Template:Did you know nominations/RAF Peterhead

Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination  The following is an archived discussion of RAF Peterhead's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination's (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the DYK WikiProject's (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 05:51, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

RAF Peterhead

edit
  • Reviewed: Not needed, not a self nom

Created by Gavbadger (talk). Nominated by Crisco 1492 (talk) at 02:32, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

  • Article is new, created 4 February; long enough as it's 2076 characters of readable prose (as per DYK check); assessed as start class on all three portals; neutral; every paragraph has at least one in line citation; no copy vios detected using earwig; and no images used.
  • Hook is less than 100 characters, so fits comfortably for hook length; is cited in first reference; and interesting and catchy.
  • No QPQ required as not self nomination.
Looks good to go to me using second hook (i.e. with word 'former' included; minor suggestion - would it be better for hook to read 'near' Peterhead?). SagaciousPhil - Chat 12:46, 8 February 2013 (UTC)