Jrugordon

SOJHL

Hello. My name is Devan and I do most of the Ontario Junior articles on Wikipedia. I am glad that you are interested in the SOJHL... finally some help. I have been forced to focus on the OPJHL and GMJHL this year. I want to point out a couple articles that may help you if you feel like improving the SOJHL articles or its team's articles.

First... the Ontario Provincial Junior A Hockey League.

• Template with logo, founding date, and executive
• A good and sourced history
• Organized list of champions
• A complete list of defunct teams
• Up to date external links

Second... Durham Huskies Jr. A

• Team template with logo, founding date, coach, gm, arena
• Detailed history with sourcing
• Complete w-l-t records
• Up to date external links

The biggest struggle I've found is finding past standings from the SOJHL/OHAJDL/WJDHL... I've seen evidence that the London Free Press covered the league... and if so, there may be standings back to 1960 if lucky. If you can, please help... I'd like to hear what you think. DMighton 23:14, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

i'm new

I'm quite new to editing and creating pages, so i have no idea what i'm doing

I used to work for the Port Stanley Lakers from about 1995 to 1997 full time, and part time off and on for a few years after that. If you find a copy of the picture from when they won the league title against Burford in 2000, I'm in that picture.

I'm currently the timekeeper for the St Thomas Stars of the Western Ontario Hockey League.

above

comment above was from me...forgot to sign my name Jrugordon 09:40, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

All contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Joe Blobinsky may be offensive or unwelcome. In case you are the user, please log in under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do, particularly to userpages. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. feydey 09:37, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

thanks feydey, i do apologize, and put an apology on his page. --When a mime shoots himself, does he use a silencer? 09:41, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

your sig and another suggestion

Hi there. Although I find it amusing, you may find people get into a bit of a twist over your signature (especially since you are reporting vandals to WP:AIV), so you may wish to consider changing it. The quote is appropriate for your userpage, though. Also, people usually put info about themselves (like what you have on your talk page) on their Userpage. And re: your comment on my talk page -- no problem! I actually reported the IP to AIV first, since they'd received a {{uw-bv}} warning earlier today, and then gave the {{uw-vandalism4}} warning. IP is blocked for a week. If you want to talk about any of this, leave a note on my talk page. Cheers! Flyguy649^talk_contribs 06:02, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Oops! I misread some of the above. It's not from you after all! (I was talking about the SOJHL section). Just ignore that part of my earlier post! And if you want a unique sig, you can always look at what other people are using and try different things. You can always test different sigs in a personal sandbox (or the Wikipedia sandbox). Cheers, Flyguy649^talk_contribs 06:15, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

WP:AIV formatting

FYI: The correct formatting is: "* {{ipvandal|ip_address}}". Thanks. --  Netsnipe  ►  06:17, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

re:reporting a persistant vandal

Hi again. Ummm... It looks like user:210.9.93.170's additions are unsourced. I don't know whether they're real or just vandalism. I'd probably have used {{subst:uw-unsourced2}} and gone through the series up to {{subst:uw-unsourced4}}, and then report to WP:AIV. There's a full list of usertalk page warnings at WP:UTM with instructions. You can click on any of the warnings listed and it will show you what they say. Let me know if you need further suggestions, but I'm about to go to bed. Regards, Flyguy649^talk_contribs 06:31, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

re: the vandal

i've removed all the vandalism he's left on other people's pages today...it's like he's got a weird obsession with a body part. Anyways, thanks for the help with Maverick423's page, and thanks for putting some warnings on this anonymous user's page Jru Gordon 06:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

I've reported him now as well, so that should be the end of it. --Samtheboy ^(t/c) 06:57, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

i hope so. I'm new to having to report people. Is this where WP:AIV would have been useful? Jru Gordon 07:00, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, AIV is good, but make sure you leave suitable warnings on people's talk pages when you revert vandalism. You can use WP:UTM which gives a list of all the warnings you can give (I tend to increase one level unless they're blatantly vandalising in which case I skip a level). Also have a look at Anti-vandal tools to help with countering vandalism. I personally use Vandal Fighter to monitor recent changes more easily, and WP:TWINKLE so a) I get a rollback feature (revert multiple edits by a user in one go) and b) I don't have to remember all the warnings! Hope that helps somewhat. --Samtheboy ^(t/c) 07:04, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

June 2007

Please refrain from removing the header or making bad edits at the Wikipedia Sandbox. You are free to edit the sandbox, but please leave the header alone and do as it asks you to.--Teddey 21:40, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, my bad. Good luck with your upcoming child. Cheers!--Teddey 03:23, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Nswpheonix

Just another one in a long line of them. Thanks for your vigilence. Any help is appreciated.  :) -- Longhair\^talk 08:18, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

...for reporting the IP in WP:AIV. Eliz81 09:24, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

you're welcome Jru Gordon 09:25, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

oh... good question about the talk blanking page. i'm not really sure... my guess is, since it's their page, it's their right to remove the warnings. but i think bots like martinbot might use it to pay attention to the number of vandalisms. i really don't know the answer! Eliz81 09:30, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

ah HA! Removal of warnings

Policy does not prohibit users from removing comments from their own talk pages, although archiving is preferred. The removal of a warning is taken as evidence that the warning has been read by the user. Deleted warnings can still be found in the page history. taken from here you're right. Eliz81 09:40, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Hey, to answer this question, believe it or not. The User Warnings Project has set a date for "good etiquette", though it isn't necessary yet. If a warning was issued by accident, you Stike it out, if it was good, you leave it. Either way, it's "good etiquette" to leave it for 3 months, then it can be removed, either way, whether it was deserved or not. Also, I'm pretty sure that the user who received the warning, even with permission, isn't allowed to strike through the warning. Anyway, that's pretty much it. Have a good one! --HAL2008 talk 15:36, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

85.139.172.73

Not a problem, infact it's becouse of your aiv report that I reverted his vandalism, becouse I saw your report and looked in his contribs and voila he had done it again. --Lwarf ^Talk! 10:03, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

70.69.51.111/24.80.113.241

More abuse from this IP on page Lauritz Melchior. IP is apparently in Alberta Canada. I see you made an objection before so I am wondering if I can ask you what is the appropriate procedure here? Thanks. -- Kleinzach 14:07, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your messages. 70.69.51.111 has again reverted the Lauritz Melchior page and has blanked his own talk page to remove your warning. What is the best thing to do now? Should I remove the infobox again, I wonder? Thanks. -- Kleinzach 08:18, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

just to let you know, I have reverted the edit yet again, have put a final warning on his talk page, and have requested Semi-Protection. I'll let you know how it turns out. Jru Gordon 08:44, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. -- Kleinzach 08:52, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

More problems with this user, unfortunately. He is using IP 24.80.113.241 - which resolves to the same address in Alberta Canada - and is reverting infoboxes on Piotr Beczala, Frank Forest, and Florence Easton (though this last one has been reverted by someone). If you have a moment to have a look I'd be grateful. This is the first time I've known an abusive user change IP like this, so I'm not sure the best way to deal with it. Best. -- Kleinzach 07:11, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

No Problem...

Hey, no problemo, just doing what I can, but I am kinda new so if I screw up, let me know about it. Peace. Spartan-James 21:23, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Spartan-James has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Are you crazy?

Vandalize? What's wrong with you?!? They're the ones vandalizing and they don't have a leg to stand on. Go ahead and block me - I don't give a flying fuck about this stupid site anymore when I'm called the vandal.
70.69.51.111 09:01, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Last time i checked, I'm not crazy, and there is nothing wrong with me. But yes you are vandalizing when you're constantly adding something that the Project Page says is not wanted. They say they do not want Infoboxes without discussion on the Talk Page. So don't add one.Jru Gordon 09:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

And on a side note, I will NOT block you simply because you request it. If you don't care about this site anymore, just leave. Bye. Jru Gordon 09:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Oh you're going to have me blocked? Go right ahead. This infobox had been on the article for some time now so it should be discussed if it's wanted taken down. There's many articles with the infobox and you people only seem to care about it on the few where no one will even notice it's gone.
70.69.51.111 09:09, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

I removed your striking out of your first message. I did report you to WP:AIV and also make a request to have Lauritz Melchior Semi-Protected. The Project Page says they don't want them on the pages, so don't put one on it. It's simple. Jru Gordon 09:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

to anyone else reading this, he's been blocked for one day.Jru Gordon 09:15, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Um excuse me, I striked it for a reason. I was under the impression I was being talked to by an administrator and the second message I left was supposed to be right after it when I realized it was just you I was messaging, but when I tried to save there was an edit conflict because you left your message first. You don't make edits to people's messages.
70.69.51.111 23:51, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Deletion

You mean beside the fact that it was non-notable spam!? Have fun. --Steve _(Stephen) ^talk 08:31, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Octaga

Hello. Please be careful in tagging for G11. This three-sentence stub was hardly promotional, and the company is likely notable as a spinoff from a major enterprize. -- Y not? 12:05, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Demon Warrior Koji

Two points on the tagging for this article: 1) You warned the user with the uw-afd warning instead of the more appropriate speedy warning, 2) If the creator blanks a newly-created page after I've speedy-tagged it, I don't even count it as an offense--I just re-tag it as a author-requested speedy deletion and move on. Thanks. --Finngall ^talk 19:14, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Your VandalProof Application

Dear Jrugordon,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that at this time you do not meet the minimum requirement of 250 edits to mainspace articles (see under main here). Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. Daniel 08:19, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Good Morning!

I saw your question on the Anti-Vandalism page. To get your name on the list, add the following line (exactly) to your Profile Page:

[[Category:Wikipedians in the Counter Vandalism Unit|{{PAGENAME}}]]

Have a great day! ArielGold♥ (talk)

thanks for telling me Jru Gordon 17:47, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

WP:CVU status

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 16:19, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Oh wow.

I came across your page and noticed the "I'm a dad!!!" announcement. I was going to just say "I was going to say the same" or whatever I thought of if I found someone who congratulated you already, but I didn't find any. So, instead, CONGRATULATIONS! Bsroiaadn^Talk 03:21, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Bob

Hi. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.196.242.210 (talk) 20:38, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

---

uh, ok....hi... Jru Gordon (talk) 18:42, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Whalers

As a North Carolina Resident, and a Carolina Hurricanes fan, i'm sorry to say you're not getting our team back :) -TinGrin 07:15, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

--- um...ok...i don't live in Hartford, so it's not my team...Jru Gordon (talk) 17:32, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Nick Kaczur

Thanks for the confirmation. Obviously, I can't use you as an official source, but (A) I couldn't find any confirmation of sisters, and (B) I figured that even if Kaczur did have kids, if there was no mention of them in his official bio--or a newspaper article specifically mentioning them--then there was no reason to mention their names, even if the info were correct.

As far as the OC goes, I honestly have no idea what to make of that. Samer (talk) 23:34, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

SOJHL

Central Elgin is on one year hiatus. West Lorne is gone for good. Mitchell is now in Western Jr. C and the Mount Brydges applied and were rejected for Great Lakes Jr. C... that is the last I've heard. DMighton (talk) 21:01, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Seaforth left the league about half a decade ago. Lambton's logo is now up. DMighton (talk) 15:55, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

According to this [1], there will be a Port Stanley team next year, but it will be the Central Elgin club from last year. DMighton (talk) 21:01, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Maybe he sold his franchise rights? Happens a lot. DMighton (talk) 21:06, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Code for the Wikipedia time

Hi Jrugordon, The code you need to get that nice little time box is {{Time-UTC-Banner}}

As for the size of the font in your message, that was my fault. I had accidentallyleft off a little bit of code that closes the small automatic signature. I fixed it now. Thanks for pointing that out! Invertzoo (talk) 21:46, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome! Invertzoo (talk) 21:54, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

I'm going to assume this is some sort of inside joke, or the antics of a family member.

I'm only going to assume this once, however. HalfShadow 01:31, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

No clue who the user is. I am dumbfounded as to why he attacked me. Erzsébet Báthory_{(talk|contr.)} 01:35, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Anaheim Ducks

Please accept this invite to join the Ducks WikiProject, a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with the Anaheim Ducks. Simply click here to accept!

--CASportsFan (talk) 08:28, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Malaysian Flight 370

I believe this flight never occurred

Quixotic plea

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 06:32, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jrugordon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

What's up with this edit?

Hey! I see you're an established editor but I noticed you made this edit [2] to Wesley Johnson (basketball). Please note that this page has been protected due to an immense influx of vandalism and myself and other editors are trying to keep it clear of vandalism. Thanks, HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 19:35, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

You have again made another vandalism type edit [3] and [4]. Please stop doing this. If you're trying to have fun or blow off steam please stop doing so on Wikipedia. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 20:46, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jrugordon. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 21:52, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

Hello, I'm Sjö. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jose Canseco have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Sjö (talk) 05:53, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mz7 (talk) 06:01, 11 March 2019 (UTC)