User talk:Misza13/Archives/2008/08

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive Map Special RfA-thanks Year 2005 Year 2006 I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Year 2007 I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Year 2008 I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Year 2009 I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Year 2010 I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Year 2011 I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Year 2012 I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Year 2013 I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Year 2014 I IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI Year 2015 I II III IV VI VII VIII IX XI XII Archive for August 2008 registierng my appreciation I just wanted tohank you for the heard work that you do archiving threads on both user talk pages and on content talk page.s It is much appreciated and teh project is better for your presence. You desrve a barnstar. Smith Jones (talk) 02:09, 1 August 2008 (UTC) Oddity Just passing by and noticed this. Thought it might be a mistake and you would want to take a look. JPG-GR (talk) 04:03, 2 August 2008 (UTC) No it's not - instead of just redirecting the bot's talk page to his, Beta decided on having all threads copied to his own. Миша13 12:01, 2 August 2008 (UTC) Ah... didn't know they were coming from the bot's talk page - didn't know where they were coming from, honestly. Makes sense now. Thanks for the reply! JPG-GR (talk) 01:35, 3 August 2008 (UTC) WP:PW newsletter The next edition of the WP:PW newsletter is ready for delivery here. Thanks, ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 06:14, 3 August 2008 (UTC) Again, please hold on. I'll let you know when it is ready. -- iMatthew T.C. 11:15, 3 August 2008 (UTC) Alright, it's good to go. -- iMatthew T.C. 11:27, 3 August 2008 (UTC) You delivered the wrong newsletter ;( Can you please replace the correct one with the other one. Cheers, -- iMatthew T.C. 16:43, 3 August 2008 (UTC) :o You got me confused because issue 23 was bolded on the newsletter page, not 22. In future, best to point out the issue # when signalling me to deliver it. Anyway, fixing in progress... Миша13 18:10, 3 August 2008 (UTC) Request for uninvolved comment Hi Misza13, I found you at random from the list of administrators. I am currently involved in a disagreement of sorts with an administrator, Raul654, regarding the content of some of the Global Warming articles. I should stress that I am not challanging any science based portion of these articles. I have written up on my talk page an informal request for comment on the situation, here. I come to you with the intention of accepting your opinion regardless of if it leaves me blocked and Raul654 vindicated completely. I am aware that reading through this (and the rest of my edit history, to verify Raul654's own accusation that I am in fact myself a disruptive editor) will take a fair lump of your time and will further respect your decision if you decide I am wasting your time. Thanks in advance, Jaimaster (talk) 03:43, 4 August 2008 (UTC) I'm relatively busy recently but I'll try my best to honestly comment on the situation over the following days. Btw, if you haven't already, you might also try other dispute resolution steps, such as the Mediation Cabal, for example. Миша13 20:17, 4 August 2008 (UTC) Image:General Chang.JPG Hey there! I noticed you deleted Image:General Chang.JPG a while back. Would you be able to restore the image, so that I may add a fair-use rationale for use in the article Chang (Star Trek)? Thank you! — OranL (talk) 03:49, 4 August 2008 (UTC) Restored. Миша13 20:12, 4 August 2008 (UTC) Thank you! I have added a fair-use rationale to the image. — OranL (talk) 22:48, 4 August 2008 (UTC) My Image Hi, I'd just like to know why you deleted my image Image:Soul Sprite.gif? Just felt like it? Skeletal S.L.J.C.O.A.A.A.T.R. 00:35, 5 August 2008 (UTC) Looks to me suspiciously similar to Sonic - are these related? Have you based your image on Sonic or his friends? Миша13 07:04, 5 August 2008 (UTC) It is a fan-fiction character that I created. I made that sprite. It's not violating anything. Skeletal S.L.J.C.O.A.A.A.T.R. 07:07, 5 August 2008 (UTC) Well, whatever. If you actually read the deletion log, you'd see that the image was deleted per Image with unknown copyright status., citing WP:CSD#I4. In fact, even after your re-upload, you still didn't tag the image with an appropriate copyright tag. As such, the image will continue to be tagged and deleted. Миша13 12:50, 5 August 2008 (UTC) I've stated that I created the image. What more could you possibly need to verify it? Skeletal S.L.J.C.O.A.A.A.T.R. 15:32, 5 August 2008 (UTC) That states nothing regarding your licensing conditions (and there are many to choose from) - every media on this site must have both the source and licensing information provided. I have provided the link for you above, let me repeat it explicitly: Wikipedia:Image copyright tags - please choose one that best fits you (as long as it's compatible with the image's planned use and that you're aware of implications of the chosen licensing). Regards, Миша13 18:12, 5 August 2008 (UTC) Talk:List_of_state_highways_in_Utah Misza - thoughts on why this page isn't archiving? --Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 19:05, 5 August 2008 (UTC) Yep. User:MiszaBot/Archive FAQ#Q1, reason 2. Миша13 19:55, 5 August 2008 (UTC) Duh! I had this problem on my userpage and never thought about the minthreadsleft parameter. Thanks! --Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 19:58, 5 August 2008 (UTC) Wikinews 4 Leads question Thank you again soooo much for the invaluable Wikinews Importer Bot (talk · contribs). I was wondering - would there be a way to create a bot to capture only the four headlines, with dates, from the 4 "Lead" article blurbs on the n:Main Page of Wikinews? n:Template:Lead article 1 n:Template:Lead article 2 n:Template:Lead article 3 n:Template:Lead article 4 I could see this as being useful on Wikipedia at some point soon. If it is too hard, no worries. Cirt (talk) 16:36, 20 July 2008 (UTC) Certainly possible, even though it would prolly be a quite different bot. Where would these be supposed to be dropped, and in what format? Миша13 20:54, 22 July 2008 (UTC) The format would be exactly like that of Wikinews Importer Bot (talk · contribs), so essentially: Headline for Lead article 1, Date. Headline for Lead article 2, Date. Headline for Lead article 3, Date. Headline for Lead article 4, Date. They would be dropped into a new page, perhaps titled User:Wikinews Importer Bot/Wikinews Lead articles or something like that. The uses could perhaps be transcluding these 4 Lead article headlines onto pages on Wikipedia (hopefully). Cirt (talk) 21:09, 22 July 2008 (UTC) Sorry to be a bother but even if it might take awhile it might be helpful to get a time estimate if this is something that could be done - we are trying to have some heady development and reform-style discussions on Wikinews and this type of bot or regularly updated list might help. Thank you so much, Cirt (talk) 00:51, 25 July 2008 (UTC) I think I may be thinking too hard about this - perhaps there is some way to use the DPL on Wikinews to have a Wikinews subpage with the 4 leads in this manner? (the way I manually did it as an example at User:Wikinews Importer Bot/Wikinews Lead articles) If so, the current bot Wikinews Importer Bot (talk · contribs) would be able to update it like any other subpage. Cirt (talk) 00:57, 25 July 2008 (UTC) Actually if Wikinews Importer Bot (talk · contribs) could do it by itself that might work out better in the long run - eh, I am not too sure, I will defer to you as you know more about this sort of thing than me and how to set it up (if you have a chance). Cirt (talk) 02:07, 25 July 2008 (UTC) Any ideas? Cirt (talk) 21:15, 29 July 2008 (UTC) Sorry for not replying timely; I've been quite busy recently. Of course, if you manage to get the DPL templates to do your work, then everything is already set - the bot is able to import that format. If however the initial idea must be pursued then I will require several days (given my other tasks) to code and test it - shouldn't be much of an obstacle though. For a start, let's see if I have it ready by the end of this weekend. Миша13 17:25, 31 July 2008 (UTC) I don't think DPL would be the way to go for that because we would first need a category, and that would require updating either by a human or by a bot - either way, I would much rather prefer the initial idea of a straight bot to do it and crawl from Wikipedia for it. No worries if it takes you some time - thanks so much for helping - I had just wanted a rough time estimate, no problem if it takes awhile. Cirt (talk) 20:16, 31 July 2008 (UTC) Any luck? Cirt (talk) 22:38, 5 August 2008 (UTC) Some, yes. I still have to get the date for the headline. I'm thinking about the the date of the first revision of the article that's linked from the template. Will try to use the API for that. Stay tuned for an update tomorrow... Миша13 16:28, 6 August 2008 (UTC) Ok, it seems to be working as expected: [1] - I'll set it to update hourly as the original bot. If you however plan on putting it on a high-visibility page (Main Page?) remember