Dan9122
Welcome! edit
Hello, Dan9122, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Lego Ninjago: Masters of Spinjitzu has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:10, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Lego Ninjago: Masters of Spinjitzu edit
Hi, please add references to support these changes to character names. If you're not sure how to add references, see Referencing for Beginners. It's pretty easy. There's a built-in tool that allows you to cite websites, news sites, etc. In the interim, since this content keeps changing back and forth without sources, I'm reverting until someone can find a source. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
False claim of adminship edit
Claiming to be an admin when you are not an admin, is a sure-fire way to wind up blocked. Please don't do that again. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:45, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Totally Spies (TV Human TV series) edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Totally Spies (TV Human TV series), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Everymorning talk 19:02, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Dan9122, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure! edit
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure! edit
- Hi Dan9122! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 06:55, Sunday, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Speedy deletion nomination of ASAP TV edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on ASAP TV requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —C.Fred (talk) 16:44, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure! edit
- Hi Dan9122! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 17:06, Saturday, May 16, 2015 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Speedy deletion nomination of Maihas edit
Hello Dan9122,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Maihas for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. FalkirksTalk 17:13, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Introducing factual errors edit
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Your form of vandalism is very subtle. ViperSnake151 Talk 17:10, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Flipline Studios (AOL) edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Flipline Studios (AOL), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
- It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:57, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Not an admin edit
You are not an administrator, so please stop claiming to be one on your userpage. Everymorning talk 18:36, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ViperSnake151 Talk 19:21, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Dan9122, you've been warned several times not to claim that you are an administrator on Wikipedia, but you continue to make statements like this and this to the effect that you are. It occurs to me that you may be confused about who is and isn't an administrator, and the differences between administrators and other Wikipedia editors.
Please start by reading WP:Administrators carefully. It explains that administrators are a small group of editors who have applied for and been granted special privileges here at Wikipedia (and possibly at other Wikimedia sites). This is generally because they have been editors for a long time and have demonstrated skill and understanding of Wikipedia operations and policies. To become an administrator, they each had to undergo a rigorous process of review and questioning by other administrators. No one becomes an administrator just by declaring themselves to be one. A new editor will never be granted the role of administrator until they have established a long history that demonstrates their understanding, skill and high quality of judgment concerning Wikipedia and the editing process. Since it is a tough process to become an administrator, admins generally get very upset when someone claims to be one who is not; not unlike the way people react to someone who claims to be a policeman or a military officer, but is not.
I'm hoping you've just misunderstood the meaning of the term "administrator", and that this explanation will help you avoid any negative consequences for continuing to claim that you are an administrator when you are not. What you are is a Wikipedia editor, and that is a fine thing to be. Dwpaul Talk 21:54, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
What Wikipedia is not a social network edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a social network. Wikipedia is not a place to socialize or do things that are not directly related to improving the encyclopedia, as you did at User:Dan9122. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. We're sorry if this message has discouraged you from editing here, but the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia (please see What Wikipedia is not for further details). Don't ask people to send you a "friend request" or to "follow" you, those concepts don't exist on Wikipedia. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:02, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Ohnoitsjamie. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 11:35, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Note edit
What you are doing is borderline sick puppetry if you intend to use the new user you created. Also you are not an admin for obvious reasons, I expect you will be blocked very soon.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 13:19, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
You are blocked indefinitely edit
You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. Vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:28, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation edit
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dan9122, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
ViperSnake151 Talk 14:46, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation edit
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dan8265, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 11:26, 1 June 2015 (UTC)