User talk:Malcolm/Archive 7

Question

How do I make a new suspected sockpuppet page? I strongly feel Henchman and Bowsy are meatpuppets at least. They are abusing AFDs (and RFC) by posting their similar opinions on it. As stated on the case page from before (located here: Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/Henchman_2000): I'm closing this investigation because WP:AGF and in light of everything stated here, these are 2 separate individuals using 1 computer... however, that being the case you both need to be careful about meatpuppetry; soliciting a person sharing your computer to show up to articles for deletion debates or content conflicts on articles and support your position is probably not going to be looked upon very favorably by the community. They deny it of course, but simply abusing and trying to favor the vote by using 2 people on one computer isn't needed. If this was acceptable on Wikipedia: everyone would make multiple accounts, and just claim it's their brother or friend with a different account on the same computer (just to lean AFD discussions in their favor). Anyway, I read how to do a sockpuppet case, but didn't understand how to do it for users that have had a case already. RobJ1981 11:17, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Ok I created it, thanks. The only issue I had was the tag I placed on User:Bowsy. A redlink appears, and I'm not sure why it did. RobJ1981 21:40, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

re:Barnstar

Thank you Llama man! I feel so much better than I did before I logged on today :) This is a very nice compliment coming from an administrator. Regards — Moe 01:06, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

No problem, you deserve it! –Llama man^talk_contribs 02:59, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Favor...

Hello, Malcolm! Can you please sign my autograph book? Thanks! User:Cremepuff222/Signature

Done. –Llama man^talk_contribs 02:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Was this fair?

User talk:RobJ1981#Bowsy and Henchman: an admin deleted my sockpuppet case against them, claiming it was "harassment". I simply think this is an abuse of power. I think a case needs to be made about them, they abuse AFD and RFC debates. It appears to be meatpuppetry to me. RobJ1981 06:47, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

While I don't think deletion of the page was necessary, I think you should wait at least a month before making a new case. –Llama man^talk_contribs 16:11, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Hey, Llama man. Thanks for your support at my RfA. I was quite overwhelmed by the level of support, but I am also trying to address the issues raised against me. One of which was yours: first, I must say I have never had a bad encounter with a llama, not at a zoo, nor any of Jeff Minter's games, nor indeed at Wikipedia. Therefore, I am considering changing my name to "Bubba llama hotep", although I may run it passed WP:RFCN first as it may well be an anagram of something quite rude in some forgotten Aztecan dialect. :D Thanks again, Mr Llama, much appreciated. Bubba hotep 21:01, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

No problem! Personally, though, I think you should rename yourself to "Llama Llama". –Llama man^talk_contribs 22:20, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, yeah and my name Llama01! :D. ~ Arjun 00:40, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Yay! –Llama man^talk_contribs 02:05, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 5th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 10	5 March 2007	About the Signpost

New Yorker correction dogs arbitrator into departure	WikiWorld comic: "The Rutles"
News and notes: Picture of the Year, milestones	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:26, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Please sign my autograph page!

Please sign my autograph page. Thanks! A•N•N•Afoxlover PLEASE SIGN, ANYONE!!! 00:44, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Um, I did that last month. –Llama man^talk_contribs 17:17, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Oops! I guess I didn't see it. Oh, there it is! I've got too many signatures. I better stop asking people to sign. Could you tell other users to sign, please? Thanks! A•N•N•Afoxlover PLEASE SIGN, ANYONE!!! 19:06, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

User talk:Owie123

Just wondering if you meant to add {{usertalk-vprotect}} to this page (this user isn't blocked). John Reaves (talk) 21:09, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Oh...I assumed the user was blocked. Doh. Well, I've removed it now. –Llama man^talk_contribs 03:24, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

owie123

why did you block my user talk page it is my own page so why cant i edit it —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Owie123 (talk • contribs).

Because you continuously blanked the warnings given to you. It has now been unprotected so that you use the {{unblock}} template, but please don't vandalize your user talk page. –Llama man^talk_contribs 02:08, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Question

Is it possible to do a RFC on a project talk page? (see:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling#Taglines for wrestling events and matches for details). Talking with the users involved with this dispute isn't helping, due to them not agreeing with my opinion (and them assuming everyone is against taglines because of one poll on an article). This is explained more in that talk page link I posted above. I don't ask for a major guideline to come along, all I ask is: either all taglines stay or they all go, not one or the other. RobJ1981 01:38, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

I don't see what would be wrong with that. Create and RFC called Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Taglines for wrestling events and matches, fill out the required info, and include a link to that WT page. If this isn't what you were asking (which might be true), please clarify a bit more. –Llama man^talk_contribs 02:13, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

So I just use the basic sections that a normal RFC would have? RobJ1981 02:26, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Yep. –Llama man^talk_contribs 02:26, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Ok I made it, and hopefully it solves this matter. I left out a few sections due to them being not being applicable to the case. I'm not sure if that was the right thing to do or not though? This dispute is different than normal RFC's, because it's about a general content for many articles, not just one. RobJ1981 03:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Is there anywhere I can request an outside comment for the RFC? Because so far: only two people have posted in the RFC (besides me) and both are biased against taglines. They assume it's now a Wrestling guideline (to not have match taglines) because of this: Talk:WrestleMania_23/Archive_1#VOTE:_Battle_of_the_Billionaires. Is there any way to report that? According to bulletproof (once the vote was over): The result of the proposal was oppose listing a match by what it is billed. Consensus is the same for other event articles under WP:PW. That's absolutely wrong. I read the vote, and see no consensus that everyone is against them on each and every article. One vote that clearly doesn't dominate all articles shouldn't be determining a project guideline, but they act like it does. I've asked them for other proof on votes about taglines: none provided yet. Also: that vote had very little people in it, so that's far from consensus (considering the wrestling project has many members). I somehow doubt other polls exist. RobJ1981 17:58, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Try other steps at WP:DR. I have no opinion on the conflict at hand. If none of the steps work (don't try arbitration yet, as that should should only be used as a last resort), report it to WP:AN; however, please try other steps (besides arbitration) before that. –Llama man^talk_contribs 19:43, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Super backlog

Aww... you beat me to it. I wanted to kill the evil blinky thing. :-) IronGargoyle 02:38, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Bwahahaha (IE7 doesn't support the blinkiness, so my eyes didn't explode like yours probably did)! –Llama man^talk_contribs 02:40, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Your right

Hello again (remember, the guy who helped you with that usermessagechangerscript?). You seem to be using your talk page as a sandbox; instead, I suggest you only do tests on User:Darkest Hour/Sandbox, as talk pages should generally only be used for discussion. –Llama man^talk_contribs 23:51, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Thats why I started my subpage. It took me forever to find out how to make the tic-tac-toe board but I move it to my sandbox where it belongs. Thanks for your suggestion, -- Darkest Hour 23:54, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Re:Your edit to User talk:PleaseVisit www.DONTvisitmywebsite!.com

Please do not use {{unb}} on a user talk page unless the username is blocked at that time. –Llama man^talk_contribs 01:20, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

no prob, I'm sure it was blocked anyways. BuickCenturyDriver (Honk, contribs, odometer) 01:24, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Actually, the account was not blocked when you saved the page (though it was blocked a few minutes later). –Llama man^talk_contribs 01:26, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Oh well, it's taken care of. Happy editing. BuickCenturyDriver (Honk, contribs, odometer) 01:28, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

All right, just wanted to make that clear. –Llama man^talk_contribs 01:29, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

With that out of the way, I'd wonder how much you really like Llamas. BuickCenturyDriver (Honk, contribs, odometer) 01:35, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Well, I was obsessed with them last June, but now I'm not, really. Maybe I should get a username change (really). –Llama man^talk_contribs 01:37, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

ack! Reconsider a speedy deletion?