that the bot is not an admin and wouldn't be able to break through a cascading protection. :> Миша13 17:59, 7 August 2008 (UTC) Many thanks, I shall check into this further. Cirt (talk) 23:06, 7 August 2008 (UTC) Um, how would we proceed if we did want to get around the cascading protection issue and put this on a high-visibility page, (Main Page, etc.) ? Cirt (talk) 23:17, 7 August 2008 (UTC) And on a related note, would it make a difference if at some point in the future the 4 Main Page lead templates at Wikinews were also full protected? Cirt (talk) 23:20, 7 August 2008 (UTC) It shouldn't make any difference whatsoever since the bot only reads the the wikinews pages. Regarding going "around" the protection, should this idea arise seriously, I would prolly try a not-so-simple request on WP:BRFA/WT:BAG and finally on WP:BN to check if any 'crats had the balls to go "around" what is called "community consensus" and flag the bot +sysop in a rouge manner. Since I'm pretty sure none would, the only choice left would be WP:RfA, a.k.a. the hard way... Миша13 20:08, 8 August 2008 (UTC) Thank you so much for all you have already done. I will think about this, discuss with others and look into it further, and keep you posted. Cirt (talk) 20:29, 8 August 2008 (UTC) Block of Dooooooo0000000000000000000000000000000 The username policy doesn't support instant blocks of names like "Dooooooo0000000000000000000000000000000". Were you unaware of this, or were you just applying IAR? The consensus of WT:U is that it's much better to give a username warning with {{uw-username}} in those situations. That way, if the user is a good-faith user who didn't realize that they need to use a non-sucky name, we give them another chance and don't necessarily drive them away, and if they're a bad faith user, we find that out the first time they edit, because the username makes their vandalism really obvious and we can hardblock them. rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 23:45, 4 August 2008 (UTC) So, how many 0s are there exactly? Or are those Os? Besides, the first thing the block template says is how to create a new account. And if they don't edit at all (which they most often do, if they just registered for the lulz), then it's a lost effort to communicate with them (2 messages in this case). This has been my experience with this type of users (with whom I've had a share of dealings). I suppose you're the type that would prefer to discuss every single block for at least a week prior to actually (not) placing it, but that's not how things have been accomplished over the past years. Миша13 07:02, 5 August 2008 (UTC) Why does it matter how many 0s or Os there are? Nobody's asking you to recite the user's name in a spelling bee. You're on a computer; if you want to see what the user's up to, you click on the link. It's no more difficult than interacting with, say, a user with an Arabic name. Perhaps nobody was harmed by this block, but that was not the case for Ggggggggggggggg12 -- you could have been the one making that mistake. Yes, I think blocks need to be discussed, and I don't see placing unnecessary blocks as an "accomplishment". rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 22:09, 9 August 2008 (UTC) And BTW, what is this pointless digging in my months-old logs? After you poked me a month ago about a similar issue, I removed the character repetition rule from my bot. Now you made me go WTF three times: For once, I couldn't find this block in my recent log and was expecting some Mediawiki bug. Second, I went to remove the rule (again!) only to find it's not there anymore. And finally, when I checked the user himself (of course you didn't even link to him as you suggest and I had to go through the copy/paste routine - I'd type the username in the URL by hand if it was simpler) I saw you were referring to a block back from May. Srsly, the world has moved by a few million kilometers since then. Миша13 23:17, 9 August 2008 (UTC) Huh. I actually don't know how I came across this block. I found the user's page as a link from some current event -- I've totally lost track of what -- and I mistakenly thought the block was current as well. I certainly didn't go digging in your logs intentionally. I do apologize for the confusion, then, and I appreciate the response to the unnecessary bother I've created. rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 23:28, 9 August 2008 (UTC) Image Renewal I wonder if you know how to renew an image, like edit an Wikipedia image a little bit to make it look better and relace that image with the old one (The old one would be shown on the image page). Do you just upload the file under the same name, or is there a more complex procedure. Asking, --RayqayzaDialgaWeird2210    21:11, 8 August 2008 (UTC) On every image page, in the "File history" section there is a link called "Upload a newer version of this file". Or you could just go straight to Special:Upload and simply specify the same destination. Either way, you should probably only upload the image with a different version of it, not with an entirely different image. Cheers, Миша13 18:30, 9 August 2008 (UTC) Deletion of Image:Phoenix_Fire_Dept_Logo.png You recently deleted an image (Image:Phoenix_Fire_Dept_Logo.png) that I uploaded on the grounds that it was copyrighted but unused. However, WP:CSD#I5 clearly states: "Reasonable exceptions may be made for images uploaded for an upcoming article." After I received a speedy deletion warning, I added a note to the image's description section saying that it was intended for us in an upcoming article. I believe that the image is acceptable for upload under said conditions, and I would appreciate your input on the matter. Thank you. Seanm028 (talk) 10:44, 12 August 2008 (UTC) Restored. Миша13 18:13, 12 August 2008 (UTC) Bluster Kong Hi Misza, I noticed that you deleted Image:BlusterKong.jpg. Based on the guideline you cited, I am under the impression that you deleted it because it was not used in any articles at that point. For some reason, Bluster Kong became a redirect to List of Donkey Kong characters but the information about him was not merged into the list. I have completed the merge, but the section would look much better if the image supplimented the information. Would you mind restoring the image now that it would be in use? Neelix (talk) 22:50, 17 August 2008 (UTC) Restored. Миша13 19:38, 18 August 2008 (UTC) Talk page not getting archived My talk page hasn't been archived since July 7, but it also hasn't been touched since July 26, though everything on it right now ought to be archived since my minthreads is set to 0. = ∫tc 5th Eye 06:07, 18 August 2008 (UTC) Thanks! Hope that works. = ∫tc 5th Eye 17:29, 20 August 2008 (UTC) Problems using archivebot.py Hi Misza13, I'm having some trouble using the archivebot.py on de.wikinews. This is the error: Traceback (most recent call last): File "archivebot.py", line 475, in main Archiver = PageArchiver(pg, a, salt, force) File "archivebot.py", line 298, in __init__ self.loadConfig() File "archivebot.py", line 339, in loadConfig raise MissingConfigError MissingConfigError Can you please help me? Don't know what to do. I don't think that there is any error, I took your original-script and I have always this error. My script looks like this: http://rapidshare.com/files/138279277/archivebot.py.html Looking forward to here from you, and thanks.--HouseGhostDiscussion 17:50, 18 August 2008 (UTC) No matter what I do, I just can't run the archivebot.py.. Do I have to make some modifications because it's a german wiki?--HouseGhostDiscussion 19:21, 18 August 2008 (UTC) Right now this looks more like a problem outlined in User:MiszaBot/Archive FAQ#Q1/scenario 3. Миша13 19:41, 18 August 2008 (UTC) I've got it now (for now he knows the parameters), but he isn't archieving anything. Can you please look over the page if everything is alright? http://de.wikinews.org/wiki/Benutzer_Diskussion:Der_Hausgeist/Archiv-Test --HouseGhostDiscussion 19:49, 18 August 2008 (UTC) I tried it now on an english wiki, too, with english timestamps, but nothing works. I just can't help myself, why it isn't archieving anything. Even with the original script, it isn't working and I just don't get why.--HouseGhostDiscussion 22:43, 18 August 2008 (UTC) Oh, and one thing: It's showing the bot-help always after every "run". Maybe that means something to you?--HouseGhostDiscussion 19:06, 19 August 2008 (UTC) Can't get this to work alone, so I need your help. Could you please contact me via E-Mail?--HouseGhostDiscussion 13:10, 19 August 2008 (UTC) It always displays the help - something to do with the framework itself, not my bot. I think the problem on dewiki is with the timestamp format - it's quite different from what we use on enwiki (and the bot doesn't handle that format). Can you show me an example on the english wiki where it doesn't work either? Миша13 19:54, 19 August 2008 (UTC) Well, it was this wiki: http://metalgear.wikia.com/ . Is there any trick, anything I can do so it will work along with the german time format?--HouseGhostDiscussion 20:11, 19 August 2008 (UTC) I don't know why it doesn't work on metalgear.wikia - can you point out a specific page? In the class DiscussionThread, method feedLine there is a string of checks like this: if not TIME: TIME = ... You could try adding the german format to the list as another option. Миша13 06:55, 20 August 2008 (UTC) One of these should work, ain't? if not TIME: TIME = txt2timestamp(TM.group(0),"%H:%M, %d. %b. %Y (%Z)") if not TIME: TIME = txt2timestamp(TM.group(0),"%H:%M, %b. %d. %Y (%Z)") if not TIME: TIME = txt2timestamp(TM.group(0),"%H:%M, %d. %B. %Y (%Z)") Or how else shall I do it? How do I tell Python, that the montch is shortenes, from August to Aug., from April to Apr.?--HouseGhostDiscussion 11:40, 20 August 2008 (UTC) Almost - a dot in a regular expression denotes "any character", so you should escape them with backslashes. Read more about python's "re" module here: http://docs.python.org/lib/module-re.html Regarding a short month name, read the documentation on the time module - %B is the full name, %b is abbreviated. Миша13 17:04, 20 August 2008 (UTC) So, this should work, right? TM = re.search(r'(\d\d):(\d\d), (\d\d?)\. (\w+)\. (\d\d\d\d) \(.*?\)', line) if TM: # wikipedia.output(TM) TIME = txt2timestamp(TM.group(0),"%H:%M, %d\. %b\. %Y (%Z)") if TIME: self.timestamp = max(self.timestamp,time.mktime(TIME)) It isn't. Isn't this script used on ANY german project before?--HouseGhostDiscussion 17:19, 20 August 2008 (UTC) Because (as the documentation I linked to explains) backslashes themselves are control sequence markers and must be escaped twice: "%H:%M, %d\\. %b\\. %Y (%Z)". And no, to my knowledge it hasn't been used on any german wiki. Миша13 17:23, 20 August 2008 (UTC) Well, thanks for your help. I did that changes, but it is still not working. As I see (and the error message is the following when I take away the "if TM:"-condition), it doesn't even grab the timestamp: TIME = txt2timestamp(TM.group(0),"%H:%M, %d\\. %b\\. %Y (%Z)") AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'group' ...what means I can't do anything anymore, right?--HouseGhostDiscussion 17:35, 20 August 2008 (UTC) Well, I'm certainly lost now. If I find some free time in the following days, I'll try to do it myself and see what's the problem. Миша13 17:47, 20 August 2008 (UTC) Okay. Here is my testing-page, so you can look over it: http://de.wikinews.org/wiki/Benutzer_Diskussion:Der_Hausgeist/Archiv-Test --HouseGhostDiscussion 17:48, 20 August 2008 (UTC) Alright, I got it here. With a lot of regexp and replace-functions. (like taking the dots away, and changing things like "Dez(ember)" into "Dec(ember)". Not the best method, but I hope that it will work until you bring up a new version with better german support :-).--HouseGhostDiscussion 00:44, 21 August 2008 (UTC) Your Deletion of Image:Celebrity centre promotional photo.jpg You deleted the Church of Scientology publicity photo featuring John Travolta and Rep. Ros Lehtinen on August 7th. The photo was more than properly documented as fair use, and it is the only known photo of a prominent Republican politician at a Scientology event. So what gives? MiamiManny (talk) 13:13, 20 August 2008 (UTC) Documented or not, it wasn't used in any articles (as you could read from the deletion log), which is a requirement for a nonfree image to stay on Wikipedia. Миша13 16:51, 20 August 2008 (UTC) Yet another whine about the archiver bot Hey, I set up archiving via your bot for my talk page back on the 15th. So far, however, there hasn't been any activity. I'm wondering if this is because I've done manual archiving before and the bot doesn't want to touch the current archive, or if I'm doing it wrong, or what... Could you please figure out how I'm screwing it up, and let me know how to fix it? Thanks. --coldacid (talk|contrib) 18:28, 20 August 2008 (UTC) No, it's actually my fault and a minor deficiency in the bot's code - case of the first letter matters for it. Миша13 18:31, 20 August 2008 (UTC) Ah. Thanks for catching that and making the change for me! --coldacid (talk|contrib) 18:36, 20 August 2008 (UTC) A talk page section not getting archived I'm curious why this section was not archived with that edit?--Rockfang (talk) 02:42, 18 August 2008 (UTC) Any ideas?--Rockfang (talk) 21:58, 20 August 2008 (UTC) Ah, just spotted it - a missing comma after the time and before the day. Миша13 20:15, 21 August 2008 (UTC) Thank you for catching the problem, and responding.--Rockfang (talk) 21:55, 21 August 2008 (UTC) Problem archiving Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles Needing Copy Edit Hi Misza. I can't seem to get the bot to archive our project's talk page. The code looks correct but no archiving has been done over the past few days... Is it a problem with the code? Thanks :) -Samuel Tan 09:37, 19 August 2008 (UTC) Well, duh! Миша13 19:51, 19 August 2008 (UTC) No need to be incivil. Simply pointing out the problem without saying "duh" or "EPIC DUH" would have been better. -kotra (talk) 19:55, 19 August 2008 (UTC) No, that's EPIC DUH. Period. And if you perceive this fact as incivil, it doesn't make it any less so. Cheers, Миша13 06:56, 20 August 2008 (UTC) To me, "duh" means "you're being stupid". "Epic duh" (in all caps, no less) means then "you're being very stupid". How is that not incivil? If you don't see this as a problem, please review WP:Civility. -kotra (talk) 18:02, 20 August 2008 (UTC) Yeah, now I'm 100% sure the problem is on your end. I suggest you research the meaning of "duh" further before making any more frivolous comments. Regards, Миша13 18:09, 20 August 2008 (UTC) Two definitions, a third. -kotra (talk) 21:02, 20 August 2008 (UTC) Seriously, this is hilarious. I honestly thought you would get the hint and go about your business now. But instead you continue this nonsensical discussion. But I'm not at all surprised that you have chosen references that are biased towards your POV, instead of, for example, reading up our own definition or about the root of the word. Well, if the hint wasn't clear before: I am not interested in further participation in this perversion. Thank you, Миша13 20:23, 21 August 2008 (UTC) I know this particular case is minor, but if you still don't see how you were being incivil, then it could potentially be a much more extensive problem. Incivility is particularly problematic for bot owners and administrators, as per Wikipedia:BOT#Good communication and Wikipedia:Administrators#Administrator conduct. As I'm sure you're aware, Wikipedia only works if editors respect each other. And I don't understand why you say I've "chosen" references that are biased to my POV: they say nearly the same thing as the wiktionary definition you provide. Dictionary.com and m-w.com are just the only two online dictionaries I am aware of (aside from wiktionary, which I don't use). Regardless, wiktionary defines "duh" as "Disdainful indication that something is obvious." wikt:Disdain is further defined as "A feeling of contempt or scorn." Now do you understand why I feel your usage of the term is incivil? If you do not, please explain respectfully. I am trying to resolve this in a cordial manner, please do the same for me. -kotra (talk) 21:33, 21 August 2008 (UTC) Minor pedantic aside: the origin of "duh" is not "d'oh". All the etymologies of the word I've seen (admittedly, only two) put the origin in the 1960s, as an imitation of a sound slow-witted people (allegedly) make. Reading up on it more, it seems that the two have recently been mistaken to have the same source, but they do not. This is, however, pretty irrelevant. -kotra (talk) 22:25, 21 August 2008 (UTC) Same thing with Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Arena Football League. Crash Underride 15:08, 19 August 2008 (UTC) User:MiszaBot/Archive FAQ#Q1; reason 2. Миша13 19:51, 19 August 2008 (UTC) Ok, thanks. I didn't know it had a minimum number. lol Crash Underride 18:18, 21 August 2008 (UTC) User:Wikinews Importer Bot/Wikinews Lead articles Thank you so much for doing this. Quick question, can you change this to only 3 items in the list and not 4? I will update you on how this goes, I am about ready to propose it. Cirt (talk) 22:38, 19 August 2008 (UTC) Which three? Some specific ones or just 3 newest ones? Миша13 07:00, 20 August 2008 (UTC) The three newest out of the 4 Main Page Lead templates. Cirt (talk) 12:22, 20 August 2008 (UTC) Ok, done. Миша13 16:53, 20 August 2008 (UTC) Awesome, thanks. Will keep you posted. Cirt (talk) 21:03, 21 August 2008 (UTC) Order of statements in MiszaBot III config, transclude questions Is order of statements which configure MiszaBot critical, in addition to having a carriage return/line feed (new line) for each statement following a pipe character? May the configuration template be transcluded to the talk page, say from a Talkheader template? Thank you! -Newportm (talk) 18:58, 21 August 2008 (UTC) The order is irrelevant - in fact, the bot will sort the variables in its preferred order next time it edits the page. Also, the template can't be transcluded from another page because then the bot wouldn't find it if it were to "enter edit mode". Миша13 20:14, 21 August 2008 (UTC) WP:PW newsletter Issue 23 of the newsletter is ready for delivery here. Thanks, ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 08:25, 18 August 2008 (UTC) Actually, there are some errors that need to be banged out. Please don't deliver it until I send you another message later this afternoon, when I get home. -- iMatthew T.C. 11:19, 18 August 2008 (UTC) Um, is it ok to send or not, then? Миша13 19:49, 19 August 2008 (UTC) Yes please do send it. I apologise for having been messed around like this. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 19:54, 23 August 2008 (UTC) oh my gosh. I'm so sorry! I completely forgot to send you the message. -- iMatthew T.C. 19:56, 23 August 2008 (UTC) My talkpage - broken? Hi - sorry to bother you, the bot seems to have left my talkpage untouched for quite a while now; the paramaters in my template all seem to be right, I wonder if you could take a look at it. Thanks! ╟─Treasury§Tag►contribs─╢ 17:55, 21 August 2008 (UTC) See User:MiszaBot/Archive FAQ#Q1, reason 2. Миша13 20:11, 21 August 2008 (UTC) No, I use those parameters already, I'm afraid - my code says: {{User:MiszaBot/config |minthreadsleft = 0 |minthreadstoarchive = 1 |algo = old(2d) |archive = User talk:TreasuryTag/Archives/%(year)d/%(monthnameshort)s }} Anything else it might be? :P ╟─Treasury§Tag►contribs─╢ 18:54, 22 August 2008 (UTC) Then it must be random space radiation - it happens from time to time that the bot doesn't see a page on Special:Whatlinkshere of the template. Best I could do for now was to remove and add it back, hoping it forces the mw:templatelinks table to update. If nothing happens though, I'll see about changing it to use api.php instead... Миша13 19:19, 22 August 2008 (UTC) Hmmm; thanks, sorry to be causing trouble :P ╟─Treasury§Tag►contribs─╢ 20:54, 22 August 2008 (UTC) Please help me set up an automatic archive on my talk page Hello there. I fear that you get these sorts of requests only too often but unfortunately when I tried to set up automatic archiving on my talk page using MiszaBot III, nothing seemed to have happened. Could you please check over the code I have used and inform me of what the problem is? Thanks in advance. It Is Me Here (talk) 16:37, 22 August 2008 (UTC) Please see two threads above - you might be the victim of the same effect (the bot doesn't see your page). I'll see what I can do about it. Миша13 19:20, 22 August 2008 (UTC) OK, thanks - if you do manage to fix the problem, it would be very much appreciated. It Is Me Here (talk) 20:24, 22 August 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for July 28, August 9, 11 and 18, 2008. Sorry I haven't been sending this over the past few weeks. Ralbot (talk) 05:29, 23 August 2008 (UTC) The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery Volume 4, Issue 31 28 July 2008 About the Signpost Wikimania 2008 wrap-up WikiWorld: "Terry Gross"  News and notes: Unblocked in China Dispatches: Find reliable sources online  WikiProject Report: Military history Features and admins  Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation  Volume 4, Issue 32 9 August 2008 About the Signpost Anthrax suspect reportedly edit-warred on Wikipedia WikiWorld: "Fall Out Boy"  Dispatches: Style guide and policy changes, July WikiProject Report: WikiProject New York State routes  Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News  The Report on Lengthy Litigation Volume 4, Issue 33 11 August 2008 About the Signpost Study: Wikipedia's growth may indicate unlimited potential Board of Trustees fills Nominating Committee for new members  Greenspun illustration project moves to first phase WikiWorld: "George Stroumboulopoulos"  News and notes: Wikipedian dies Dispatches: Reviewing free images  Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News  The Report on Lengthy Litigation Volume 4, Issue 34 18 August 2008 About the Signpost From the editor: Help wanted  WikiWorld: "Cashew" Dispatches: Choosing Today's Featured Article  Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News  The Report on Lengthy Litigation Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:29, 23 August 2008 (UTC) Greenhouse effect archiving I am fairly new to Wikipedia but not at all new to physics. I have been contributing to the Greenhouse effect but recently dicussion has been almost completely suppressed by the introduction of automatic archiving which sends discussion to the archives when it is a few weeks old. It does this by running some software called a mizabot or some such. I have been told that I might be able to adjust the parameters of this Mizabot but, although I have searched extensively, I cannot find where the code is still less how to edit these parameters. I am familiar with the obscurities of MS Access with it hidden processing that conceals most of what is happening. To me this automatic archiving is similar. Are you able to enlighten me on the matter of automatic archiving? I have asked those who enabled the archiving to change it to leave contributions for this year visible but no luck so far. Perhaps the last 6 months would be a better idea. The current situation is absurd and appears to be quite contrary to Wikipedia policy i.e, consent for automatic archiving (is this for all archiving?) I may be at the wrong place or completely out of step, I have the weird feeling I am writing this to a non-existant person whose identity is only a programing construct, it keeps you in the beginner category just so much longer. I have contribution to make to Greenhouse effect and I don't see why discussion should be suppressed by archiving. --Damorbel (talk) 21:07, 25 August 2008 (UTC) First of all, it's "Misza", not "Miza" - seems like dozens of people who keep confusing that can't read what's before their very eyes. Second, you're talking to me, a human, the bot's operator. Third, the edits where the archiving was requested were here: [2] - as you see, it wasn't me who did that, I only provide archiving service to those who opt in to use it. (And you could've found it in the page's history on your own.) If someone uses it against consensus, it's not my problem - you can adjust the settings, revert the archiving, etc. Fourth, if you bothered to do some research first, and visited the bot's userpage, you'd invariably end up at User:MiszaBot/Archive HowTo which explains the rules of archiving in great detail. Fifth, archiving discussions that haven't been posted to in two month can hardly be called "suppressing" (on the other hand, it's a demagogy-loaded word, and entirely unnecessary here). If you want that to be 6 months, help yourself, I coudln't care less. Sixth, if you bothered to enter edit mode on the archived page, you'd notice the bot's configuration at its very top (does that qualify as more than "extensive searching"?). Regards, Миша13 22:40, 25 August 2008 (UTC) Thanks for the warm welcome to a beginner! Your response "Fifth, archiving discussions that haven't been posted to in two month" I may have made a mistake but what I object to is stuff being archived when it has been on show for two months or less, in my book that is "suppressing", I know you "coudln't care less" sorry I bothered you for help.--Damorbel (talk) 12:56, 26 August 2008 (UTC) By the way your problem with the spelling of you name arises because sometimes it reads "Миша" instead of Misza. I have the same problem because my name was originally Gaelic. I solved the problem by not getting upset when dealing with non Gaelic speakers who did not understand. I tried looking at the Polish alphabet but I still couldn't resolve the characters in Миша, is that article no good? --Damorbel (talk) 13:17, 26 August 2008 (UTC) Well uh u see, i went to da store an bough sum gum.. it is sour gum. its good —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.156.57.227 (talk) 13:50, 28 August 2008 (UTC) Um, excuse me? Миша13 20:52, 29 August 2008 (UTC) Puerto Rico Newsletter Hey, I am interested in reviving this Newsletter, but User:R who used to work with the delivery has since retired. I noticed that your bot does the delivery for WP:PW, is there a chance that it could do so for WP:PUR? - Caribbean~H.Q. 01:03, 29 August 2008 (UTC) Sorry, I'm too busy to accomodate yet another newsletter at this point. But you might try other members of Category:Newsletter delivery bots instead - there should be some active ones around. Миша13 20:56, 29 August 2008 (UTC) That's cool, I will keep going in my search, thanks for your time. - Caribbean~H.Q. 01:39, 30 August 2008 (UTC) ~*Giggle*~ You around this morning, dear? :) Ariel♥Gold 12:43, 29 August 2008 (UTC) Not really. I'm so wound up with work lately, I only occasionally check for new messages. :( I do though (as I check my mailbox), so feel free to msg me at any time (don't expect a very timely response though). Миша13 20:58, 29 August 2008 (UTC) how is the archiving done? I would like an explanation about how archiving is done, in particular unresolved complaints. I am referring to a complaint entitled /*Harassment by Badagnani */ which was archived in this sweep. Would it be appropriate to reinstate it, and if so, how? Ohconfucius (talk) 02:41, 30 August 2008 (UTC) Archiving (as noted in the edit summary) is done by copying threads that are older than (in case of AN/I) 24 hours (where "old" means that no one has posted to the thread in 24 hours). If you wish to reinstate a thread just copy it from the archive back to the main page (and add a fresh timestamp, so that the bot doesn't archive it right away). Миша13 19:22, 30 August 2008 (UTC) WP:PW Newsletter ready for delivery. The WP:PW Newsletter is ready to be delivered here.--SRX 03:06, 31 August 2008 (UTC) It's issue 24, btw. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 03:08, 31 August 2008 (UTC)