
Feedback on template
You have a good sense of where fanboy enthusiasm gets in the way of the bigger picture, so can I get a second opinion about the need of User:Sgeureka/Carnivàle template? It is not used in any of the five Carnivàle articles at this time, all C subarticles are linked from the main article via hatnotes, but at least two of the C lists have to use SeeAlso sections to crossreference to other C articles. If even you are neutral on this, then this template would be alright in the eyes of most wikipedians and I'd move it to template space. – sgeureka t•c 09:05, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- I think it would probably be fine to use it. You can see them fairly clearly from the main article, but it certainly wouldn't hurt anything to connect them. I personally hate see also sections, so removing those is also a plus. TTN (talk) 18:24, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Interested in a demolition job?
TTN, since you have a reputation for AfD'ing non-notable fictional elements, would you be interested in taking a look at {{vmarsnav}}? Cornucopia and I are in the process of cleaning up and redirecting some of the content there, and we haven't gotten any pushback yet, but if you were going to go through that series of articles, what would you merge, redirect, or delete? Thanks! Jclemens (talk) 01:37, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- To TTN, EVERY fictional character is non-notable. If he had his way you'd get rid of everything. ----DanTD (talk) 05:37, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- Don't put words in other people's mouths. -- Ned Scott 05:51, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- Correct. DanTD, please read WP:CIVIL and WP:ATTACK. If you don't have anything constructive to say, don't bother saying anything. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 06:19, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- Well, excuse me for trying to prevent articles from being destroyed. I just had another image I uploaded tagged for deletion again because people like TTN are so eager to get rid of the articles they're attached to. If there were a way to say this without even sounding like I'm attacking him, I'd like to know what it is. ---DanTD (talk) 05:21, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- Not describing people with various titles, no strong bias-inducing words, and not jumping to conclusions. For example, respectively, calling User:Akradecki a "communist", saying articles are being "destroyed", and very promptly reuploading Image:Anti-Red China Poster.jpg, saying it was an unjust deletion. There are guidelines on what makes or breaks a contibution, and more often than not, something is removed because it's lacking something. Learn what you did wrong and just make sure it's done right, instead of finding a scapegoat. - Zero1328 Talk? 06:57, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- Did I call User:Akradecki a communist? I don't think so. Not unless he was originally under the user name User:Dzhugashvili, who did in fact proudly claim to be a communist. And judging by the age of Akradecki's user page, it's safe to say that he wasn't. And, a lot of articles are being destroyed, some of which are justified. ----DanTD (talk) 19:37, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- Not describing people with various titles, no strong bias-inducing words, and not jumping to conclusions. For example, respectively, calling User:Akradecki a "communist", saying articles are being "destroyed", and very promptly reuploading Image:Anti-Red China Poster.jpg, saying it was an unjust deletion. There are guidelines on what makes or breaks a contibution, and more often than not, something is removed because it's lacking something. Learn what you did wrong and just make sure it's done right, instead of finding a scapegoat. - Zero1328 Talk? 06:57, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- Well, excuse me for trying to prevent articles from being destroyed. I just had another image I uploaded tagged for deletion again because people like TTN are so eager to get rid of the articles they're attached to. If there were a way to say this without even sounding like I'm attacking him, I'd like to know what it is. ---DanTD (talk) 05:21, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
You might want to check the other Tiny Toons characters, none of them seem notable either. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 16:59, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Small request regarding your merges
I noticed that when you merged Abe (Oddworld) into Oddworld [1], you didn't name Abe (Oddworld) in your edit summary. When you are merging one article into another, could you please name the article you are merging in your edit summary, per the instructions at WP:MERGE:
- Save both [pages], and note the merger (including the page names) in the edit summaries. (This step is required in order to conform with §4(I) of the GFDL. Do not omit it or omit the page names.)
Thanks. Bláthnaid talk 22:27, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- Seeing as barely anyone else does it, it's generally just a waste of five seconds. If it becomes more common, I'll start doing it at that point. TTN (talk) 18:46, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- At the very least it might be a good idea to do it to set an example for others, since it says that it's a requirement to conform to the GFDL. It's only five seconds, right? - Zero1328 Talk? 11:38, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I've been doing it since I was a newbie. I was under the impression that it's best practise to name the articles. There needs to be some way of getting to the edit history of the article that has been merged. Isn't that part of the reason that an article that has been merged cannot be deleted? It would also be a good idea in case a conglomerate article full of information from many merged articles is transwikied to something like Wikia in the future. You are an active and high-profile editor and--like Zero1328 says--you would set an example for others. Bláthnaid talk 19:43, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- At the very least it might be a good idea to do it to set an example for others, since it says that it's a requirement to conform to the GFDL. It's only five seconds, right? - Zero1328 Talk? 11:38, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Dizzy Devil
No worries re: the re-direct, I don't think anyone expected it to be re-opened the same day. Have a nice day. StarM 20:44, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Your first BarnSakura
The Anime and Manga BarnSakura | ||
For without you we'd be drowning in anime and manga cruft. -- Goodraise (talk) 00:34, 13 November 2008 (UTC) |
And because you're too busy AfDing articles, keeping your userpage from being vandalized, and defending yourself against an incredible amount of shit, I went through your talk page archives and counted your awards, to remind you of how much your edits are valued. Here is the result:
(I took the liberty of counting 3 more exotic awards as whatever Barnstar I thought closest.) -- Goodraise (talk) 00:34, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Help me understand
Sorry if this is a silly question but we all have to start somewhere. What exactly do you mean when you say "This character does not establish notability independent of the Bartimaeus Trilogy". And could you give an example of a fictional character that does meet this criterion and why. Thank you. --Beligaronia (talk) 04:12, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Nominating multiple related articles for deletion
I noticed that you had nominated a number of related articles as seperate afds. For ease of nominating and discussion you can nominate related subjects in one single afd. See WP:BUNDLE for details how to do this. --neon white talk 00:40, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
- People often use mass nominations as an excuse to vote to keep them all. I like to avoid that possibility unless there are hundreds of closely related articles, where nominating groups of ten makes more sense. TTN (talk) 00:54, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Creed Diskenth
Greetings, if you don't mind, could you tell me why this article was deleted, was it because of the lack of references. OgasawaraSachiko (Talk) 12:32, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
- The article does not contain any real world information (reading over WP:WAF would help you) from reliable sources. It needs information detailed in WAF to stand as an article. TTN (talk) 14:12, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Kudos!
Hi TTN, just thought I'd drop by and say how much I appreciate the work you do at AfD. It seems as though you're one of the few people there who still remember that we do have standards for verifiability, notability and original research and that those standards should be upheld. Good work. Reyk YO! 14:20, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Careful
Hello there TTN. Can I ask you to be a little bit more careful when merging content? You removed content from List of Densetsu no Stafy characters[2] and placed it in Densetsu no Stafy (series)[3] but you didn't give any attribution in the edit summary so it's a violation of the GFDL at the minute. When readding the content to the new article, you should of linked to where you got it from in the edit summary, e.g. "Text taken directly from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Densetsu_no_Stafy_characters#Characters " - that's the only way our content license can be satisfied. Regards, Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 17:34, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- That wasn't being merged into the article. It was recently split out for no reason, so I just reverted both of them to their states before that. TTN (talk) 17:36, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
"See discussion"
Hey, I was patrolling in Huggle just a minute ago and notice your redirect on the List of Disgaea characters page, with the edit summary 'See the discussion'. I have looked at the AfD, and there is no consensus to merge - which discussion are you talking about? Thanks, — neuro(talk) 17:41, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- I was referring to the one on Talk:Disgaea (series). I didn't realize that he had removed the merge tag. Applying that the only person opposing it was due to style reasons (I didn't even end up doing what he was opposing anyway), and the common consensus that character lists for single games and mainly unrelated series such as this one don't require character lists, it's best to merge it. TTN (talk) 17:47, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- Hello, I came over from the VG wikiproject and I have a different solution I wish to present here. Rather than redirecting the list of characters that contains characters from at least three games (of the same series) to one game, I would offer my help in merging the recurring characters to Disgaea (series).
- Unfortunately, almost all of these characters appear with significant roles in all three games which may lead to redundancy in each of the game articles. It is for this reason that I am somewhat inclined to keep a character list. If we remove the character list, the main game articles would become needlessly long. If we keep the list, the character entries in each of the game articles can be trimmed and then linked to the list in question. A more long term approach would be to prepare the Disgaea (series) article to hold all recurring elements and characters that are shared among the games. A cleaner, better organized approach. What are your thoughts on this matter? DDDtriple3 (talk) 18:04, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- The main problem with trying to keep a main character list is that there really is absolutely no real content be used to build it. Besides basic personality details, everything else should be covered within the plot of the main games. It would basically amount to copying the current sections of the main articles and just pasting them right into it. I was planning on just listing Laharl, Flonne, Etna, Mid Boss, Baal, the Prism Rangers, and Pleinair in the series article. I'm just waiting to see what is actually going to become of it, as it may require that more characters be placed there also. TTN (talk) 18:18, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- Quite true, though it goes without saying that this is a problem that almost every character list article on WP has. Though, such a problem would also plague the series article if we started it with character entries. It is for that reason that I suggested 'preparing' that article first. Main elements in game play and universe, and then finally major recurring characters, for example.
- It is for the sake if being 'tidy' that I am inclined to keep the list. I admit I am more biased to trimming the several main articles and linking them to the series article. First to avoid redundant, copied information. Second to make three plus pages cleaner and shorter compared to leaving them in that state in favor of one less messy article.
- However, your plan can accomplish both tasks if it is carried out with some care. I am weary of editors who let their enthusiasm get in the way of improving WP. The phrase 'tread carefully' certainly applies here. To facilitate this, I will lend a hand to this task, since it appears you are my elder in terms of cleaning up and I am familiar with the content, that we may satisfy both policies and those enthusiastic editors who are adamant that every bit of content is preserved. DDDtriple3 (talk) 18:48, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- The main problem with trying to keep a main character list is that there really is absolutely no real content be used to build it. Besides basic personality details, everything else should be covered within the plot of the main games. It would basically amount to copying the current sections of the main articles and just pasting them right into it. I was planning on just listing Laharl, Flonne, Etna, Mid Boss, Baal, the Prism Rangers, and Pleinair in the series article. I'm just waiting to see what is actually going to become of it, as it may require that more characters be placed there also. TTN (talk) 18:18, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
Article for Deletion
Hey there. I saw that you nominated a bunch of articles at AfD recently. I wondered if you could consolidate them per this guideline, as it would make closing the deletion discussions a lot easier, and would make the decisions unified, rather than a possible scatterings of keeps, no consensi, and deletes. Thanks! - NuclearWarfare contact meMy work 23:39, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
- Last time I tried a larger group nomination, it was rejected as "being out of hand." Granted, that was with thirty articles, but I'm avoiding that possibility for now. TTN (talk) 23:40, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
- Try groups of 5-10 maybe. Eusebeus (talk) 05:47, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of List of Mischief Makers characters
An article that you have been involved in editing, List of Mischief Makers characters, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Mischief Makers characters. Thank you. Magioladitis (talk) 22:28, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Characters
Wanting to improve character articles is fine, but you know as well as anyone that real world information is required. You may not agree with the idea, but it still stands. Adding basic references and using a fairly sneaky summary to bring them back is not helping anything. Please continue to do so while AfDs and the such are in effect, but don't think that adding a single reference makes an article perfectly fine. Use Template:Splitsection or one of its variations if you think that an article is capable of standing on its own. TTN (talk) 16:24, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Please help us add references. Nominating them for deletion with templated and oftentimes inaccurate "rationales" is not helping anything and nor is unilaterally redirecting especially for ones in which the AfDs closed as "keep". Almost all of these articles can and should be improved and we would all appreciate your help in finding and adding references to these articles to better help our project's goals of being a comprehensive catalog of human knowledge. Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 16:26, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- I am not going to get into yet another argument over editing practices with you. We've been through that dozens of times already. Currently, you are just being disruptive and, you'll eventually force me to waste time placing those up for deletion, as I cannot edit war. The only reason any of those were kept is because of a few closers who refuse to close a couple AfDs with a "merge" result, and that very messy mass nomination. In a proper AfD, all of those will be turned into redirects or deleted. Allowing them to become and stay redirects now will fit with your standard of always keeping the history, so you should really be content with that. TTN (talk) 16:36, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- And please, use a summary like "I believe this article fits or could be improved to fit our standards, so I am bringing it back." or simply, "Restore." Using summaries like "Spacing" and "Format" is disruptive and not very kind. TTN (talk) 16:39, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Please be do not use disruptive and misleading edit summaries as you did here, here, and here, for example. This is exactly the sort of thing that gets people talking about an RfC to begin with. Please cut it out. HiDrNick! 17:00, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- If you disagree with a closing rationale I suggest taking that up with the closing admin. Accusing editors of being disruptive goes against assuming good faith and seems like a personal attack. It is best to focus on content. I agree that edit summaries should reflect the edits made. Redirecting or merging an article that recently closed as keep can seem disruptive, especially without seeking a consensus. ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:58, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- This wasn't only about the articles for deletion. He also did the same thing with two or three articles that had proper merge discussions behind them. TTN (talk) 18:39, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- If you disagree with a closing rationale I suggest taking that up with the closing admin. Accusing editors of being disruptive goes against assuming good faith and seems like a personal attack. It is best to focus on content. I agree that edit summaries should reflect the edits made. Redirecting or merging an article that recently closed as keep can seem disruptive, especially without seeking a consensus. ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:58, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
If you do not wish to argue, then that is fine as I also am not here to argue with anyone. I just wish you would help us sometimes with finding these references as I think a lot of time and energy is wasted/misdirected in AfDs. I think you would help diminish some of the criticisms you receive if you showed a greater willingness to compromise with your colleagues. I would be okay with merges and redirects if they are true merges and the redirects are not made unilaterally. But at the same time, one would expect topics that are mergeable and redirectable to not be AfDed. Just as I do argue to delete on occasion as seen most recently at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WoodyRimShot, I encourage you to help look for and add references on occasion as well. By the way, what do you think of these ideas? I would be curious what someone who usually has a different perspective than me thinks of some of these brainstorming ideas. Regards, --A NobodyMy talk 17:18, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- As I said, I do not wish to discuss editing practices. I've explained why I don't care about sources that much, and I've explained why I do not agree with your views. As for your proposal, I'm not really interested in community related things, so I don't have an opinion on it. TTN (talk) 18:39, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Regarding this, you had actually previously merged that information (see [4] and [5]) to the section where you say it already exists (that is why it exists there) and thus per the GFDL, my understanding is that the contributions of the various editors such as myself who originally wrote and worked on that content must remain visible, so when you say it is already covered in that section in the nomination and yourself merged the content a few weeks ago to the area where you are okay with it existing, the nomination strikes me as odd, because if you believes that section should exist, then we cannot delete the article, rather only redirect the article. Thus, you should withdraw that nomination and instead discuss the merge on the talk page. Finally, for some good humor, see User_talk:Casliber#Joke_for_today. Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 18:50, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- We don't have any sort of merge process that can stop somebody from logging out and undoing the redirect, so AfD is the best process for it. If the outcome is delete, anyone can have it brought back and redirected to keep the edit history. TTN (talk) 19:58, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Because you have merged content that other editors wrote to another article, per the GFDL, the article cannot be deleted. The edit history must remain public. In any event, I have to focus on grading finals and all, so I may not be able to reply quickly for the next few weeks. Just so it is clear I am not ignoring anyone, just focusing on real life priorities. So, take care in the meantime. Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 20:17, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- We don't have any sort of merge process that can stop somebody from logging out and undoing the redirect, so AfD is the best process for it. If the outcome is delete, anyone can have it brought back and redirected to keep the edit history. TTN (talk) 19:58, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Regarding this, you had actually previously merged that information (see [4] and [5]) to the section where you say it already exists (that is why it exists there) and thus per the GFDL, my understanding is that the contributions of the various editors such as myself who originally wrote and worked on that content must remain visible, so when you say it is already covered in that section in the nomination and yourself merged the content a few weeks ago to the area where you are okay with it existing, the nomination strikes me as odd, because if you believes that section should exist, then we cannot delete the article, rather only redirect the article. Thus, you should withdraw that nomination and instead discuss the merge on the talk page. Finally, for some good humor, see User_talk:Casliber#Joke_for_today. Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 18:50, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
I'm curious as to whether you'd support an editor merging some of the articles you've nominated, would that be enough to withdraw the nom or is your feeling once nominated it's best to go through with the process? Is the disadvantage of a merge the ease of recreating the character? Are there advantages to deleting? Just curious. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:10, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- Generally, I merge the articles that actually need to be merged. Most of those that I nominate are just complete junk that doesn't need to exist. If redirects could always stay redirects, I would be fine utilizing them all of the time, but that certainly isn't the case. TTN (talk) 18:31, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
- The big problem for these articles seems to be sourcing. Given the interest and enthusiasm to create them, they appear to be notable to many, just not wp: notable. Thanks for your response. Happy Holidays. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:05, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Several subcategories and no main category
Hi. What would you do in the following case: There is Category:The King of Queens characters with 3 (bad) articles that may very well be able to establish notability, but could also be merged (I am not interested in performing a merger). Then there is Category:King of Queens episodes with one (bad) article, but I don't intend to redirect it as it's a series finale and is likely notable. There is no Category:King of Queens. I have seen this with various TV show articles, but I am unsure how to proceed each time. – sgeureka t•c 16:47, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- I would probably move the articles from those smaller categories into the new main category, and have the now empty categories deleted. TTN (talk) 18:47, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Notice
See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Not_properly_attributing_contributions_in_merge_edit_summaries. Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 20:45, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- I really don't understand why there is a problem with using the r from merge template instead of using a method that has probably only been utilized in ten percent of all merged articles. TTN (talk) 21:04, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- My understanding is that we have to indicate where we merged from per the GFDL. I recall reading that in some places and have started to make sure that I attribute where I am merging from as seen here. My understanding is that it all has something to do with making sure people are properly acknowledged for their contributions and to prevent articles showing up at AfD that cannot be deleted due to a merge. Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 21:07, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- I know all about that, but that is also the purpose of the template. If we were to actually follow the GFDL word for word, we would actually have to merge the histories of any merged content. TTN (talk) 21:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- I am withdrawing the thread there as another user suggested we discuss at Help_talk:Merging_and_moving_pages#Merge_edit_summaries, which will probably be more constructive. Best, --A NobodyMy talk 04:51, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- I know all about that, but that is also the purpose of the template. If we were to actually follow the GFDL word for word, we would actually have to merge the histories of any merged content. TTN (talk) 21:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- My understanding is that we have to indicate where we merged from per the GFDL. I recall reading that in some places and have started to make sure that I attribute where I am merging from as seen here. My understanding is that it all has something to do with making sure people are properly acknowledged for their contributions and to prevent articles showing up at AfD that cannot be deleted due to a merge. Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 21:07, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
An alternate option is to use the {{merged|Merged_Article}}
template on talkpages afterwards, see e.g. Talk:List of recurring Earth characters in Stargate SG-1. While edit summaries are better, anyone can add these templates to talkpages. – sgeureka t•c 21:20, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Protection
I've gone ahead and fully move-protected your user/usertalk pages, given this page's history. If you'd like this removed or modified, let me know. I've not edit-protected them. seresin ( ¡? ) 01:00, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Warning
TTN, you've continued to remove content from articles and merge them into other articles without attributing the edits properly. When you merge content from one article, you need to state exactly where the content came from in the edit summary. An example would be using the edit summary "Adding content taken from List of Gantz Equipment" when placing the content into Ganz. Below are some merges you've done that do not offer proper attribution to satisfy the GFDL. Simply placing "merge" in the edit summary is not enough;
- [6], [7], and [8] merged to [9]
- [10] merged to [11]
- [12] merged to [13], which was challenged and then the challenge reverted with [14]
- [15] merged to [16]
- [17] merged to [18]
I'm not at all bothered about you actually merging the content, by all means do it, but if you fail to attribute the edits properly again I'm going to block you. Not satisfying the GFDL attribution requirement in edit summaries when merging content is extremely serious when it's the license that our editors choose to release their edits under. Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 16:52, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- I really have no idea why I have been using Template:R from merge if it doesn't apply to this kind of thing. Oh well, I guess I'll be one of the seven people that actually utilize this method, which doesn't even matter, given how 98% of merges will never be correctly attributed anyway. TTN (talk) 19:10, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Afd
- That is exactly the problem. When people claim the sources are valid, the best thing to do to get a solid discussion is to explain why the sources in the article or the ones people suggest aren't suitable (so it doesn't turn into a debate were people are dancing around the actual issue). Then it might actually unearth the basic cause of the disagreement so some sort of policy, guideline or consensus can be formed as to what is acceptable and what isn't. It helps people to get your line of thought.
On a side note: I believe there are two different sources. Ones that establish notability and ones that don't (because they're trivial for example) but would nevertheless be useful for verifiability. That's why I don't understand people nominating something verifiable for deletion just because it doesn't deserve a separate entry. - Mgm|(talk) 19:45, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Merges to Spirit (comics)
I'm not going to revert your edits, yet, but please explain to me why you merged a multitude of articles without prior discussion. If there was discussion, and I haven't found it, please point me to it. If I do decide to revert your edits, please don't start warring with me. Any way this may go, thank you for actually merging, and not just making each page a redirect. Tealwisp (talk) 20:59, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- They have very low traffic, so a merge discussion would likely only attract a couple people, if any. It is much easier to follow WP:BRD in cases like this. Only three of the articles have any sort of content, and the only one that is based from a real world perspective (White) is already covered. I do ask that if you wish to revert them, that you don't just revert them for the sake of forcing a discussion. That is counterproductive and unnecessarily bureaucratic. The only reason that they should be reverted is people have a problem with it because the articles can possibly follow WP:N and WP:WAF. TTN (talk) 21:08, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- I agree with you on the cases of Silken Floss and Sand Serif, but since The Octopus and Ebony White are referenced, I'm going to restore them. If you want to merge all four into a characters page, however, you can count on my support. Tealwisp (talk) 21:23, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- The only references The Octopus has are already covered within the film article, and White's controversy already has a section in the main article. They're currently nothing but redundant. TTN (talk) 21:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- Redundant references aren't great criteria for removal/redirection of an article, but I do think we should set up each of the character articles as one list, given the fact that none is very long, but they do have some content, and people are likely to try to view them more often with the film coming up. Tealwisp (talk) 22:18, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- My point was that you felt that the references meant something should gone over, but there is no real point in doing that if they're already covered. Do you know if that series has many more characters than that? I certainly wouldn't disagree with a list if it were to match the list of Preacher (comics), but the current details seem to be very small, leading them to be able to fit in the main article easily. TTN (talk) 22:27, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not very familiar with the Spirit, but this site has some. Not a reliable reference, I think, but it's a start. Tealwisp (talk) 23:01, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- There are only six more characters that need to be added following that. After removing the two not covered in that list, they should still fit in the main article. The Spirit doesn't seem to be a very plot oriented series unlike Preacher, which follows a single main storyline with a number of subplots. Given that the characters seem very simple (two sentences will be enough for about half of them), I don't think a list would be of much use. TTN (talk) 23:11, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed. Tealwisp (talk) 23:56, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- So do you care if the two leftover characters are redirected again for now? TTN (talk) 02:03, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- I suppose I'd be alright with it, but I'd feel better if we at least held a discussion on a project page. Tealwisp (talk) 19:34, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- So do you care if the two leftover characters are redirected again for now? TTN (talk) 02:03, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed. Tealwisp (talk) 23:56, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- There are only six more characters that need to be added following that. After removing the two not covered in that list, they should still fit in the main article. The Spirit doesn't seem to be a very plot oriented series unlike Preacher, which follows a single main storyline with a number of subplots. Given that the characters seem very simple (two sentences will be enough for about half of them), I don't think a list would be of much use. TTN (talk) 23:11, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not very familiar with the Spirit, but this site has some. Not a reliable reference, I think, but it's a start. Tealwisp (talk) 23:01, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- My point was that you felt that the references meant something should gone over, but there is no real point in doing that if they're already covered. Do you know if that series has many more characters than that? I certainly wouldn't disagree with a list if it were to match the list of Preacher (comics), but the current details seem to be very small, leading them to be able to fit in the main article easily. TTN (talk) 22:27, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- Redundant references aren't great criteria for removal/redirection of an article, but I do think we should set up each of the character articles as one list, given the fact that none is very long, but they do have some content, and people are likely to try to view them more often with the film coming up. Tealwisp (talk) 22:18, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- The only references The Octopus has are already covered within the film article, and White's controversy already has a section in the main article. They're currently nothing but redundant. TTN (talk) 21:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- I agree with you on the cases of Silken Floss and Sand Serif, but since The Octopus and Ebony White are referenced, I'm going to restore them. If you want to merge all four into a characters page, however, you can count on my support. Tealwisp (talk) 21:23, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- User:Tenebrae has reverted ebony white, and I think he'll probably want to force discussion, so shall we do it at Spirit's talk or a project page, given that it is for multiple merges? Tealwisp (talk) 02:14, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Cheers to the brave, mow'em down. I was, however, bemused to realise that WAF can mean something else than Wife acceptance factor. Hope you leave this one to stay. :)) NVO (talk) 21:27, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Afds of Zoids
I want to express my agreement that an article for each Zoid is unecessary, but I want to propose that, instead of deleting these articles, we merge them all into a list of Zoids. Would you object to that? Tealwisp (talk) 21:27, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- Besides Zoids that are important to a certain piece of media, there is absolutely nothing relevant that can be said about them. Given the sheer number of them, it is also impossible to have a decent quality for such a list either. It is much better to just cover the important Zoids within their main anime or video game, and let the rest of them just not be mentionedR. TTN (talk) 21:31, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- Believe it or not, I've dealt with this kind of situation before. Check out User:Tealwisp/Space Marine Chapters (which I have yet to get around to). It was AfD'd once as an indiscriminate list, but consensus was reached regarding its preservation. Once I cut it down severely, clean it, and organize it, it will be left in the mainspace. I think that's the best course of action regarding Zoids; it maintains the information that will be most useful without cluttering WP. I would offer to take such a list of Zoids under my wing, but I don't know which are most notable, aside from Liger Zero. Tealwisp (talk) 21:46, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- I don't really know anything about that other topic, but it really is a much different scenario. The only useful information is the animal type and special weaponry, while the rest is just complete junk. Each series has probably ten or so main Zoids that should be covered, so they should be good enough within those. Can you also respond to the above discussion? I've added the only useful reference from The Octopus to the film article, so that should reduce its weight a bit. TTN (talk) 21:52, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- Also, List of Zoids does exist. The current information with an additional sentence or two for each one would make up any possible content. There really is nothing that can make that look decent at all. TTN (talk) 22:00, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- Wouldn't it be worth mentioning notable pilots, fights, or histories? What about unique construction? By notable, I mean in-universe. You are certainly right; that list is less than admirable. If you are familiar with the Zoids universe, I think we should collaborate on the list. As an unfamiliar third-party, I can select the really non-notable stuff for removal, but with sympathy for inclusion, and you could help me with what content could be added.Tealwisp (talk) 22:12, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- The only Zoids that would have details like that are going to be those that have appeared in the different anime series, so they should probably be covered there in the first place. If I felt that they deserved coverage, I definitely would have merged them. It's just that nothing of quality will come from it in the end. If you saw the five hundred Pokemon articles in the past and look at the current lists of them, they're still complete trash. The only difference is that there are less extraneous details and articles overall. That'll likely be the same case with Zoids, but with even less details. TTN (talk) 22:23, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I think it would just take diligent work and a watchful eye. I think it would be best to redirect the articles to zoids for now, and discuss a compendium page on one of the relevant projects' talk page. That way, everyone can have their say. Tealwisp (talk) 22:36, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- There are currently under twenty articles not currently nominated, so I'd like to just finish up with the nominations over the next two days just to be uniform. You may want to look into establishing notability for the independent toy lines (Category:Zoids releases). If that is done, the specific Zoids from each of them could be covered within those articles. TTN (talk) 22:46, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- I can't find anything with a few googles, but I think we could find something with a stronger search. Let's put a post on the project page. Tealwisp (talk) 23:12, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- There are currently under twenty articles not currently nominated, so I'd like to just finish up with the nominations over the next two days just to be uniform. You may want to look into establishing notability for the independent toy lines (Category:Zoids releases). If that is done, the specific Zoids from each of them could be covered within those articles. TTN (talk) 22:46, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I think it would just take diligent work and a watchful eye. I think it would be best to redirect the articles to zoids for now, and discuss a compendium page on one of the relevant projects' talk page. That way, everyone can have their say. Tealwisp (talk) 22:36, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- The only Zoids that would have details like that are going to be those that have appeared in the different anime series, so they should probably be covered there in the first place. If I felt that they deserved coverage, I definitely would have merged them. It's just that nothing of quality will come from it in the end. If you saw the five hundred Pokemon articles in the past and look at the current lists of them, they're still complete trash. The only difference is that there are less extraneous details and articles overall. That'll likely be the same case with Zoids, but with even less details. TTN (talk) 22:23, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- Wouldn't it be worth mentioning notable pilots, fights, or histories? What about unique construction? By notable, I mean in-universe. You are certainly right; that list is less than admirable. If you are familiar with the Zoids universe, I think we should collaborate on the list. As an unfamiliar third-party, I can select the really non-notable stuff for removal, but with sympathy for inclusion, and you could help me with what content could be added.Tealwisp (talk) 22:12, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- Believe it or not, I've dealt with this kind of situation before. Check out User:Tealwisp/Space Marine Chapters (which I have yet to get around to). It was AfD'd once as an indiscriminate list, but consensus was reached regarding its preservation. Once I cut it down severely, clean it, and organize it, it will be left in the mainspace. I think that's the best course of action regarding Zoids; it maintains the information that will be most useful without cluttering WP. I would offer to take such a list of Zoids under my wing, but I don't know which are most notable, aside from Liger Zero. Tealwisp (talk) 21:46, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Re: Soul series discography
Do you still plan on putting that together? Otherwise, I'll probably merge them into the game articles at some point. TTN (talk) 01:19, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- Down the line. There are some reviews for the music on the whole so I should be able to make a solitary page similar to those for the Final Fantasy discographies PresN put together. I'm still busy with the character articles/other things on wikipedia/real life stuffs more at the moment though.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 01:27, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
AFDs
Ryan4314 (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, Go on smile! Cheers, and Happy editing!=)
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Per your recent AFD nominations I just wanted to send you some much deserved peace, Wikilove and karma. Even though I was a "keeper" on a few of them, I admire your bold editing and I don't think WP:BEFORE should void your nominations. Obviously if you'd of just tagged the articles etc, no one would've fixed em. Saying that, most of the noms are about un-notable subjects and no amount of "fixing" can change that. Ryan4314 (talk) 07:43, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- I also think it's stupid when people say you should've tried to discuss a merge/redirect on the article's talk page first. We all know that a redirect is essentially the same as deletion, and if you suggest that on a cruft article's talk page, only one person is gonna reply (often the only person whose watching), the author, and what's his response gonna be? LOL "yes your argument is soooo good, please feel free to redirect/delete my article!" No of course not, it's pure silliness. I don't know what they're talking about anyway, merge/redirect votes have long been the accepted practice at AFD. Ryan4314 (talk) 11:24, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Redirects
Hey there. What's with the redirect craze all of a sudden? ^^ Has a new policy been released recently? Or was it a AfD I missed? :-/ I just want to know the background, that is all (though I might have been nice to explain it in the edit summaries, to begin with...). --Koveras ☭ 11:17, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- The anime and manga project disliked a large number of character related AfDs, so I'm just redirecting the ones that don't need to be merged. Any that are resurrected will go to AfD afterward. TTN (talk) 13:31, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- Ah, I see. Do you perhaps have a link to the project discussion on this or something like that? I'm afraid I haven't paid much attention to what was going on there recently... EDIT: Btw, I've noticed you also redirected some VG soundtrack articles. What was the rationale with them? --Koveras ☭ 16:19, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- No, people were just commenting in anime related AfDs that it was annoying to have that many, so WP:BRD is the best thing to use in that case. I'm merging the soundtracks to their main articles due to the fact they'll likely never be able to establish independent notability. TTN (talk) 16:22, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- OK. :) --Koveras ☭ 16:36, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- I suppose its reasonable to mention, TTN, that you have been previous topic banned by arb com for redirecting articles in large numbers without discussion. The ban is expired now, but I'm surprised you are doing it just the same way again. I will leave it to others how to proceed. DGG (talk) 23:42, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- Uh, the arbcom thing was for edit warring, not for following BRD. Any that are reverted by someone other than a stalker anon are put up for deletion or discussed depending on the circumstances (though AfD is much more likely). TTN (talk) 23:44, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- I suppose its reasonable to mention, TTN, that you have been previous topic banned by arb com for redirecting articles in large numbers without discussion. The ban is expired now, but I'm surprised you are doing it just the same way again. I will leave it to others how to proceed. DGG (talk) 23:42, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- OK. :) --Koveras ☭ 16:36, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- No, people were just commenting in anime related AfDs that it was annoying to have that many, so WP:BRD is the best thing to use in that case. I'm merging the soundtracks to their main articles due to the fact they'll likely never be able to establish independent notability. TTN (talk) 16:22, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- Ah, I see. Do you perhaps have a link to the project discussion on this or something like that? I'm afraid I haven't paid much attention to what was going on there recently... EDIT: Btw, I've noticed you also redirected some VG soundtrack articles. What was the rationale with them? --Koveras ☭ 16:19, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
AFDs for Wunderland and We Made It
Further to your AFD notification on my talk page, note that I initially created these items as redirects and therefore have no vested interest in them. I suggest you notify the person who first added some actual content - namely User:Kuralyov. --TheParanoidOne (talk) 00:23, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- That is just an semi-automated tool doing the notifications, not me specifically. TTN (talk) 00:26, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Request at ArbCom
A request has been filed to have your restrictions reenacted and extended. See Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Request to amend prior case: TTN. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 20:28, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
Do not reopen closed AfD discussions
I have never edited any articles related to the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Risa Harada discussion. Please do not reopen closed discussions again. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 20:47, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
- Because you obviously never have been in a direct dispute with me or anything. TTN (talk) 21:08, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
- Whether or not I've ever had a disagreement with you is irrelevant. In this case, you are gaming the system by nominating articles which are already being handled through more effective methods. While your behavior over the last while has certainly improved, you are still taking the heavy-handed approach to most everything you do.
- You really need to learn to work better with others rather than appearing to be constantly seeing what you can do to irritate as many people as possible. There are a finite number of editors working on various things, and your current methods only seem to overwhelm them with too much to do in too little time. Wikipedia has no deadline, so it would be more effective and more productive of you to find some way to accomplish the good work you are trying to do without alienating almost everyone who runs into you. Yes, there are many, many articles all over Wikipedia which need work (some more than others), but they do not all need to be fixed this instant. Wikipedia is a work in progress, and things are already moving in a positive direction. How about helping that along rather than causing even more work? ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 22:00, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
The articles listed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daiki Niwa were already being discussed for merger, so there was absolutely no reason to nominate them for deletion. Please stop gaming the system. This is your last warning. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 22:43, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
This is getting really old, TTN. You know that all of the D.N.Angel characters are being discussed for merger, yet you keep [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Mousy |nominating]] them. Stop it now. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 00:32, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
- You do realize that all four nominations were started right after each other, right? The last two were not even part of the merge discussion in the first place, so it seems fairly silly to also close those just because Collectonian is pretending that this merge discussion wouldn't still be up next year if I hadn't touched it. TTN (talk) 00:43, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
- Please assume good faith on the part of Collectonian. She has done an excellent job in getting rid of articles which shouldn't exist, merging articles which belong together, and generally improving anime and manga articles on Wikipedia. There has been a huge improvement in the quality of anime and manga articles since she came along. In fact, I would recommend following her example as a way for you to improve the way you work on Wikipedia. She caused quite a stir when she first came around (just as you are doing), but she settled into things quite a while ago and has been an excellent force for improvement ever since. I strongly encourage you to take a page from her book and seriously change your MO. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 01:38, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
- ANd yes, looking at them, I can see they were all nominated at similar times. I apologize for assuming they were done after I had issued the prior warnings. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 01:45, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
- My apologies here as well as I didn't realize you did them within close proximity. As for "pretending that this merge discussion wouldn't still be up next" - if you mean January, well, maybe, but if you mean 2010, then that's rather insulting. I left the merge discussion to go a good month because of the outright hell I went through in the Dragon Ball character merges because the discussions closed after only 2 weeks. And if you looked at the actual Clean up task force page, you will see that I am the one who already volunteered to do the merge here, as well as the one on another large character list, while also attempting several extensive article redos, and prepping two other lists (one character - which did all told take about a year to redo from pure unsourced, OR ridden crap with tons of subarticles to near-FLC ready, one episode) for FLCs. I'm sorry if I can't work at the speed you are desiring, but the work will be done a lot sooner than "next year." As you already noted, neither the lists, nor the character articles have much referencing, as such I'd rather finish my two FLCs, which don't need as much work, before I start another extensive character list renovation. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 02:40, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
- Given that an anon started the discussion, I was assuming that this was one of those discussions that just gets lost in time (like most merge discussions that don't receive any attention for over a month), so I apologize for thinking that you had no plans for it. Still, my main problem was that you insisted on reverting the articles despite the fact that nothing needs to be merged. I compared the list to the articles beforehand, and I certainly saw nothing that a simple cleanup by someone that knows the series wouldn't cover. If anything relevant can be merged, it could have easily been done from the redirects rather than the actual article. Now, there are still eleven bad article that would take twenty minutes roughly merge into the article instead just a single list that requires some cleanup. It just seemed like you were unnecessarily forceful in trying to keep with a schedule of sorts that really didn't matter, so I just did something just as forceful. TTN (talk) 20:33, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Re:Zoids articles
Can I make the request to not be notified about the deletion of Zoids-related articles, as despite being the creator of many of them, I do not care about their fates.
On a related note, based on some of the comments regarding 'important' Zoids, you may want to avoid any of the Ligers (Shield Liger, Blade Liger, Liger Zero, Murasame Liger), the Command Wolf, and the 'Geno' line (Geno Saurer, Geno Breaker, Berserk Fury), as these particular Zoids had major roles in several of the anime series, as well as significant roles in the Battle Story and video games (which are broadly unrelated to the anime). -- saberwyn 01:07, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
- Saberwyn, if you do have some advice about which should be deleted and which not, I'd think you'd want to be notified so you could say so at the deletion discussions, which is where it matters. DGG (talk) 05:48, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
My Banjo-Tooie edits
While I understand your decision to revise my edits since they placed unnecessary headers under the characters section, you also neglected to see the other edits I made to the character descriptions, which were revised since the previous descriptions poorly versed the information, and were much too clumped together. You undid much of my work and I'd like a rectification on your part, please. PsychoJosh (talk) 08:25, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
u can has broom
Jack's very-own Broomstar | ||
Awarded for inspiring efforts at clearing out the trash. |
I made you a cookie, but it got AfD'd
Hey, it's late and my ingenuity's shot at this time of hour. Whatever the case Merry Christmas TTN, looking forward to many discussions with you and occasionally against you in the future man.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 04:00, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Have a happy New Year
Concerning dragonball redirects and mergers
Hello TTN. Please listen carefully. Please do not remove or merge or summarize the Zarbon and Dodoria sections. There are a slew of lesser characters (more than half the characters on the page). They are major characters in their sagas and it was already wrong that they were merged and didn't get their own separate pages like Frieza. But to summarize the major characters into one tiny section called Frieza's empire would be like committing a sin, generally speaking. They deserve to have their small sections at the least. Please do not do anything like that without bringing it up for discussion in the talk page. It was already a mistake to have deleted the pages that the characters had initially had to themselves. But now to actually go and completely remove character profiles would be an erroroneous step on your part. I will relay this message to anyone else who was involved with the mergers, including Tintor2. If you want to contest this, you can discuss it in the talk page, but you will find that there are a slew of lesser appearing, less important characters in the page that still need to be merged into sections way before the likes of major characters are ever merged. Zarbon (talk) 02:28, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:Mx0characters.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Mx0characters.JPG. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 18:33, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:Prinnyart.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Prinnyart.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 12:07, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello. Would you (and perhaps others reading this popular talk page) like to take a look at these character pages and take appropriate action? Cheers. The JPStalk to me 20:04, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'm on it. The five stubby character pages and Other characters in The Brittas Empire simply get bold-merged into List of The Brittas Empire characters. – sgeureka t•c 20:28, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
- Good luck... This editor has quite an idiosyncratic style. (Apologies to TTN for using his talk page). The JPStalk to me 20:41, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Sub-3KB episode articles
If you're interested, the following 1236 episode articles are either 1KB or 2KB long (sorted in descending order). It may be worth going through and checking them/merging them. Sceptre (talk) 11:26, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- A few hundred of them are already on my todo list (I tagged them and have since been sitting out the recommended few weeks/months to "give editors some time to address the issues"), so don't be surprised if a considerable portion gets dealt with by me too. Better stay away from The Outer Limits ones for a few months though - a recent merge debate was closed as no consensus. – sgeureka t•c 15:16, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Still, most sub-5k articles are solely plot and might be better as redirects/merges to LOEs. It's only when you hit around 8KB that real-world context tends to pop up (see Flashes Before Your Eyes). Sceptre (talk) 20:07, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Full agreement, but when enough fans say don't merge this 2kB stub, then there is not going to be a merger. *shrugs* Moving on... :-) – sgeureka t•c 20:17, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- The real problem isn't the length but the contents--if either an article or a section is going to describe the plot it has to actually describe the plot , including the ending, not be a teaser.My real objection to most of the combination articles is that they are in fact just teasers. concicse they should certainly be, but that does not mean to omit the ending. with better written material, it would be easier to agree on how to handle it. DGG (talk) 23:52, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Full agreement, but when enough fans say don't merge this 2kB stub, then there is not going to be a merger. *shrugs* Moving on... :-) – sgeureka t•c 20:17, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Still, most sub-5k articles are solely plot and might be better as redirects/merges to LOEs. It's only when you hit around 8KB that real-world context tends to pop up (see Flashes Before Your Eyes). Sceptre (talk) 20:07, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- A few hundred of them are already on my todo list (I tagged them and have since been sitting out the recommended few weeks/months to "give editors some time to address the issues"), so don't be surprised if a considerable portion gets dealt with by me too. Better stay away from The Outer Limits ones for a few months though - a recent merge debate was closed as no consensus. – sgeureka t•c 15:16, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- The Posthumous Collection (2 kB)
- Chinoiserie (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Broadcast to the Empire (2 kB)
- Secret Admirer (Frasier) (2 kB)
- Examination Day (2 kB)
- Space (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- The Hunger Artist (CSI) (2 kB)
- Boo (CSI: NY episode) (2 kB)
- Turk Flu (2 kB)
- Series 1: Episode 7 (Life on Mars) (2 kB)
