Welcome!

edit
Hello, Btpowers91, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking   if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 00:47, 29 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

May 2012

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Snow White has been reverted.
Your edit here to Snow White was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120307005436/onceuponatime8042/images/d/d6/Tumblr_m0he1rrWDq1qkydt4o1_500.jpg) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:47, 29 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Snow White has been reverted.
Your edit here to Snow White was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://onceuponatime.wikia.com/wiki/Snow_White/Gallery?image=Tumblr_m0he1rrWDq1qkydt4o1_500-jpg) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:47, 29 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zoo (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thriller. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 7 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Snow White (Disney), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stephanie Bennett. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 12 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Btpowers91. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Unsourced and unnecessary content

edit

You've been constantly reverted and warned for adding unsourced and unnecessary content that belongs in plot summaries, and content that is more in-universe based, which is not necessary on an encyclopedia. Please cease these additions. Regards. Alex|The|Whovian? 07:19, 11 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

I'm wondering if you've noticed how your edits are constantly reverted. Please take note of this. -- AlexTW 00:55, 27 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
Ditto - theWOLFchild 01:30, 27 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
Wow, back two years later, and still going at it. Someone really needs to block this one. -- /Alex/21 03:45, 9 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Move request

edit

A request to change the title and content of a comics article has begun at Talk:X-Men (film series)#Requested move 7 April 2017. Any interested WikiProject:Comics editor may comment there within one week. --Tenebrae (talk) 02:04, 8 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Btpowers91. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

December 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm TAnthony. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Titans (2018 TV series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — TAnthonyTalk 00:54, 4 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Non (comics), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Vance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 8 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

March 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm DonQuixote. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, The Defenders (miniseries), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonQuixote (talk) 02:43, 15 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited DC Extended Universe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jonathan Goldstein (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 23 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Dead Kids

edit

Hi. Thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to Dead Kids, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edit had to be reverted, because as you must know by now, having been editing here since 2012, Wikipedia cannot accept uncited material or original research. This includes material lacking cited sources, material obtained through personal knowledge, or which constitutes the an analysis or interpretation by the editor that is not found in cited sources. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, as described here. With regard to material about the content of narrative works that is evaluative, analytical or interpretive, the source must be a secondary source, and it must explicitly mention the information in relation to the work in question. Relying instead on personal observation or interpretation is original research, and using primary sources to form conclusions not explicitly in those sources is synthesis, which is a form of original research. If you want to discuss this, you can start a discussion on the article's talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 03:27, 29 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arrow (season 7), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ben Lewis and Jack Moore (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 16 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Btpowers91. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nite Owl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patrick Wilson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 7 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deathbolt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doug Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 14 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cicada (comics), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Klein (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 23 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

April 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Notimelivelong. I noticed that you recently removed content from Cloak & Dagger (season 2) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Notimelivelong (talk) 04:14, 5 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited American Gods (season 2), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bast (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 22 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Apologies for accidentally blocking you!

edit

I momentarily blocked you by accident while attempting to block the vandal who edited Thor (Marvel Cinematic Universe) right after you. I noted the error when unblocking - my apologies for the error. bd2412 T 20:44, 16 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

June 2019

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Elementals (Marvel Comics), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. StaticVapor message me! 16:36, 9 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

WP:RELTIME

edit

Please note the WP:RELTIME guidelines and take care to avoid using vague time words such as "now" or "currently" which are best avoided when writing for an encyclopedia (and news and many other writing too frankly). The guidelines explain it all in detail but the short version is be specific and say when or leave it out. -- 109.77.196.160 (talk) 03:59, 27 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thomas Wayne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ben Aldridge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 4 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of planets in Marvel Comics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cygnus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:37, 23 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Re: Shimmer edits

edit

I have noticed that you have added the Shimmer appearance information on Titans at the top of the article, in the Lede. It is already included below, and there honestly isn't enough of an appearance to warrant inclusion in the Lede. If you disagree with this assessment, please feel free to come to the Shimmer article discussion page and propose why it should be at the top of the article. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 07:40, 19 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

October 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Alex 21. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Crisis on Infinite Earths (Arrowverse), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- /Alex/21 22:55, 13 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced content. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:50, 13 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ad Orientem, continued unsourced additions. -- /Alex/21 22:43, 16 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Flash (season 6). Ad Orientem (talk) 22:56, 16 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

The above notice should be understood as a Final Warning. This has gone on long enough. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:57, 16 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
Ad Orientem, Further unsourced, later reverted by another editor. -- /Alex/21 23:47, 17 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
Ad Orientem, continued. The source they did use was simply copy-pasted from the previous entry and did not support the content they added. -- /Alex/21 02:52, 23 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 23:49, 17 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Crisis on Infinite Earths (Arrowverse). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 02:59, 23 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
  Knock it off. This is the last block you are going to receive with an expiration date. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:59, 23 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
Ad Orientem, straight out of the block. -- /Alex/21 03:31, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

November 2019

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 04:05, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Btpowers91 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

So somehow one of my friends has been doing the changes. The only changes I do is just add the live action version of the character on other pages to reference them. I’ve actually been out of town. I am sorry if one of my friends has been causing trouble.

Decline reason:

See Wikipedia:My little brother did it. How do we know you’ve gained control of this account? Please see WP:Compromised. We must now leave this account blocked for security measures. Again, how do we know you now have control of this account? HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 09:00, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Well I talked to him and he’s gonna stop. I’m also gonna change my password. Look he likes mess other people sometimes. Do not get me started on why he uses different names at theme parks. He sort of has a mental problem. I cannot give his name since it would not be right. Unfortunately he won’t apologize but I’ll do it for him. I am sorry for what he did. Btpowers91 (talk) 15:45, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

"I have not caused any trouble". You have been warned for unsourced content multiple times over the past several years; see my first comment at #Unsourced and unnecessary content. Despite the constant warnings, you have never used any talk page on Wikipedia until now. The edits that you were blocked for, continuing your addition of unsourced content straight out of your previous block, are completely in line with the editing you've done over the past several years. Multiple editors have tried to reach out to you about it, myself included, yet you've ignored us all. -- /Alex/21 00:17, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Btpowers91 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Well I talked to him and he’s gonna stop. I’m also gonna change my password. Look he likes mess other people sometimes. Do not get me started on why he uses different names at theme parks. He sort of has a mental problem. I cannot give his name since it would not be right. Unfortunately he won’t apologize but I’ll do it for him. I am sorry for what he did. You know I cannot change my password and username if you will not let me. I have been on here for seven years and I have not caused any trouble until I found out about what this idiot did. I need you to let me to change my username and password. Btpowers91 (talk) 15:51, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Compromised accounts are not unblocked. We have no way of knowing who is sitting at the computer operating this account, and since you say someone else did, it will have to remain blocked. They may have changed the password and be pretending to be you in order to get unblocked; we have no way to verify any claim that you have talked to your friend. Please read WP:COMPROMISED for information on how you can resume editing and better secure your account. 331dot (talk) 16:09, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Arrowverse task force‎

edit

  As someone who has frequently edited the Arrowverse article in the past, you may be interested in participating in the newly created Arrowverse task force‎. -- /Alex/21 03:43, 25 September 2020 (UTC)Reply