Cape doctor

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Bow Project.
• To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Bryce (talk | contribs) 08:07, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Bow Project concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Bow Project, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 09:00, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission The Bow Project

Hello Cape doctor. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled The Bow Project.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Bow Project}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:02, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC The Bow Project was accepted

The Bow Project, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:59, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Bow Project (September 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Bow Project and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:49, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello! Cape doctor, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:49, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Bow Project concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Bow Project, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Bow Project

Hello, Cape doctor. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "The Bow Project".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Bow Project}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 12:15, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of London New Music

The article London New Music has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article advancing minimal claims to notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:48, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Michael Mosoeu Moerane has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Michael Mosoeu Moerane. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 09:22, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

I repaired the referencing errors. Wikipedia does not use op cit for multiple uses of the same ref. instead, it incorporates a "/" into the ref name for the subsequent uses. David notMD (talk) 10:14, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Cape doctor! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Publishing my new article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:M.M. Moerane c. 1965.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:M.M. Moerane c. 1965.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://africlassical.blogspot.com/2014/04/rangoane-khomo-nephew-of-michael-mosoeu.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Theroadislong (talk) 10:41, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

---- Okay, thank you very much for the explanation. I understand. The original image I uploaded, I had credited to "Thuso Moerane Private Collection" but then I was advised to delete all references to this personal source in my article and find other sources. I did this in the article, a few days ago, and today I thought that I would give a more verifiable source for the image Michael_Mosoeu_Moerane circa 1926 and so I credited it to https://african-composers-edition.co.za/. This is a source I have used in the article itself. So I'm puzzled as to why today's attempt to rectify the previous error (using a private source) was not accepted. Thank you! ---- Cape doctor (talk) 10:49, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

---- Okay, thank you very much for the explanation. I understand. The original image I uploaded, I had credited to "Thuso Moerane Private Collection" but then I was advised to delete all references to this personal source in my article and find other sources. I did this in the article, a few days ago, and today I thought that I would give a more verifiable source for the image Michael_Mosoeu_Moerane circa 1926 and so I credited it to https://african-composers-edition.co.za/. This is a source I have used in the article itself. This attempt to rectify the previous error (using a private source) was not accepted, and so I then found an alternative image on another website, but this, too, was not accepted. Thank you! ---- Cape doctor (talk) 11:53, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

That source clearly states at the bottom of the page copyright African Composers edition 2022. Theroadislong (talk) 11:57, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

@Cape doctor If an image is copyrighted, unfortunately, you can't just "give credit" and use the image in Wikipedia. You must find an image that is free of copyright. This area is complicated, so I will leave the details to others -- but I wanted to mention this part clearly. Copyright laws are hard to understand... 73.127.147.187 (talk) 00:08, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Cape doctor! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Follow-up to Publishing my new article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NewMusicSA, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Simon. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Afrikosmos (April 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Afrikosmos and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:26, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Afrikosmos

Hello, Cape doctor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Afrikosmos, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 23 September 2023 (UTC)