Your submission at Articles for creation: Honorary Consulate of Finland, Karlskoga (April 14) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 06:02, 14 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Möckelngymnasiet (April 14) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curbon7 (talk) 07:54, 14 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, KarlskogaHjärtat! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curbon7 (talk) 07:54, 14 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Möckelngymnasiet edit

  Hello, KarlskogaHjärtat. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Möckelngymnasiet, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:03, 14 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Honorary Consulate of Finland, Karlskoga edit

  Hello, KarlskogaHjärtat. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Honorary Consulate of Finland, Karlskoga, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Karlskoga Art Gallery edit

 

The article Karlskoga Art Gallery has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:02, 27 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Karlskoga Tidning Kuriren edit

 

The article Karlskoga Tidning Kuriren has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:33, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Mass media in Karlskoga edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Mass media in Karlskoga indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:09, 18 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kristinehamn railway station edit

Hello, KarlskogaHjärtat

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username DoubleGrazing, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Kristinehamn railway station, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

  1. Edit the page
  2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|DoubleGrazing}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:36, 14 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Björkborn Manor edit

Hi, KarlskogaHjärtat, nice work at Björkborn Manor. I hope you don't mind me fiddling a little with it. If you want me (and others) to leave it alone while you're actively editing it, you can add the template {{inuse}} at the top. Bishonen | tålk 15:29, 19 October 2022 (UTC).Reply

Bishonen Thanks for helping me with my mistakes! If you want, you are welcome to take a look at the Karlskoga-article as well. KarlskogaHjärtat (talk) 20:06, 21 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Karlskoga looks very good, as far as I've read tonight. It doesn't need much copyediting, but perhaps I can do some small tweaks. Bishonen | tålk 21:23, 21 October 2022 (UTC).Reply

Proposed deletion of Lunedet Church edit

 

The article Lunedet Church has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seems to lack all notability, not a notable or remarkable building?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 15:26, 8 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Storfors stubs has been nominated for deletion edit

 

Category:Storfors stubs has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 04:21, 15 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Palladium Cinema, Arvika" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Palladium Cinema, Arvika and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 6#Palladium Cinema, Arvika until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Rusalkii (talk) 22:36, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Elias Strokirk moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Elias Strokirk, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 12:04, 18 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Karlskoga Airport edit

Hello, KarlskogaHjärtat

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username DoubleGrazing, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Karlskoga Airport, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

  1. Edit the page
  2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|DoubleGrazing}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:54, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Skogskyrkogården Chapel (Karlskoga) edit

 

The article Skogskyrkogården Chapel (Karlskoga) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:21, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notability edit

Hi, I've now proposed deletion on a few of your articles, all for the same reason, namely that there is no evidence of notability. Could you please start referencing your article creations properly, so that the sources cited clearly establish notability per WP:GNG or some special notability guideline (WP:SNG) as appropriate. Creating articles which only end up getting deleted or draftified is a waste of your efforts as well as of those who review them. It's great that you're contributing content, but the content needs to comply with the various policies and guidelines in order to be useful. If there's anything unclear about this, please ask either myself or eg. at the TEAHOUSE. Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:27, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Karlskoga Hundred Savings Bank moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Karlskoga Hundred Savings Bank, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 12:38, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Elias Strokirk edit

  Hello, KarlskogaHjärtat. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Elias Strokirk, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Karlskoga Hundred Savings Bank edit

  Hello, KarlskogaHjärtat. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Karlskoga Hundred Savings Bank, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 27 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Oxehufvud family has been nominated for deletion edit

 

Category:Oxehufvud family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:00, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Karlskoga Hundred Savings Bank edit

 

Hello, KarlskogaHjärtat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Karlskoga Hundred Savings Bank".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:46, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Swedish people of Bohemian descent edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Swedish people of Bohemian descent indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 22:38, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply