Welcome!

edit

Hello, Bhojpuriya, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Akshara Singh, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Boleyn (talk) 20:18, 16 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Akshara Singh

edit
 

The article Akshara Singh has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Boleyn (talk) 20:18, 16 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

July 2017

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Akshara Singh, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 21:55, 16 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Akshara Singh

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Akshara Singh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 22:45, 16 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

July 2017

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, you may be blocked from editing. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 22:45, 16 July 2017 (UTC) Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Bhojpuriya (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #18759 was submitted on Jul 17, 2017 10:21:50. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 10:21, 17 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bhojpuriya (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please unblock me.I am new on Wikipedia.I have not done anything wrong.I think it's an error.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. Superseded by the new request below. Vanjagenije (talk) 12:25, 17 July 2017 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bhojpuriya (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am new on wikipedia.I think it's an errorBhojpuriya (talk) 12:08, 17 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This is not a mistake. You are blocked as a sockpuppet of Rohitchauhanofficial. Please, explain your relation to this user and sevelra others. Vanjagenije (talk) 12:25, 17 July 2017 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bhojpuriya (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have never used any other account.This is the first account of my life.I really do not know who is rohitchauchanofficial.I request you to kindly unblock me,Sir please.I am just 1 day old on wikipedia.Bhojpuriya (talk) 12:39, 17 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Such a bland denial butters no parsnips. To have any prospect of being unblocked you need to explain your relationship and how you intend to avoid such conduct in the future. Just Chilling (talk) 15:53, 17 July 2017 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Bhojpuriya (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I do not how my account got blocked.I joined wikipedia to spread knowledge.I want to assure you sir that I will always follow the rules of Wikipedia.Bhojpuriya (talk) 5:50 am, Yesterday (UTC+2)

Accept reason:

Unblocked due to the discussion below. Yamla (talk) 13:30, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Why I am block? Why I am block

Yes,Sir I have never used any other account.This is my first time on wikipedia.I want to tell you that when I was creating a page Akshara Singh I do not how @rohitchauhanofficial came on top of the sandbox and unfortunately I I clicked on save.I have no relation with Bhojpuricinema.Sir,please unblock me.I have been trying since last three days.

Yes,Sir.......Sir please unblock me.I want to explore Wikipedia

Not an admin but if you were unblocked would your intention be to continue recreation Akshara Singh? CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 11:17, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

No sir.I'll try to edit some articles with references.

Sir,I belong to Bhojpuri community and Akshara Singh is a very popular actress of bhojpuri cinema.I search her name on Wikipedia but I couldn't find her page.So I thought to create a page on actress Akshara Singh.

Sir,Please Please Please Unblock me.I have been trying constantly to get unblocked since three days.

Thanks, Vanjagenije, for the ping. Bhojpuriya, I find your explanation plausible and, in combination with KrakatoaKatie's investigation, I have lifted your block. My apologies here. You were blocked because there's a prolific vandal who regularly recreates the exact page you recreated, and who often lies when caught. When I saw the same behaviour from your account, and given the similarly in username, I thought this was obviously another case. It looks like I was mistaken and so you have my sincere apologies. I have unblocked you. Would you like me to undelete (to recover) the page you created? --Yamla (talk) 13:30, 19 July 2017 (UTC) Thank you so much sir.Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Bhojpuranchal

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Bhojpuranchal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Adamgerber80 (talk) 19:24, 27 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Harsh Beniwal for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harsh Beniwal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harsh Beniwal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edwardx (talk) 22:26, 2 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Harsh Beniwal

edit

  Hello, Bhojpuriya. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Harsh Beniwal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply