User talk:Frosty/archive9
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The Signpost: 24 April 2016
- Special report: Update on EranBot, our new copyright violation detection bot
- Traffic report: Two for the price of one
- Featured content: The double-sized edition
- Arbitration report: Amendments made to the Race and intelligence case
The Signpost: 2 May 2016
- In the media: Wikipedia Zero piracy in Bangladesh; bureaucracy; chilling effects; too few cooks; translation gaps
- Traffic report: Purple
- Featured content: The best ... from the past two weeks
The Signpost: 17 May 2016
- Op-ed: Swiss chapter in turmoil
- In the media: Wikimedia's Dario Taraborelli quoted on Google's Knowledge Graph in The Washington Post
- Featured content: Two weeks for the prize of one
- Traffic report: Oh behave, Beyhive / Underdogs
- Arbitration report: "Wikicology" ends in site ban; evidence and workshop phases concluded for "Gamaliel and others"
- Wikicup: That's it for WikiCup Round 2!
Can we talk about Huggle?
I’m reaching out to you because our logs tell us you’re a highly active Huggle user (top 20, actually). The Wikimedia Collaboration Team is researching a project that we hope will be useful to people who use Huggle and others engaged in edit-review and anti-vandalism. Using artificial intelligence programming (in ORES) and other means, we believe we can create feeds of Recent Changes that are better tailored to the type of work you do, helping you to be more effective and efficient. (The technology will have other benefits as well, which we can talk about.)
We're in the early stages of planning this and want to speak with people like yourself to better understand your work, goals and issues. If you’re interested in helping, I’d like to set up a time to meet by video conference, so that you can explain and demonstrate (via screensharing) some of your workflows, and we can ask and answer any questions.
To participate, please email the following information to me, jmatazzoni
wikimedia.org, or send it to designresearch wikimedia.org:
- Username
- city/time zone
- Best time to talk to you?
- Email where we can reach you
- Please use the subject line: Huggle User Conversations
Thanks! JMatazzoni (WMF) (talk) 19:43, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
re-semiprotected your talkpage
The disruption had resumed, so I re-semi-protected your talk page. If you want the semi-protection removed, feel free to ask. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 04:28, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 May 2016
- News and notes: Upcoming Wikimedia conferences in the US and India; May Metrics and Activities Meeting
- Special report: Compensation paid to Sue Gardner increased by almost 50 percent after she stepped down as executive director
- Featured content: Eight articles, three lists and five pictures
- Op-ed: Journey of a Wikipedian
- Arbitration report: Gamaliel resigns from the arbitration committee
- Recent research: English as Wikipedia's Lingua Franca; deletion rationales; schizophrenia controversies
- Traffic report: Splitting (musical) airs / Slow Ride
The Signpost: 05 June 2016
- News and notes: WMF cuts budget for 2016-17 as scope tightens
- Featured content: Overwhelmed ... by pictures
- Traffic report: Pop goes the culture, again.
- Arbitration report: ArbCom case "Gamaliel and others" concludes
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Video Games
The Signpost: 15 June 2016
- News and notes: Clarifications on status and compensation of outgoing executive directors Sue Gardner and Lila Tretikov
- Special report: Wikiversity Journal—A new user group
- Featured content: From the crème de la crème
- In the media: Biography disputes; Craig Newmark donation; PR editing
- Traffic report: Another one with sports; Knockout, brief candle
The Signpost: 04 July 2016
- News and notes: Board unanimously appoints Katherine Maher as new WMF executive director; Wikimedia lawsuits in France and Germany
- Op-ed: Two policies in conflict?
- In the media: Terrorism database cites Wikipedia as a source
- Featured content: Triple fun of featured content
- Traffic report: Goalposts; Oy vexit
The Signpost: 21 July 2016
- Discussion report: Busy month for discussions
- Featured content: A wide variety from the best
- Traffic report: Sports and esports
- Arbitration report: Script writers appointed for clerks
- Recent research: Using deep learning to predict article quality
The Signpost: 04 August 2016
- News and notes: Foundation presents results of harassment research, plans for automated identification; Wikiconference submissions open
- Obituary: Kevin Gorman, who took on Wikipedia's gender gap and undisclosed paid advocacy, dies at 24
- Traffic report: Summer of Pokémon, Trump, and Hillary
- Featured content: Women and Hawaii
- Recent research: Easier navigation via better wikilinks
- Technology report: User script report (January to July 2016, part 1)
The Signpost: 18 August 2016
- News and notes: Focus on India—WikiConference produces new apps; state government adopts free licenses
- Special report: Engaging diverse communities to profile women of Antarctica
- In the media: The ugly, the bad, the playful, and the promising
- Featured content: Simply the best ... from the last two weeks
- Traffic report: Olympic views
- Technology report: User script report (January–July 2016, part 2)
- Arbitration report: The Michael Hardy case
The Signpost: 06 September 2016
- Special report: Olympics readership depended on language
- WikiProject report: Watching Wikipedia
- Featured content: Entertainment, sport, and something else in-between
- Traffic report: From Phelps to Bolt to Reddit
- Technology report: Wikimedia mobile sites now don't load images if the user doesn't see them
- Recent research: Ethics of machine-created articles and fighting vandalism
The Signpost: 29 September 2016
- News and notes: Wikipedia Education Program case study published; and a longtime Wikimedian has made his final edit
- In the media: Wikipedia in the news
- Featured content: Three weeks in the land of featured content
- Arbitration report: Arbcom looking for new checkusers and oversight appointees while another case opens
- Traffic report: From Gene Wilder to JonBenét
- Technology report: Category sorting and template parameters
The Signpost: 14 October 2016
- News and notes: Fundraising, flora and fauna
- Discussion report: Cultivating leadership: Wikimedia Foundation seeks input
- Technology report: Upcoming tech projects for 2017
- Featured content: Variety is the spice of life
- Traffic report: Debates and escapes
- Recent research: A 2011 study resurfaces in a media report
The Signpost: 4 November 2016
- In the media: Washington Post continues in-depth Wikipedia coverage
- Wikicup: WikiCup winners
- Discussion report: What's on your tech wishlist for the coming year?
- Technology report: New guideline for technical collaboration; citation templates now flag open access content
- Featured content: Cream of the crop
- Traffic report: Un-presidential politics
- Arbitration report: Recapping October's activities
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Frosty. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 November 2016
- News and notes: Arbitration Committee elections commence
- Featured content: Featured mix
- Special report: Taking stock of the Good Article backlog
- Traffic report: President-elect Trump
The Signpost: 22 December 2016
- Year in review: Looking back on 2016
- News and notes: Strategic planning update; English ArbCom election results
- Special report: German ArbCom implodes
- Featured content: The Christmas edition
- Technology report: Labs improvements impact 2016 Tool Labs survey results
- Traffic report: Post-election traffic blues
- Recent research: One study and several abstracts
Season's Greetings!
Adapted from {{Xmas6}}. Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:User:Altamel/Christmas}} to their talk page.
The Signpost: 17 January 2017
- From the editor: Next steps for the Signpost
- News and notes: Surge in RFA promotions—a sign of lasting change?
- In the media: Year-end roundups, Wikipedia's 16th birthday, and more
- Featured content: One year ends, and another begins
- Arbitration report: Concluding 2016 and covering 2017's first two cases
- Traffic report: Out with the old, in with the new
- Technology report: Tech present, past, and future
The Signpost: 6 February 2017
- Arbitration report: WMF Legal and ArbCom weigh in on tension between disclosure requirements and user privacy
- WikiProject report: For the birds!
