Welcome!

edit
Hello, Kh122201! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! paul2520 (talk) 18:49, 3 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

About your user page

edit

Hello, Kh122201! I would like to request that you correct the inaccurate information on your user page, which you apparently copied from the user page of User:Alexf. Please remove the misinformation. You are NOT an administrator as you imply. You are not ranked #276 on Wikipedia by number of edits, and you have not made more than 160,000 contributions to Wikipedia. You are not a Grandmaster Editor First Class or a Lord High Togneme Laureate. The list of languages is equally suspect. I suggest you start over, erase this page, and give us an accurate picture of yourself - and then we can get to know you. -- MelanieN (talk) 06:44, 22 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Never mind. I see that the problem has been dealt with. -- MelanieN (talk) 15:34, 22 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

December 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Nihonjoe. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Atul Chitnis have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 18:41, 23 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Sheldon Brown. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 18:42, 23 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Busch Gardens Tampa. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 18:48, 23 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Mike Quinn (puppeteer), even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 18:49, 23 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:HJ Mitchell. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 18:49, 23 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 20:05, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Kh122201! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 20:05, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

January 2020

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at Wikipedia:WikiProject Japan, you may be blocked from editing. "Wikipedia:WikiProject Japan" is NOT NOT NOT a user. Calton | Talk 04:05, 9 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Page moves: Just DON'T!

edit

Hello, Kh122201,

Do not move pages in the project space, that is Wikipedia pages or WikiProject pages. Your move resulted in bots moving a lot of page redirects than now have to be fixed manually which is a lot of work for other editors to have to take care of because of your mistakes. I assume this was just an error on your part because I have no idea why you would move a WikiProject page to become a User page.

So, I urge you not to make rash actions like this in the future or your actions will be further scrutinized. If you have questions, visit the Teahouse. Liz Read! Talk! 01:03, 9 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, you may be blocked from editing. Also, if you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, you may be blocked from editing. As far as altering piped links is concerned, see WP:NOTBROKEN. Your edits in general, such as editing the user pages of other editors and altering the status of deceased Wikipedians, are not in line with community standards and if they continue you will be blocked. Dekimasuよ! 01:33, 9 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
Redlinks (links that do not go to articles) can be an indication of new articles that should be created. It is usually not necessary to remove redlinks from articles. Also, I suggest that you review the criteria for speedy deletion before renominating any articles for deletion, and WP:MALPLACED before moving any further disambiguation pages. Unfortunately, a large percentage of your edits are currently creating additional cleanup work for other editors and if this continues you may face blocking, even if your intentions are good. Dekimasuよ! 05:19, 17 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
The link you changed here was WP:NOTBROKEN. Are you unwilling to review the recommendations and warnings you have been given here? Dekimasuよ! 14:02, 18 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sock block

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:21, 16 June 2020 (UTC)Reply