- When the Spirit Moves You (2 kB)
- Renaissance Man (Star Trek: Voyager) (2 kB)
- Mandatory Minimums (2 kB)
- Skin Deep (The Outer Limits) (2 kB)
- Wish Bank (The Twilight Zone) (2 kB)
- Iced (CSI) (2 kB)
- Who's Your Daddy? (House) (2 kB)
- The Late Dr. Crane (2 kB)
- The LSD Story (2 kB)
- The Special One (The Outer Limits) (2 kB)
- First Flight (Enterprise) (2 kB)
- Human Trials (The Outer Limits) (2 kB)
- The Truth (Seinfeld) (2 kB)
- Worlds Apart (The Outer Limits) (2 kB)
- The Beginning (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- Demon (Star Trek: Voyager) (2 kB)
- Mother Load (part II) (2 kB)
- Tsunkatse (2 kB)
- Bright Boy (2 kB)
- Retrospect (Star Trek: Voyager) (2 kB)
- The Devil's Threesome (2 kB)
- Pas de Deux (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Was It Good For You? (2 kB)
- Monsters! (2 kB)
- Nisei (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- Hostage (CSI: NY episode) (2 kB)
- Dowisetrepla (2 kB)
- Rich Hank, Poor Hank (2 kB)
- The Ticket (Seinfeld) (2 kB)
- Accession (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine) (2 kB)
- To Tell the Truth (The Outer Limits) (2 kB)
- Last Laugh (CSI) (2 kB)
- Rivals (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine) (2 kB)
- A Murderer Among Us (2 kB)
- Business as Usual (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine) (2 kB)
- Talitha Cumi (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- Phantom (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Bartlet for America (2 kB)
- Long John Peter (2 kB)
- Caged (CSI) (2 kB)
- The Visa (2 kB)
- Rite of Passage (The Outer Limits) (2 kB)
- Living Hell (The Outer Limits) (2 kB)
- The Cold (2 kB)
- Faith Based Initiative (2 kB)
- Untitled Sketch (2 kB)
- Suite Sorrow (2 kB)
- The Placeholder (Frasier episode) (2 kB)
- Fear Itself (The Outer Limits) (2 kB)
- The Unusual Suspect (2 kB)
- Shadows and Symbols (2 kB)
- Anchors Away (SATC episode) (2 kB)
- Life Support (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine) (2 kB)
- Grandma Got Run Over By a Reindeer (Grey's Anatomy) (2 kB)
- The Movie (2 kB)
- The Letter (Seinfeld) (2 kB)
- Bull (CSI) (2 kB)
- Dream Cruise (2 kB)
- Darkness Ascending (2 kB)
- The Switch (Kappa Mikey episode) (2 kB)
- Courtship (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Blues for Sister Someone (2 kB)
- Past Tense (Private Practice) (2 kB)
- The Hunt (The Outer Limits) (2 kB)
- Room Full of Heroes (Frasier) (2 kB)
- Inauguration, Part I (2 kB)
- The Star (The Twilight Zone) (2 kB)
- Time's Orphan (2 kB)
- Exile (Star Trek: Enterprise) (2 kB)
- Nesting Dolls (CSI) (2 kB)
- To Thine Old Self Be True (2 kB)
- Duck and Cover (The West Wing) (2 kB)
- Counterweight (The Outer Limits) (2 kB)
- A Race Through Dark Places (2 kB)
- Dreadnought (Star Trek: Voyager) (2 kB)
- Soldiers of the Empire (2 kB)
- Lying Down With Dogs (2 kB)
- The Ex-Girlfriend (2 kB)
- The Trouble with Women (2 kB)
- The Magnificent Ferengi (2 kB)
- Quarantine (The Twilight Zone) (2 kB)
- The Benign Prerogative (2 kB)
- Josh (The Outer Limits) (2 kB)
- Confessions and Lamentations (2 kB)
- In Theory (2 kB)
- Demons (Star Trek: Enterprise) (2 kB)
- Goodbye To All That (Third Watch) (2 kB)
- The Lame Duck Congress (2 kB)
- A Man, a Plan, and a Gal: Julia (2 kB)
- The Dream Lover (The O.C. episode) (2 kB)
- Give Me a Ring Sometime (2 kB)
- The Accused Is Entitled (2 kB)
- The Taxman Cometh (2 kB)
- Stratagem (Star Trek: Enterprise) (2 kB)
- In Lieu of Johnson (Third Watch) (2 kB)
- Deathtrap (Frasier episode) (2 kB)
- Home Brew (2 kB)
- A New Position for Roz (2 kB)
- Roz, a Loan (2 kB)
- Qpid (2 kB)
- Ashes to Ashes (Star Trek: Voyager) (2 kB)
- The Tabloid (Matlock episode) (2 kB)
- Apocrypha (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- Band-Aid Covers the Bullet Hole (2 kB)
- E.B.E. (2 kB)
- Interface (Star Trek: The Next Generation) (2 kB)
- The Spoils (Rome) (2 kB)
- Stirred (2 kB)
- Love Story (M*A*S*H) (2 kB)
- Prey (Star Trek: Voyager) (2 kB)
- Camp Fear (CSI episode) (2 kB)
- Maledictus (2 kB)
- Murder on the Rising Star (2 kB)
- Rooms with a View (2 kB)
- Family (Masters of Horror episode) (2 kB)
- Return to Grace (2 kB)
- Homefront (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine) (2 kB)
- Pilot (Californication) (2 kB)
- Scuba Doobie-Doo (2 kB)
- Mr. Frost (2 kB)
- Dreamland (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- The Spirit (Third Watch) (2 kB)
- No Exit (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- From Within (The Outer Limits) (2 kB)
- His Story IV (2 kB)
- What Have I Done to Deserve This? (Grey's Anatomy) (2 kB)
- Ex Stasis (2 kB)
- Dia-BILL-ic Shock (2 kB)
- Two Fathers (2 kB)
- The Beacon (The Twilight Zone) (2 kB)
- Mr. Monk and the Big Reward (2 kB)
- Blood (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- Serving Two Masters (Private Practice) (2 kB)
- The Good (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Champagne for My Real Friends, Real Pain for My Sham Friends (2 kB)
- Daphne Does Dinner (2 kB)
- Masquerade (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- The Probe (2 kB)
- On Fire (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Fresh Bones (2 kB)
- Charity Bounce (2 kB)
- We Two Kings (2 kB)
- Captive Pursuit (2 kB)
- Sgt. Wilson's Little Secret (2 kB)
- Mother Earth (The Green Green Grass) (2 kB)
- Anywhere But Here (Third Watch) (2 kB)
- Change of Life (Goodies episode) (2 kB)
- The Adversary (2 kB)
- Judgment Day (The Outer Limits) (2 kB)
- Innocence (Star Trek: Voyager) (2 kB)
- The Conversion (Seinfeld) (2 kB)
- Initiations (Star Trek: Voyager) (2 kB)
- The Hamptons (Seinfeld) (2 kB)
- Momma Mia (2 kB)
- See Me (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Voices of Authority (2 kB)
- Testimony of Evil (Dead Men Don't Laugh) (2 kB)
- Nailed (CSI episode) (2 kB)
- Vendetta for a Dead Man (2 kB)
- Dodonuts (2 kB)
- Caged Fury (The Legend of Tarzan) (2 kB)
- The Two Hundredth (2 kB)
- The Counter-Clock Incident (2 kB)
- Take My Life...Please! (2 kB)
- Bodies of Evidence (The Outer Limits) (2 kB)
- Tempting Faith (Private Practice) (2 kB)
- Phobos Rising (2 kB)
- Episode Five (The Office, Series Two) (2 kB)
- The Pez Dispenser (2 kB)
- Weapons Grade Life (2 kB)
- Pilot (Sabrina) (2 kB)
- Death Roe (2 kB)
- False-Hearted Judges (2 kB)
- Organ Grinder (2 kB)
- A Ticket Grows in Brooklyn (Third Watch) (2 kB)
- The Groundhog Day (The O.C. episode) (2 kB)
- For the Good of the Outfit (2 kB)
- White Gold (M*A*S*H) (2 kB)
- The Pony Remark (2 kB)
- Police Story (Frasier episode) (2 kB)
- Can You Hear Me Now? (CSI: NY episode) (2 kB)
- Chess Pains (2 kB)
- Come Lie with Me (2 kB)
- Flower Child (The Outer Limits) (2 kB)
- Anasazi (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- The Clip Show (2 kB)
- Tomorrow (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- All Souls (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- Who Killed Cock Robin? (Randall and Hopkirk Deceased) (2 kB)
- In the Dark (Law & Order: Criminal Intent) (2 kB)
- The Red and the Black (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- Prototype (George Lopez) (2 kB)
- Cross Jurisdictions (2 kB)
- The Guests (The Outer Limits) (2 kB)
- The Texas Panhandler (2 kB)
- An Affair to Forget (2 kB)
- Bem (Star Trek: The Animated Series) (2 kB)
- The Goodies – Almost Live (2 kB)
- New Lease (The Outer Limits) (2 kB)
- A Passing Fancy (Frasier episode) (2 kB)
- Chip Off the Ol' Block (2 kB)
- Bloodlines (Star Trek: The Next Generation) (2 kB)
- Junior Agent (2 kB)
- Good Grief (Frasier) (2 kB)
- Fraternal Schwinns (2 kB)
- After the Show (CSI) (2 kB)
- The Bad Son (2 kB)
- The Invisible Enemy (The Outer Limits) (2 kB)
- Much Too Much (2 kB)
- Diamond Dogs (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- The Love You Fake (2 kB)
- Keep Young and Beautiful (2 kB)
- Reality Bites (Step By Step) (2 kB)
- If She Dies (The Twilight Zone) (2 kB)
- Hungry Heart (Frasier episode) (2 kB)
- 20 Hours in America, Part II (2 kB)
- Off the Hook (Happy Tree Friends) (2 kB)
- The Man, The Myth, The Viagra (2 kB)
- Tempus Fugit (2 kB)
- The Itch (2 kB)
- Blood Oath (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine) (2 kB)
- Terra Firma (Farscape episode) (2 kB)
- Sex Club (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Objects at Rest (2 kB)
- The Interrogation (2 kB)
- Nuttin' but the Tooth (2 kB)
- Infection (Babylon 5) (2 kB)
- It Takes Two to Tangle (2 kB)
- Dark Rain (The Outer Limits) (2 kB)
- Inert Dwarf (2 kB)
- Bill’s House (2 kB)
- Detour (Frasier episode) (2 kB)
- Six Meetings Before Lunch (2 kB)
- Grail (Babylon 5) (2 kB)
- Paper Hearts (2 kB)
- Out of Body (The Outer Limits) (2 kB)
- Wrecking Crew (CSI: Miami episode) (2 kB)
- The Jihad (2 kB)
- The Lonely Herdsman (2 kB)
- Pollution (Goodies episode) (2 kB)
- The Brain of Colonel Barham (2 kB)
- A Time to Stand (2 kB)
- Dreams for Sale (2 kB)
- The Harassed (2 kB)
- I'm Listening (2 kB)
- Holiday (Goodies episode) (2 kB)
- Mad Hops (2 kB)
- Bill, Bulk and the Body Buddies (2 kB)
- Women's Lib (Goodies episode) (2 kB)
- Seeds (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- And Then There Were None (CSI) (2 kB)
- Big Crane on Campus (2 kB)
- Lazarus (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- Legal Tender Love and Care (2 kB)
- Let the Seller Beware (2 kB)
- The Chick Chop Flick Shop (2 kB)
- Kim (M*A*S*H) (2 kB)
- Sweet Sorrow (2 kB)
- Shake Your Groove Thing (Grey's Anatomy) (2 kB)
- Gone Quiet (2 kB)
- The Dog that Rocks the Cradle (2 kB)
- Ship of Fools (Kappa Mikey episode) (2 kB)
- The Gift (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Swiss Diplomacy (2 kB)
- Frankenfido (2 kB)
- Gum Drops (2 kB)
- War of Nerves (M*A*S*H) (2 kB)
- Prisoner (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Heart of Stone (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine) (2 kB)
- A Special Edition (2 kB)
- Schizogeny (2 kB)
- The Chain of Screaming (2 kB)
- Juvenilia (Frasier episode) (2 kB)
- Shapes (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- The Cloud (Star Trek: Voyager) (2 kB)
- The Terratin Incident (2 kB)
- The Special Relationship (2 kB)
- Access (The West Wing) (2 kB)
- Goodies and Politics (2 kB)
- Up in Smoke (CSI) (2 kB)
- Juggernaut (Star Trek: Voyager) (2 kB)
- Eleven Angry Jurors (2 kB)
- Lord John Marbury (The West Wing) (2 kB)
- The Vanished Sea (2 kB)
- The Red Mass (2 kB)
- All things (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- Blind Spot (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Once Upon a Time (Star Trek: Voyager) (2 kB)
- Three Blind Dates (2 kB)
- The Abandoned (DS9 episode) (2 kB)
- Wake Up Walmington (2 kB)
- Things Past (2 kB)
- The Voyager Conspiracy (2 kB)
- And Frasier Makes Three (2 kB)
- Night Five (2 kB)
- Darkness Falls (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- The War at Home (The West Wing) (2 kB)
- Sticky Wicket (2 kB)
- Fifteen Minutes (The Green Green Grass) (2 kB)
- Lust in Translation (2 kB)
- Save Me (Grey's Anatomy) (2 kB)
- Drive (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- Cruise to Nowhere (2 kB)
- Tru Love (2 kB)
- Awakening (Star Trek: Enterprise) (2 kB)
- The Final Curtain (The Green Green Grass) (2 kB)
- Sea Bee Jeebies (2 kB)
- Flipped (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Miss Right Now (2 kB)
- Saving Face (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Begin the Begin (Grey's Anatomy) (2 kB)
- Let It Be (Grey's Anatomy) (2 kB)
- Self-Made (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Series 1: Episode 6 (Life on Mars) (2 kB)
- Cuba Libre (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- The Tentacled Forest (2 kB)
- Turn of the Screws (2 kB)
- Inga Fossa (2 kB)
- Pilat (Maalaala Mo Kaya episode) (2 kB)
- If You Go Down to the Woods (2 kB)
- Beast (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- The Babysitter (Frasier episode) (2 kB)
- The Cosmic Comet (2 kB)
- The Host (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- Unnatural Selection (The Outer Limits) (2 kB)
- Hospital for Hire (Goodies episode) (2 kB)
- The Time Trap (Star Trek: The Animated Series) (2 kB)
- Crisis (M*A*S*H) (2 kB)
- Pro-Life (Masters of Horror episode) (2 kB)
- Personal Demons (The Twilight Zone) (2 kB)
- The Shadow Man (2 kB)
- Crime and Punishment (Private Practice) (2 kB)
- Deja Vu (The Outer Limits) (2 kB)
- The Producer (2 kB)
- Edwina (M*A*S*H) (2 kB)
- How Do You Spell Belief? (Third Watch) (2 kB)
- The Pilot (Waterman Episode) (2 kB)
- Chubbie Chumps (2 kB)
- Acts of Contrition (2 kB)
- Arctic Radar (2 kB)
- Fury (Third Watch) (2 kB)
- What's Eating Gilbert Grissom? (2 kB)
- The Elevator (The Twilight Zone) (2 kB)
- Resistance (Star Trek: Voyager) (2 kB)
- Folie a Deux (2 kB)
- The General (The Prisoner) (2 kB)
- The Women of Qumar (2 kB)
- Grotesque (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- Jackpot (CSI) (2 kB)
- Tiny Machines (2 kB)
- Tears of the Prophets (2 kB)
- Gropos (2 kB)
- Don't Go Breaking My Heart (Frasier episode) (2 kB)
- They're Tearing Down Tim Riley's Bar (2 kB)
- Shibboleth (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Valley of the Twenty Something Guys (2 kB)
- Three Valentines (2 kB)
- Purgatory (Law & Order: Criminal Intent Episode) (2 kB)
- Still Life (The Twilight Zone) (2 kB)
- Who's Zoomin' Who? (Grey's Anatomy) (2 kB)
- Tuxedo Hill (2 kB)
- Siren Call (2 kB)
- Take Me Out to the Ballgame (SATC episode) (2 kB)
- View from up Here (2 kB)
- Leviathan (Harsh Realm) (2 kB)
- Proud Flesh (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Beyond the Veil (The Outer Limits) (2 kB)
- Atonement (Babylon 5) (2 kB)
- To the Bone (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Dreamland II (2 kB)
- Kenny on the Couch (2 kB)
- Mind War (2 kB)
- The Chicken from Outer Space (2 kB)
- 2Shy (2 kB)
- The Monogamists (2 kB)
- My Good Name (2 kB)
- Damage Case (2 kB)
- Porno Gil (Curb Your Enthusiasm) (2 kB)
- Glitch (The Outer Limits) (2 kB)
- Extreme Measures (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine) (2 kB)
- Leaving Las Vegas (CSI) (2 kB)
- Time Stands Still (Degrassi: The Next Generation) (2 kB)
- Bully for Martin (2 kB)
- Equal and Opposite (Private Practice) (2 kB)
- Documentary Special (2 kB)
- Horizon (Enterprise) (2 kB)
- Silver Lining (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- How Sharper Than a Serpent's Tooth (2 kB)
- The Aenar (2 kB)
- Two Days and Two Nights (2 kB)
- Welcome Home (Third Watch) (2 kB)
- The Tape (2 kB)
- Don't Ever Change (House) (2 kB)
- Stalker (CSI) (2 kB)
- 10-7 (2 kB)
- Best Defense (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- World's Fair (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Collective (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Deal Me Out (2 kB)
- No Humans Involved (CSI) (2 kB)
- Big Mac (M*A*S*H) (2 kB)
- Felonious Monk (2 kB)
- In Their Own Words (Third Watch) (2 kB)
- Life on Mars (The West Wing) (2 kB)
- Graveyard Desert (2 kB)
- Post Mortem (CSI) (2 kB)
- All for Our Country (2 kB)
- In the Room (2 kB)
- Bombshell (CSI: Miami episode) (2 kB)
- Match Game (Frasier episode) (2 kB)
- Bystand Me (2 kB)
- Afterimage (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine) (2 kB)
- Hooping Cranes (2 kB)
- Depths (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Fathers and Sons (Frasier episode) (2 kB)
- The Bracelet (Curb Your Enthusiasm) (2 kB)
- Burn Out (CSI) (2 kB)
- Moments of Transition (2 kB)
- Ellie (CSI) (2 kB)
- Cranes Go Caribbean (2 kB)
- Pusher (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- The Black Cat (Masters of Horror episode) (2 kB)
- Process Stories (2 kB)
- The Long Dark (2 kB)
- Consumed (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Parturition (Star Trek: Voyager) (2 kB)
- The Recruit (Dad's Army episode) (2 kB)
- Blink (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Patient X (2 kB)
- The Longjohn Flap (2 kB)
- Memorial (Star Trek: Voyager) (2 kB)
- Rajiin (2 kB)
- Edu-macating Lucky (2 kB)
- Dollhouse (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Inauguration Over There (2 kB)
- No Man's Land (Grey's Anatomy) (2 kB)
- Henry Please Come Home (2 kB)
- First Date (Frasier) (2 kB)
- Daddy's Little Girl (CSI) (2 kB)
- Eosphoros (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Bedfellows (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- The Devil and Dr. Phil (2 kB)
- Raising Caine (2 kB)
- The Greenies (Goodies episode) (2 kB)
- Farm Fresh Food (Goodies episode) (2 kB)
- The Mango (2 kB)
- Some Assembly Required (Frasier episode) (2 kB)
- Han (The West Wing) (2 kB)
- Raising Shane (2 kB)
- The Nose Job (2 kB)
- My Waste of Time (2 kB)
- Conscience (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Third-Day Story (2 kB)
- Countdown (Star Trek: Enterprise) (2 kB)
- Untethered (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Happy Family (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Privilege (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- The Turtle and the Hare (2 kB)
- Darkling (2 kB)
- Brave New World (Grey's Anatomy) (2 kB)
- Whose Line Is It Anyway (Happy Tree Friends) (2 kB)
- The Caste System (2 kB)
- I Love a Charade (2 kB)
- College Kids (2 kB)
- The Zero Imperative (2 kB)
- Joyride (The Outer Limits) (2 kB)
- Soft Light (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- Cheating Death (CSI: Miami episode) (2 kB)
- Avatar (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- Major Fred C. Dobbs (2 kB)
- The Hot Tub (2 kB)
- The Uncle Devil Show (The Twilight Zone) (2 kB)
- One Armed Bandits (Dukes) (2 kB)
- Miracle Man (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- The Return of Martin Crane (2 kB)
- The Good Child (2 kB)
- Sleight Out of Hand (CSI: NY episode) (2 kB)
- Wheels of Fortune (2 kB)
- Wasichu (2 kB)
- 24 Hour Propane People (2 kB)
- Three's A Crowd (SATC episode) (2 kB)
- Plus One is the Loneliest Number (2 kB)
- Duane Barry (The X-Files episode) (2 kB)
- Bully for You (2 kB)
- The Debate (2 kB)
- Rules of Engagement (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine) (2 kB)
- Something to Talk About (Grey's Anatomy) (2 kB)
- Ice Queen (JAG) (2 kB)
- The Sword of Kahless (2 kB)
- Epiphanies (Babylon 5) (2 kB)
- How the Ghosts Stole Christmas (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- Superstition (Grey's Anatomy) (2 kB)
- Officer of the Day (M*A*S*H) (2 kB)
- Three Days of the Kahndo (2 kB)
- Gramma (The Twilight Zone) (2 kB)
- Tell Me Sweet Little Lies (Grey's Anatomy) (2 kB)
- The Ghost Ship (Stingray Episode) (2 kB)
- Transition (The West Wing) (2 kB)
- Legacies (Babylon 5) (2 kB)
- Ship of Tears (2 kB)
- Hair Today, Gone Tomorrow (2 kB)
- Animals (Goodies episode) (2 kB)
- Welcome to Wherever You Are (The West Wing) (2 kB)
- Cranes Unplugged (2 kB)
- Shandeh (2 kB)
- The Infinite Vulcan (2 kB)
- Virtuoso (Star Trek: Voyager) (2 kB)
- Revelations (Babylon 5) (2 kB)
- Reunion (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Girls, Interrupted (Californication) (2 kB)
- Bartlet's Third State of the Union (2 kB)
- Fade Out, Fade In (2 kB)
- Hunting Pink (Goodies episode) (2 kB)
- Chinga (2 kB)
- Old Dogs, New Dicks (2 kB)
- Analyzed Kiss (2 kB)
- Impact Winter (The West Wing) (2 kB)
- Hot Sub (Miss Guided episode) (2 kB)
- Play with Fire (CSI) (2 kB)
- Time of Your Death (2 kB)
- Crossfire (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine) (2 kB)
- Sleepless (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- Attack of the Five Foot Ten Woman (2 kB)
- Semi-Detached (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Terms of Endearment (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- Girl, You'll Be a Giant Soon (2 kB)
- Election Night (The West Wing) (2 kB)
- Rainbow Bridge (M*A*S*H) (2 kB)
- The Big Journey (2 kB)
- All Access (CSI: NY episode) (2 kB)
- The Pirates of Orion (2 kB)
- Ghost of a Chance (2 kB)
- The Execution of Catherine Willows (2 kB)
- Woulda, Coulda, Shoulda (CSI episode) (2 kB)
- If Tomorrow Never Comes (Grey's Anatomy) (2 kB)
- Shadow Play (1986 The Twilight Zone episode) (2 kB)
- Grissom's Divine Comedy (2 kB)
- Leave Out All The Rest (CSI episode) (2 kB)
- Glen Peggy Glen Ross (2 kB)
- The Phone Message (2 kB)
- Child’s Play (Star Trek: Voyager) (2 kB)
- Shattered (CSI: Miami episode) (2 kB)
- Guide to: Notes & Best Friends (2 kB)
- Paper or Plastic (2 kB)
- Bite Me (CSI) (2 kB)
- Unusual Suspects (2 kB)
- Revelations (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- The Best Thing That Ever Could Have Happened (2 kB)
- Requiem (The West Wing) (2 kB)
- Blasters (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Fathers and Sons (The Outer Limits) (2 kB)
- Coming of Rage (2 kB)
- A Little Murder (2 kB)
- The Great Plateau (2 kB)
- Bay of Married Pigs (2 kB)
- Bodies in Motion (2 kB)
- The Proposal (Frasier episode) (2 kB)
- Kaddish (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- Primum Non Nocere (2 kB)
- Owner of a Lonely Heart (Grey's Anatomy) (2 kB)
- Saving Face (Kappa Mikey episode) (2 kB)
- Strip Strangler (2 kB)
- The Lorelei Signal (2 kB)
- Hollywood A.D. (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- Dramma Giocoso (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Winning a Battle, Losing the War (Grey's Anatomy) (2 kB)
- Gun on Ice Planet Zero (2 kB)
- Nothing To Lose (CSI episode) (2 kB)
- Twas the Night Before Mxymas (2 kB)
- NSF Thurmont (The West Wing) (2 kB)
- My Night to Remember (2 kB)
- The Self-Destruct Button (2 kB)
- Zero Sum (The X-Files episode) (2 kB)
- The Dog (Seinfeld) (2 kB)
- The Healer (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Justice Is Served (2 kB)
- Face Lift (CSI) (2 kB)
- The Council (2 kB)
- The Sleeper (Spooks) (2 kB)
- Bang-Bang (CSI) (2 kB)
- Carnival (Bottom episode) (2 kB)
- Drama Queens (2 kB)
- A New Life (The Outer Limits) (2 kB)
- Jetrel (2 kB)
- A Bullet Runs Through It (2 kB)
- The Fix-Up (2 kB)
- Separation of Powers (The West Wing) (2 kB)
- Wrongful Life (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Nothing to Talk About (Private Practice) (2 kB)
- Cover Girl (SATC episode) (2 kB)
- Oh Come All Ye Faithful (SATC episode) (2 kB)
- There's No 'I' in Team (Grey's Anatomy) (2 kB)
- Tithonus (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- Chain Reaction (CSI: Miami episode) (2 kB)
- The Mommy Problem (2 kB)
- Interior Decorator (Curb Your Enthusiasm) (2 kB)
- Childen of the Dark (Criminal Minds) (2 kB)
- Indiscretion (2 kB)
- Biogenesis (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- The Smelly Car (2 kB)
- Born Again (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- The Practical Joker (2 kB)
- Gone with the Windstorm (2 kB)
- Beyond the Farthest Star (2 kB)
- The Virgin (2 kB)
- Star Crossed (The Outer Limits) (2 kB)
- Lifesigns (2 kB)
- The Al Smith Dinner (episode) (2 kB)
- Secret Sex (2 kB)
- The First Taste (True Blood) (2 kB)
- Caught in the Act (Goodies episode) (2 kB)
- Losing Face (CSI episode) (2 kB)
- Unchained (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Divided Loyalties (2 kB)
- The Endless Desert (2 kB)
- Things Fall Apart (The West Wing) (2 kB)
- Oubliette (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- Bad Blood (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- D.N.R. (Becker) (2 kB)
- Mea Culpa (CSI) (2 kB)
- Power Trip (CSI: Miami episode) (2 kB)
- Excelsis Dei (2 kB)
- Where There's Smoke... (SATC episode) (2 kB)
- Tropical Antarctica (2 kB)
- Mary Christmas (Frasier episode) (2 kB)
- Piper Maru (2 kB)
- Dealer's Choice (The Twilight Zone) (2 kB)
- Sanguinarium (2 kB)
- As You Were (M*A*S*H) (2 kB)
- Critical Condition (SATC episode) (2 kB)
- Evaluation Day (2 kB)
- But Can She Type (2 kB)
- Vacancy (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Game Over (CSI episode) (2 kB)
- Aubrey (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- Three of a Kind (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- Chaos Theory (ER) (2 kB)
- A Change Is Gonna Come (The West Wing) (2 kB)
- Kein Ausgang (2 kB)
- Roland (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- The Apartment (Seinfeld) (2 kB)
- Offense (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- The Stone Age (Goodies episode) (2 kB)
- The Burning Man (The Twilight Zone) (2 kB)
- Homeward Bound (Private Practice) (2 kB)
- A Night at the Movies (CSI) (2 kB)
- Semi-Professional (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Live or Let Die (CSI: NY episode) (2 kB)
- A Thousand Days on Earth (2 kB)
- A Rover Runs Through It (2 kB)
- Twenty-Something Girls vs. Thirty-Something Women (2 kB)
- Matters of Honor (Babylon 5) (2 kB)
- Renewal (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- A Horrible Mind (2 kB)
- The Fuck Buddy (2 kB)
- Mudd's Passion (2 kB)
- Breaking Point (The Outer Limits) (2 kB)
- The Nanny Reunion: A Nosh to Remember (2 kB)
- The Closer (CSI: NY episode) (2 kB)
- Hippocratic Oath (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine) (2 kB)
- Dead in the Water (Midsomer Murders episode) (2 kB)
- You've Got Male (2 kB)
- Eater (Fear Itself episode) (2 kB)
- Meld (Star Trek: Voyager) (2 kB)
- The Dare (Matlock episode) (2 kB)
- Alpha (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- The Global Ocean (2 kB)
- Payday (M*A*S*H) (2 kB)
- Tipping Point (CSI: Miami episode) (2 kB)
- Assume Nothing (2 kB)
- 731 (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- Abra-Cadaver (2 kB)
