Problems with upload of File:Tom Milton.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:Tom Milton.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 11 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Tom Milton edit

 

The article Tom Milton has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 21:54, 11 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Cam Perron and the Negro Baseball League edit

It was moved back to Draft:Cam Perron and the Negro Baseball League for two reasons. First articles are not put in the Wikipedia name space. Second, as is the article would probably be deleted. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:54, 12 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Tom Milton.jpg edit

 

A tag has been placed on File:Tom Milton.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa (talk) 03:36, 13 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi Bobbys1953. If the copyright holder wishes to release the image to Wikipedia under license, they need to provide written permission directly to Wikipedia via the ORTS system. There's instructions how to do this at WP:Donating copyrighted materials and a sample permission email at WP:Consent. Once the email is received and processed, the file can be restored. — Diannaa (talk) 13:47, 13 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cam Perron (July 13) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tseung Kwan O was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Tseung Kwan O Let's talk 18:12, 13 July 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Bobbys1953, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tseung Kwan O Let's talk 18:12, 13 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gerald "Gerry" Ramsberger (December 6) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Smmurphy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Smmurphy(Talk) 17:48, 6 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Cam Perron edit

 

Hello, Bobbys1953. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Cam Perron".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 04:39, 16 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gerald "Gerry" Ramsberger (March 22) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 19:26, 22 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Gerald "Gerry" Ramsberger has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gerald "Gerry" Ramsberger. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 01:28, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Gerald "Gerry" Ramsberger concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Gerald "Gerry" Ramsberger, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 23 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Cam Perron concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Cam Perron, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 16 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Cam Perron edit

 

Hello, Bobbys1953. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cam Perron".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 01:12, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Tom Milton for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tom Milton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Milton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. » Shadowowl | talk 17:05, 14 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Ramsberger.jpeg edit

 

The file File:Ramsberger.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image, no context to determine possible future encyclopedic use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 21:03, 17 December 2020 (UTC)Reply