Welcome! edit

 
Some cookies to welcome you!  

Welcome to Wikipedia, Omotine! Thank you for your contributions. I am Celestina007 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Celestina007 (talk) 17:05, 13 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Calebin for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Calebin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calebin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... discospinster talk 20:55, 13 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest edit

  Hello, Omotine. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Calebin, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ... discospinster talk 20:57, 13 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of UGO (artist) edit

 

The article UGO (artist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:MUSICBIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KH-1 (talk) 07:56, 30 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Cody Patrick edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cody Patrick, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 15:10, 7 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Theadina Von Seyfried moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Theadina Von Seyfried, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 15:31, 5 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the update. I will edit it when I can. Omotine (talk) 10:13, 9 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Theadina Von Seyfried moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Theadina Von Seyfried, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:03, 8 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

June 2022 edit

 

Hello Omotine. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Omotine. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Omotine|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:03, 8 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

No I am not been paid to edit. Thank you Omotine (talk) 08:41, 1 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Theadina Von Seyfried (September 29) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MurielMary were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MurielMary (talk) 10:27, 29 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Omotine! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MurielMary (talk) 10:27, 29 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Theadina Von Seyfried edit

  Hello, Omotine. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Theadina Von Seyfried, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Theadina Von Seyfried edit

 

Hello, Omotine. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Theadina Von Seyfried".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:58, 24 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of AIPCC Energy (Edo Refinery) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AIPCC Energy (Edo Refinery) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AIPCC Energy (Edo Refinery) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

LusikSnusik (talk) 14:55, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Editi Effiong moved to draftspace edit

Thanks for your contributions to Editi Effiong. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and I am not persuaded that he passes WP:BIO. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:25, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Editi Effiong (October 21) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:26, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Editi Effiong moved to draftspace edit

Thanks for your contributions to Editi Effiong. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jamiebuba (talk) 14:37, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have moved your article Editi Effiong back to draft because you are trying to circumvent the AFC process by moving it to mainspace without being reviewed by an AFC reviewer. If you do decide to take it back to mainspace I will certainly take it to articles for deletion. Jamiebuba (talk) 14:44, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
I don't understand this comment. Fiddle said it wasn't ready because it lacked references, I added over 20 references and yet you still say it isn't ready or claim it possible conflict of interest. I am a Nigerian and here to contribute to Wikipedia. Editi is a film maker and producer of The Black Book, Up North and several other movies that have charted in the Nigeria cinemas. I noticed he was listed on Wikipedia and I felt the need to create one for him. Omotine (talk) 17:23, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Editi Effiong (October 29) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 13:24, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply