MapleviewLounge

Your submission at Articles for creation: Slicks (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Slicks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:40, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for the response.

I think i now have a better grasp of everything.

thank you! MapleviewLounge (talk) 16:47, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello, MapleviewLounge! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 16:40, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Jacob Schlichter for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jacob Schlichter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Schlichter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 17:44, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Conflict-of-interest required disclosures

Hello, MapleviewLounge. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:04, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

I understand. Tank you Jamie! MapleviewLounge (talk) 18:12, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MapleviewLounge. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GeneralNotability (talk) 00:29, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MapleviewLounge (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

my friend informed me they got me blocked due to them pushing for the acceptance of a page i made. wea re not the same people, we do not personally know jacob. we were fans of his from his old tiktok account and figured wed be helping one of our favorite creators by being the first to make a wiki about them. i know this is silly but i hope you understand. i didn't realize iburn had did this or made another account and now im here asking to be unblocked and for my IP to be allowed again.thank you for understanding MapleviewLounge (talk) 02:00, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

All three accounts are on the same IP address. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:28, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A more likely explanation is that these two three accounts and the subject are the same individual. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 05:00, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MapleviewLounge (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear Ninja, there's not a rule stating two people cant be sharing the same internet source thus meaning the same IP. we aren't the same person but were in the same building... What more must be said? MapleviewLounge (talk) 07:15, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

If we believe that two people using the same IP are, in fact, the same person, then as they say, if it walks like a duck and quacks like one, then it's a duck. That alone cannot be grounds for unblock.

And maybe the best thing you can say is nothing. You are getting perilously close to having your talk page revoked on all three of these. — Daniel Case (talk) 08:01, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:Slicks

Hello, MapleviewLounge. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Slicks, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Slicks

Hello, MapleviewLounge. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Slicks".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:25, 5 May 2023 (UTC)