ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Maksim Yeleyev edit

 

The article Maksim Yeleyev has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails the WP:NFOOTY critera as the match was against a 3rd tier side which isn't from a WP:FPL based league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HawkAussie (talk) 01:31, 21 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Vadim Zubavlenko for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vadim Zubavlenko is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vadim Zubavlenko until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

HawkAussie (talk) 01:47, 21 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:People from Kedrovy, Tomsk Oblast edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:People from Kedrovy, Tomsk Oblast requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:57, 22 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Tibor Garay edit

 

The article Tibor Garay has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz Read! Talk! 17:55, 4 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Carlo Lenci edit

 

The article Carlo Lenci has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz Read! Talk! 21:42, 23 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dominik Plechatý has been accepted edit

 
Dominik Plechatý, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Kichu🐘 Need any help? 06:49, 17 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Patrice Sorbara edit

 

The article Patrice Sorbara has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz Read! Talk! 20:54, 19 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Lazar Aizenpreisz for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lazar Aizenpreisz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lazar Aizenpreisz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:10, 20 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Eligio Vecchi for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eligio Vecchi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eligio Vecchi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

JTZegersSpeak
Aura
15:10, 6 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Giambattista Bonis edit

 

The article Giambattista Bonis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP that doesn't demonstrate notability at all. There are a couple of other sources on the other language versions ([1], [2]), but neither demonstrate notability either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Aerin17 (talk) 23:42, 9 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Giambattista Bonis for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Giambattista Bonis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giambattista Bonis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Aerin17 (talk) 18:01, 10 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Mikhail Petrusyov edit

 

The article Mikhail Petrusyov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

the significance of the face is doubtful. despite the fact that an article about him in the English Wikipedia was created in 2011 (as part of pre-sale preparation or advertising), the person did not move higher than the Russian regional clubs (also of minor importance). remove by criterion "lack of significance", "advertising of a person", "lack of educational value"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. plicit 11:00, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Romano Voltolina edit

 

The article Romano Voltolina has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz Read! Talk! 18:12, 12 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

UEFA Cup winners edit

Just an FYI, in the past, only players who played (or were on the bench) in the final actually got a winner's medal; those that played in the earlier rounds did not. Cheers, Number 57 14:59, 15 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Unsourced edit

"Despite appearing in qualifiers, he was not selected for Italy's 2021 UEFA European Under-21 Championship squad due to suffering from persistent injuries at that time" (Luca Pellegrini (footballer, born 1999)).

Please add a source to any claim you make on Wikipedia, thanks. Nehme1499 22:21, 9 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Use of arrows edit

Hi, we don't use arrows for players who played for reserve teams. For example, this is how the information should be displayed in Pietro Beruatto's infobox, not like this. Thanks, Nehme1499 16:39, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Piero Betello edit

 

The article Piero Betello has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. RoanokeVirginia (talk) 23:38, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Giancarlo Centi edit

 

The article Giancarlo Centi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. RoanokeVirginia (talk) 15:26, 4 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of João Prietos for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article João Prietos, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/João Prietos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 12 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Giuseppe Morosi edit

 

The article Giuseppe Morosi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. RoanokeVirginia (talk) 21:13, 23 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Player club categories edit

Hello. Please do net remove club categories from the player articles of the player played for the reserve squad. Per established consensus at FOOTY project, such categories are valid. Thanks. --BlameRuiner (talk) 07:37, 4 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Yuri Zheludkov edit

 

The article Yuri Zheludkov has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Link20XX (talk) 21:17, 5 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Logo of FC Baltika Kaliningrad (2002).gif edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Logo of FC Baltika Kaliningrad (2002).gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 29 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Jeff Hardeveld edit

Please can you re-locate references, rather than deleting them? GiantSnowman 21:53, 30 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

@GiantSnowman My apologies, I was not careful. I try to move the references when possible, I will pay more attention going forward, thank you for reminding me. Geregen2 (talk) 22:14, 30 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Not a problem, thank you for the response. GiantSnowman 22:16, 30 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

WP:STUBSPACING edit

Hi there. WP:STUBSPACING states: "Leave two blank lines between the first stub template and whatever precedes it." I've restored the two blank lines at Danny Bakker (footballer, born 16 January 1995). Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 19:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Great! :-) Happy editing, Robby.is.on (talk) 19:34, 4 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Miguel Pacios edit

 

The article Miguel Pacios has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:07, 12 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Chilean expatriates in Finland edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Chilean expatriates in Finland indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 18:10, 13 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wording for Finnish footballers edit

Please be careful when adding sources (and you're doing an amazing job of updating articles) - saying 'he signed for X in November 2021' is not technically true, it implies that is when he joined, but players would not join until the 2022 season. It is an important thing to note in the prose. GiantSnowman 22:35, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

@GiantSnowman Thank you for reminding me. I am making more effort to word it correctly in the later updates, I completely overlooked that detail before.Geregen2 (talk) 22:40, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
no worries, thanks! GiantSnowman 16:51, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Armando Massiglia edit

 

The article Armando Massiglia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources. Most obviously fails WP:V.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 05:43, 7 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Fabrice Garin edit

 

The article Fabrice Garin has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz Read! Talk! 14:02, 2 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jean-Baptiste Daguet for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jean-Baptiste Daguet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean-Baptiste Daguet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 07:38, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ifeanyi David Nduka for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ifeanyi David Nduka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ifeanyi David Nduka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 16:22, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Mathieu Didion for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mathieu Didion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mathieu Didion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 17:03, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Florent Gache for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Florent Gache is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florent Gache until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 19:31, 12 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Disestablishments in the Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic by year indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 20:36, 19 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Russian suspended contracts edit

Hey. I think that "special leave" is too big in the infobox for the players who are suspended from their Russian contracts. Instead, put a lower-alpha note and add a notes section, explaining the situation. That would be better. Paul Vaurie (talk) 22:30, 24 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Rogério Martins edit

 

The article Rogério Martins has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article plainly fails WP:GNG, with all of the content being seemingly based on a single database entry. Looking for further sources apparently yields plenty of coverage, but it all seems to be about some other Rogerio Martins, not this one.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 22:02, 11 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ibourahima Baldé edit

 

The article Ibourahima Baldé has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable athlete with trivial news coverage

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. agtx 05:06, 29 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Lorenzo Simonetti edit

 

The article Lorenzo Simonetti has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable athlete with trivial news coverage

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. agtx 05:08, 29 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Marino Nicolich edit

 

The article Marino Nicolich has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unsourced article on footballer of unclear notability. No incoming links from any football-related page, so might not even be missed.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Kusma (talk) 14:25, 29 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Marino Nicolich for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marino Nicolich is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marino Nicolich until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kusma (talk) 10:12, 1 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Dzmitry Chaka for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dzmitry Chaka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dzmitry Chaka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:48, 1 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Amara Konate (Guinean footballer) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amara Konate (Guinean footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amara Konate (Guinean footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

agtx 19:36, 10 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Yevgeny Bal for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yevgeny Bal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yevgeny Bal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 06:30, 23 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Sergei Gritsenko for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sergei Gritsenko is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sergei Gritsenko until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

- Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 06:36, 5 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of FC Spartak-Arktikbank Arkhangelsk edit

 

The article FC Spartak-Arktikbank Arkhangelsk has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Couldn't find any sources, even with a Russian-language search. The article itself states they played for a single season and withdrew from the leagues.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Merko (talk) 22:13, 5 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Kraig Noel-McLeod for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kraig Noel-McLeod is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kraig Noel-McLeod until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:38, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Cyril Granon edit

 

The article Cyril Granon has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. PICKLEDICAE🥒 22:33, 27 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Antonio Tranchina for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Antonio Tranchina is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antonio Tranchina until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Angelo (talk) 15:36, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Salvatore Temperino for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Salvatore Temperino is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salvatore Temperino until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Angelo (talk) 15:38, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Rosario Costantino (footballer, born 1988) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rosario Costantino (footballer, born 1988) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosario Costantino (footballer, born 1988) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Angelo (talk) 15:41, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Davide Monteleone (footballer) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Davide Monteleone (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davide Monteleone (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Angelo (talk) 15:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:People from Vuktyl has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:People from Vuktyl has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 13:35, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:People from Krasnokholmsky District has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:People from Krasnokholmsky District has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 08:59, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:People from Nelidovsky District has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:People from Nelidovsky District has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 09:00, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:People from Spirovsky District has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:People from Spirovsky District has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 09:01, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:People from Gai, Orenburg Oblast has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:People from Gai, Orenburg Oblast has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 09:14, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:People from Grachyovsky District, Orenburg Oblast has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:People from Grachyovsky District, Orenburg Oblast has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 09:14, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:People from Kurmanayevsky District has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:People from Kurmanayevsky District has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 09:15, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:People from Mednogorsk has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:People from Mednogorsk has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 09:15, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:People from Novoorsky District has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:People from Novoorsky District has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 09:15, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:People from Totsky District has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:People from Totsky District has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 09:16, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:People from Irbeysky District has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:People from Irbeysky District has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 08:33, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:People from Krasnoturansky District has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:People from Krasnoturansky District has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 08:34, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:People from Rybinsky District, Krasnoyarsk Krai has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:People from Rybinsky District, Krasnoyarsk Krai has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 08:35, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:People from Zheleznogorsk, Krasnoyarsk Krai has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:People from Zheleznogorsk, Krasnoyarsk Krai has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 08:38, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:People from Alexeyevsky District, Republic of Tatarstan has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:People from Alexeyevsky District, Republic of Tatarstan has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 08:53, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:People from Buinsk, Republic of Tatarstan has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:People from Buinsk, Republic of Tatarstan has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 08:54, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:People from Buinsky District has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:People from Buinsky District has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 08:54, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:People from Mamadyshsky District has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:People from Mamadyshsky District has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 08:55, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:People from Sabinsky District has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:People from Sabinsky District has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 08:57, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:People from Zelenodolsky District has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:People from Zelenodolsky District has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 08:58, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:People from Bogoroditsky District has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:People from Bogoroditsky District has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 17:22, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply