Sidinvincible01

Welcome!

Hello, Sidinvincible01, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Ben Johnson (Canadian sprinter) did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Introduction tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome.  HiLo48 (talk) 04:45, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

Hello, I'm Cairo2k18. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Mike Powell (long jumper) seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Cairo2k18 • (talk) • (contribs) 04:30, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

November 2020

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Dharmendra, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 13:24, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hatha yoga, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:15, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Yogi, you may be blocked from editing. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:16, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Cassiopeia. I noticed that you recently removed content from Justin Gaethje without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Cassiopeia^(talk) 22:14, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

January 2021

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Shawn Crawford—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 18:21, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Swastika. Binksternet (talk) 16:38, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

February 2021

Hello, I'm Ab207. I noticed that you recently removed content from S. S. Rajamouli without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ab207 (talk) 17:37, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Recent edits

Hi. I have been forced to revert several of your recent edits. You seem simply to insert your own observations, unsourced, as your main modus operandi. It's not just that the edits themselves are poorly written and not supported, it's also that you tend to replace good content with your own (not good) content. Please support with sources and don't simply put in your own opinion. Also please remember that the quality of writing is important, and you should make sure that, when copyediting, your writing is of good quality and void of errors where possible. Happy to help, just let me know.NEDOCHAN (talk) 11:14, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ajay Devgn, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 08:19, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Narsingh Yadav, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 08:20, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Pyrros Dimas. - Arjayay (talk) 08:22, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Asian Athletics Championships records. bonadea contributions talk 09:28, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:45, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Olive wreath. - Arjayay (talk) 09:45, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Chris Hemsworth. - Arjayay (talk) 14:28, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Demetrious Johnson. Cassiopeia^(talk) 22:22, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Abhinav Bindra. Cassiopeia^(talk) 22:26, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sushil Kumar. Johnnie Bob (talk) 00:39, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 07:56, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Neeraj Chopra.
You have already been blocked twice for unsourced additions, but are still making them - Arjayay (talk) 09:40, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

March 2021

I noticed that there was no section for March 2021 for the user's vandalism! I am now fixing March articles edited by him. Jay ^(Talk) 14:09, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 14:22, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

August 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Dorian Yates, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 12:13, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Vivek Agnihotri. -- DaxServer (talk) 14:12, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saikhom Mirabai Chanu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tokyo Olympics. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 13 August 2021 (UTC)