A page you started (École des Navigateurs) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating École des Navigateurs, Bob yo!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Redirecting per bWP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 05:34, 21 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Owen Shroyer (November 15)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 10:11, 15 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Bob yo! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 10:11, 15 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Owen Shroyer has been accepted

edit
 
Owen Shroyer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CNMall41 (talk) 06:18, 23 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Owen Shroyer

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Owen Shroyer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owen Shroyer. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:02, 23 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

October 2020

edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 16:53, 2 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

DS Alert

edit

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Jorm (talk) 17:18, 2 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of École des Navigateurs for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article École des Navigateurs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/École des Navigateurs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talkcontribs) 04:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

May 2024

edit

  Hello, Bob yo, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Alks taboulet (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talkcontribs) 23:49, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

I do not. I have had my wikipedia account for years and it is insulting that you can accuse me of such a thing. I have invited friends that know about the school to contribute to the article. It is not a multiple account. It is a friend of mine that is able to contribute. Why do you have such a vendetta against me? Bob yo (talk) 02:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
What exactly in my editing patters may indicate such an accusation? I am not even active on Wikipedia like I used to be. I've only had to come back thanks to you causing trouble to an article about a place that means a lot to me and friends of mine. Bob yo (talk) 02:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
I'm not 'causing trouble'. Nominating articles for deletion is part of what I do here. As for the article itself, you're welcome to participate in the discussion and give your reasons for keeping the article. In addition, you inviting your friends to edit the article might be considered meatpuppetry. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talkcontribs) 02:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
You really don't get it do you? Why do you even care. This is a small school that we attended to years ago that nobody knows about and this article HELPS bring light to it's existence in the community when you google its name. And it is not "meatpuppetry" I have not recruited him to my "cause". I have asked someone that is knowledgeable on the school to contribute. As simple as that. This article as small as it may be is important for the community in Richmond. Especially the French community as small as it is. Why do you have to target it specifically? Bob yo (talk) 02:57, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Like I've said multiple times earlier, you're welcome to participate in the discussion and give your reasons there. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talkcontribs) 02:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply