User talk:Misza13/Archives/2006/07

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive Map Special RfA-thanks Year 2005 Year 2006 I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Year 2007 I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Year 2008 I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Year 2009 I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Year 2010 I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Year 2011 I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Year 2012 I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Year 2013 I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Year 2014 I IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI Year 2015 I II III IV VI VII VIII IX XI XII Archive for July 2006 My dear Misza My dear Misza, your extremely kind words and your beautiful gift mean so incredibly much to me, that I'm not sure I can express it properly. I'll display it with pride, you can count on it. I did notice your previous hard work on the Native American Portal, and your excellent work did it all much more clear and easy for me - and this is also the perfect oportunity to invite you to retouch it all you want. I hope this is but the beginning of a long friendship, since it's not everyday that I get approached out of the blue by one of the kindest Wikipedians I've ever seen. A big big hug, Phædriel ♥ tell me - 21:16, 1 July 2006 (UTC) RE: Birthday Thanks a ton! Hopefully the next one doesn't come for a while. >_< Cheers, Master of Puppets Giant Enemy Crab! 05:09, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Call for consensus on fan site list on Andy Murray page Hello Misza13, You've probably noticed my (probably foolhardy) attempt to resolve the edit war on the Andy Murray page regarding fansites. The protagonists do not look about to resolve it among themselves, so I'd appreciate it if you and other regular editors could express your views on this part of the page, so that we can stop the war going forward, or at least block a protagonist who persists in it. Please come to the talk page here The questions I've put are: Please can I have the opinions of those who regularly edit this site: 1.Should there be a list of fansites? 2.Should it be ordered a) alphabetically b) by site's popularity or quality c) by some other factor 3. If by popularity/quality how to judge this? Thanks RobbieC 21:10, 5 July 2006 (UTC) No thanks. I only reverted vandalism/Google Toolbar malfunction on that page and am certainly not interested in your edit war. Misza13 T C 21:38, 5 July 2006 (UTC) Deleting my edits Dear Misza13, Why did you delete my edits to User:Nathanrdotcom? 81.158.86.241 17:21, 8 July 2006 (UTC) Not to be rude but user pages are for users to tell the world about themselves and user talk pages are for other users to leave comments, not the reverse. — Nathan (talk) / 18:02, 10 July 2006 (UTC) Thanks Misza! Hi there. I would like to thank you very much for your vote in the Esperanza Elections, your trust in me was appreciated and I hope I will be able to live up to your expectations in the future. Thanks again! Regards -- Banes 09:57, 10 July 2006 (UTC) Esperanza Elections Misza13 Thank you for your vote in the Esperanza Elections. Your support is much appreciated, and it means that I am now in the Council. I will continue to try my best, and if you have any questions or queries, please don't hesistate to leave me a message. Thanks again, — FireFox 15:26, 10 July 2006 (UTC) Lots of thanks I offer many thanks to you, Misza13, for your support in the Esperanza elections! Your confidence means a lot, and I look forward to working to better Esperanza. -- Natalya 01:07, 11 July 2006 (UTC) Nazi symbols Nazi symbols Ilya K 12:51, 13 July 2006 (UTC) Python Where did you learn python? GangstaEB (sliding logs~dive logs) 01:51, 14 July 2006 (UTC) From books mainly. I started with Python. Pocket Reference, but it was too concise. Later, I studied some example code for the pywikipedia framework and finally bought Python Cookbook, which should now serve all my further needs (like Perl Cookbook does). Misza13 T C 15:34, 14 July 2006 (UTC) Barnstar The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar This Anti-Vandalism Barnstar is awarded to you because of all of the work you have done reverting vandalism. Gray Porpoise 01:43, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Thanks Hey thanks for the CSS. :P My browser seemed to cope quite well. Here's to many more wikibirthdays! Cheers -- Banes 18:44, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Cool Barnstar above too btw. And why didnt you tell me you were up for adminship you scamp! I might have missed it... -- Banes 18:58, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Poland question I find it somewhat suprising - not in a negative way, just suprising - that a active editor from Poland, one who is now applying for adminship, seems to never involve himself with WP:PWNB...? Well, you added yourself to the participant list, but I don't recall you posting there. Any particular reason why?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 18:50, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Yeah, I know. I'm usually so preoccupied with maintenance work (like reverting vandals) that I don't find time for "real" article editing, much less visiting our cabal's den. Moreover, whenever I read PWNB, I have a bad luck at finding issues with someone altering Poland-related articles in a sneaky way, and such edit wars just drive me away. I promise I'll try to improve, boss. ;-) Misza13 T C 19:12, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Thank you for the answer. Do what is most fun for you, wikignome work is much appreciated. Although I we need more users involved in some discussions, on the other hand, being less involved in some content disputes makes you a more neutral admin then I am - so feel free to keep on doing what you have. Wiki needs us all. Keep up the good work! PS. If you are familiar with bots, there is something related to geography of Poland Wikiproject and pl wiki that User:Balcer (IIRC) wanted to do, you may want to talk to him.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 01:49, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Mazel tov! Congrats on reaching WP:100!!! -- Where 17:07, 18 July 2006 (UTC) Thank you! :-D Next stop, WP:200. ;-) Misza13 T C 17:18, 18 July 2006 (UTC) Thanks for the thanks :). Sadly though, I think the rate of RFA supports has a strong inverse coralation to the amount of people who have already supported (now that is something that would probably be fun to fit a regression line to :) ). Still, I hope you get it anyway. Maybe more people would notice you if you changed your IRC nick to Misza13|rfa? Then again, people might oppose because of attempts to publicize your RFA if you did that. -- Where 22:22, 18 July 2006 (UTC) Nage drove ya Yeah Meesh, you shoulda told me! I've been watching your talkpage for an RfA (I was too afraid of screwing up the nomination to nom you), and all of the sudden I'm passing thru WP:RfA and there's you! It was like the Twilight Zone.....your nomination was already halfway down the page! Best of luck as an admin!--The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 19:53, 18 July 2006 (UTC) Well, advertising one's RfA has been frowned upon in the past, so I chose to keep a low profile. All I did was actually changing the "Admin hopeful" userbox on my main userpage to "Admin nominee" (even that's hard to spot, since they're all rolled up). I'm glad you found it anyway. I have {{User:Dragons flight/RFA summary}} transcluded on my Desk, so it's harder to miss someone I'd care to vote for, BTW. Misza13 T C 20:32, 18 July 2006 (UTC) Ah, so I see.--The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 20:45, 18 July 2006 (UTC) WIkipedia:Esperanza/User Page Award Misza13, thanks for signing up for the Esperanza User Page Contest. The judges have received the fifteen entries, and are ready to start judging. The judges will take a week to complete the judging process, and they will contact all the participants when the judging is done. Please drop by the contest page for contest updates and questions. Take care, and good luck! May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|) 10:12, 20 July 2006 (UTC) A new RfA Q Just to let you know, Viva La Vie Boheme! added a simplw last minute Q on your RfA. Not that it'd make any difference answering it to the result of the RfA, but having a nice completed flawless RfA to look back on and be proud of would be nice.--Andeh 02:51, 21 July 2006 (UTC) comments Hi, Misza13, thanks for your comments on my page and happy editing to you, too! Shannonduck talk 16:13, 21 July 2006 (UTC) Misza13: I try to AGF but I think that vote may be against the spirit of the RFA process (although I'm not expert, so I'm not sure). I heard that sometimes people asked 'crats if this was the case, and, if so, obtained permission to cross such votes out; maybe you should ask? On the other hand, maybe doing so would cause wikiStrife, and thus may not be worth it. Just something to think about. -- Where 20:24, 21 July 2006 (UTC) Totally not worth the potential fuss. I'll leave it be. BTW, the RfA is now 2.5 hrs after deadline. Where's the 'crats when you need one? :-P *Considers an RfB to speed it up...* Misza13 T C 20:34, 21 July 2006 (UTC) :) -- Where 21:13, 21 July 2006 (UTC) Congratulations I saw your RfA just closed with a remarkable 132 supports. Congratulations! Welcome to the mop. Best, Gwernol 01:24, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Amazingly, one of the bots reported an extra 22 oppose votes, and yet you still would have passed if they were real . NoSeptember 01:39, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Congratulations After an impressive showing of community support, you're now an admin. Use the new tools wisely, as questions whenever you may be in doubt, and re-read the policies before taking action. Have fun, and let me know if I can help with anything. And find 4 more good admin candidates! :) Anyway congrats again. - Taxman Talk 01:27, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Mazel tov! -- Where 01:44, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Congrats! Congrats, and