Your submission at Articles for creation: Research on synchronicty (March 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:49, 8 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, SymICiEl! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:49, 8 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Research on synchronicty (March 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 04:55, 11 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Research on synchronicty (March 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Praxidicae (talk) 11:37, 11 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

March 2020

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself. I have already explained to you how copyright works on IRC and on the talk page. Do not remove the tags again. Praxidicae (talk) 19:53, 11 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your deletion notice does not make sense for the reasons you stated. There are no sections of the article that are not referenced properly or plagiarized.

You cannot copy content from elsewhere even if you cite it as wikipedia has a specific licensing that allows copying itself. You copied content from the links I gave on the talk page. That is not allowed. Praxidicae (talk) 19:59, 11 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please provide in quotations the copied material which you speak of. The survey items that were not in quotations are now shown in quotations and cannot be changed or else they change the meaning of the summary research.

click the links, read them. I'm not going to recopy copyrighted material. It's not just "survey items." Do your own research. Praxidicae (talk) 20:02, 11 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

You are not properly backing up your claim then that there are words on the page that are not properly copied from the sources you have listed. It is your claim that there is plagiarized material on the page which I dispute as I have checked the sources.

Plagiarism and WP:COPYRIGHT are not the same. Read it for yourself. Praxidicae (talk) 20:11, 11 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Research is allowed to be cited for educational purposes. Copyright protects against others using for monetary gain. Citing survey research is not copyright infringement.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Research on synchronicty (March 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
Sulfurboy (talk) 21:54, 11 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

POV forks

edit

Hello SymICiEl. I noticed that your draft was deleted as a copyright infringement, which Wikipedia takes very seriously. There however are other problems: please note for instance that in the example you cited, meditation has a Research section. To prevent that section from being too large, because there was significant material, research on meditation is a subarticle that is linked at that section. When edits are contested at the main synchronicity article, we cannot add them to a seperate subarticle, resulting in a WP:POVFORK. You should instead seek WP:CONSENSUS for your changes at Talk:Synchronicity and expand that article first. I hope this helps, —PaleoNeonate03:48, 12 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Important message

edit

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

PaleoNeonate03:49, 12 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Research on synchronicity (April 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-- RoySmith (talk) 22:39, 21 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Research on synchronicity has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Research on synchronicity. Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 23:03, 17 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Research on synchronicity

edit
 

Hello, SymICiEl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Research on synchronicity".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:52, 18 June 2021 (UTC)Reply