Disambiguation link notification for October 15 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yuri Dmitrievich Petukhov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Falsification (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 15 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your edits to "Russian grammar" edit

Здравствуйте! I have been making edits to a number of your edits, but I am basically only trying to reword for clarity. I do not know what the answer is (since I am a Russian total beginner), so when I have to work out what something means, I hope to be able to write it better. (I found "possessive genitives" confusing, because I wondered if it was a technical term, for example) If you think I have changed the meaning or got something wrong, please say. For a person who claims to have "level 1" English, you seem to be doing an extremely good job! Thanks.

One question: You wrote "In bylinas one can find all other forms and roles of short adjectives..." -- and I do not understand what you mean by "forms and roles"? Do you mean that the short adjectives decline just like the long ones? (This is all still rather mysterious to me!)

Imaginatorium (talk) 17:36, 13 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • Hello! Sorry, my English is really could be better. Yes, I mean that in bylinas you can read lines like "У ласкова князя у Владимира" ('at kind prince Vladimir'), "Стопили ему парну баенку" '(They) heated for him a pretty steamy bain' ([1]). I thought that "possessive genitives" means "noun phrases in genitive case which denotes possession", please correct me if this is not understandable. Ignatus (talk) 17:56, 13 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for December 14 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Russian grammar, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Predicate, Пушкин and Alexandr (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 14 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Wikilinking edit

Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:

  • dates
  • years
  • commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
  • common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).

This is true also for infoboxes.

Thanks and my best wishes.

Tony (talk) 08:55, 8 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • Thanks! I'll read the rules better. Ignatus (talk) 11:59, 9 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion declined: Цари́ца edit

Hello Ignatus. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Цари́ца, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a recently created redirect - consider WP:RfD. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 12:05, 28 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Ignatus. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Ignatus. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Module:RuGrammar edit

 Module:RuGrammar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the module's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pppery (talkcontribs) 15:51, 28 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Ignatus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

"XXXIII century" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect XXXIII century and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 20#XXXIII century until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 21:22, 20 August 2022 (UTC)Reply