User talk:K6ka/Archives/2019/January

Latest comment: 5 years ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic GOCE 2018 Annual Report

Administrators' newsletter – January 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2018).

  Guideline and policy news

  1. G14 (new): Disambiguation pages that disambiguate only zero or one existing pages are now covered under the new G14 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-disambig}}; the text is unchanged and candidates may be found in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as unnecessary disambiguation pages.
  2. R4 (new): Redirects in the file namespace (and no file links) that have the same name as a file or redirect at Commons are now covered under the new R4 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-redircom}}; the text is unchanged.
  3. G13 (expanded): Userspace drafts containing only the default Article Wizard text are now covered under G13 along with other drafts (discussion). Such blank drafts are now eligible after six months rather than one year, and taggers continue to use {{db-blankdraft}}.

  Technical news

  • Starting on December 13, the Wikimedia Foundation security team implemented new password policy and requirements. Privileged accounts (administrators, bureaucrats, checkusers, oversighters, interface administrators, bots, edit filter managers/helpers, template editors, et al.) must have a password at least 10 characters in length. All accounts must have a password:
  1. At least 8 characters in length
  2. Not in the 100,000 most popular passwords (defined by the Password Blacklist library)
  3. Different from their username
User accounts not meeting these requirements will be prompted to update their password accordingly. More information is available on MediaWiki.org.
  • Blocked administrators may now block the administrator that blocked them. This was done to mitigate the possibility that a compromised administrator account would block all other active administrators, complementing the removal of the ability to unblock oneself outside of self-imposed blocks. A request for comment is currently in progress to determine whether the blocking policy should be updated regarding this change.
  • {{Copyvio-revdel}} now has a link to open the history with the RevDel checkboxes already filled in.

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • Accounts continue to be compromised on a regular basis. Evidence shows this is entirely due to the accounts having the same password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately.
  • Around 22% of admins have enabled two-factor authentication, up from 20% in June 2018. If you haven't already enabled it, please consider doing so. Regardless of whether you use 2FA, please practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.

FYI

Creat a new article

Hi, I am trying to creat a new article named "MJ Freeway". I have sources https://www.forbes.com/sites/sarabrittanysomerset/2018/09/20/mj-freeway-makes-a-comeback-with-10-million-in-series-c-financing/#728d53060098 http://www.cnbc.com/2015/03/24/how-techies-are-profiting-from-the-booming-pot-business.html http://fortune.com/2013/03/21/yes-we-cannabis/ http://blogs.wsj.com/riskandcompliance/2014/02/13/marijuana-an-industry-shaped-curiously-enough-by-compliance/ https://www.wired.com/2014/04/high-tech/ http://money.cnn.com/video/smallbusiness/2013/03/21/sbiz-marijuana-software-business.cnnmoney http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2013/04/07/medical-marijuana-industry-growing-billion-dollar-business/2018759/ http://www.inc.com/profile/mj-freeway https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/233877

Will you please help me to create this article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayur Bhatt Shiv (talkcontribs) 11:51, 4 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

User talk:NavjotSR

Thank you for talking to me before unblocking the user. I appreciate the courtesy, not to mention the compliance with policy.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:50, 5 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

I apologize for the dripping sarcasm. Regardless of my irritation, it was uncalled for. I would like to know, though, why you didn't first talk to me before unblocking. My assumption is I would not have objected to the unblock. Just so you know, the reason I picked a week is because much of the disruption, etc., was occurring at the AfD, so I figured a week would prevent the user from editing the AfD, which, of course, usually lasts a week. Otherwise, the block would have been shorter, and there is a good argument that it should have been shorter anyway. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:00, 6 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Hi Bbb23, and thanks for your apology. Perhaps I should apologize too for not pinging you first before unblocking. I had initially thought about doing so, but after reviewing the user's edits carefully, I felt that a week seemed a little too excessive; if a block was warranted, I might've expected 24 to 48 hours as being the appropriate duration. Since the user had already been blocked for a little over 72 hours, I decided that, given how I felt the block should've been shorter (and I think 72 hours would be the appropriate maximum duration) I decided to unblock. The user had actually come onto #wikipedia-en-unblock connect asking for someone to review the request which is how it came to my attention; I would probably not have even known about this incident otherwise. Thanks, —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 02:44, 6 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 2, 2019)

 
An example of page orientation: a smartphone positioned upright (portrait orientation) and horizontally (landscape orientation)
Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Page orientation

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Farce • Scalp


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:27, 7 January 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Adminship Anniversary!

