Open main menu

User talk:Feminist/Archive 7

DYK for Pssst

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:02, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Bot automation at Wikipedia:Today's articles for improvement

  Greetings WikiProject TAFI members!

Over the past two weeks, there has been extensive discussion on introducing bot automation to assist with maintenance of the Today's Articles for Improvement project. A bot has now been approved for trial and will carry out the weekly duties. The bots first run will occur around 00:00, 22 November 2015 (UTC) (midnight on Sunday).

If you have been assisting any of the weekly maintenance tasks, please refrain from doing so this week. The bot needs to be tested and proven it can do the job, and it only gets one chance per week. The tasks will include:

Updating the accomplishments and archiving selections is still done manually, along with daily tasks such as adding approved entries to the articles for improvement page. These will become automated in the near future.

We hope the bot proves to serve well, and by carrying out the routine housekeeping tasks we can boost the overall efficiency and effectiveness of the project. MusikBot thanks you for your service in helping with the weekly tasks in the past, and for your cooperation during this trial period :)

Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:48, 21 November 2015 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions for all project notifications

DYK nomination of Hotel Les Trois Rois

  Hello! Your submission of Hotel Les Trois Rois at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:13, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

The RM at Talk:Two+Two (film)

Excuse me, but your closure of the RM at Talk:Two+Two (film) looks a bit confused. I don't really see any evidence of a consensus for the move that was performed by the involved editor. I request you to reopen that discussion. Also, as a non-admin, you really shouldn't be closing controversial RM discussions (per WP:RM). —BarrelProof (talk) 23:11, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

@BarrelProof: there is no consensus for the move. This is a procedural close. sst✈(discuss) 01:16, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
If there is no consensus for the move, why did the move take place? You closed the discussion as moved. —BarrelProof (talk) 01:18, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
I did not move the page; another involved editor did. I have now relisted the discussion. sst✈(discuss) 01:23, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Thank you! —BarrelProof (talk) 03:45, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Acceptable (disambiguation) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Acceptable (disambiguation). Since you had some involvement with the Acceptable (disambiguation) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Be prosperous! Paine  08:12, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Recently closed RfC

In regard to your comment on this page, just two gentle reminders here and here. Be prosperous! Paine  12:55, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2015 November 10#File:Amylin fragment 20-29.jpg

Could you explain your closure here? There is still no way to verify the copyright claim. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:40, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

@Stefan2: I have undone my closure. I am only starting to help close FFD discussions, so if I did anything wrong, please tell me. Thank you. sst✈(discuss) 15:50, 22 November 2015 (UTC)


174.88.22.97 (talk) 21:57, 22 November 2015 (UTC)Hello this is the person that edited jonathan ive's biography. I stated that he was a tottenham hotspur fan. You said my source was not reliable. If you checked my source it was a tweet from the tottenham hotspur feed that welcomed jonathan ive as a tottenham fan. It also included him HOLDING a tottenham jersey with a smile on his face. I do feel that is a pretty reliable evidence, don't you think? 174.88.22.97 (talk) 21:57, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

174.88.22.97 (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)You said it was "too detailed"??? What does that even mean? Isn't detail good? I don't understand what the problem is. He is a tottenham fan. The link I posted clearly shows that. It is the personal life section; plenty of celebrities have their sports fandom listed in such a section. Look up the actor Jon Hamm's wikipedia page. It discusses his love of the St. Louis cardinals and the St. Louis blues. I feel you are needlessly editing something that is perfectly fine. Later on I will reupload this edit. If you decide that it needs removal again, I will contact people higher on the wikipedia totem pole to get their thoughts.174.88.22.97 (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Qatar Airways Flights 15 and 16

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Surface Book

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 48, 2015)

Hello, SSTflyer.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Coffee production in Cuba

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Goods and services • Marie Serneholt


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

DYK for Heinrich Schmitt

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

DYK for HTC One A9

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

IllumiNations Picture Nomination

Thanks for your support on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Illuminations Picture! Elisfkc (talk) 17:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 25 November

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

DYK for A Very Gaga Thanksgiving

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Andrew Massey (British Army officer)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 26 November

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

  Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Environmental issues in Tehran at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:26, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 49, 2015)

 

The First Geneva Convention (1864) is one of the earliest formulations of international law.

