Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 18) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 12:45, 18 June 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Nageshkumarcs, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 12:45, 18 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, User:Nageshkumarcs/sandbox edit

 

Hello, Nageshkumarcs. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JustaZBguy (talk) 18:56, 18 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 23) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 08:24, 23 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, User:Nageshkumarcs/sandbox edit

 

Hello, Nageshkumarcs. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 13:15, 23 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Rangamahal Rahasya edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rangamahal Rahasya, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 16:26, 31 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Rangamahal Rahasya moved to draftspace edit

Thanks for your contributions to Rangamahal Rahasya. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TartarTorte 16:37, 31 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Anaku Ramanath moved to draftspace edit

Thanks for your contributions to Anaku Ramanath. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Annh07 (talk) 10:15, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anaku Ramanath (October 9) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Phuzion was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Phuzion (talk) 13:24, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

October 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm AgisdeSparte. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Anaku Ramanath because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. AgisdeSparte (talk) 14:17, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Anaku Ramanath. Wikipedia is not a collection of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links may include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. AgisdeSparte (talk) 14:21, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sir, Can you please tell me if Facebook, Linked in and Youtube links are inapproriate. If the said person has no other links in the Internet and I puiblish a text article withg out any links, still the article will be called without references. Not a Complaint, please help Nageshkumarcs (talk) 14:29, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Anaku Ramanath. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. AgisdeSparte (talk) 14:26, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Cut and paste move edit

  Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Anaku Ramanath. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:30, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Seelu Nakshatra edit

 

The article Seelu Nakshatra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of individual notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BangJan1999 15:47, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Seelu Nakshatra moved to draftspace edit

Thanks for your contributions to Seelu Nakshatra. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 08:01, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I will improve ....I also found another half formed wiki page. Please check and take n/a. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudesh_Berry Nageshkumarcs (talk) 13:43, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Rangamahal Rahasya edit

  Hello, Nageshkumarcs. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rangamahal Rahasya, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 31 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Rangamahal Rahasya edit

 

Hello, Nageshkumarcs. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rangamahal Rahasya".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:49, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Anaku Ramanath edit

  Hello, Nageshkumarcs. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anaku Ramanath, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:39, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Veerakaputra M srinivasa edit

  Hello, Nageshkumarcs. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Veerakaputra M srinivasa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:40, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Seelu Nakshatra edit

  Hello, Nageshkumarcs. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Seelu Nakshatra, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:15, 19 April 2024 (UTC)Reply