- Technology report: Better PDFs, backup plans, and birthday wishes
- Traffic report: Cool It Now
- Featured content: Three weeks dominated by articles
" commonwealth of Virginia not the state of Virginia"
Virginia is one of the 4 members of the USA union that go by commonwealth not state. Virginia only has one department with the name state in it the state troopers everything else goes by commonwealth. The commonwealth to this date practices a lot of old things, we still have slander as a crime. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.99.93.36 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Upon reading over Commonwealth (U.S. state) and the fact the change added a redlink to the article, state will be fine as Virginia is a state as well as a commonwealth. There is no real need to spcify in that case. —Frosty ☃ 07:46, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 February 2017
- From the editors: Results from our poll on subscription and delivery, and a new RSS feed
- Recent research: Special issue: Wikipedia in education
- Technology report: Responsive content on desktop; Offline content in Android app
- In the media: The Daily Mail does not run Wikipedia
- Gallery: A Met montage
- Special report: Peer review – a history and call for reviewers
- Op-ed: Wikipedia has cancer
- Featured content: The dominance of articles continues
- Traffic report: Love, football, and politics
CSD declined
I've declined your nomination of Armand Rada for deletion under WP:A3. It is clearly ineligible, as there is content on the page. Please be more careful while applying CSD tags. ~ Rob13Talk 22:55, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Pages
Hey I added content on the page you said didn't have enough 😊 Samhallehalle1 (talk) 09:53, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- Ah good, in future I strongly recommend you make a more substantial first edit on a page you are creating, especially if you plan to come back to it later. Doesn't need to be much, a few sentences is enough, but it needs to be more than just recreating the title of the page. Have fun! —Frosty ☃ 10:43, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello
|
Kenneth T. Tran Award |
| Hi Frosty, I noticed you undid my changes sir... or ma'am.. is it sir, or ma'am? ;D
What was wrong with it? It's on the clone wars plot page Kennethttran (talk) 07:53, 10 March 2017 (UTC) |
- It would be sir I suppose. As for the revert, I did it because you removed a very large section of a draft article created by somebody else. If there was a problem with the content such as copyright related issues, could you please use an edit summary next time to avoid confusion? It appears this was an instance where the removal was appropriate as I have since been reverted by another editor who originally reverted you, but yeah, communicate to other editors your intent when making significant changes. —Frosty ☃ 08:09, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer granted
Hello Frosty. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.
- URGENT: Please consider helping get the huge backlog (around 15,000 pages) down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.
- Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
- You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
- Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
- Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 19:52, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1998 NFC Championship Game, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drew Pearson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Roberto Estuardo Penedo
Hello Frosty; I'm currently working with my first article, the biography of Roberto Estuardo Penedo, I already categorized and also put some references (links) to support the information. I am new on this so please be patient with me, I am planing to put some pictures as soon as find out how to do it, that will also support the content. Do not propose deletion of Roberto Estuardo Penedo, please give me the chance to finish my first biography/article. best, OlgaWills2017 — Preceding unsigned comment added by OlgaWills2017 (talk • contribs) 01:47, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- @OlgaWills2017: Ok, I advise that you have a read of Wikipedia:Inline citations to make sure you conform to expected styles. Additionally, you may find Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Text formatting helpful. —Frosty ☃ 02:18, 17 March 2017 (UTC).
- Frosty, I just found that my article on Roberto Estuardo Penedo was deleted by Jimfbleak, I don't think this is fair, this system is so complicated and difficult to work with, it is not easy to create an article here. I try to contact Jimfbleak to ask why he deleted my article and how can I rewrite it but is not understandable how to leave a message to this person, I was considering to donate to wikipedia cause I think the information you guys displays is very helpful however I don't understand how you guys really works here and give me the impression that wikipedia is not for everybody to write, just for a selected group of people. I need to know if I can rewrite my article on Roberto Estuardo Penedo and how to do his biography according to your rules to avoid to be deleted. OlgaWills2017
- @OlgaWills2017: It appears it was deleted because the sources were not independant and you didn't provide evidence of notability. You can absolutely create a page about him, but you must provide these things. Have a read of Wikipedia:Verifiability, it provides good detail on what is a good source of information to cite and what isn't. As for leaving a message for Jimfbleak, just go to User talk:Jimfbleak and talk to him about it. —Frosty ☃ 21:56, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- Frosty, I just found that my article on Roberto Estuardo Penedo was deleted by Jimfbleak, I don't think this is fair, this system is so complicated and difficult to work with, it is not easy to create an article here. I try to contact Jimfbleak to ask why he deleted my article and how can I rewrite it but is not understandable how to leave a message to this person, I was considering to donate to wikipedia cause I think the information you guys displays is very helpful however I don't understand how you guys really works here and give me the impression that wikipedia is not for everybody to write, just for a selected group of people. I need to know if I can rewrite my article on Roberto Estuardo Penedo and how to do his biography according to your rules to avoid to be deleted. OlgaWills2017
Dibs
Hi Frosty, it looks like you're active right now, so just a quick question;
re Cowboy Caboose (talk · contribs) making The International Dibs Protocol,I notice pretty obvious sock/meat to contest it, with Benji0944 (talk · contribs) and 72.221.125.223 (talk · contribs).
Fors
Is it worth doing anything about that socking?
Thought I'd ask before bothering to do an SPI thing, it's pretty trivial. Cheers, 86.20.193.222 (talk) 02e:38, 17 March 2017 (UTC
- Absolutely go for it. Perhaps wait a few minutes, the admin who deleted the page in question may notice the same thing you did. Otherwise definitely report it. —Frosty ☃ 02:41, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- OK, SPI? Or just post on AN/I? I'll do it in, like, an hour or something. 86.20.193.222 (talk) 02:49, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- SPI and you can probably do it now. —Frosty ☃ 02:52, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for your advice on it, Wikipedia talk:Sockpuppet investigations/ Cowboy Caboose 86.20.193.222 (talk) 03:13, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- SPI and you can probably do it now. —Frosty ☃ 02:52, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- OK, SPI? Or just post on AN/I? I'll do it in, like, an hour or something. 86.20.193.222 (talk) 02:49, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Frosty, this is Cowboy_Caboose, and I've read your messages, and I am slightly hurt by the deletion of my page. Don't get me wrong, I understand your job is hard, and it must be very annoying to have to deal with many useless and fake pages created by accounts. I came to talk to you, not only to apologize that my page came off on the wrong foot, but to defend it as well. To begin, Dibs is a cultural phenomenon which has developed and grown throughout society, and is still very prevalent today. I believe that since Dibs has no page on this website, it needed one to describe its aspect in society. When I began to look into it, I saw a set of rules that stood together as the Dibs protocol. The Dibs Protocol stands as a separate entity from the topic of Dibs itself, and I therefore believed it deserved its own page. I spent a long time compiling information from various sources to make a complete version to this date of the protocol. As an avid fan of Red vs. Blue, this dibs protocol was actually created during the fifth season, and I wanted to also make an extension from that into its own page for those who look to find a more complete and detailed synopsis of the protocol. If we could please discuss this topic some more I would love to answer any questions and or concerns that you have about this issue. Thank you and have a wonderful day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cowboy Caboose (talk • contribs) 04:13, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Amiga
Frosty like most of u guys ..who dont know jack on the Amiga, and preceed to use the wiki ......which is irony. .,because wiki can be changed to say its "shite" ,and if someone said belive it you would do so. You asked me what was my source..they gave only sources of themsleves or of thier friends links if you look close enough.. I did ..My source was from of which they hate with a passion my source which I stated is Jay Miner himself. you are only 20 years old you know nothing of the Amiga muchless the archtiecture of the Amiga or the pc=mac. Maybe u will learn. The so called amiga commuinty is well been kickout by me. The few yes the few are still in and around, and never would get apple products like some have. Point is u can find me by my title given by Jay Miner may he RIP. When u do then you can correct them for lieing about amiga information after u ask me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.166.75.119 (talk • contribs)
Some baklava for you!
|
hi for helping me Nilav.ahmed (talk) 06:18, 24 March 2017 (UTC) |
Speedy deletion declined: 4016
Hello Frosty. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of 4016, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not nonsense - there is meaningful content. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 22:34, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Template
Can you help me with creating a template in wikipedia. I don't know about the step by step process of creating one. This is for my contribution to this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markx121993 (talk • contribs) 10:28, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Markx121993: I recommend you experiment with new templates in your userspace first. Create something at User:Markx121993/sandbox and if/when you feel your template is good, let me know and we can maybe talk about incorperating it in where its needed. —Frosty ☃ 11:34, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Template:Greek mythology (deities)
can you adjust for me the Template:Greek mythology (deities). I just experimented on this template and I have new contributions but it doesnt turn out well the way i wanted it. Can you take a look and see what is the problem with my editing — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markx121993 (talk • contribs) 11:39, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Markx121993: I reverted your changes because the incorrect coding used will get transluded onto many pages. Take my advice above and experiment with templates in your userspace first, they can be hard at first to get right. Unfortunately, I myself am not brilliant when it comes to template coding so I can't help you identify where you went wrong. You could ask a Template editor perhaps? They may be able to steer you in the right direction. —Frosty ☃ 11:45, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
DIC2
Hi jst full fu9
Mohit S Tembhurne (talk) 11:31, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Not BLP, subject is deceased, Lily Harmon
Whoops, many thanks. I'm off to bed. Best, Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 23:03, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Ellie McHugh
Hello Frosty. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Ellie McHugh to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 00:15, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Adam9007: Yeah alright, it was marginal for me on which to give it. Ran a Google search and didn't find anything so I figured csd, but all good for the change. —Frosty ☃ 01:39, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Greetings sir. At the link above the section about scandal part has been deleted. I do know why. Can you please help me with that?
Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vocativusss1987 (talk • contribs) 00:05, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Vocativusss1987: it seems Oshwah was the user that reverted your scandal addition. At a guess it was because you failed to cite a reliable source. Check out Wikipedia:Reliable sources and it should give you some useful advice :) —Frosty ☃ 01:12, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you sir. It must be okay now. I would appreciate if you have checked in any case. I want to be sure that everything is okay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vocativusss1987 (talk • contribs) 01:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Vocativusss1987: The issue is not with how you sourced it, but with what the source was. Oshwah explaining in the revert summary that pastebin is not a source you can use (WP:UGC will give you an explanation why). I'm going to revert it back, however when you can produce a reliable and unbiased source for your edits you are more than welcome to change it back. —Frosty ☃ 01:32, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you sir. It must be okay now. I would appreciate if you have checked in any case. I want to be sure that everything is okay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vocativusss1987 (talk • contribs) 01:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
RfPP made. Thanks. Goodnight! Jim1138 (talk) 11:02, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
seems you've made a mistake. I've never heard of the 2007 New England Patriots videotaping controversy, let alone edited it. Check to see if you have the right IP. thx — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.230.80.242 (talk) 04:20, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Page mover granted
Hello, Frosty. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, and move subpages when moving the parent page(s).
Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.
Useful links:
- Wikipedia:Requested moves
- Category:Articles to be moved, for article renaming requests awaiting action.
If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! NeilN talk to me 04:05, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Thanks for catching the weird page I created and have no idea how. Left a message for you on my user talk page. Are1718. Are1718 (talk) 02:07, 12 April 2017 (UTC) |
Review request
hello sir, can you please review a page for me ? Its call Erskine Amo Whyte...Thanks..41.66.255.135 (talk) 15:09, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Review request
Hello, can you please review and fix on these pages for me ,namely zionfelix and scata bada. Thanks...45.211.146.172 (talk) 13:51, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
- ZionFelix is now done. I just moved the external links to the appropriate section, filled out the complete references and fixed a couple of typos. I have also restored the maintenance tags requiring more links to other articles and the orphan, its not a big deal and quite easily fixed just find relevant/related articles to link it too and from. —Frosty ☃ 22:23, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Thanks for reviewing Cornell International Affairs Society, Frosty.
Unfortunately TonyBallioni has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:
The notability of a student organization at a university is questionable. I had been saving this to research later with the possibility of AfD or PROD.
To reply, leave a comment on TonyBallioni's talk page.
TonyBallioni (talk) 01:21, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
John D. Goff
I came across the John D. Goff article and since it's creation it doesn't look like there's been much activity, aside from adding categories and such. I was tempted to nominate for deletion when I looked at the history and noticed you already had done a WP:BLPPROD but I couldn't find any relevant talk or logs regarding proposed deletion. Obviously, the page is still there but was there any discussion or did you rescind the request? My initial guess is it would qualify for WP:A7. Just wanted your thoughts. Thanks! Snickers2686 (talk) 23:44, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Snickers2686: Possibly couod have qualified for A7, but of late I have less inclined to tag A7 (unless really obvious) as I have come to view it as the "hard option". I tagged it for BLPPROD (it definitely qualified) with a possible AFD later if little progress was made. I see this as the "soft option". So yes, if you think this person is non-notable feel free to start an AFD :) —Frosty ☃ 07:19, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Millionaires Unit
Saw that you reviewed the page for The Millionaire's Unit. Question! The film is actually called The Millionaires' Unit (apostrophe in different spot). Is this something you can fix for me as I cannot figure out how to fix it? —CaptAubrey talk page —Preceding undated comment added 17:09, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Review request
Hi frosty, can yiu please review a page call ebony reigns? Thanks ..41.189.161.48 (talk) 03:30, 3 May 2017 (UTC)