User talk:McPhail/Archive 7

Latest comment: 6 years ago by McPhail in topic Getting information


You did not answer the question because you know I'm right and you're not just admitted she used it twice accept it man — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ale236 (talkcontribs) 22:31, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

McPhail the move counts because she used the finisher twice in segments even the wwe recognized that she used the move twice I don't understand why you don't accept that maybe you're in denial or something. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.215.111 (talk) 01:04, 30 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Then why don't you go to the evolution page and remove the finisher of triple powerbomb they never used it in a match to finish but you don't have a problem with that but in case of Lana you do? What a hypocrite you are McPhail. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.215.188 (talk) 17:02, 31 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 1 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stan Stasiak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Grand Wizard. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 16 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Boris Malenko, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sleeper hold. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 16 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 23 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kelley Jakle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Resident Advisors. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 23 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 14 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dick the Bruiser, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lineman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 14 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Elite Guard for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elite Guard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elite Guard (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 19:07, 15 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Andrea Feczko edit

 

The article Andrea Feczko has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Inadequate references to establish notability. Ref search turns up very little.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 17:23, 30 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 1 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andrea Feczko, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HLN. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 1 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Lord James Blears has been nominated for Did You Know edit

Hello, McPhail. Lord James Blears, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know . You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 23:23, 2 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:JinseiShinzaki2011Cropped.png listed for discussion edit

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:JinseiShinzaki2011Cropped.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:03, 3 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 13 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pepper Gomez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AAA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 13 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of J.R. edit

Hello McPhail,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged J.R. for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Killer Moff (talk) 10:48, 5 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

WP:JR edit

Note that Wikipedia style is to not use a comma before Jr. I reverted your move. Dicklyon (talk) 05:41, 13 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 2 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Epico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Primo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 2 October 2016 (UTC)Reply


Not properly sourced? She used the finisher twice on her here's the links

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bvAwEAsg1RA

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bNSkj8FXrVc

I'm later gonna add the bella buster finisher again she used it twice in 2016 so it counts as a finisher parodied from brie bella — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ale236 (talkcontribs) 21:20, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, McPhail. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Graduated listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Graduated. Since you had some involvement with the Graduated redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 04:01, 25 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Eureka Humboldt Standard listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Eureka Humboldt Standard. Since you had some involvement with the Eureka Humboldt Standard redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:36, 29 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

The Sultan listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Sultan. Since you had some involvement with the The Sultan redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:18, 17 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Attempted assassination of Donald Trump for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Attempted assassination of Donald Trump is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attempted assassination of Donald Trump until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Carl Fredrik 💌 📧 22:19, 30 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

NWA Championship articles in WP:AFC edit

Hi McPhail. I notice you've written a few articles on Territory-era wrestlers and wondered if you'd be interested in looking over two articles I submitted to WP:AFC last summer: Draft:NWA City of Mobile Heavyweight Championship and Draft:NWA Columbus Heavyweight Championship. Not sure when wrong especially as the Columbus title has the same references I used to create the NWA Macon championships. Thanks for your time. 72.74.203.149 (talk) 01:36, 20 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 19 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jerry Jarrett, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Programs. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 19 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 26 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jerry Jarrett, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Universal Wrestling Federation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 26 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:PaulOrndorff2016.png edit

 

A tag has been placed on File:PaulOrndorff2016.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", or "used with permission"; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

  • state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
  • add the relevant copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Train2104 (t • c) 23:58, 5 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Trump assassination attempt edit

As you know, I feel that this article is a bunch of disjoint UNDUE COATRACK and other unworthy content, and you seem to be taking an ungodly level of personal ownership in the article. I can appreciate the amount of work and attention you've devoted to it, but if I may ask: Why? And why not step away for a while and see where the community goes with this. The more bloated it gets the more you're likely to see the whole thing drastically cut back, in my opinion. What inspires you to devote so much of yourself to this article? SPECIFICO talk 22:44, 17 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Sting book.jpg edit

 

The file File:Sting book.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Decorative use of non-free cover art in Sting (wrestler)#Sporadic appearances (2003–2004). Non-free cover art is generally considered acceptable when used as the primary means of identification in a stand-alone article about the work in question, but (per WP:NFC#cite_note-3) requires a much stronger justification for non-free use when used in other articles. This particular book is mentioned by only by name three times throughout the entire article, and there is no sourced commentary wbout the book cover at all, so the context required for non-free use by WP:NFCC#9 is completely lacking.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:38, 3 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of deceased wrestlers edit

Hi, I don't believe that your statement that my category pages growing to big is a good one. If that is the case why hasn't Category:living people been deleted? Davidgoodheart (talk) 19:08, 25 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging for File:SamuWrestler2006.png edit

Thanks for uploading File:SamuWrestler2006.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:30, 5 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Trump edit

You know, blindly reinstating "your" text does not address the reasons I stated in my edit summary when I pared it to a simple descriptive statement. You're cherrypicking commentary from marginal sources and on topics unrelated to the subject of the article. Warsi may be a notable figure in British public life, but that is not the criterion for inclusion of her opinion in any article other than her own WP article. Please review WP:WEIGHT. You are concatenating a variety of primary statements of opinion but that does not make them noteworthy content for this article. Please review WP:COATRACK. It's not helpful to simply reinstate your preferred text after another editor has challenged it by reverting with reasons in the edit summary. Please undo your recent reinsertion and engage at article talk. SPECIFICO talk 18:09, 12 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Getting information edit

@McPhail: Hi, I need to get some information about this category Category:NWA World tag-team champions which I have made, It seems that they have changed what is considered to be NWA tag team champions and what is WCW tag team champions, and I not sure which is which. Can you please help me with this issue? Also this category Category:USWA Unified World Heavyweight Champions, which I also recently created needs reviewing, can you please review it for me? Davidgoodheart (talk) 04:02, 16 November 2017 (UTC) (talk)Reply
@Davidgoodheart: - sorry for the delay in getting back to you on this.
You can see the list of NWA World Tag Team Champions here. Note that the NWA does not recognise the reigns under the WCW banner so the champions from Gordy though Roma should not be included in your category. Also note that there were previously multiple versions of the NWA World Tag Team Championship (see [1]) so your category should really include all of the people who held these championships. Also note that the name of the category should be formatted the same way as the article it refers to - so instead of Category:NWA World tag-team champions it should be Category:NWA World Tag Team Champions (capitalised, and with no hyphen). You can request that the category be renamed here.
I've reviewed the USWA article and it looks fine to me. McPhail (talk) 17:03, 19 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Another article that needs reviewing edit

@McPhail: Can you please review this article Disappearance of Dennis Martin, though I didn't create it, it says it needs reviewing, I would do so, but I don't yet know how to