- The Winchester Tapes (2 kB)
- Mikey Impossible (2 kB)
- The Miser's Hoard (2 kB)
- Superstar (Goodies episode) (2 kB)
- Elogium (2 kB)
- Contamination (Private Practice) (2 kB)
- Travelers (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- Grissom Versus the Volcano (2 kB)
- The Tipping Point (The Outer Limits) (2 kB)
- Lessons (Star Trek: The Next Generation) (2 kB)
- One of Our Planets is Missing (2 kB)
- The DeLuca Motel (CSI: Miami episode) (2 kB)
- Dear Dad...Again (2 kB)
- When Did You Last See Your Money? (2 kB)
- Turn the Page (episode) (2 kB)
- Ch-Ch-Changes (CSI) (2 kB)
- Visionary (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine) (2 kB)
- The Happy Place (2 kB)
- The Shipment (Star Trek: Enterprise) (2 kB)
- The Vessel (The Outer Limits) (2 kB)
- Memento Mori (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- Unrequited (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- The Ragged Edge (2 kB)
- Babel One (2 kB)
- Detour (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- Leonard Betts (2 kB)
- Wet Foot/Dry Foot (2 kB)
- Series 5 Episode 6 (Spooks) (2 kB)
- Collision (CSI: Miami episode) (2 kB)
- Ninety Miles Away (2 kB)
- Watch (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Chaos Theory (CSI) (2 kB)
- The Little People of Killany Woods (The Twilight Zone) (2 kB)
- Black Box (The Outer Limits) (2 kB)
- Identity Crisis (CSI) (2 kB)
- Stealing Home (CSI: NY episode) (2 kB)
- Six Days, Part 1 (2 kB)
- Alter Boys (2 kB)
- La Douleur Exquise! (2 kB)
- Teso Dos Bichos (2 kB)
- Wossamotta U (story arc) (2 kB)
- Witness To Murder (CSI episode) (2 kB)
- Rush (CSI: Miami episode) (2 kB)
- Sons and Daughters (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine) (2 kB)
- The Goldberg Variation (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- The Eye of the Beholder (Star Trek: The Animated Series) (2 kB)
- A Chip in the Sugar (2 kB)
- Election Day Part II (2 kB)
- The Saddle Club (episode) (2 kB)
- 'Til Death Do We Part (CSI: NY episode) (2 kB)
- No Ifs, Ands or Butts (2 kB)
- The War Prayer (Babylon 5) (2 kB)
- Tinder Box (CSI episode) (2 kB)
- Ten Count (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (2 kB)
- Dog Eat Dog (CSI) (2 kB)
- The Birnam Wood (2 kB)
- George (M*A*S*H) (2 kB)
- Her Big Chance (2 kB)
- Formalities (2 kB)
- Pilot (The Closer) (2 kB)
- Sounds Like (2 kB)
- Recipe for Murder (2 kB)
- Politically Erect (2 kB)
- A Bed Among the Lentils (2 kB)
- A Lady of Letters (2 kB)
- Convictions (Babylon 5) (2 kB)
- Resisting the Aggressor Down the Ages (2 kB)
- Essence of Life (The Outer Limits) (2 kB)
- Blood, Sweat & Tears (CSI: NY episode) (2 kB)
- Oedipus Hex (CSI episode) (2 kB)
- Shrink-Wrapped (2 kB)
- Kiss-Kiss, Bye-Bye (2 kB)
- Extreme (CSI episode) (2 kB)
- Break (Bottom episode) (2 kB)
- North Star (Star Trek: Enterprise) (2 kB)
- In God We Trust (The West Wing) (2 kB)
- Blood In The Water (CSI: Miami episode) (2 kB)
- Teliko (2 kB)
- Milagro (The X-Files) (2 kB)
- Shattered Mirror (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine) (2 kB)
- Opening Day (The Twilight Zone) (2 kB)
- Got Murder? (2 kB)
- Let It Go (Private Practice) (2 kB)
- A Grizzly Murder (2 kB)
- Soldiering On (2 kB)
- The Peggy Horror Picture Show (2 kB)
- Skeletons (CSI episode) (2 kB)
- In the Kingdom of the Blind (2 kB)
- Heart of the Storm (2 kB)
- Boy, Girl, Boy, Girl... (2 kB)
- Getting Off (CSI) (2 kB)
- Swap Meet (CSI) (2 kB)
- Super Men (2 kB)
- Small Potatoes (2 kB)
- Hush (CSI: NY episode) (2 kB)
- Random Acts of Violence (2 kB)
- Room Service (CSI) (2 kB)
- $35K O.B.O. (2 kB)
- The Big Time (SATC episode) (2 kB)
- Bad Words (2 kB)
- Prairies of Amazonia (2 kB)
- The Long Goodbye (The West Wing) (2 kB)
- My Butterfly (2 kB)
- Internal Displacement (2 kB)
- Riddles (Star Trek: Voyager) (2 kB)
- Favor the Bold (2 kB)
- Dust to Dust (Babylon 5) (2 kB)
- Ye Gods (The Twilight Zone) (2 kB)
- Shortcomings (SATC episode) (2 kB)
- Blood Lust (2 kB)
- A Day in May (2 kB)
- Bobby Rae (2 kB)
- Burden of Proof (CSI) (2 kB)
- Not What It Looks Like (2 kB)
- Dear Dad... Three (2 kB)
- Blood and Sauce (2 kB)
- Daisy's song (2 kB)
- My Therapeutic Month (2 kB)
- Bloodlines (CSI) (2 kB)
- The Chicken Dance (SATC episode) (2 kB)
- Ellie (The West Wing) (2 kB)
- Inside the Box (CSI) (2 kB)
- F. Emasculata (2 kB)
- Under the Influence (CSI episode) (2 kB)
- Shooting Stars (CSI) (2 kB)
- Survivors (Babylon 5) (2 kB)
- Dog Gone / All You Can't Eat (2 kB)
- The Vessel (episode) (1 kB)
- Friends and Lovers (Melrose Place episode) (1 kB)
- Shootout (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- The Magicks of Megas-tu (1 kB)
- Are We Sluts? (1 kB)
- Eyes (Babylon 5) (1 kB)
- Hank’s Back (AKA The Unbearable Lightness of Being Hank) (1 kB)
- Unoriginal Sin (1 kB)
- Four Women and a Funeral (1 kB)
- Thieves Gambit (1 kB)
- Agua Mala (1 kB)
- United (Star Trek: Enterprise) (1 kB)
- Asses to Ashes (1 kB)
- The Passion of Dauterive (1 kB)
- Crow's Feet (CSI) (1 kB)
- Closure (The X-Files) (1 kB)
- Precious Metal (1 kB)
- Speed Kills (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Models and Mortals (1 kB)
- Mona Lisa (The Outer Limits) (1 kB)
- The Surrogate (The Outer Limits) (1 kB)
- Broken (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Like Water For Murder (CSI:NY episode) (1 kB)
- The Watch (1 kB)
- Albatross (Star Trek: The Animated Series) (1 kB)
- Exploration Earth: The Time Machine (1 kB)
- Synchrony (The X-Files) (1 kB)
- Payback (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Blipverts (Max Headroom) (1 kB)
- Analyzing the Laughter (1 kB)
- Run Silent, Run Deep (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Down the Drain (1 kB)
- Electric Vendetta (1 kB)
- Secrets and Flies (1 kB)
- Officer Blue (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Officers Only (1 kB)
- Just One Kiss (1 kB)
- Werewolves (CSI) (1 kB)
- His Way (1 kB)
- Charge of this Post (1 kB)
- Homebodies (1 kB)
- I Like to Watch (1 kB)
- One Hit Wonder (CSI) (1 kB)
- Get Me A Lawyer (1 kB)
- Lonelyville (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (1 kB)
- S.R. 819 (1 kB)
- Inside Out (CSI: Miami) (1 kB)
- Ashes to Ashes (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Todd Strikes Out / The Jerky Girls (1 kB)
- Recoil (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- Feeling the Heat (1 kB)
- The Inheritors (The Outer Limits 1995) (1 kB)
- Lines of Communication (Babylon 5) (1 kB)
- Requiem (The X-Files) (1 kB)
- Summer In The City (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Redux (The X-Files) (1 kB)
- The Dove Commission (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- No More Bets (1 kB)
- Harvest (CSI) (1 kB)
- Bang, Bang, Your Debt (1 kB)
- The Fall (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Blank Slate (The Outer Limits) (1 kB)
- Simple Man (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- Forever (CSI) (1 kB)
- Luck Be an Old Lady (1 kB)
- Message of the Week (1 kB)
- The Paragon of Animals (1 kB)
- Early Rollout (1 kB)
- Proxy Prexy (1 kB)
- Still Life (CSI) (1 kB)
- Crime & Misdemeanor (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Painted in Blood (Midsomer Murders episode) (1 kB)
- Freaks and Tweaks (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- Moosylvania Saved (1 kB)
- The Cheating Curve (1 kB)
- Valiant (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine) (1 kB)
- Supply and Demand (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Deadline (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Three Generations are Enough (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Rumors, Bargains and Lies (1 kB)
- Complications (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Dressed for Success (Ugly Betty) (1 kB)
- On the Job (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- The Cornish Floral Dance (1 kB)
- Stress Relief (The Office) (1 kB)
- Guide to: Vice Principals and Mondays (1 kB)
- Blood Moon (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Conduct Unbecoming (Law & Order episode) (1 kB)
- Tanglewood (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Suckers (CSI) (1 kB)
- Spellbound (CSI) (1 kB)
- The Pine Bluff Variant (1 kB)
- Faimly (1 kB)
- Recycling (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Emily (The X-Files) (1 kB)
- Wetwired (1 kB)
- Return of the Ice (1 kB)
- Door Jam (1 kB)
- Bunk (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Hell Night (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Resurrection (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine) (1 kB)
- A Day in the Strife (1 kB)
- Little Minnesota (1 kB)
- Entrance Wound (1 kB)
- Anatomy of a Lye (1 kB)
- Come As You Are (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- Death Pool 100 (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- Election Day Part I (1 kB)
- Meditations on the Abyss (1 kB)
- High and Low (CSI) (1 kB)
- Open and Shut (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Ring Out Your Dead (1 kB)
- Racing Mars (1 kB)
- Replica (The Outer Limits) (1 kB)
- Three Percenters (1 kB)
- Secrets of the Soul (1 kB)
- Terma (The X-Files) (1 kB)
- Warlord (Star Trek: Voyager) (1 kB)
- Behind the Lines (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine) (1 kB)
- Minimum Security (NCIS) (1 kB)
- Night, Mother (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Evidence of Things Unseen (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- The Corps is Mother, the Corps is Father (1 kB)
- The Chosen People (1 kB)
- For The Girl Who Has Everything (1 kB)
- Love Run Cold (1 kB)
- Lucky Strike (CSI) (1 kB)
- Grave Young Men (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- Lost Planet of the Gods (1 kB)
- Snuff (CSI) (1 kB)
- The Gambler (Matlock episode) (1 kB)
- The New Deal (TV episode) (1 kB)
- The Element of Surprise (Flashpoint episode) (1 kB)
- Double-Cross (CSI) (1 kB)
- The Last Laurel (Night Gallery episode) (1 kB)
- Fight Night (CSI) (1 kB)
- TKO (Babylon 5) (1 kB)
- Adelle Coffin (1 kB)
- Conflicts of Interest (Babylon 5) (1 kB)
- The Gun (The Outer Limits) (1 kB)
- Signs & Wonders (The X-Files) (1 kB)
- Mr. Monk Gets a New Shrink (1 kB)
- Money For Nothing (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Cool Hunter (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Family Business (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine) (1 kB)
- All in the Family (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Wannabe (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Arcadia (The X-Files) (1 kB)
- Forced Entry (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Spark of Life (1 kB)
- Seeds of Destruction (1 kB)
- Operation Noselift (1 kB)
- Flooded World (1 kB)
- Hank's on Board (1 kB)
- Cop Killer (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- The Drought (SATC episode) (1 kB)
- Murder in a Flash (1 kB)
- The Shroud (The Outer Limits) (1 kB)
- Legal (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Crash and Burn (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Dispo Day (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- Backstabbers (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- Spring Break (CSI: Miami Episode) (1 kB)
- Animals Are People Too (1 kB)
- Big Middle (1 kB)
- Ambush (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- What You See Is What You See (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Comes Around (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Stalkerazzi (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- The Walk (The X-Files) (1 kB)
- Going Going Gone (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- The Incubator (1 kB)
- Fare Game (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Once Upon a Planet (1 kB)
- You Are Cordially Invited... (1 kB)
- Slow Burn (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Sisters on the Verge of a Nervous Breakdown (1 kB)
- Drops Out (1 kB)
- Destroying Angel (Midsomer Murders episode) (1 kB)
- Let He Who Is Without Sin... (1 kB)
- Down to the Wire (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- Whacked (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Reunion (Harsh Realm) (1 kB)
- Not Landing (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Ceasefire (M*A*S*H) (1 kB)
- Double Cap (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- Murder Sings the Blues (1 kB)
- Tunguska (The X-Files) (1 kB)
- Vengeance (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- To Kill A Predator (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- Cold Reveal (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Tri-Borough (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Three-Way (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Without (The X-Files) (1 kB)
- Cold Kansas Desert (1 kB)
- Rain (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Strange Relations (Babylon 5) (1 kB)
- The Score (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Shock (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- Manifest Destiny (The Outer Limits) (1 kB)
- L.I.P. (Local Indigenous Personnel) (1 kB)
- Past Imperfect (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- A Daze Of Wine And Roaches (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- From the Grave (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- Christmas Carol (The X-Files) (1 kB)
- Personal Foul (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Zoo York (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- The Problem with Power (1 kB)
- Rush to Judgement (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Unruhe (1 kB)
- The Sixth Extinction II: Amor Fati (1 kB)
- Tunnel Vision (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- A Good Opportunity (1 kB)
- Invasion (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Fade Out (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- The Ruby Yacht (1 kB)
- Prototype (Star Trek: Voyager) (1 kB)
- You May Now Kill the Bride (1 kB)
- Trevor (The X-Files) (1 kB)
- Innocent (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Playing With Matches (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Phoenix Rising (Babylon 5) (1 kB)
- The Survivor (Star Trek: The Animated Series) (1 kB)
- Big Brother (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Identity (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- El Mundo Gira (1 kB)
- Wrongs Darker than Death or Night (1 kB)
- Hot Lips and Empty Arms (1 kB)
- Critical Care (Star Trek: Voyager) (1 kB)
- What Schemes May Come (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Open Water (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- Grand Master (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- The V Word (1 kB)
- The Assignment (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine) (1 kB)
- Happily Never After (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Forbidden Fruit (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Songs of Praise (The Vicar of Dibley) (1 kB)
- Slaughterhouse (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- The Treasure of Monte Zoom (1 kB)
- And Here's To You, Mrs Azrael (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- First In Line (Flashpoint episode) (1 kB)
- Connect! Connect! (1 kB)
- Rise (Star Trek: Voyager) (1 kB)
- The Ambergris Element (1 kB)
- Silent Night (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Death Eminent (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- Rap Sheet (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Blood Brothers (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- The Weather Lady (1 kB)
- Fight Club (The X-Files) (1 kB)
- Necrophilia Americana (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- A Man a Mile (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- The Guns of Abalone (1 kB)
- Youngblood (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- The Three Moosketeers (1 kB)
- The Duel (The Office) (1 kB)
- The Last Angry Moose (1 kB)
- Waterland (The Future is Wild episode) (1 kB)
- Because I Know Patty (1 kB)
- Elegy (The X-Files) (1 kB)
- Welcome to the Future (The Future Is Wild episode) (1 kB)
- Pottsylvania Creeper (1 kB)
- Grand Murder at Central Station (1 kB)
- Sein Und Zeit (1 kB)
- Camera Obscura (Harsh Realm) (1 kB)
- The Best Defense (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Rock and A Hard Place (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- Upsidaisium (story arc) (1 kB)
- Carry On, Hawkeye (1 kB)
- Knights of Madness (1 kB)
- Kissed Off (1 kB)
- Guerillas in the Mist (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- Grace Note (The Twilight Zone) (1 kB)
- Sweet Sixteen (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Louse on 92nd Street (1 kB)
- Say Uncle (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Outside Man (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Bullwinkle's Testimonial Dinner (1 kB)
- The Illusion of Truth (1 kB)
- Asking for Flowers (Flashpoint episode) (1 kB)
- Stuck On You (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Something Rich and Strange (1 kB)
- Topsy Turvy World (1 kB)
- Simon Says (The Outer Limits) (1 kB)
- Darkroom (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- Bait (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Meltdown (JAG) (1 kB)
- Kitsunegari (1 kB)
- American Dreamers (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Broken Home (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- Going Under (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- Lazy Jay Ranch (1 kB)
- Death Grip (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Missouri Mish Mash (1 kB)
- Miami Confidential (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- Bumbling Brothers Circus (1 kB)
- Dead Air (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- Goof Gas Attack (1 kB)
- Field Trip (The X-Files) (1 kB)
- Young Man with a Horn (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- If Looks Could Kill (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- The Oath (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- The List (The X-Files) (1 kB)
- 19 Down (1) (1 kB)
- Money Plane (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Rio (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- Grand Prix (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Cincinnati (Harsh Realm) (1 kB)
- Mucho Loma (1 kB)
- Rue Britannia (1 kB)
- Painting Theft (1 kB)
- Hurricane Anthony (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Throwing Heat (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- Addiction (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- The Ride-In (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Breathless (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- The Rain King (The X-Files) (1 kB)
- Moosylvania (Rocky & Bullwinkle episode) (1 kB)
- Bloodline (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- Trapped (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Heart of Glass (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Silencer (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- And They're Offed (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- Banana Formula (1 kB)
- Metal-Munching Mice (1 kB)
- The Very Long Night of Londo Mollari (1 kB)
- The Gift (Matlock episode) (1 kB)
- People With Money (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Profit and Lace (1 kB)
- High Octane (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- The Best Friend (Matlock episode) (1 kB)
- Never Kissed a Girl (Flashpoint episode) (1 kB)
- He Knows His Brother (Flashpoint episode) (1 kB)
- Orchis Fatalis (Midsomer Murders episode) (1 kB)
- Bad Beat (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Fire in Space (1 kB)
- Wasted (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Hard Time (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Obsession (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- The Sixth Extinction (1 kB)
- Devil's Alphabet (The Twilight Zone) (1 kB)
- Doggone Crazy (1 kB)
- Bombshell (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (1 kB)
- City Of The Dolls (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Buried Treasure (Rocky & Bullwinkle episode) (1 kB)
- Wailing Whale (1 kB)
- Art Imitates Life (1 kB)
- The Making of Private Pike (1 kB)
- Triple Threat (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- 48 Hours to Life (1 kB)
- The Arrival (The Vicar of Dibley) (1 kB)
- Free Fall (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- Dead Zone (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Deviant (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- Greenpernt Oogle (1 kB)
- Taxi (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Jamalot (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Planets Aligned (Flashpoint episode) (1 kB)
- Mind’s Eye (The X-Files) (1 kB)
- Pirated (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Attention Shoppers (Flashpoint episode) (1 kB)
- Showtime (M*A*S*H) (1 kB)
- Head Case (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- Stand Your Ground (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- The Triangle (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- The Sniper (M*A*S*H) (1 kB)
- Manus Domini (Harsh Realm) (1 kB)
- Mail Call (M*A*S*H) (1 kB)
- Max (The X-Files) (1 kB)
- Deep Freeze (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- Internal Affairs (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- Consequences (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Admissions (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Henry in Love (1 kB)
- Via Negativa (The X-Files) (1 kB)
- The Lying Game (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- The Network (Matlock episode) (1 kB)
- Risk (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Scorpio (Flashpoint episode) (1 kB)
- Prey (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- The Baby Shower (SATC episode) (1 kB)
- Scorpio (Flashpoint Episode) (1 kB)
- The March to Freedom (1 kB)
- Help (CSI: NY episode) (1 kB)
- Prince Family Paper (1 kB)
- Quagmire (The X-Files) (1 kB)
- Der Tag (M*A*S*H episode) (1 kB)
- The Dover Test (The West Wing) (1 kB)
- Driven (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- Kill Zone (CSI episode) (1 kB)
- Rapture (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine) (1 kB)
- A Class Divided (1 kB)
- Maneuvers (1 kB)
- Endgame (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (1 kB)
- Who's George (Flashpoint episode) (1 kB)
- Flittin (1 kB)
- Orison (The X-Files) (1 kB)
- Rush (The X-Files) (1 kB)
- Mr. Monk and the Election (1 kB)
- The Amazing Maleeni (1 kB)
- Contract (Law & Order: Criminal Intent episode) (1 kB)
- X-Cops (The X-Files) (1 kB)
- Redux II (1 kB)
- When You've Got to Go (1 kB)
- Number Engaged (1 kB)
- Redrum (The X-Files) (1 kB)
- My Nanny (CSI: Miami episode) (1 kB)
- Demons (The X-Files) (1 kB)
- The Means Justify the Trend (1 kB)
- En Ami (The X-Files) (1 kB)
- Dont Do That Thing You Do (1 kB)
- Theef (The X-Files) (1 kB)
- The Wheel (Mad Men) (1 kB)
- Hungry (The X-Files) (1 kB)
- The Promise (The Larry Sanders Show episode) (1 kB)
- Montana / Sassy / Justice (1 kB)
- Man Enough (1 kB)
- Jimmy's Dumb (1 kB)
- Within (The X-Files) (1 kB)
- Ghost of Things Past (1 kB)
- Stand By Me (McLeod's Daughters) (1 kB)
- 4-D (The X-Files) (1 kB)
- The Principals of Golf (Recess episode) (1 kB)
- Cara Fitzgerald (1 kB)
- Sophia Lopez Part II (1 kB)
- Mime and Mime Again(Happy Tree Friends) (1 kB)
- The Marooning (1 kB)
episode redirects
I have reverted your redirect of Gamble (Death Note episode), for I see no attempt to gather consensus for it. In general these articles should not be redirected to a bare list, but a suitable amount of content merged to such a list. I will help obtain consensus for such cases if the material is adequate to describe the episode, and not be a mere listing on a program guide. I will strongly oppose destructive merges. I know you and I differ on this material, but if you'll except a compromise solution not only will we not have to fight about them, but we can cooperate doing them. DGG (talk) 01:26, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
South Park episode list
I saw your work on the episode list for Farscape episodes against considerable resistance. I was proposing to merge the episodes of South Park season 1 into a more manageable list of episodes, would you mind giving an opinion on the talk page concerned. Alastairward (talk) 10:57, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
The articles you turn into redirects
Dear TTN, I see that you have a diligent agenda to erase all pop culture trivia from Wikipedia. I used to fight whoever was on your position; however, since lately it has become popular among editors I decided to create a site to save and showcase the work of several editors that spent hours into creating those articles. I can't really copy the history pages too in order to honor them more properly, but I ass a reference to the history page of the Wikipedia redirect with recognition of their work.
Please, do me a favor and honor their work too. Before you turn such articles into redirects, copypaste them into and new article with the same name in [19].
Thanks beforehand and kind regards,