I apologize for the lengthy speech on your RfA page in response to the oppose vote; I was trying to neutralize all the back and forth comments with a compromising point of view. — Deckiller 02:22, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Congrats! Make good use of your tools, and you will be a fantastic admin. --Terence Ong (Chat | Contribs) 04:54, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Congratulations and all the best. --Bhadani 09:13, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Congratulations! Michael 09:25, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Congrats and well done! (happy I could squeak in a support before it closed) -- Samir धर्म 09:32, 22 July 2006 (UTC) The mop is yours! Congratulations, and you're very welcome! --Merovingian (T, C, @) 09:33, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Well done on your very successful RfA. Happy mopping!  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  11:44, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Congrats! You'll be a great admin! :) --Firsfron of Ronchester 09:40, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Choose a mop!! Misza13, I'm really glad that you not only are now an admin, but you're also in WP:100! Seeing as you'll be needing them, why not choose from this fine selection of mops? I'm sure you'll continue to be as great an admin as you are a user. Cheers, Thε Halo Θ 09:51, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Oy! Hearty congratulations on your promotion, it was well deserved. As said above, I'm sure you'll make a great admin, and an abusive one too I don't doubt. :P Enjoy your new buttons! Oh, and happy edit day too! w00t my account is 4 days older than yours. (Sticks out tongue childishly.) -- Banes 10:11, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Well done! Seivad 12:07, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Happy First Edit Day (a day early)! I'm going to be looking at colleges for the next few days, so I thought I'd post this now: HAPPY FIRST EDIT DAY! from the BIRTHDAYCOMMITTEE Wishing Misza13/Archives/2006/07 a very Happy First Edit Day! Have a fantastic day! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee Michael 10:08, 22 July 2006 (UTC) More Congrats Well done on your RfA, outstanding support across the board. Use the tools wisely and happy mopping. Best wishes. --Cactus.man ✍ 10:42, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Belated congratulations from me as well! I must have just missed it... CaptainVindaloo t c e 13:48, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Congrats from me too: if I hadn't missed your RfA, I would have supported it :) Mushroom (Talk) 13:54, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 4.243.215.217 This is your first block and I feel it is wonderful. He have constantly stated that his link is legitamte link for infomation. Can you please watch him and if he gets out of the line can you do what administrators do best? -ScotchMB 12:16, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Congrats and, perhaps, an apology. My heartiest congratulations on a successful candidacy! My only regret is that it appears that my asking you the questions I did set off that user's diatribe which marred your perfect unopposed record. I do apologise for that (but won't stop asking the question, it's a good one...) All the best of luck and I look forward to working with you more! ++Lar: t/c 12:59, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Thanks. I also regret that my RfA didn't finish spotless, but I don't blame you. That was indeed a very good question and some user's reaction is certainly not your fault. I believe it does take some time to understand that WikiPolitics and what you name them doesn't really matter, but rather the goal itself. Happy editing! Misza13 T C 13:05, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Awesome job! How about some ice cream? ;) The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 13:54, 22 July 2006 (UTC) My congrats. I see your RFA passed successfully. I hope you have fun with your new tools. Remember, always use caution when you need to block. Mostly Rainy 14:02, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Congrats on your RfA I now realise that I shouldn't have supported at your RfA. As Shannon says, the fact that so many people support you clearly shows that you are not suitable for adminship. --David Mestel(Talk) 16:27, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Could you please explain what in the world has the ammount of support votes to do with suitability for adminship? This is just beyond my understanding... Misza13 T C 16:34, 22 July 2006 (UTC) I think that he felt that the large number of supports showed that you had rigged the RfA. However, given the large number of entries on WP:100, this is patently false. --David Mestel(Talk) 17:39, 22 July 2006 (UTC) I wish Shannon heeded my advice, since someone may use that voting issue against him in the future. — Deckiller 18:07, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Good point. --David Mestel(Talk) 18:09, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Concerning User:Storminnorman789 There is no real pertinent information left on this user's talk page. I think we can clear it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.216.135.41 (talk • contribs) . Let the user decide for himself if (s)he wants it archived/removed/whatever. Misza13 T C 16:59, 22 July 2006 (UTC) typo congrats on becoming an admin and thx for the thank you note, thought i'd mention there's a typo in it... the word "to" is missing in the first few words: "Thank you for contributing the impressive the pile of supports" Themindset 16:57, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Thanks. That's not the only error in the message though. But it's also loaded with pranks of some kinds. ;-) Misza13 T C 17:00, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Another typo ... you didn't get the support/oppose vote count correct. You used 0x, implying hexadecimal, but the number you gave in hexadecimal doesn't even come close to matching the actual number of support votes you got ... Cyde↔Weys 17:39, 22 July 2006 (UTC) That's exactly what I had in mind above. When the RfA was about to close, it was 127 and then I made the error, writing 0xFF instead 0x7F when composing it. Then 5 more votes came in and you can figure the 0x0104 now. :) Misza13 T C 17:42, 22 July 2006 (UTC) I think I have found them all.... 43 61 72 40 42 151 155 160 162 145 163 163 151 166 145 40 164 150 145 40 160 151 154 145 42 56 40 43 62 72 40 74 156 157 167 151 153 151 76 47 47 47 163 165 160 160 157 162 164 47 47 47 163 40 50 155 151 147 150 164 40 156 157 164 40 142 145 51 74 57 156 157 167 151 153 151 76 40 43 63 72 40 74 156 157 167 151 153 151 76 74 41 55 55 112 165 163 164 40 144 157 156 47 164 40 142 145 40 163 165 162 160 162 151 163 145 144 40 151 146 40 171 157 165 162 40 165 163 145 162 142 157 170 145 163 40 163 164 141 162 164 40 164 157 40 166 141 156 151 163 150 41 40 115 165 150 165 150 141 150 141 150 141 41 55 55 76 74 57 156 157 167 151 153 151 76 40 43 64 72 40 74 156 157 167 151 153 151 76 133 133 101 40 156 157 156 55 145 170 151 163 164 145 156 164 40 141 162 164 151 143 154 145 174 40 135 135 74 57 156 157 167 151 153 151 76 40 43 65 72 40 74 156 157 167 151 153 151 76 133 133 105 171 145 174 74 163 160 141 156 40 163 164 171 154 145 75 42 143 157 154 157 162 72 154 151 155 145 73 42 76 157 160 164 151 143 141 154 40 163 145 156 163 157 162 40 141 162 162 141 171 74 57 163 160 141 156 76 135 135 74 57 156 157 167 151 153 151 76 40 43 144 145 146 141 165 154 164 72 40 141 154 154 40 164 150 145 40 163 164 165 146 146 40 157 164 150 145 162 40 160 145 157 160 154 145 40 160 157 151 156 164 145 144 40 157 165 164 GeorgeMoney (talk) 18:10, 22 July 2006 (UTC) My RfA and your vote Hey Misha, Thanks for participating in my RFA! Ultimately, no consensus was reached, but I still appreciate the fact that you showed up to add in your two cents. I was delighted to see you turn out to support--hopefully someday I'll live up to the user you are! You can feel free to talk to me about it or add some advice on my improvement page. Sincerely, The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) Congrats! Big congrats on receiving the mop! I know you will wield it wisely! Baseball,Baby! balls•strikes 17:04, 22 July 2006 (UTC) No need to thank me, you should thank yourself :) //Halibutt 14:03, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Protection A few pointers: The article featured on the Main Page should not be protected. Many edits (and much vandalism) is to be expected, and protection is not the answer. Although opinions on this do vary, the consensus on Wikipedia:Protection policy is that we benefit more from people being able to edit these articles than we suffer from having them vandalized (past history consistently shows articles improving from their exposure on the Main Page, even if it also takes continuous reverting of vandalism). If you do protect an article, please follow the guidelines at Wikipedia:Protection policy. In particular, add the page to the list of protected pages specifying a reason, and place the appropriate protection template at the top of the article. This helps editors to recognize what's going on, and it allows the wikignomes to find and unprotect pages that have been protected for too long. Protection is a powerful tool; use it sparingly. It makes our lives easier, but that's not its primary purpose. JRM · Talk 21:27, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Cryptography was getting a hard beating for the last few hours with no good edits in sight (FA articles don't need much innovative edits anyway). I also didn't put the {{sprotected}} template, because it's too ugly for a Main Page article. (A pretty of a dilemma here, huh?) But thanks for the guidelines. I'll keep them in mind and will "revert till doomsday". ;-) Misza13 T C 21:56, 22 July 2006 (UTC) The guideline isn't really what the ratio of good to bad edits is (because if that were the case, countless pages that are rarely edited would "deserve" protection), but how much trouble we have keeping up with them. The Main Page article will get hammered by vandals hard, but it will also be closely watched by the RC patrollers. When the smoke clears, the article is usually no worse for the wear, and has typically picked up a few improvements from casually visiting experts (yes, we get those too, not just 12-year-olds making asses of themselves :-) that our regular contributors simply missed. That "FA articles don't need much innovative edits" is quite correct, but nobody is asking for "innovative" edits. Any good edit will do! Don't think that a featured article is "finished"—it's a little more stable than a non-featured article, but that's all. FAs can be and are regularly improved, sometimes quite drastically (don't take my word for it; watch some for a longer time). Basically, though, you can think of it as a PR issue. We advertise as "the free encyclopedia anyone can edit". Imagine new editors going to the first article they see, and finding out they can't edit it... Being "the free encyclopedia anyone can edit, if not too many people are actually doing it, because then we can't really be bothered to keep things in shape" doesn't sound half as impressive (and worse, it will make people think that Wikipedia doesn't work after all, since we apparently can't handle vandalism). Keeping the featured article unprotected is a kind of public service, one that we've had no trouble providing in the past. JRM · Talk 22:19, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Well Done! Well done on getting admin status!!! -- Legolost 20:22, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Best wish for your adminship.--Jusjih 01:50, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Thankyou For your help. please let him know that I will not tolerate any more. I have tried to be civil and it has gotten to me. I did get a little angry. Sorry for getting out of line so please let me know of what i can do to get back to a civilized community. >--Qho 16:50, 24 July 2006 (UTC)< Just drop it. It's really that simple. You drop it, he drops it and everyone's happy. If someone doesn't and pesists, I'll just block, because neither will I tolerate any more incivility by either side. Misza13 T C 16:54, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Toolserveraccount Hello Misza13, please write your prefered login-name, your real name and the public part of your ssh-key to . We plan to create your account in the near future. --DaB. 14:17, 22 July 2006 (UTC) Congratulations! A great administrator you will be! :) All the best! -Mike Judgesurreal777 00:04, 25 July 2006 (UTC) I stole your RFA box Hi, Misza13. I have an RFA that will close soon, so I took the liberty of using your html box as my thank you note because I can't code HTML to save my life. I hope you don't mind. Just for reference, here's the box I created: Thank you so much for voting in my recent RFA. It passed on the relatively narrown vote of 36/8/7. It was also one of the least-participated-in RFA nominations in several months, so pat yourself on the back, and join the party on your left, but first, take your cookie! NOTE: I can't code HTML to save my life. I copied this from Misza13. I guess I should write him a thank you note as well. Cookies sold separately. Batteries not included. Offer not valid with other coupons. May contain peanuts or chicken. Keep out of the reach of small children, may present a choking hazard to children under the age of 3. Do not take with alcohol. This notice has a dark background and therefore may be eaten by a grue at any time. The receiver of this message, hereafter referred to as "Pudding Head" relinquishes all rights and abilities to file a lawsuit or any other litigious activities. RyanGerbil10, Jimbo Wales, and the states of Georgia, North Dakota and Wisconsin are not liable for any lost or stolen items or damage from errant shopping carts. I hope it does your excellent sense of humor justice. Cheers, RyanGerbil10 (Drop on in!) 05:43, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Happy First Edit Day! Happy First Edit Day, Misza13/Archives/2006/07, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Jrcoga! 02:44, 23 July 2006 (UTC) HAPPY FIRST EDIT DAY! from the BIRTHDAYCOMMITTEE* Wishing Misza13/Archives/2006/07 a very Happy First Edit Day! Have a fantastic day! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee Have a great day! EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME | EMAILME | IMPROVEME 13:15, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Happy First Edit Day! May you have many many more at Wikipedia. Aeon Insane Ward 17:24, 23 July 2006 (UTC) To make for First Edit Day bright and cheerfull a little sun Aeon Insane Ward 17:24, 23 July 2006 (UTC) I wish you happy wiki-birthday - a day late. Somehow, I could not come to the party yesterday. --Bhadani 15:23, 24 July 2006 (UTC) My belated wiki-birthday wishes. All the best in the coming years ahead and make good use of your shiny tools. --Terence Ong (Chat | Contribs) 09:28, 26 July 2006 (UTC) Things that rock for a thousand, Alex What is a script that every wiki-n00b should know about, as it would have prevented several accidental edits? Thx! -- MrDolomite | Talk 16:46, 25 July 2006 (UTC) You're welcome. I did't find it any useful, but I have created it by a request on WP:US. Misza13 T C 21:26, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Another RFA Congrats I haven't had time to contribute lately, but I've been checking WP:RCA and a few other pages occasionally. I'm glad to see that you were approved for adminship. Please keep up the good work. --TantalumTelluride 19:46, 25 July 2006 (UTC) On blocking users Hi, the next time you block a user, could you remember to leave a note on their talk page telling them (and others) why? It's helpful documentation for both the blocked user and other admins. --Improv 20:37, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Which user in particular do you mean? I thought I did leave tags either on talks (in case of IPs - unless it's a 15' AOL block) or on User: (in the case of indef vandals-only accounts). If I have missed some though, I'll be more thorough then. Misza13 T C 20:43, 25 July 2006 (UTC) My apologies. In digging through the user's talk page, I found the warning -- it was up higher than I thought it was due to considerable talk since. Take care. --Improv 04:19, 26 July 2006 (UTC) Please take care blocking User:Stefanalexei. It's an AOL dynamic ISP, so blocks should be kept very short (I've been blocked as collateral damage six times already today on this address. jimfbleak 12:11, 26 July 2006 (UTC) The problem with blocking users is that when a username is blocked, the IP behind it is autoblocked, and for privacy reasons we as administrators are not given the IP address so we can manually unblock it seperately. If you report the block # (it'll say #1246432 or something) and request that # unblocked, we can do that seperately. Thank you for your understanding. :) ~Kylu (u|t) 03:07, 27 July 2006 (UTC) He Why are you saying that I vandalized he removed all of my userboxes and I can't remove stuff from his page. --So Fresh and So Clean_Wish U Was Me 19:53, 26 July 2006 (UTC) I checked his edits and couldn't find where did he remove any userboxes. Show me the diffs, please. Misza13 T C 19:54, 26 July 2006 (UTC) Please Please Can you just mind your business. Please, no offense, no disrespect. --So Fresh and So Clean_Wish U Was Me 20:25, 26 July 2006 (UTC) It's not about minding my business. Your behaviour is disruptive and that's unacceptable, thus I'm intervening. Misza13 T C 20:26, 26 July 2006 (UTC) Thanks! I cannot thank you enough for helping me, and the rest of the WikiCommunity in battling the Kitten Vandal. You have repeatedly blocked sockpuppets of the vandal before I can even load the WP:AIV page! Just a side note: any sockpuppets that you see, please add them to WP:LTA, under 'Kitten Vandal', as that will aid the investigation. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Richard0612 (talk • contribs) 20:58, 26 July 2006 (UTC). I was watching the new new user log, so I was able to catch some of them before they even contributed. And in reporting them, you edit-conficted with me. :) And by the way, remember to sign your posts with ~~~~. Happy editing! Misza13 T C 21:09, 26 July 2006 (UTC) Request Hi, i would like to vandalize both your user page and your user talk page but first i thought it would be civil to ask for your permission. so, is that ok?222.238.185.84 13:20, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Nice of you to ask, but no. Misza13 T C 16:40, 27 July 2006 (UTC) GG? It's nice to be able to keep in touch via GG in some cases. You can find my number at my user page, and most of our noticeboard users are active on that network.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus  talk  15:11, 27 July 2006 (UTC) I used it in the past, but not anymore for a few months. Actually, I use Skype more often (but still very rarely). The best way to catch me real-time is IRC. I'm in about 10 WikiMedia-related channels. Misza13 T C 16:44, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Kitten Vandal I have created a subpage on WP:LTA about the Kitten Vandal, after enquiring on the talk page, and feeling that it would be easier for users and admins to act if a MO and actions were listed. As you have helped a great deal on this issue, I thought it only polite to inform you of the new page. Any further information about the KV can be put here. ><Richard0612 12:29, 28 July 2006 (UTC) Archive Why did u moved my archive? it is my right to choose where to put it as long as its content is available to everyone.89.32.1.82 18:51, 28 July 2006 (UTC) That is not the case. It must be a subpage off of your userspace. --Yamla 18:54, 28 July 2006 (UTC) IRC How can a person get on IRC? I am too stupid to figure it out... GangstaeB help me improve! 20:53, 29 July 2006 (UTC) You need an IRC client. The choice is varied, depending on your configuration. If you're using Firefox, then probably a best start would be to install the ChatZilla extension. You should be able to find some instructions (how to configure it, connect) on its website. A good tutorial site on IRC in general is available at http://www.irchelp.org Misza13 T C 21:06, 29 July 2006 (UTC)