  Wishing K6ka a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! A 10 fireplane Imform me 16:05, 7 January 2019 (UTC)Reply


18:29, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

 
Wishing K6ka a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:54, 7 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 3, 2019)

Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Vicki Gunvalson

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Page orientation • Farce


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 14 January 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

17:54, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Protection of Raashi Bawa

Yesturday night , you took the advantage of being an admin by protecting my sister ( Raashi Bawa) 's Wikipedia Page. You have power , it's your decision , I will not say anything , but... do you know her page was deleted with false conditions? You really made her upset . I will do nothing to you , but god is there and he will definitely protect my sister and give her justice one day... And before deleting this message , think what would you do if the same happened to your sister , hoping that you respect girls in your country.Thank you for reading this message.Jcphfc0001 (talk) 02:09, 17 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Jcphfc0001, Wikipedia's goals are not to make people happy or to give justice to people. Our goal is to build an encyclopedia, and there are things that we can and can not accept. We can only accept articles about figures who meet our standards for notability. You should be aware that the article was deleted after a community discussion, which formed the consensus that the subject was not notable for a Wikipedia article at this time. We consider going against consensus to be a form of disruption that prevents us from focusing on our goal of creating an encyclopedia, which is why the article was deleted after being recreated, and which is why I create protected the page to prevent further inappropriate recreations. You should also be aware that comments like "You made [someone] upset" or "you should respect [people] in your country" are off-topic and irrelevant to the very reason as to why the article was deleted, which was that the subject in question was not notable; making these comments serve no purpose other than to frustrate other people and don't address any of the reasons why the article was deleted. Lastly, you must remember to comment on content and not contributors, which includes avoiding religious threats or even suggestions that you will do something to an editor in real life in response to something they did on Wikipedia; these will not solve the problem and may result in blocks from editing or even local authorities being contacted if necessary. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 03:27, 17 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

User:K6ka I think you didn't get what I said . Firstly , I clearly specified thaylt I am nOT giving any Threat , so please don't comment on that. Secondly , I said that her page was deleted with reason that she worked in only one sitcom show , whereas the reality is that she has worked on 3 television shows , so the condition of deleting her page was totally false. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.88.26.236 (talk) 04:37, 17 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

I will do nothing to you , but god is there and he will definitely protect my sister and give her justice one day sounds like you were implying a threat, which in any case is off-topic and should never have been mentioned in the first place. Secondly, nowhere in your first message did you ever mention the number of TV shows she worked on. Thirdly, you are not even logged in right now, so I am not even sure if I am responding to the right person. I won't continue this absurd discussion any longer. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 15:26, 17 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

♪♪You wanted a hippopotamus for christmas♪♪

 


Smash!

You've been squished by a whale!
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something really silly.

♪♪But you got a whale instead♪♪ Kb03 (talk) 17:23, 17 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hey how do i edit pages — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skai Kurana (talkcontribs) 18:38, 17 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

(talk page stalker) Skai Kurana, Editing can be complicated at times, I suggest you complete The Wikipedia Adventure and it should get you up and running. Kb03 (talk) 18:49, 17 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Rename

Hello !

Not sure I'm using the right way to contact you - I hope it is -. I'm just sending this to confirm I'd like to be renamed. Thanks ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orion.buffe (talkcontribs) 20:57, 19 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 4, 2019)

 
A view of the Quetschenfest street fair in the community of Geichlingen, Germany
Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Street fair

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Vicki Gunvalson • Page orientation


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 21 January 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

20:35, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Enquiry about username taken

Hi K6ka, I have seen you are dealing with my user renaming. For what I've seen, the user that holds the other username has no activity and has not been active since 2009. Is there some way to somehow reclaim that unused username? By the way, that user was most probably me making some tests with a now extinct e-mail account, but I am not sure of that.

Thanks! --Luis andres gonzalez (talk) 00:27, 24 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi Luis andres gonzalez.
The username is eligible for usurpation, which you can request here. However, you only have three edits made over the course of nine years, so you would almost certainly not be considered eligible to request usurpation of another user account. In general, we prefer only granting usurpations to established editors, usually those with at least 400 total edits and be registered for at least six months. Usurpation would be the way of reclaiming unused usernames, but as of now you're not eligible to request for that at this time. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 01:46, 24 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Hi! (I hope I am editing this the right way!, LOL). Sounds absolutely logic that rule. I guess I should start editing it right now! Thank you! Luis andres gonzalez (talk) 23:23, 24 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 5, 2019)

Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Assassination attempts

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Street fair • Vicki Gunvalson


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 28 January 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Rename

Hi k6ka, I would like if my name were changed to Qwerty3.141592 Thanks 👍 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomas McGearty (talkcontribs) 17:08, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

18:15, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

  The Special Barnstar
Thanks for changing all those usernames, buster. That's it. BashurMan (talk) 21:50, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Rename

Hi K6ka, can you change my name to m.m.g.g.0202 please👍 Thanks Qwerty3.141592 (talk) 19:35, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Qwerty3.141592: You have been renamed less than 24 hours ago. We won't accept repeated or frivolous requests, sorry. Please wait six months before making another request. You should not make requests for username changes without having thought it through. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 10:54, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello

Hi, sorry for the vandalism under this IP address last year, I discovered that recently on my new IP address. Thank you!--77.73.68.211 (talk) 17:32, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 31 January 2019

GOCE 2018 Annual Report

Guild of Copy Editors 2018 Annual Report
 

Our 2018 Annual Report is now ready for review.

Highlights:

  • Overview of Backlog-reduction progress;
  • Summary of Drives, Blitzes, and the Requests page;
  • Membership news and results of elections;
  • Annual leaderboard;
  • Plans for 2019.
– Your project coordinators: Miniapolis, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, Reidgreg and Tdslk.
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.


MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 31 January 2019 (UTC)Reply