Welcome!

edit

Hello, OGWFP, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Necktie did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  – UnnamedUser (open talk page) 19:52, 29 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Sticky shutter syndrome moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Sticky shutter syndrome, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 22:03, 12 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Canon EF 35-80mm PZ moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Canon EF 35-80mm PZ, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Larryzhao123 (talk) 23:25, 24 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kenopsia

edit

Hello, OGWFP

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Joseywales1961, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Kenopsia, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

  1. Edit the page
  2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JW 1961 Talk 21:38, 27 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Kenopsia for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kenopsia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenopsia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 17:41, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sticky shutter syndrome (March 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 15:43, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, OGWFP! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 15:43, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Glass dip pen moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Glass dip pen, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 23:00, 22 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Cropped jacket moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Cropped jacket, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 18:11, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Canon EF 35-80mm PZ

edit

  Hello, OGWFP. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Canon EF 35-80mm PZ, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 27 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Canon EF 35-80mm PZ

edit
 

Hello, OGWFP. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Canon EF 35-80mm PZ".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:28, 24 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Sticky shutter syndrome

edit

  Hello, OGWFP. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sticky shutter syndrome, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 13 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Sticky shutter syndrome

edit
 

Hello, OGWFP. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sticky shutter syndrome".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:44, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Glass dip pen

edit

  Hello, OGWFP. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Glass dip pen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 23 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Cropped jacket

edit

  Hello, OGWFP. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cropped jacket, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Glass dip pen

edit
 

Hello, OGWFP. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Glass dip pen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:34, 23 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Cropped jacket

edit
 

Hello, OGWFP. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cropped jacket".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:11, 24 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi OGWFP! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Dashboard?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi OGWFP! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Alignment of Userboxes, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 28 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Using internet and Youtube on smart TV

edit

[internet and Youtube on smart TV]

So I cannot use the Internet on smart tv? And I can't use Youtube either? 86.131.21.36 (talk) 20:01, 4 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

As other wikipedians said, it depends on what your dad says, after all it does seem to be his TV.
Sincerely OGWFP (talk) 22:08, 4 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi OGWFP! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, What to do with this IP?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 5 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

edit
 
Hello, OGWFP. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by ARoseWolf 17:37, 6 May 2022 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi OGWFP! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Userbox alignment again, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 10 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Alpha High Theft Solutions has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alpha High Theft Solutions. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 21:28, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi OGWFP! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Article i'm working, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 9 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse

edit

From the conversation from teahouse,there is nothing wrong with introducing your family to Wikipedia. Wikipedia can be contributed by anyone. Note: Message added November 13, 2022, I forgot to sign then. Cwater1 (talk) 18:08, 15 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Alpha High Theft Solutions

edit

  Hello, OGWFP. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alpha High Theft Solutions, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply