Welcome!

edit

Hi Rkyadavdhruv! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! DIVINE 19:08, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Educational Multimedia Research Centre Patiala (May 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 09:24, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Sir, the EMRC Center is an institution, and I created a draft of this institution as you welcome the pages of villages and railway stations; similarly, this is a
notable institution in India, and I have no kind of conflict of interest. Rkyadavdhruv (talk) 06:06, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Rkyadavdhruv! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 09:24, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhadaura, Ghazipur (May 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LJF2019 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
LJF2019 talk 04:19, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jayant Sahasrabuddhe (June 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Alpha3031 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Alpha3031 (tc) 14:02, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Rkyadavdhruv. Thank you for your work on Pujarli, Himachal Pradesh. User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

I don't think this is a valid form of an article. You can make the indivual villages into articles and then convert this page into a disambiguation page.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:10, 26 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Educational Multimedia Research Centre Patiala (August 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DreamRimmer was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 08:10, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Educational Multimedia Research Centre Patiala

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Educational Multimedia Research Centre Patiala, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 08:10, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

This draft page was about a government institution, and in any manner, it is not a promotion or advertisement. Rkyadavdhruv (talk) 22:22, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

August 2023

edit

  Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:13, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Drug abuse in India for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Drug abuse in India is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drug abuse in India until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

- The literary leader of the age 13:22, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Bhadaura, Ghazipur

edit

  Hello, Rkyadavdhruv. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bhadaura, Ghazipur, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Gopal Singh Visharad

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gopal Singh Visharad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/800cff82-04ba-4c47-9f8b-d21367acb04d/downloads/venizisarutu.pdf and https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/047c717c-7bd8-4cec-b09f-8a9648ff740c/downloads/tepemuse.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dan arndt (talk) 05:59, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Jayant Sahasrabuddhe moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Jayant Sahasrabuddhe. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. signed, Rosguill talk 18:42, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jayant Sahasrabuddhe (February 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by User4edits was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
User4edits (talk) 09:50, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

State Highway 17 (Haryana) moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to State Highway 17 (Haryana). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris talk! 20:56, 21 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of South Asian Society of Criminology and Victimology

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on South Asian Society of Criminology and Victimology requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://sascv.org/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 08:38, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —Cryptic 09:04, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Please unblock me as I was working in good faith and the content was not copied. Rkyadavdhruv (talk) 09:16, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
As per moral duty under IPR, I have already mentioned the source and not used it. Please unblock me. Rkyadavdhruv (talk) 09:32, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Rkyadavdhruv (talk) 09:33, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rkyadavdhruv (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This is wrong and again natural justice that you have blocked me without notice and heard. I had created a page in goodfaith and page is already there in other language — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rkyadavdhruv (talkcontribs) 09:10, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This is incoherent and indicates you lack sufficient competence (WP:CIR) to communicate in English. Perhaps you should stick to your own native-language version of Wikipedia. Yamla (talk) 11:25, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have an open unblock request, help requests are unnecessary and won't speed up the process. Please be patient. 331dot (talk) 10:19, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply