Your submission at Articles for creation: Juliette Leong (July 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tol was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Tol | talk | contribs 19:50, 16 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, JDRL Koala! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tol | talk | contribs 19:50, 16 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hi JDRL Koala! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! GPL93 (talk) 03:14, 17 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Juliette Leong (July 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JavaHurricane was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
JavaHurricane 06:47, 17 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Juliette Leong (July 18)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 01:29, 18 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Juliette Leong (July 18)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 05:19, 18 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Juliette Leong has been accepted

edit
 
Juliette Leong, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qwerfjkltalk 12:17, 18 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, JDRL Koala. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Juliette Leong, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GPL93 (talk) 01:52, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

@JDRL Koala: please do not edit this article directly until you make a disclosure. You essentially re-added all of the promotional language that you removed after AngusWOOF rejected the article upon Qwerfjkl accepting the draft. Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:30, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
@GPL93: @GPL93: I am not related to the subject. Juliette is not a family or friend or colleague. I saw her singing the national anthem in Reno and looked her up and found out that she is also an artist and donates the money to nonprofits. I'm making edits to other incredible people as well. I also have a couple other articles that I am drafting, also not related to me in any way. Sorry for the late reply. I was trying to figure out how to response in (talk). Thanks. JDRL Koala (talk) 21:59, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
@JDRL Koala: except that you uploaded a photo of the subject that was clearly taken in person and tagged it as an "own work" and your edits have been overly promotional towards the subject. Best, GPL93 (talk) 22:36, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
@GPL93: I (and a bunch of other people) took pictures of Juliette when she performed in Reno. But, understood, I will be careful on the tone and wording (for other articles as well). Thanks. JDRL Koala (talk) 22:44, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

July 2021

edit

  Hi JDRL Koala! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 17:03, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JDRL Koala. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mz7 (talk) 21:16, 27 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Juliette Leong

edit
 

The article Juliette Leong has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, probably WP:TOOSOON as well. Most sources are not reliable and those that are appear to be a few local news stories. The article was created by a likely WP:COI/WP:UPE editor, who has now been blocked for sockpuppetry.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GPL93 (talk) 22:45, 28 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Juliette Leong for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Juliette Leong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juliette Leong until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

--- Possibly 03:30, 23 October 2021 (UTC)Reply