Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical

WikiProject Disambiguation Talk Request edit

This is a form message being sent to all WikiProject Disambiguation participants. I may have found your page based on your contributions or your link repair user box on your user page. If you are not a member, please consider including your name on the project page. I recently left a proposed banner idea on the WikiProject Disambiguation talk page and I would appreciate any input you could provide. Before it can be approved or denied, I would prefer a lot of feedback from multiple participants in the project. So if you have the time please join in the discussion to help improve the WikiProject. Keep up the good work in link repair and thanks for your time. Nehrams2020 23:12, 9 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation fixes edit

Please don't go around deleting[1] links to disambiguation pages, but fix[2] them. Simply removing them is a harm not an improvement. :-/ — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 19:13, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

tagging articles for WikiProject Computer science edit

Please don't tag commercial products as part of WikiProject Computer science. Typically only articles on areas of research qualify as "Computer science". --Ideogram 16:04, 30 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

I haven't added the WikiProject Computer science tag to any pages. What I did do was try and help the project by adding assessments to articles list here Category:Unassessed-Class Computer science articles via Wikipedia:WikiProject Computer science/Assessment. For a couple of quick examples see edit history to these talk pages [3] and [4]. The tags on Talk:JScience and Talk:Javolution where added by User:EngineerScotty. That aside I do agree that they don't qualify as "Computer science" and set them as low importance, but I didn't want to remove a tag that some else may have added in good faith. -- Ryan Roos 19:55, 4 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link fixing one-day contest edit

I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:32, 18 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

"Deputy editor" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Deputy editor and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 11#Deputy editor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
18:02, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply