This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Welcome!
Hello, Gavbadger, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Wellesbourne. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!
|Uncle Milty | talk| 22:37, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - January 2013
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 10,275 last month to 10,294 on December 15th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 93 is just ahead of WP:GM who have 73. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 57 out of a total number of 3,171 articles.
Currently we have thirty one Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Signpost
Just to let members know that the project was featured in the 3 December issue of the Signpost magazine. You can read that issue of the magazine here.
Happy New Year
It is the start of another year so I would like to take this opportunity to wish all members of the project a happy New Year.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The January 2013 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered January 2013 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page. → Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 13:00, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 9
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited RAF Grove, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grove (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Thanks for the welcome message! :) CountVlad (talk) 16:07, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
You're welcome. Gavbadger (talk) 16:31, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXII, January 2013
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Done I think you may need to change the DYK as it implies that Peterhead is still in use by the Royal Air Force which it isn't. Good Luck. Gavbadger (talk) 12:24, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Added as an ALT, thanks. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:39, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Funnily enough and somewhat bizarrely, I landed here to ask if you would be kind enough to have a quick look at RNAS Longside to make sure it was okay from the 'Military history' point of view as I've expanded it a bit and I have no experience or knowledge of that type of article. My idea was to possibly put it forward for a DYK as well, so any thoughts would be gratefully appreciated.
PS: I do still have more info to try to include in RNAS Longside! SagaciousPhil - Chat 13:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
One obvious is the naming since the title and lead says Longside yet everything else says Lenabo, so would a name change be in order? Otherwise a lot of the text would need to be changed. Otherwise it looks fine. For the DYK you could say about how It was the most northerly air ship station in Britain, but it's up to you as i never (apart from above) do anything to do with DYK. Good Luck. Gavbadger (talk) 18:07, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Brilliant - thank you so much for doing that! I've changed the text to read 'the base' or 'the site' rather than Lenabo except when referring to the land, so hopefully that now works. Old habits die hard as it's just called 'Lenabo' locally but it's surprising how few people (even locals) actually know the history of the place. I don't know all that much about DYK either but I'll give it a shot. Thanks again for your help, it's much appreciated! SagaciousPhil - Chat 09:02, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
RAF Thornaby
Latest comment: 11 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
Hi, i have a couple of problems, where do i have to sign the posts? and the elevation and coordinates of the airfield. The RAF had the elevation of Thornaby at 60 feet which i tried to change but it keeps changing back and, the coordinates the RAF had were 5432 North and 0118 West, which i have not tried to change. Also i'm in possession of a motor race program produced by the Middlesbrough and District Motor Club dated 9 August 1959 which contradicts the claim that the first race meeting took place on 6 September 1959, Cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.4.91.211 (talk) 19:49, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
1. When you post on talk pages you should add ~~~~ which automatically says who you are and when you posted the message so other people know who is talking (which is what we call signing), for example if you look at your own talkpage for my messages it adds my name and time i posted the message so you can tell who said what and when
2. The convert template "{{Convert|18|m|disp=output number only|0}}" is used to turn metres into feet since everyone on Wikipedia uses a different type of measurement. In which reference does it says the elevation of the airfield? As some books use the centre of the triangle runways and some use the location of the airfield headquarters as the elevation point which often varies in height.
3. The exact co-ordinates of 52 32 00 N 001 18 00 W puts the point where the E/W runway crosses over the NE/SW, which today is just east of the roundabout with the full-size replica Spitfire aircraft at the junction of Thornaby Road, Bader Avenue and Trenchard Avenue. The centre of the three runways was located 54 32 05 N 001 17 44 W which is currently Blenheim House (according to Google Street View) however if you wish to change it go ahead as we cannot use satellite imagery/street view as a reference.
4. The motor sport section is currently without a page number within the reference as the person who added the information did not put one in, so i have moved the reference before the part where it says "There is some evidence that one race meeting was organised by Middlesbrough & District Motor Club, they produced at least two of the race programs, 1959 and 1960" then you can add the reference at the end of the paragraph.
5 Also why do you not want to have a proper wikipedia account since you can do more like being able to add RAF Thornaby to your watchlist and edit certain articles which people without an account cannot?
1 I'll have a look on the talk page, i think i know what you mean.
2 The elevation was given on the Thornaby sign on the tower which read AMSL 60 feet, its also given as 60 feet on period aeronautical maps, although i have a flight map from 1951 which gives it as 61 feet. There's a picture of the sign on the tower on UK control towers and airfield photographs of WW2.
3 If you look on Aerial Views of UK Airports and Airfields you can still see part of the peri track which runs into the West end of the E/W runway at Bader Avenue (left of the Spitfire). If you look across to the East end near the woods part of it is still there behind the club in Tedder avenue. The NE/SW runway ran from Wolsingham drive, along Trenchard avenue and ended at blackbush walk, Blenheim house is north of the E/W/ runway.
4 Ok i'll have a look at that.
5 I did a couple of years ago but can't remember if i gave a password or not, if i did i'd never be able to remember it, could i join twice?
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.4.91.211 (talk) 21:18, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello, 2: Infobox changed to 60ft, 3:Ok, If you want to change the coordinates, go ahead, 5: Yes. Gavbadger (talk) 21:50, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
2. Cheers, 3. Ok, will do, i would'nt usually be fussed but there's a well known photograph taken in the crew room with, Thornaby 5432N 0118W, and all us anoraks have it! 5. Ok i'll join again....
Many thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.4.91.211 (talk) 22:01, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks a lot ...
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
... for the barnstar. The ISO codes for regions of the UK can be found on this page. And by the way, if you use "region:GB-" (hyphen followed by nothing) in a {{coord}} template or in a "coord_region" infobox field, it shows up as an error in this log, which is why I was attracted to the articles in the first place. It's better to use just "GB" unless you know the specific subregion code, and often that's quite sufficient. Deor (talk) 20:36, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - February 2013
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 10,294 last month to 10,371 on January 28th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 93 is ahead of WP:GM who have 74. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 57 out of a total number of 3,185 articles.
Currently we have thirty one Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
2011 Census
The Office for National Statistics have now published the detailed information from the 2011 Census for wards and parishes. The data can be searched for on their web site here. Would be good to get the information added to all of the relevant articles but this is a big job. If the article already has the 2001 census figures then it may be worth retaining these, in the text of the article, for comparison purposes.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The February 2013 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered February 2013 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page. → Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 12:44, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
DYK for RAF Peterhead
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I had just noticed the changes when I got your message. I don't have the book any longer as I'd got it from the library. Phoned a local and was told soo would be more likely to be pig, so I've changed the article to be on the safe side. SagaciousPhil - Chat 18:34, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Ok, Thanks. Gavbadger (talk) 18:41, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Sandbox installation template
Latest comment: 11 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
I seem to have fixed the issue and have gotten the other location parameters to display. With a bit of luck, and the exception of the airfield map coordinates section - which may not be required - all that is needed now is some tricolation (dialect: "tarting up"). GraemeLeggett (talk) 22:47, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
I wouldn't bring out the banner just yet as i have just checked the testcases page and when the "switch" is changed only the airfield information header disappears and nothing else, which is quite a problem! Gavbadger (talk) 22:53, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
How are you getting on? Noticed you're having a go at the elevation at the moment. I haven't looked at the current code so apologies if you've already tried this. In pseudo code, I see it as going something like this.
If elevation-m or elevation-f or elevation (are present)
Then
if elevation (is present) then (show in infobox) "Elevation: elevation" Else
(show in infobox) "Elevation: elevation-m metres / elevation-f ft"
There probably ought to be a couple more Ifs to avoid putting in the m and ft if theres no value for it.
Alternatively (or as well as) the code could if the airport switch is used display the elevation next to the runway info and in other cases put it next to the map. Though that might be going a bit far... GraemeLeggett (talk) 19:18, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
All i did for elevation, was to put the actual parameter in as it was missing and then used the simple convert template to get it to convert, nothing else. Since elevation only came from the airport infobox and nothing else i cannot see why it should be moved since it looks fine with the runway information. The real issues with the infobox are the runways and map (or lack of). Gavbadger (talk) 19:59, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Shipdham
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Thanks for the reply on Shipdham Airfield. Sadly this civil airfield seems to be staggering towards returning to agriculture rather than building on the early hopes. No more ATC, no more runway lights, no license any more, no more flying school, no gliding club any more and no more ai shows. Along with Norfolk County Council using taxpayers money to block private investment at Coltishall these are sad days for aviation in Norfolk. DiverScout (talk) 20:23, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Indeed, i have already liked RAF Coltishall for some reason. Gavbadger (talk) 20:32, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Discussion at User talk:Senra#RAF Witchford
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I felt I had to reset the parameters in the Compatibility section of the testcases. The section is to check how far the new template would be a seamless transition for the airport one and to compare the new template side by side with the current one, the inputs have to be the same. GraemeLeggett (talk) 19:37, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
Ok, that's fine. Gavbadger (talk) 19:38, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXIII, February 2013
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 10,371 last month to 10,390 on February 25th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 95 is ahead of WP:GM who have 74. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 57 out of a total number of 3,190 articles.
Currently we have thirty one Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Interwiki links
There has been a major change this month to the way that interwiki links are handled with the introduction of Wikidata. Wikidata is a central place to record meta-data about an article and the initial phase was rolled out this month to cater for interwiki links. The links in the language area are served from this project and can be edited by use of the "edit links" icon at the bottom of the list. These links in articles are now redundant but if present override the information supplied by wikidata. Check each of the links to ensure that they exist and are correct on wikidata before removing the entry from an article. BOTs are in the process of removing these links from articles but will leave behind missing or conflicting links for someone to investigate and fix appropriately.
Be aware that when moving articles to change the destination for the en interwiki link on wikidata to point to the new article location. The redirect will normally take care of this
but if the original name is reused for a different article then other wikis will be pointing to an incorrect location.
Wikidate also does not handle section links in the interwiki link so these must remain as part of the article code.
Watchlists have been changed to give an extra option to Show/Hide changes to wikidata entries for articles on the watchlist.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The February 2013 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered March 2013 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page. → Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 08:41, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Article Feedback deployment
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hey Gavbadger; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:51, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXIV, March 2013
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 10,390 last month to 10,444 on March 27th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 97 is ahead of WP:GM who have 75. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 57 out of a total number of 3,208 articles.
Currently we have thirty one Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Lua
Another change to the software last month sees the introduction of Lua for coding of templates. Those of you who edit templates may come across this with the introduction of the "#invoke" statement. The code is held in the new namespace of Module that was created for this purpose. One of the first places to show the change is the search screen that now has options to search the Module or the associated Module talk namespaces.
The use of Lua is expected to improve the speed of loading of pages with a large number of complex templates. The heavily used complex templates are being targeted for early conversion to use Lua. {{Coord}} and {{cite}} family of templates are among the first to receive attention. If you see any problems when conversion is made then report them to Technical Village Pump or to the talk page of the module involved.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The April 2013 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered April 2013 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page. → Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 07:11, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXV, April 2013
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Hi, I just noticed an editor made a change to RNAS Longside as there was an airship base at Caldale on Orkney, so it seems the plaque at Lenabo is wrongly stating it was the northern most. Being naturally curious (OK, just downright nosey) I did a quick spin on google for it as I couldn't find anything on Wikipedia? I'm sure you already know about it but I thought it might be something you would be interested in. I managed to find a book with preview on it here. Seems it was closed after a couple of fatal accidents. I thought you might want to do an article on it? Sorry in advance if I'm being inappropriate and feel free to completely ignore me! SagaciousPhil - Chat 18:39, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
I noticed it as well, but I only went as far to look on here. I will create the article, thank you for telling me. Gavbadger (talk) 19:05, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
You're welcome - my forte has always been delegation (aka:avoiding doing any work myself ). It does sound interesting though, doesn't it? SagaciousPhil - Chat 19:49, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
It's at RNAS Caldale. It's alright, it was closed because of the wind and there was a kite repair centre post Jan 1918. I personally prefer Second World War military installations more but I am willing to work on the WW1 era installations. Gavbadger (talk) 20:43, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - May 2013
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 10,444 last month to 10,461 on April 27th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 99 is ahead of WP:GM who have 76. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 58 out of a total number of 3,229 articles.
Currently we have thirty one Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Notifications
By the time you read this the new Notifications tool will be available for use. You will have a new Notifications tab under Preferences to enable the selection of which type of notification you want on web and which you want e-mailing about. The count of those selected for web delivery will be shown between your user page and talk page links at the top of each page. Just click on this number to see the notifications that are applicable to you. One the resulting page there is also a direct link to the new Notifications tab of your preferences.
