User talk:Mavaddat/Archives/2020/June
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Image tagging for Image:ZackMorrisPhone.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:ZackMorrisPhone.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:08, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Greenbeard.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Greenbeard.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 17:53, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:ZackMorrisPhone.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:ZackMorrisPhone.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:51, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Edits
I am removing this phrase "subordinates the conclusions of science to its own doctrines". None of the sources you have provided state that and it is original research. Be careful in using a synthesis of different sources to make a point because that is also original research. Regards, -- Jeff3000 01:45, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- All that quote says is that Baha'i belief says that science hasn't progressed as far. If everything science said originally was true then the rutherford model of the atom would still be true. Science changes, and that's all Shoghi Effendi is saying. If the current science doesn't totally agree with the Baha'i belief that doesn't make the baha'i belief in the harmony in science and religion wrong. So please don't synthesis your own opinions into the article. Regards -- Jeff3000 02:00, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- The point is that your are skewing the wording and representing only one side of the debate Your wording of "... subordinates the conclusions of science to its own doctrines, which the religion takes as fundamentally true...." alludes to science is definitely correct. I'm going to be editing the page to make it more neutral. Regards, -- Jeff3000 02:08, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Page 79
- "While this seems to suggest that religion must accept current scientific knowledge as authoritative, this is not necessarily always the case. The present scientific point of view is not always correct, nor is the truth limited to only what science can explain."
- Regards, -- Jeff3000 04:09, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- The paper has been published in the JBS so it has been reviewed by the Baha'i administration as not distorting the teachings of the religion. Furthermore, the House of Justice in many cases, specifically in relating to homosexuality, has noted that current science may have not understood the whole issue completely, so it does match the beliefs of the Baha'i administration. Regards, -- Jeff3000 04:18, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Page 79
- The point is that your are skewing the wording and representing only one side of the debate Your wording of "... subordinates the conclusions of science to its own doctrines, which the religion takes as fundamentally true...." alludes to science is definitely correct. I'm going to be editing the page to make it more neutral. Regards, -- Jeff3000 02:08, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Baha'i Faith and science
Sorry, but it's not OR: it's the definition of the word. Shoghi Effendi's translations are considered authoritative and there are a variety of words he could have used if the Persian intent was "living thing". MARussellPESE (talk) 03:50, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Restoring sub-heading on "Homosexuality and Bahá'í Faith"
I'm just writing on your Talk page because I restored the section subheading ("Non-Bahá'í homosexuals") on "Homosexuality and Bahá'í Faith." The reason I restored it is that, first, it is not clear from the paragraph that it is talking only about the Bahá'ís' treatment of non-Bahá'í homosexuals. And second, even if it was clear, it is (at least) no less clear than that the next paragraph is talking about Bahá'í homosexuals (even without its) subheading. So would you suggest removing the subheading for that section too? I mean, what is wrong with extra clarity? Surely, there is no benefit to an ambiguity as to who the first paragraph is about, am I right? Hope all is well, man!! Regards, Mavaddat (talk) 03:15, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Hi Mavaddat. I noticed you've been having most of your conversations about page content on user talk pages. You should really get in the habit of using the talk page of the subject that you're discussing. Some people will read over an associated talk page before making edits, to see if there have been any controversial edits or compromises made. I'll repost your comment on Talk:Homosexuality and Bahá'í Faith, and respond there. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 06:18, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
3RR Warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bahá'í Faith and science. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. MARussellPESE (talk) 04:08, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Mavaddat. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
A page you started (Confusion network) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Confusion network, Mavaddat!
Wikipedia editor Triptothecottage just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
I've made a few minor cleanups. Nice work!
To reply, leave a comment on Triptothecottage's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Triptothecottage (talk) 00:54, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Mavaddat. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
November 2018
Hi! I was wondering if you'd be able to add my image File:Immokalee-Zocalo Plaza 2018.jpg to the corresponding article on the Farsi Wikipedia. I tired editing it myself, but my computer was unable to process right-to-left text. Cheers, dmartin969 00:58, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
- سلام قربان Dear user:dmartin969, I have posted the image you requested! See the change here:https://fa.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D8%A7%DB%8C%D9%85%D9%88%DA%A9%D8%A7%D9%84%DB%8C%D8%8C_%D9%81%D9%84%D9%88%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%AF%D8%A7&type=revision&diff=24753305&oldid=22903922 Es ist das Ergebnis Mavaddat (talk) 07:27, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Rosetta Barnstar |
Thank you for your help!
dmartin969 17:33, 1 November 2018 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Mavaddat. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 1
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (December 2018).
Hello everyone and welcome to the brand new Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
|
|
|
|
Wishing you a happy new year, --DannyS712 (talk) 20:01, 31 December 2018 (UTC) |
|
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 2
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (January 2019).
Hello everyone and welcome to the second issue of the new Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
|
|
|
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
Miscellaneous
- There was a recent village pump thread about either Enterprisey's or Equazcion's "Script Installer" tool becoming a gadget. It wasn't officially closed, and so far neither has become a gadget. Stay tuned for updates.
Lets keep up the good work! --DannyS712 (talk) 03:09, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 3
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (February 2019).
Hello everyone and welcome to the third issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
|
We are three months in to this newsletter and everything is going great–keep on creating amazing new scripts!
|
|
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 4
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (March 2019).
Hello everyone and welcome to the fourth issue of the new Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
|
|
|
Miscellaneous
- The Wikimedia Foundation has requested help with the testing of and feedback on a new tool for "Automated article section recommendations" for stub articles. See the village pump notice for more.
mw.loader.getScripthas been added tomw.loader, closing a feature request from 2010. It allows users to load a script via URL (likemw.loader.load()) and specify a callback function (likemw.loader.using()). See mw:ResourceLoader/Core modules#mw.loader.getScript for more.
Enjoy your April Fool's, --DannyS712 (talk) 18:43, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 5
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (April 2019). Hello everyone and welcome to the 5th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
|
|
|
Until next month, --DannyS712 (talk) 00:22, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 6
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (May 2019).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 6th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
|
|
|
Enjoy your summer, --DannyS712 (talk) 23:44, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 7
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (June 2019).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 7th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
|
|
|
Miscellaneous
- After an MfD, DannyS712's MMS was deleted. It was originally created by Abelmoschus Esculentus. If you import either of these scripts, you may want to uninstall them, as they no longer exist.
Having published 6 issues of this newsletter, I decided it was time to move it out from my user space. It is now located at Wikipedia:Scripts++. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 11:45, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 8
|
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (July 2019). Hello everyone and welcome to the 8th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
|
|
Hope everyone is having a good winter (or summer, for those in the northern hemisphere). Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 02:40, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Death of Yongzheng Ye
Hello, Mavaddat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Death of Yongzheng Ye".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CASSIOPEIA(talk) 02:56, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 9
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past two months (August and September, 2019).
|
Hello everyone and welcome to the 9th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
Sorry for falling behind a bit. Please let me know if I missed any new scripts. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 01:55, 7 October 2019 (UTC) |
|
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 10
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (October 2019).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 10th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
|
|
Have a great November, --DannyS712 (talk) 22:18, 7 November 2019 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 11
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (November 2019).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 11th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
|
|
|
Enjoy your thanksgiving --DannyS712 (talk) 08:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 12
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past two months (December 2019 and January 2020).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 12th issue issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
|
|
...and many more, all available at Wikipedia:User scripts/Requests
|
Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 06:12, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 13
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (February 2019).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 13th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
|
|
|
I hope everyone is having a great year so far! --DannyS712 (talk) 15:53, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 14
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (March 2020).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 14th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
|
|
|
Stay safe, --DannyS712 (talk) 05:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 15
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (April 2020).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 15th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
|
|
|
Miscellaneous
- Wikipedia:User scripts/Most imported scripts now also shows the number of active users for each script. It will now be updated by a bot periodically.
- Twinkle's Morebits library added a new
Morebits.dateclass to replace the moment library. It can handle custom formatting and natural language for dates, as well as section header regexes. If you were usinggetUTCMonthNameorgetUTCMonthNameAbbrevwithDateobjects, those have been deprecated and should be updated. - User:SD0001/find-archived-section was made a gadget. You can enable it from your gadget preferences, in the Browsing section.
Hope everyone stays safe. --DannyS712 (talk) 20:27, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 16
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past two months (May and June 2020).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 16th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
|
|
|
If anyone else would like to contribute to future issues, please comment at Wikipedia talk:Scripts++. --DannyS712 (talk) 20:13, 30 June 2020 (UTC)