Drbogatyr
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure! edit
- Hi Drbogatyr! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 22:06, Thursday, October 18, 2018 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure! edit
- Hi Drbogatyr! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 22:15, Thursday, October 18, 2018 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
AfC notification: Draft:John E. James has a new comment edit
Your draft article, Draft:John E. James edit
Hello, Drbogatyr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "John E. James".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 15:17, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
October 2019 edit
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your recent talk page comments on Talk:Lana Lokteff were not added to the bottom of the page. New discussion page messages and topics should always be added to the bottom. Your message may have been moved. In the future you can use the "New section" link in the top right. For more details see the talk page guidelines. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 06:06, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
- Again, please post new comments on the bottom of the talk page per WP:BOTTOMPOST. I have once more moved your comment to the appropriate place. Please also sign your talk page comments. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 00:27, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello Grayfell, I am very sorry, I just saw these, it will not happen again. Drbogatyr (talk) 00:58, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Replacement migration are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. --MarioGom (talk) 21:39, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Important Notice edit
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 08:11, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
- Drbogatyr, I am considering imposing a topic ban on you, a very specific one: I am considering topic-banning you from article talk pages of articles covered under these discretionary sanctions. You were warned, you were informed of these sanctions, and yet I see you discuss one hot topic after another. It would be add to impose such a sanction (Doug Weller can confirm)--but it might work in combination with a 1R ban for the articles, and/or the mandate that any edit you make to such a talk page would be in the form of a requested edit template. Or you can just stop with all this chatter right now, because there is also a possibility that I or another admin just blocks you for forum-posting. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 23:41, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Hello Drmies, I am very surprised to see this message. If you take a look at the topic I posted, and all the links I had posted there, I was citing reliable sources to discuss demographic changes in Europe, it was not my intent to do original research or discuss topics unrelated to the article. I was attempting to preserve NPOV in the article on the "great replacement conspiracy"; the article already cited demographic data and reliable sources that were critical of the conspiracy theory, I wanted to add supporting data and reliable sources. Also, what is wrong with merely discussing a controversial topic? I was not spreading disinformation and my comments were all civil. What do you mean by "stop with all this chatter"? Drbogatyr (talk) 00:39, 29 October 2019 (UTC)