Antischism were pretty well-known amongst the crust punk and anarcho-punk scenes. Probably one of the most well-known American crust bands. Perhaps I'm biased as they're one of my favorite bands, but still, I think you should at the very least undelete it and then list it on AFD. Here are some pages about them on the net: [1] [2] [3] [4]. Just a couple weeks ago I saw a long thread devoted to them on a radical green site, but I can't find it again. Anyways, a lot of their lyrics are all over the net, which is more than I can say for some other punk bands that have articles and have been considered notable. Ungovernable Force^{Poll: Which religious text should I read?} 08:46, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

While I respect your decision, Llama man, I do feel it was in haste. I deleted their listing on the list of anarchist musicians after seeing the redlink, but I feel that they are notable. Crust punk is not my most favourite punk subgenre, but even I am acquainted with Antischism. Along with Amebix, Doom (band), Aus-Rotten and a local band called Mutiny, they are one of the few crust bands with a strong following in Melbourne. With that kind of global popularity, they surely meet notability criteria? ~Switch ^{t c g} 09:15, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

After studying the diffs, I restored the page. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. –Llama man^talk_contribs 14:33, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! Ungovernable Force^{Poll: Which religious text should I read?} 01:37, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Alsace

Why did you erase my mail?

• R9tgokunks (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) on the article Alsace From december 27th 2006  : we have 12 reversions on the article Alsace in which User:R9tgokunks is directly concerned : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 and he does not want to have a serious talk on his talk page (section Vandalism on the article Alsace)... I'm a bit fed up of his behavior. Can you do something? Sincerily user:Paris75000 13:11, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Because WP:AIV is not the right noticeboard for edit wars; instead, please go to WP:AN WP:AN/I (normally, I would recommend WP:AN/3RR, but the user has not violated the 3-revert rule). –Llama man^talk_contribs 14:59, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

ok it's done thx bye user:Paris75000 15:13, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Advise on a user

Hey Llama man,

I don't know who else to ask, so I hope you don't mind.

User:Vgx5 is a new user, but so far all he has done is making nonsense edits, creating nonsense articles, such as one on his own username, making talk pages into forums etc.

He, at least to me it does so, seems to do it in good faith, but someone definitely needs to tell him how things work here, and I'm not really sure how to make that clear to him in a nice way.

Maybe you can tell him, or we can brainstorm together to help him.

JackSparrow Ninja 20:59, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

OK, I've tried to explain it to him, hopefully he'll listen. –Llama man^talk_contribs 21:11, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! JackSparrow Ninja 21:13, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Rfa thanks

Hey, just stopping by to say thanks a bunch for supporting my Rfa which passed successfully on saturday, I am honoured to serve the community. If you have any problems or I can help you anyway, you know where to find me, ceers Ryanpostlethwaite contribs/talk 16:57, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 12th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 11	12 March 2007	About the Signpost

Report of diploma mill offering pay for edits	Essay tries to clarify misconceptions about Wikipedia
Blog aggregator launched for Wikimedia-related posts	WikiWorld comic: "Cartoon Physics"
News and notes: Wikimania 2007, milestones	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:31, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry

Oh... Sorry.--j@5h+u15y@n 04:35, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

World of Warcraft Userbox

Just for fun, showing you my next-gen WoW ubx. :) -- Richard D. LeCour ^{(talk/contribs)} 06:09, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

:) Since yours is so much better than mine, maybe I'll redirect mine to yours (confusing, huh?) –Llama man^talk_contribs 21:55, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Problems with Henchman 2000 again

It's all right here: User talk:Henchman_2000#Stop.2C please. He says I act like a "corrupt admin", and thinks that's not a personal attack. He claims it's just "highlighting flaws". I'm getting very sick of this. Is there anything that can be done? I already have a RFC for Henhcman about his personal attacks towards me: which has done very little to change his ways on Wikipedia. RobJ1981 16:41, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

I'll try to get to this tomorrow, I don't have time now. –Llama man^talk_contribs 02:11, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

It was a good idea to bring it up to WP:ANI, but so far it's just caused him to attack me once again. RobJ1981 16:03, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

for reverting vandalism to my userpage! Natalie 22:51, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome! (aren't exclamation marks cool?) –Llama man^talk_contribs 22:55, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Hey...

I replied at my talk page, thanks for helping out at the AIV :) ~ Arjun 17:25, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

No problem, and I've been busy in real life myself, up until the 15th. I'm glad you're doing well. –Llama man^talk_contribs 17:28, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

What's wrong with "BlueMoonCandles"!!??

What;s wrong with that username!!!!???? I don't see anything wrong with that username, yet you fucking block it!!!! --Edmundkh 17:49, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

From WP:U#Inappropriate usernames: "Usernames that promote a company: Usernames of or closely resembling the names of companies and groups are discouraged and may be blocked as a violation of Wikipedia policy against spamming and advertisement." "BlueMoonCandles" is the name of a company; see [5]. –Llama man^talk_contribs 17:54, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Alia Lahlou

i was going to improve the article. i had {{hangon}} —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Harlot (talk • contribs) 18:25, 17 March 2007 (UTC).

The reason for deletion was that the article's subject was non-notable, not that it was needed improvement. If you still contest its deletion, please provide a reason as to how it satisfies WP:N. –Llama man^talk_contribs 18:30, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Why did you revert my edit?

Okay, so maybe its a stupid question. The edit was friendly however, and not trollish. You seems like a good guy and have an interesting sense of humor(I just read your user page), but I am a bit puzzled.Also, please post more random thoughts, since I too like bizarre humor.I am your friend,and I have MONEY! 18:46, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

The edit was definitely not trollish; I reverted it because WP:ANI isn't the appropriate place for that type of thing (try Wikipedia talk:Tutorial (Talk pages). I love alliteration, don't you?). As for the random thoughts, there were a couple more that I had before I remodeled my userpage:

• If someone had a cat named Llama, would they have a llama named Cat?
• Never forget Chicken Man!

Not as good as the others in my opinion, but still kinda good. –Llama man^talk_contribs 18:53, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Birth control

There's currently an unprotection request for this on WP:RFPP. As the protecting admin, I'm leaving this up to you. – Steel 23:50, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Done, thanks. –Llama man^talk_contribs 01:02, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Falls Grove

I have to disagree with your actions, please inform me a little more... What makes it fall under this criteria, everything posted is all factual-based: "Unremarkable people, groups, companies and web content" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by MonkeyCounty (talk • contribs) 02:14, 19 March 2007 (UTC).

I deleted it because it had no assertion of notability, not because it wasn't "fact-based"; please read Wikipedia:Notability. –Llama man^talk_contribs 18:50, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Here we go again, it's HubmaN...sorry for the absence from Wikipedia!

Just came to stop by! Nice site redesign, where do you get the icons from? And how did you actually do that page? Anyway, my question: How DO you cite sources anyway? Somehow, I've managed to miss all of the citation quite, and Wikipedia doesn't seem to display it in detail. Thanks in advance! -HuBmaN!!!! 14:29, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

P.S. Do exclamation marks still rule?

Heh, thanks. I combined the ideas of User:Arjun01's old userpage header with User:Luna Santin's to make it. I made User:Llama man/Header by (again) following their leads. As for your question, read WP:CITE (though you probably already did). For example: Say you wanted to cite something from the web. You'd use the template {{cite web}}, and fill in the parameters (which are explained on the template page). The only parameters you'd actually have to use would be "title" and "url", but you should try to fill in as many as possible. For example of the example: If I wanted to cite http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Llama_man, you'd use <ref>{{cite web | title=User:Llama man - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia | url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Llama_man}}</ref>, trying to fill in more parameters, at the end of the thing that you want to cite. If you have any questions (which is likely, as this is very confusing; it took me a while to understand it, too), free free to ask, blah blah blah. –Llama man^talk_contribs 19:01, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Oh, and exclamation marks do still rule. –Llama man^talk_contribs 19:02, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

NPA Warning

Sure, but may I ask who I attacked and when? Djma12 ^(talk) 01:22, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Never mind, I meant to just warn User:TheColdTruth, sorry. –Llama man^talk_contribs 01:25, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi, may I too, ask who I attacked and when? TheColdTruth 20:36, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

You attacked User:KazakhPol here. –Llama man^talk_contribs 21:42, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

I'll keep your advice in mind, however my comment was solely directed at Djma12 and in no way meant to personally attack, harm, offend or threaten KazakhPol. However, it has been noted here [6] that KazakhPol is pushing his own POV, hence my comment on propaganda. Again thank you for reminding me a useful advice, which I will certainly keep in mind. TheColdTruth 21:56, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 20th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 12	20 March 2007	About the Signpost

WikiWorld comic: "Wilhelm Scream"	News and notes: Bad sin, milestones
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:16, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

"Take it to RFCN"

Re this diff - [7]. Please read WP:U and WP:RFCN. The first step if a username is dubious is to ask the user to change it, not to submit it for an RFC. Neil (not Proto ►) 22:53, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Well, I assumed that the user would first read the "Before listing this user here" before submitting an RFC, as it says there that the user should first be warned with {{subst:UsernameConcern|reason for objection}}. But "never assume" (except good faith, ha ha ha...eh), so every time I remove an unclear username violation from WP:AIV from now on, I'll tell that the user should be warned before RFCN. –Llama man^talk_contribs 23:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Unprotect

Hi can you please unprotect Brock Lesnar. It has been left protected with not true facts for long enough. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Datghettoplaya (talk • contribs) 11:01, 22 March 2007 (UTC).

Please do NOT unprotect this page, this request was made by the 80th+ sockpuppet of community banned vandal Verdict. Thank you. Bmg916 ^{Speak to Me} 17:12, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Hmm...no. –Llama man^talk_contribs 18:53, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Inappropriate tone for List of Mario Party 3 minigames

Are you sure this tag was necessary? Bowsy ^{(review me!)} 19:24, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Definitely. Example: "Race through a tunnel, hitting boosters and avoiding electric fields." It should say "The players race through a tunnel, hitting boosters and avoiding electric fields." Same with everything else. –Llama man^talk_contribs 21:39, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

What the deuce??

Malcolm? No, no...that simply won't do...it's entirely inappropriate, and doesn't fit as well as the Llama moniker. At least, that's what I think...your mileage may vary, I suppose. Gene S. Poole 03:52, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Uh...no comment. — Malcolm^{May the schwartz be with you!} 18:56, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Good change

Well it seems you did change your name, goodbye to those Llamas. BuickCenturyDriver (Honk, contribs, odometer) 21:49, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Yeah...*sniff* I miss them...but they betrayed me! (I think) — Malcolm^{May the schwartz be with you!} 21:56, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Oh, it seems you've seen Spaceballs. BuickCenturyDriver (Honk, contribs, odometer) 22:21, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, a couple weeks ago. Awesome movie. — Malcolm^{May the schwartz be with you!} 22:51, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protection of Lon Chaney, Sr.

While you were declining the protection for Lon Chaney, Sr., I was semi-protecting the article. It is not true that there has only been one instance of vandalism in the past week, but I do realize that the article has not been the victim of rampant vandalism. The reason I semi-protected the article despite the low numbers of vandalism was the amount of time that vandalism would stay on the article. Browsing through the article's history, you will find vandalism lasting often times for more than half an hour (vandalism, on average, should be reverted in less than five minutes) and as long as nearly six hours. That's just too long. -- tariqabjotu 21:58, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Ugh, I need to look at IPs more carefully; I thought that all the 86.1xx.xxx.xxx IPs were the same. Sorry for the confusion, and thank you for protecting the article. — Malcolm^{Use the schwartz!} 22:05, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Hello Tariqabjotu and Malcolm. As this was my first foray onto the request for protection page I just wanted to make sure that I did not do anything out of line. As Tariqabjotu pointed out there have been five acts of vandalism in the last three days and this is what prompted my request. I do appreciate Malcolm's note that I wasn't violating the three revert rule. It seems that I may be one of a few (or the only editor) that has this actors page on a watchlist, thus the time delay on getting any vandalism reverted so I appreciate the semiprotect status that it now enjoys. Perhaps in a couple of months this person will have moved on and it can be taken off. Again, please feel free to let me know if I have violated any policy and thank you for your time. MarnetteD | Talk 22:16, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Revived discussion concerning fair use in portals

I am contacting everyone who participated in the discussion that became inactive in December. Due to the length of the previous discussion, I have proposed a new amendment and you like you to weigh in so that we may actually have a consensus on this matter as it doesn't seem there exists one either way. -ΖαππερΝαππερ ^Babel_Alexandria

Signpost updated for March 26th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 13	26 March 2007	About the Signpost

From the editor: Tardiness, volunteers, RSS
Patrick and Wool resign in office shakeup	WikiWorld comic: "Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo"
News and notes: Board resolutions, milestones	Features and admins
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 14:05, 27 March 2007 (UTC)