The main noticeable change will be the disappearance of the big orange bar at the top when you get a new talk page message, it will now be just a discreet change to the notification count.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The May 2013 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered May 2013 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page. → Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 10:18, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXVI, May 2013
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 10 years ago7 comments3 people in discussion
Do you happen to have a timeline on when this will be finished? I know myself, and possibly a few others, are waiting until this template is finished before we update anything, so any timeline to completion would be great! Thanks! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 21:44, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
I believe everything bar the co-ordinates part is working (Although I have no idea what is wrong with the co-ords). I have just left a message on Graeme's talk page asking about them but there's a notice there saying he is busy in real life. I know it will be finished by July 2013 but the sooner the better will help me out a lot, since during the upcoming June B-class drive I hope to change a large amount of 8th AF USAAF station infoboxes over. Gavbadger (talk) 22:42, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
What exactly is the issue with coordinates? Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:20, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
I have no idea. Sorry. Gavbadger (talk) 08:14, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Do we know any people who might be experts in this who would be willing to help us? Kevin Rutherford (talk) 01:37, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
I personally know no-one that could help. We might have to try the Mil:Hist project. Gavbadger (talk) 00:15, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Hucknall Aerodrome Entry
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hello Gav Badger,
My name is Colin Anthony, the information for the Hucknall Aerdrome entry is coming from a book - Notts and Derbyshire Airfields in the Second World War book by Robin J Brooks and a further book Twenty-One Squadrons by Leslie Hunt (504 sqn included) and google searches. I also have a fair amount of first hand witness knowlege from local individuals. The books I am of course just removing the key points.
Thanks for helping me with the project, it quite heavy going but do you think it is shaping up okay?
It looks fine at the moment. However the referencing side is troubling me somewhat. In the article you say use have used "Google searches" you need to actually say which website and when you looked at each individual one. I have added a template you need to use, to both the article and below in this message, also "first hand witness knowlege from local individuals" is a BIG no-no on Wikipedia, unless it has been published by a reliable source it shouldn't go into any article at all regardless of their reputation. The books you used are fine but you need to remember they are subject to copyright so you need to completely re-write the information you get from them.
I have set up for you one of the referencing techniques we use on Wikipedia for the two books.
The "Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire Airfields in the Second World War" book is below:
The first line provided is the line reference which you put after the information. You just need to fill in the page numbers twice in each reference.
The second sentence is all about the book and only needs to be placed once in the bibliography section of the article (which I have already done for you)
*{{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Brooks|2003}}|reference=Brooks, R, J. ''Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire Airfields in the Second World War''. Countryside Books. 2003. ISBN 978-1853067990.}}
The "Twenty-One Squadrons - The History of the Royal Auxiliary Airforce 1925 - 1957" book is below
The first line provided is the line reference which you put after the information. You just need to fill in the page numbers twice in each reference.
The second sentence is all about the book and only needs to be placed once in the bibliography section of the article (which I have already done for you)
*{{wikicite|ref={{harvid|Hunt|1992}}|reference=Hunt, L. ''Twenty-One Squadrons - The History of the Royal Auxiliary Airforce 1925 - 1957''. Crecy Publishing Limited. 1992. ISBN 978-0947554262.}}
For websites you use the following:
This reference goes after the information and (relevant punctuation such as a full stop or comma, if applicable). The publisher should only be wiki linked "[[information]]" if the subject is notable by Wikipedia standards.
<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.raf.mod.uk/ |title=Home|publisher=[[Royal Air Force]]|accessdate=31 May 2013}}</ref>
Good Luck. Gavbadger (talk) 15:25, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - June 2013
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 10,461 last month to 10,472 on May 18th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 99 is ahead of WP:GM who have 76. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 58 out of a total number of 3,247 articles.
Currently we have thirty one Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The June 2013 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered June 2013 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page. → Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 05:28, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXVII, June 2013
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 10,472 last month to 10,605 on June 29th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 103 is ahead of WP:GM who have 78. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 57 out of a total number of 3,265 articles.
Currently we have thirty Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The July 2013 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered July 2013 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page. → Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 01:01, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Tagging rollbacks as vandalism
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Hi Gavbadger,
For the 2nd time today you tagged my edits or creations as "vandalism" and rolled them back. I feel you should have just edited them and not rolled them back. And, certainly using the Vandal tag was over the top. See: RAF Bruntingthorpe and Bruntingthorpe Proving Ground. Maybe it was accidental, if you're using some tool for the rollbacks, but the Vandal tag is what is coming up. Checkingfax (talk) 21:06, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Good Evening Checkingfax
When I reverted your edit for the RAF article I wrote "soon to be filled" adding onto the default message in the edit summary and top of the page it says "If you are undoing an edit that is not vandalism, explain the reason in the edit summary" i clearly wrote the reason for the revert showing it was not vandalism and it shows in the page history.
For the proving ground article I changed the redirect by just normally editing it there was no revert tool used at all. The page history clearly shows this: [1]
Roger that. Thank you. Checkingfax (talk) 21:24, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hey, Gavbadger. The template that I removed from the Operation Herrick page is for redirects only; it's supposed to be used on pages that were turned into redirects as a result of a merge. That's why the #REDIRECT [[Page name]] bit is there; it doesn't make any sense for that redirect syntax to be in a non-redirect. Anyway, jusdt letting you know that I've gone ahead and removed it again; it's really not supposed to be there. 98.231.213.113 (talk) 14:51, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXVIII, July 2013
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 10,605 last month to 10,659 on July 29th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 105 is ahead of WP:GM who have 79. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 57 out of a total number of 3,269 articles.
Currently we have thirty Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The August 2013 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered August 2013 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 10,659 last month to 10,691 on August 21st). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 106 is ahead of WP:GM who have 79. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 57 out of a total number of 3,277 articles.
Currently we have thirty Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Wiki Loves Monuments
This month sees the UK participating in the Wiki Loves Monuments competition for the first time. The aim is to capture images of Grade I and Grade II* listed buildings and to upload them to Commons. Many monuments have no images available for them or need better ones without clutter in view. The lists of the monuments have been produced on a county basis, some already existed as wiki articles, and have been enhanced as part of this process. A full list of the English lists for use in the competition are available at listed buildings in England. If you are interested in taking part then take a look at the UK home page for further details. You do not have to take images in Yorkshire but it would be helpful if those in the area would help out to try and get at least one image for every monument in our area. Would be good to get some of the unusual or overlooked ones, for example we have several of "Sewerby House", but no good ones of the "Terrace Balustrade and Attached Garden Wall and Archway to Sewerby House" as this appears as an incidental item in images of the main house.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The September 2013 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered September 2013 by EdwardsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill[talk] 17:33, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXXX, September 2013
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 10,691 last month to 10,706 on September 28th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 106 is ahead of WP:GM who have 81. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 57 out of a total number of 3,288 articles.
Currently we have thirty Yorkshire featured articles:
No members left the project this month but the project membership list has been pruned by removing those members who have been indefinitely blocked or have been inactive for over 12 months.
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Wiki Loves Monuments
Last month saw the UK participating in the Wiki Loves Monuments competition for the first time. The aim was to capture images of Grade I and Grade II* listed buildings and to upload them to Commons. Many monuments have no images available for them or need better ones without clutter in view. The result of this initiative produced a total of 8,605 images for the whole of England of which 73 related to Yorkshire, assuming the tagging was done correctly.
The breakdown of the Yorkshire images is –
North Yorkshire – 43
East Riding of Yorkshire – 26
West Yorkshire – 18
South Yorkshire – 2
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The October 2013 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered October 2013 by EdwardsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
World War II
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Women of World War II memorial, Whitehall.
With regards to this edit. I think you are mistaken in assuming "World War II" is not British English. See for example "The Women of World War II" memorial in Whitehall (close to the Cenotaph]. Or take this [British Legion FAQ which quite happily uses both "Second World War" and "World War II" in the text (and a Google search of ["world war II" site:gov.uk] returns thousands of examples of World War II and Second World War, not infrequently on the same page).-- PBS (talk) 22:06, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 17
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited RNAS Ballykelly (HMS Sealion), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ballykelly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Jefford
Latest comment: 10 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion
Are you using the 2002 edition or the 1988 edition? And any reason why you're using an out of date template like {{wikicite}} when {{cite book}} supports harv referencing probably more easily than wikicite. NtheP (talk) 17:38, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
1988, used to have 2001 edition but was damaged beyond repair, there is another user who is using the 2001 edition (with cite book) mainly on articles concerning RAF bases in Northern/Western Scotland. I never knew wikicite was out of date, and prefer wikicite since when you click on the citation it goes straight to the book in the bibliography. Gavbadger (talk) 17:45, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
The ISBN is wrong for the 1st (1988) edition. Citebook will give you the same clickthrough if you use {{sfn}} footnotes rather than <ref name=> NtheP (talk) 17:55, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Ok, I will update the referencing styles to sfn and cite book. But on the RAF Castletown article I cannot get it when you click on the citations in the references in goes to book in the bibliography. The reference is No. 10 and I have put in your cite book in the bibliography. Can you help please? Gavbadger (talk) 18:17, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Sorted it, I couldn't get the link either then worked out the problem - for |ref=harv to work properly the surname of the author has to match and of course Jefford is not the same as Jefford MBE. Quick tinker with the ref parameter sorts it. NtheP (talk) 19:10, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Thanks a lot. I will start changing them over. Gavbadger (talk) 19:17, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Avalon Airport
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for your help in cleaning up the article Avalon Airport - the article is already looking much better! Dfadden (talk) 22:44, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCI, October 2013
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited RAF Macmerry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Haddington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 4
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of air stations of the Royal Navy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RAF Kingsnorth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 10,706 last month to 10,787 on October 30th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 108 is ahead of WP:GM who have 81. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 57 out of a total number of 3,294 articles.
Currently we have thirty one Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The November 2013 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered November 2013 by EdwardsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Disambiguation link notification for November 17
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
List of ISAF Installations in Afghanistan
Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Gavbadger-
Thanks for the heads up and corrections on the List of ISAF installations in Afghanistan. I assume you are the original author, if so thanks for cataloging all the info and publishing. I have a format idea I'd like to pass by you, check out my sandbox I think it will make the page a little easier to navigate.
Regarding the US Army to USA - I completely agree with you, having the official acronym the same as our country code is a little silly. I'm on board with your criticism. Thanks
Cheers
VTCofC (talk) 02:30, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Yeah, it looks fine. You'll need to add a quick message to the article talk page to say what you are doing since i'm not the only other person to edit it. I see "Type" has dissapeared i wasn't too sure if i liked it there or not. Good luck. Gavbadger (talk) 03:30, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Gavbadger - Look at my sandbox, I like what you did I took it one step further and made it a little more organized - let me know if you want my edits or not, I see no point in working on this if it's just going to be undone. Thanks
VTCofC (talk) 01:35, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
My issue is that i thought we were dividing into RC's and no further, having a table for one base looks silly add 3 or 4 tables together i think would look better and adding extra provinces for where their might or might not have ISAF bases in them seems unusual. What do you think? Gavbadger (talk) 02:06, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCII, November 2013
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 10,787 last month to 10,842 on November 29th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 108 is ahead of WP:GM who have 81. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 57 out of a total number of 3,299 articles.
Currently we have thirty one Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Happy Christmas
It is nearly the end of another year and Christmas will soon be upon us so Happy Christmas to all project members.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The December 2013 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered December 2013 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
The Bugle: Issue XCIII, December 2013
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 10,842 last month to 10,844 on December 14th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 108 is ahead of WP:GM who have 81. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 57 out of a total number of 3,300 articles.
Currently we have thirty one Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Happy New Year
It is the start of another year and so Happy New Year to all project members.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The January 2014 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered January 2014 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
The Bugle: Issue XCIV, January 2014
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hey, would you like help in finish up the template so that we could finish up this long endeavor? Kevin Rutherford (talk) 22:11, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Yes please, not 100% sure what needs doing though. Gavbadger (talk) 22:45, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 30
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited RAF Brize Norton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carterton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
January 2014
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to RAF Northolt may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Just an FYI re AAC Netheravon and RAF Syerston: I monitor Category:Convert invalid options and noticed that {{convert}} was complaining about a missing value in these articles. It's no problem, but if you are adding more of those infoboxes, you might consider commenting-out unused converts as I did: example. Johnuniq (talk) 03:11, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Thank you, i'll change my prepared code. Gavbadger (talk) 12:57, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Done I think you may need to change the DYK as it implies that Peterhead is still in use by the Royal Air Force which it isn't. Good Luck. Gavbadger (talk) 12:24, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at User talk:Senra#RAF Witchford. Senra (talk) 12:56, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to RAF Northolt may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.