Hello, SSTflyer.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

International law

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Coffee production in Cuba • Goods and services


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Template:Did you know nominations/Nexus 5X, Nexus 6P

SSTflyer, the latest comments from the reviewer were posted over a week ago. Please stop by as soon as possible to address the issues raised. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:00, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

@BlueMoonset: I have withdrawn the nomination. sst✈(discuss) 05:00, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Pilatus P3-03

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Pilatus P3-03 P3-Flyers HB-RBP OTT 2013 02.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 07:30, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Hotel Les Trois Rois

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Fallout Shelter

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Operation Puttur

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

TFYC

Hi SSTflyer, Just a quick note to congratulate & thank you for your work on getting TFYC to GA status. Excellent work. - Ryk72 'c.s.n.s.' 20:40, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Inappropriate NAC closures

Please reverse your NAC closures of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helen Duval and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cassidey. Both of these were contested, controversial discussions, generally not suitable for NAC action, and your closes show no attempt to determine whether several delete !votes, challenged as guideline-noncompliant, should be given significant weight (a task better left to admins generally). The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 14:09, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

  • I was about to post a message saying exactly the same thing. I ask that you reconsider the closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathleen Snavely (2nd nomination). The consensus did NOT appear to lean towards redirecting, and in fact the same article was nominated for deletion only a month ago, with the outcome being keep. The article had changed very little since, so you should at least consider both discussions in my view. The consensus over the two discussions was leaning towards keeping. -- Ollie231213 (talk) 19:44, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
  Done. WP:NPASR means that you are free to immediately renominate these articles for deletion, which in my opinion would be more effective than relisting that the nth time, but I reversed my closure anyway. sst✈(discuss) 00:07, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
WP:NPASR applies only to AFDs that have had little or no !votes so AFDs like Helen or Cassidy shouldn't be closed as No Consensus NPASR, If anyone renominates an article whatever the outcome then they tend to get bit of a bashing so it's probably best to lay off the No Consensus closures until you fully understand it (Sorry I'm not trying to sound condescending or harsh!), Happy editing :), –Davey2010Talk 00:38, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
I re-closed the Snavely AFD. The one you closed (correctly, I think) as keep was superceded by the more recent one to redirect. Since it's now a redirect, the first AFD is moot. Why they re-nominated a month later is unclear, at least to me. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 14:19, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

This wasn't exactly a clear "keep". More of a "no consensus" if anything given how one vote was just an "it's interesting" rationale (not a valid reason for retaining an article), and therefore doesn't really count for consensus. Your given rationale was misleading for this closure. Snuggums (talk / edits) 06:22, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

SNUGGUMS, I believe that I have closed your AfD nomination appropriately. If you disagree with it, you may take it to WP:DRV. sst✈(discuss) 08:06, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
I'd agree with the close on the Clemens AFD. If you go by !votes, you've got 4 to keep and 2 to redirect, with 1+nom to delete. The keep arguments resulted in sources being found and added to the article. What tips it is that the sources discuss clemens himself - not just as the father of Mark Twain, though obviously that's a factor. Discount the INTERESTING Keep, and you still have three who can make a weak case that the subject passes GNG - which, with the sources and a few bucks, gets you a cup of coffee. DRV might be your best bet, Snuggums, but it's a narrow thing. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 14:19, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
@Mrfrobinson: If you disagree with this closure, take this to WP:DRV. sst✈(discuss) 01:47, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
I will however there is an extremely troubling trend here. Please refrain from closing any more XfD as NAC. The comments in this thread should make this clear. 129.100.253.78 (talk) 19:45, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Re-signing this as I wasn't logged in Mrfrobinson (talk) 19:56, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Personal note: Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2015 December 4, I was not notified in any way sst✈(discuss) 13:58, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Second RM for Southern Apls

You took part in an RM "talk:Southern Alps#Requested move 29 November 2015" which I closed with a "Technical close" and a move the page back to the original name under WP:RMUM,but suggesting that another RM could be started immediately. A new RM was opened one day later talk:Southern Alps#Requested move 30 November 2015, proposing that the page is moved from Southern AlpsSouthern Alps (New Zealand) with Southern Alps becoming a dab page. Your are receiving this mass message because you expressed an opinion in the first RM request and AFAICT have not done so in the second. -- Sent by PBS using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:41, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

DYK for French brig Renard (1810)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

  The Civility Barnstar
I'm impressed by your maturity and civility in the face of aggressive criticism of your non-admin closures. Thparkth (talk) 14:53, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Feminist/Archive 7".